Democrats: Here's who's to blame for overturning of Roe...

[toobfreak]

The Founders didn't believe that there should be political parties.

COMPLETE CRAP

They would be appalled by the hyper partisan Supreme Court we now have

Please spare us your pusillanimous trash. You would have us think Sotomayor and Kagen are the norm and justices adhering strictly to the original intent of the law as the Founders wrote them made it "hyper-partisan?" PLEASE MY ASS. You sick twisted lying America-hating fucks actually think adhering to our laws and traditions is "partisan" while you "normal" people promoting child sex, gender fluidity, abortion on demand and deviant behavior are the norm?

INCREDIBLE how full of CRAP you demented sickos are. Boy are you in for a rude awakening in about 19 weeks when REALITY slaps you upside the head.

 

[Oddball]

It's not Trump.

Trump gets the credit...he nominated the majority that overturned Roe v Wade... that's his legacy...but the blame from the point of view of the Democrats should lie elsewhere.

Mitch McConnell should get a little.

He didn't change the rules though. He simply made choices unpopular with Democrats within his power by refusing to confirm Merrick Garland.

He also removed the filibuster on Supreme Court Justices confirmations in retaliation for an earlier Democratic Filibuster rule change.

How Mitch McConnell playing 'long game' shaped the Supreme Court and led to the end of abortion landmark Roe

Decisions made by then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell were key to a chain of events that resulted in the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.

www.foxnews.com

But that's not the person that's really to blame.

Enter Democrat Majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada...the person who initially nuked the filibuster for a considerably short term gain of a few federal judgeships...

Much of the blame falls here.

You should read this one...Harry Reid's interview where he states he has laid the groundwork for Democrats to nuke the Filibuster for Supreme Court nominations if Hillary is Elected President.

​

​

Outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said he is confident that he has laid the groundwork for Democrats to nuke the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees if they win back the Senate in November.​

​

Envisioning Hillary Clinton in the White House and Democrats controlling the Senate, Reid warned that if a Senate Republican minority block her Supreme Court nominee, he is confident the party won’t hesitate to change the filibuster rules again.​

Harry Reid – Nuclear Option proliferator

If Hillary wins, and Dems retake the Senate, expect Dems to use the Nuclear Option for a Supreme Court nominee

legalinsurrection.com

Next...Hillary Clinton. She knew what was on the line...and proceeded to run one of the most ill conceived Presidential campaigns in recent memory, capped with a loss to a challenger with no campaign experience, no political experience and... according to the polling...no chance of winning.

A chunk of blame goes here.

__________

And last but not least...former President Obama.

The leader of the party who without doubt put his personal seal of approval on the fateful decision to send Harry Reid to the floor of the Senate to nuke the filibuster and show those Republicans who is boss.

He believed Hillary was a shoe in for 2016 and there was a good chance Democrats would take the Senate...but mostly I think it was ego, hubris, and short-sighted strategy that contributed to one of the all-time political backfires in US history.

​

President Obama applauded Senate Democrats Thursday for changing the rules on filibusters, saying too many of his nominees and initiatives have been blocked by Republicans for strictly partisan reasons.​

​

<Snip>​

​

The change does not affect nominees for the Supreme Court. Nor does it apply to legislation, though Obama suggested he wouldn't mind seeing that change as well.​

Obama applauds filibuster rule change

President Obama discusses new filibuster rules in the Senate.

www.usatoday.com

So...there you go...when you are sitting alone at home fuming over the fate of Roe...these should be the targets of your animosity.

I disagree......THEY are responsible for Roe being overturned.

They went from "safe,legal, and rare" to selling aborted fetus parts like they came from junked Buicks, and people like Barry the Boiking and Ralph Northam talking openly about post-birth abortions (i.e. infanticide).

They smoked their own selves out as a death cult, and it turns out that most people are repulsed by such things.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's not Trump.

Trump gets the credit...he nominated the majority that overturned Roe v Wade... that's his legacy...but the blame from the point of view of the Democrats should lie elsewhere.

Mitch McConnell should get a little.

He didn't change the rules though. He simply made choices unpopular with Democrats within his power by refusing to confirm Merrick Garland.

He also removed the filibuster on Supreme Court Justices confirmations in retaliation for an earlier Democratic Filibuster rule change.

How Mitch McConnell playing 'long game' shaped the Supreme Court and led to the end of abortion landmark Roe

Decisions made by then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell were key to a chain of events that resulted in the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.

www.foxnews.com

But that's not the person that's really to blame.

