Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Democrats….Is This Your Cup Of Borscht?
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
- Banned
- #42
Next thing you'll say is that they are Nazis....and will put Americans in concentration camps....
Oh, wait......
.....they did.
I wish they were merely nazis. The death toll would be significantly lower and they put out a list. If you didn't fit on it, you really didn't have shit to worry about.
With the path the DNC is taking we're looking at neo-bolshevik commissars and Checka jack boots that make people disappear, and there is no "list" you can avoid. If your asshole neighbor "red flags" you then welcome to a train car ride. Then again you might get to beat the shit out of that neighbor in a week or so when his train ride comes up.
It really is too bad the allies allowed the ussr to become part of the alliance. The soviets should have been defeated and forced to stand trial at Nuremberg right along with the German National Socialists, The Imperial Nips, and the commie gooks. It would have taken several more years of war of course, hundreds of thousands more lives, but in the end the death toll of the marxists never would have been nearly so numerous. The soviets were far more evil than the nazis.
MinTrut
Diamond Member
- Jun 7, 2021
- 14,327
- 7,870
- 1,938
It's a puzzler...Why does Joe's New Expanded Private Gestapo need guns and ammunition?
All that the Democrats claimed to fear about Trump is what they are, complete with both the FBI and IRS acting as their private enforcement army.
- Banned
- #44
Not enough rainbow colors though.
Last edited:
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
"This is NOT WHO WE ARE!"It's a puzzler...
All that the Democrats claimed to fear about Trump is what they are, complete with both the FBI and IRS acting as their private enforcement army.
Right Democraps?
Yet, they like this Nazi Fascist Shit.
Look how they cheered when they brought an army to Roger Stone's home in a Pre-Dawn Raid over NOTHING!
- Banned
- #46
A PUZZLER????It's a puzzler...
All that the Democrats claimed to fear about Trump is what they are, complete with both the FBI and IRS acting as their private enforcement army.
My ass crack would resist manipulation in some fucked up puppet show if I tried to make it look like my ass cheeks were trying to assert there is anything "puzzling, unsuspected, or surprising" about these events. Jim Carrie's "butt talking" skit has nothing on the stage show I could get away with if my ass didn't have more integrity than the entire collective DNC.
This is not unexpected by me... In fact I can't believe they haven't poisoned him or otherwise laid him to permanent silence at this point.
THEY RAIDED HIS FUCKING LAWYER'S OFFICE FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!!!!!!!!!!
That was when he was POTUS, and it was regarding his alleged banging of a whore who owes him money, and had nothing to do with the bullshit russian "collusion" hoax that it was spawned from.
Not only was this new or even unprecedented in US history, let alone soviet history, no one has ever been able to show me any other circumstance in all of legal history in civilized courts that an accused person had their lawyer's office raided during an investigation.
I can not believe there aren't 10 million people descending on DC with pitchforks, torches, barrels of tar, feathers, with miles of rail and rope ready to do some shit that might bring UN Troops and free guns to our shores.
.
- Thread starter
- #47
7. There is a reason why, even though nations that choose communism, socialism, always fail…..some remain as such for quite a period of time.
An additional factor is that one can expect nations that choose this path will be atheist. And, as such, have no respect for human life. The have no compunctions about killing those who don’t go along with the program.
So that’s what they do….kill or imprison any who don’t toe the line….e.g., gulags, guillotine, facing the Jan6 Commission.
"Over the past 100 years the most oppressive ideology in the world has been communism [Marxism]. While the people who lived under it were starved, tortured and murdered, its leaders lived in luxury.
The suppression of ordinary people by their communist rulers far surpasses anything capitalist employers were ever accused of doing. While condemning exploitation, communist dictators turned out to be masters at it.
R.J. Rummel estimates that almost 170 million people were killed in the 20th century by their own governments. These are not deaths in war. They are the victims of genocide by the governments in the countries where they lived. Hate on the Left
The Left’s revolutions fit a pattern:
“They recalled what had happened during the French Revolution, when the power had simply fallen into the hands of a new set of tyrants, and assumed that what the socialists wanted was to seize the power for themselves.” Colin Wilson
An additional factor is that one can expect nations that choose this path will be atheist. And, as such, have no respect for human life. The have no compunctions about killing those who don’t go along with the program.
So that’s what they do….kill or imprison any who don’t toe the line….e.g., gulags, guillotine, facing the Jan6 Commission.
"Over the past 100 years the most oppressive ideology in the world has been communism [Marxism]. While the people who lived under it were starved, tortured and murdered, its leaders lived in luxury.
The suppression of ordinary people by their communist rulers far surpasses anything capitalist employers were ever accused of doing. While condemning exploitation, communist dictators turned out to be masters at it.
