Democrats make the most solid case yet for a border wall

P@triot

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2011
60,915
11,384
2,060
United States
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report
 
Of course dingleberry ignores the fact that you just don’t build the wall. You have to maintain it which is probably a nominal cost (we’ll see) but even if you do build the silly thing, you still need to have the border patrol, the camera monitoring, the monitoring of the sensors, etc… The cost of the wall add $70B to the expenditure; not cap it. :p
 
Of course dingleberry ignores the fact that you just don’t build the wall. You have to maintain it which is probably a nominal cost (we’ll see) but even if you do build the silly thing, you still need to have the border patrol, the camera monitoring, the monitoring of the sensors, etc… The cost of the wall add $70B to the expenditure; not cap it. :p


Ok, if building a wall cost $70B, hopefully you agree that $70B is less than $113B which is the cost of illegals. After the wall is built let's say it cost $68B/year to maintain, isn't that still less than the $113B/year to maintain illegals?
 
Of course dingleberry ignores the fact that you just don’t build the wall. You have to maintain it which is probably a nominal cost (we’ll see) but even if you do build the silly thing, you still need to have the border patrol, the camera monitoring, the monitoring of the sensors, etc… The cost of the wall add $70B to the expenditure; not cap it. :p

The wall makes every border guard more effective. That means it reduces the cost of manning the border.
 
Of course dingleberry ignores the fact that you just don’t build the wall. You have to maintain it which is probably a nominal cost (we’ll see) but even if you do build the silly thing, you still need to have the border patrol, the camera monitoring, the monitoring of the sensors, etc… The cost of the wall add $70B to the expenditure; not cap it. :p


Ok, if building a wall cost $70B, hopefully you agree that $70B is less than $113B which is the cost of illegals.
Point of order:
I’m not sure if the cost calculation is including the benefit calculation. For example, are you including the sales taxes they pay, the fees they pay, the rent they pay landlords, the bills income they create for AT&T through their cell phones, their ISP bills, etc…?

If you want to say $113B a year….okay but make it a fair calculation where costs AND benefits are both included.

After the wall is built let's say it cost $68B/year to maintain, isn't that still less than the $113B/year to maintain illegals?

I doubt it would cost that much to maintain. The point is whatever the maintenance costs are is going to be added on to whatever the security apparatus costs currently. You don’t get a savings by building the wall.
 
Of course dingleberry ignores the fact that you just don’t build the wall. You have to maintain it which is probably a nominal cost (we’ll see) but even if you do build the silly thing, you still need to have the border patrol, the camera monitoring, the monitoring of the sensors, etc… The cost of the wall add $70B to the expenditure; not cap it. :p

The wall makes every border guard more effective. That means it reduces the cost of manning the border.

So the guards are getting a pay cut?
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]
If they come in legally, they are not illegal immigrants dumbass.
 
Of course dingleberry ignores the fact that you just don’t build the wall. You have to maintain it which is probably a nominal cost (we’ll see) but even if you do build the silly thing, you still need to have the border patrol, the camera monitoring, the monitoring of the sensors, etc… The cost of the wall add $70B to the expenditure; not cap it. :p

The wall makes every border guard more effective. That means it reduces the cost of manning the border.

So the guards are getting a pay cut?
Do all snowflakes have a talent for posting non sequiturs?
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]

So you're saying we shouldn't use a means of stopping 60% because it won't stop 100%?

You realize, of course, that you are incapable of committing logic.
 
Last edited:
Of course dingleberry ignores the fact that you just don’t build the wall. You have to maintain it which is probably a nominal cost (we’ll see) but even if you do build the silly thing, you still need to have the border patrol, the camera monitoring, the monitoring of the sensors, etc… The cost of the wall add $70B to the expenditure; not cap it. :p


Ok, if building a wall cost $70B, hopefully you agree that $70B is less than $113B which is the cost of illegals.
Point of order:
I’m not sure if the cost calculation is including the benefit calculation. For example, are you including the sales taxes they pay, the fees they pay, the rent they pay landlords, the bills income they create for AT&T through their cell phones, their ISP bills, etc…?

If you want to say $113B a year….okay but make it a fair calculation where costs AND benefits are both included.

After the wall is built let's say it cost $68B/year to maintain, isn't that still less than the $113B/year to maintain illegals?

I doubt it would cost that much to maintain. The point is whatever the maintenance costs are is going to be added on to whatever the security apparatus costs currently. You don’t get a savings by building the wall.

Actually the point is whatever the maintenance costs are, they will be much less than the cost of maintaining illegal immigrants.
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]

I dunno, math appears to be a bit complicated for some of you folks. Stopping 60% would be much better than stopping 0% of the illegals coming across the border....besides the wall may be a "smart" wall.
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]

I dunno, math appears to be a bit complicated for some of you folks. Stopping 60% would be much better than stopping 0% of the illegals coming across the border....besides the wall may be a "smart" wall.
You have to laugh at these snowflakes who think stopping 60% of all illegals is an argument against building the wall.
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]
If they come in legally, they are not illegal immigrants dumbass.


What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

derp ya'll
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]

I dunno, math appears to be a bit complicated for some of you folks. Stopping 60% would be much better than stopping 0% of the illegals coming across the border....besides the wall may be a "smart" wall.
You have to laugh at these snowflakes who think stopping 60% of all illegals is an argument against building the wall.

I'd like to laugh and often do...but it's sad to realize there are so many that are brain dead.
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]
If they come in legally, they are not illegal immigrants dumbass.


What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

derp ya'll

What about them?
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]
If they come in legally, they are not illegal immigrants dumbass.


What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

derp ya'll

Is there some law that says we can't deal with visa overstays if we build the wall?

How stupid are you snowflakes? Are you capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time?
 
Democrats still won't acknowledge they want illegals here....its because other than blacks and mentally ill degenerates that's the lefts voting bloc!
 
A new report from Senate Democrats claims that the border wall could (key word) cost $70 billion. Well, lets just say that is true. Lets give them their worst case scenario. Even ardent left-wing organizations acknowledge that illegal aliens cost the U.S. $113 billion per year. And adjusted for illegal "contributions" the net result is still a $99 billion per year cost to U.S. taxpayers. Which means that in less than one year, the wall will pay for itself. And in one full year, the wall will result in a $29 billion surplus in the absolute worst case scenario (it could - and probably would - be even higher than that).

As usual, the Democrats didn't think this one through. :lmao:

Border wall could cost $70 billion, says Senate Democrats' new report

Stupid is as stupid does.

Do you really think that the stupid wall is going to stop all illegal immigration?

What about the 40% who arrive legally on planes and then overstay their visas?

That's gonna have to be one tall fucking wall! [derp]
If they come in legally, they are not illegal immigrants dumbass.

They are if they overstay their visas, dumbass.

That's where 40% of the illegal population comes from.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top