Enter Democrat Majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada...the person who initially nuked the filibuster for a considerably short term gain of a few federal judgeships...

Much of the blame falls here.

You should read this one...Harry Reid's interview where he states he has laid the groundwork for Democrats to nuke the Filibuster for Supreme Court nominations if Hillary is Elected President.

​

​

Outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said he is confident that he has laid the groundwork for Democrats to nuke the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees if they win back the Senate in November.​

​

Envisioning Hillary Clinton in the White House and Democrats controlling the Senate, Reid warned that if a Senate Republican minority block her Supreme Court nominee, he is confident the party won’t hesitate to change the filibuster rules again.​

Harry Reid – Nuclear Option proliferator

If Hillary wins, and Dems retake the Senate, expect Dems to use the Nuclear Option for a Supreme Court nominee

legalinsurrection.com

Next...Hillary Clinton. She knew what was on the line...and proceeded to run one of the most ill conceived Presidential campaigns in recent memory, capped with a loss to a challenger with no campaign experience, no political experience and... according to the polling...no chance of winning.

A chunk of blame goes here.

__________

And last but not least...former President Obama.

The leader of the party who without doubt put his personal seal of approval on the fateful decision to send Harry Reid to the floor of the Senate to nuke the filibuster and show those Republicans who is boss.

He believed Hillary was a shoe in for 2016 and there was a good chance Democrats would take the Senate...but mostly I think it was ego, hubris, and short-sighted strategy that contributed to one of the all-time political backfires in US history.

​

President Obama applauded Senate Democrats Thursday for changing the rules on filibusters, saying too many of his nominees and initiatives have been blocked by Republicans for strictly partisan reasons.​

​

<Snip>​

​

The change does not affect nominees for the Supreme Court. Nor does it apply to legislation, though Obama suggested he wouldn't mind seeing that change as well.​

Obama applauds filibuster rule change

President Obama discusses new filibuster rules in the Senate.

www.usatoday.com

So...there you go...when you are sitting alone at home fuming over the fate of Roe...these should be the targets of your animosity.

Thank the Lord Garland was kept off of SCOTUS!

 

[Lesh]

COMPLETE CRAP


Please spare us your pusillanimous trash. You would have us think Sotomayor and Kagen are the norm and justices adhering strictly to the original intent of the law as the Founders wrote them made it "hyper-partisan?" PLEASE MY ASS. You sick twisted lying America-hating fucks actually think adhering to our laws and traditions is "partisan" while you "normal" people promoting child sex, gender fluidity, abortion on demand and deviant behavior are the norm?

INCREDIBLE how full of CRAP you demented sickos are. Boy are you in for a rude awakening in about 19 weeks when REALITY slaps you upside the head.

You realize that you are defending hyper partisanship and using the PeeWee Herman Defense?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You realize that you are defending hyper partisanship and using the PeeWee Herman Defense?

Defending originalism.

 

[toobfreak]

You realize that you are defending hyper partisanship and using the PeeWee Herman Defense?

Do you realize you ARE hyper-partisanship and have a PeeWee Herman dick for a brain? Maybe that should be your new name: PeeWee. Fits you perfect!

 

[Missourian]

Please spare us your pusillanimous trash.

Had to look that one up...

Definition of pusillanimous | Dictionary.com

Pusillanimous definition, lacking courage or resolution; cowardly; faint-hearted; timid. See more.

www.dictionary.com

 

[ColonelAngus]

Notice how the left does not discuss the merits of the case, they just scream nonsense and say racist shit about Thomas.

They are remarkably stupid.

Where in the Constitution does it say a birthing person has a right to an abortion?

U.S. Constitution | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

The original text of the United States Constitution and its Amendments.

constitution.congress.gov

There is the text…cite where it says this.

 

[Rigby5]

Notice how the left does not discuss the merits of the case, they just scream nonsense and say racist shit about Thomas.

They are remarkably stupid.

Where in the Constitution does it say a birthing person has a right to an abortion?

U.S. Constitution | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

The original text of the United States Constitution and its Amendments.

constitution.congress.gov

There is the text…cite where it says this.

No real conservative would ever dream of saying something that wrong.
Conservative are supposed to know that rights are NOT at all created by any law, have to pre-exist before laws to defend them are even supposed to be considered, the Constitution does not at all grant any rights, rights are infinite so can never be listed, and the Founders had absolutely NO problem with the fact abortion was perfectly legal in their time.