R.J. Rummel estimates that almost 170 million people were killed in the 20th century by their own governments. These are not deaths in war. They are the victims of genocide by the governments in the countries where they lived. Hate on the Left
The Left’s revolutions fit a pattern:
“They recalled what had happened during the French Revolution, when the power had simply fallen into the hands of a new set of tyrants, and assumed that what the socialists wanted was to seize the power for themselves.” Colin Wilson
- Thread starter
- #48
8. Now, the reality of human nature, and economics.....and it doesn't support communism.
What if everyone starts off with the same amount of money?
“…. by the end of the first year, some people will have more than others. Guaranteed. Some people, you see, will be careful with what they have. Others won’t. Some people will gamble, others will save. Some will spend lavishly, others will be frugal.Besides that, some people simply have more of the kind of wealth that can’t be redistributed. Intelligence; education; ambition. Drive, as opposed to: aw, we’re gonna get what we’re gonna get anyway, so let’s just stay on the couch and watch TV. Some people will put a little giddy-up in their get-alongs, and will find ways to improve their own lives.
Some of that will be “unfair,” because some people have more and better resources to tap. Intelligence; talent; family. Even accounting for such differences, though: some people will turn what they have into more, while others will not. Therefore, by the end of the very first year (not to mention the first five or ten) “haves” and “have-nots” will appear.
I know what you’re thinking. Crap. I thought we had it this time. Fairness! And this return to economic inequity will happen, I daresay, even under the strictest Communist policies.
I’ll come back to that.
After ten, twenty, thirty years, those discrepancies will widen. A middle class will form. An upper economic class, and a lower economic class. These classes will not be dead ends: people will be able to move from one to another and back again. But they’ll reappear, despite the original, radical redistribution of wealth.
So: let’s take this exercise further. Rather than a one-time redistribution of wealth, let’s redistribute every year. Every April 23 – Michael Moore’s birthday – all wealth is redistributed. All wages set by Central Command. Everyone is as equal as it’s possible to make them. Even individual advantages are nullified.
Not really, but we’ll come back to that, too.
Obviously, that system does away with any incentive to create. It removes any incentive to save; to be frugal; to work hard. Because no matter what you do, what you get is predetermined.
And yet, by April 22 of the following year, some people will still have more than others. And they’ll keep it.
How can that be? Simple. Even state-enforced economic “equality” did not – cannot – make everyone “equal.” It can only change the attributes that are most important to getting ahead.
Sucking up to your superiors becomes more important than working hard. Figuring out which bureaucrats can do the most for you, and ingratiating yourself to them.
Using the power of government to get you ahead, instead of creating, making, building, selling. Improving technical or academic skills? What for? Improving political skills. That’s what makes a difference.
You may recognize a little of our current system there. More and more, becoming a “have” in our society requires entering the bureaucracy, or getting the bureaucracy on your side.
Even the hard working entrepreneurs and innovators among us increasingly need the bureaucracy’s help. Vast mazes of regulations give bureaucracies vast power over both you and your competitors. Government can make or break an industry. Make or break a company. It can increase the cost of entry beyond plausibility, or it can make that cost go away.
In the free market, wealth comes from work. The closer we move toward socialism, the more wealth comes from power. That’s the difference. The similarity: wealth still exists in relatively few hands.”
www.rightwingnews.com
What if everyone starts off with the same amount of money?
“…. by the end of the first year, some people will have more than others. Guaranteed. Some people, you see, will be careful with what they have. Others won’t. Some people will gamble, others will save. Some will spend lavishly, others will be frugal.Besides that, some people simply have more of the kind of wealth that can’t be redistributed. Intelligence; education; ambition. Drive, as opposed to: aw, we’re gonna get what we’re gonna get anyway, so let’s just stay on the couch and watch TV. Some people will put a little giddy-up in their get-alongs, and will find ways to improve their own lives.
Some of that will be “unfair,” because some people have more and better resources to tap. Intelligence; talent; family. Even accounting for such differences, though: some people will turn what they have into more, while others will not. Therefore, by the end of the very first year (not to mention the first five or ten) “haves” and “have-nots” will appear.
I know what you’re thinking. Crap. I thought we had it this time. Fairness! And this return to economic inequity will happen, I daresay, even under the strictest Communist policies.
I’ll come back to that.
After ten, twenty, thirty years, those discrepancies will widen. A middle class will form. An upper economic class, and a lower economic class. These classes will not be dead ends: people will be able to move from one to another and back again. But they’ll reappear, despite the original, radical redistribution of wealth.
So: let’s take this exercise further. Rather than a one-time redistribution of wealth, let’s redistribute every year. Every April 23 – Michael Moore’s birthday – all wealth is redistributed. All wages set by Central Command. Everyone is as equal as it’s possible to make them. Even individual advantages are nullified.
Not really, but we’ll come back to that, too.
Obviously, that system does away with any incentive to create. It removes any incentive to save; to be frugal; to work hard. Because no matter what you do, what you get is predetermined.
And yet, by April 22 of the following year, some people will still have more than others. And they’ll keep it.
How can that be? Simple. Even state-enforced economic “equality” did not – cannot – make everyone “equal.” It can only change the attributes that are most important to getting ahead.
Sucking up to your superiors becomes more important than working hard. Figuring out which bureaucrats can do the most for you, and ingratiating yourself to them.
Using the power of government to get you ahead, instead of creating, making, building, selling. Improving technical or academic skills? What for? Improving political skills. That’s what makes a difference.
You may recognize a little of our current system there. More and more, becoming a “have” in our society requires entering the bureaucracy, or getting the bureaucracy on your side.
Even the hard working entrepreneurs and innovators among us increasingly need the bureaucracy’s help. Vast mazes of regulations give bureaucracies vast power over both you and your competitors. Government can make or break an industry. Make or break a company. It can increase the cost of entry beyond plausibility, or it can make that cost go away.
In the free market, wealth comes from work. The closer we move toward socialism, the more wealth comes from power. That’s the difference. The similarity: wealth still exists in relatively few hands.”
What if we just gave everybody the same amount of wealth? - John Hawkins' Right Wing News
What if we quit playing at redistribution, and actually redistribute? Take all the wealth in America, and divvy it up. Everybody gets the same, as close as we can make
www.rightwingnews.com
The Documents....that Fox News used as justification for this raid were given to the FBI back in January.
Now Fox News is admitting that the docs involved were in their possession....not Trump.
Now Fox News is admitting that the docs involved were in their possession....not Trump.
MinTrut
Diamond Member
- Jun 7, 2021
- 14,327
- 7,870
- 1,938
A PUZZLER????
My ass crack would resist manipulation in some fucked up puppet show if I tried to make it look like my ass cheeks were trying to assert there is anything "puzzling, unsuspected, or surprising" about these events. Jim Carrie's "butt talking" skit has nothing on the stage show I could get away with if my ass didn't have more integrity than the entire collective DNC.
This is not unexpected by me... In fact I can't believe they haven't poisoned him or otherwise laid him to permanent silence at this point.
THEY RAIDED HIS FUCKING LAWYER'S OFFICE FOR CHRIST'S SAKE!!!!!!!!!!
That was when he was POTUS, and it was regarding his alleged banging of a whore who owes him money, and had nothing to do with the bullshit russian "collusion" hoax that it was spawned from.
Not only was this new or even unprecedented in US history, let alone soviet history, no one has ever been able to show me any other circumstance in all of legal history in civilized courts that an accused person had their lawyer's office raided during an investigation.
I can not believe there aren't 10 million people descending on DC with pitchforks, torches, barrels of tar, feathers, with miles of rail and rope ready to do some shit that might bring UN Troops and free guns to our shores.
.
Pssst...
It's not a puzzler; it's the dangerous, poison fruit of the 6 year Democrat Insurrection.
- Thread starter
- #51
Rigby5
Diamond Member
This in turn means that Marx’s philosophy ignores a basic reality of human nature: that man works best when he is driven by a sense of purpose: that is, by ‘the profit-motive’ in its broadest sense.
Wrong.
There is not a human or animal that normally works on the "profit motive".
What profit do birds work for when the tirelessly go back and forth collecting food for nestlings?
Why would anyone have kids if they were working on the profit motive?
All animals, and especially humans, are social and work for social reasons, not profit.
Profit is a perversion that always results in people realizing the greatest profits are from theft and murder.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
YELTSIN SAY COMMUNISM FAILED USSR
That is silly because the USSR was never even remotely communist.
Communism requires democracy, egalitarianism, mutual cooperation, sharing, equality, fairness, etc.
The USSR was total capitalism, the profit motive, and was run by a wealthy elite.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
What if everyone starts off with the same amount of money?
“…. by the end of the first year, some people will have more than others.
Irrelevant.
Communism is not about equality of outcome, but equality of opportunity.
Everyone should be able to gain the same amount if they are willing to do the same work.
But with capitalism, those who cheat and manipulate a monopoly on capital, gain far more than those who actually produce and do all the work.
Some try to claim that this capitalist inequality is fair because the capitalist has to be rewarded for taking risk, and that is fake because bank robbers take the most risk of all, and yet we do not reward them at all.
That is because like the capitalist, they are unethical.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 69
- Views
- 664
- Locked
- Replies
- 51
- Views
- 443
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 109
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 33
- Views
- 97
- Replies
- 48
- Views
- 160
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8039
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-