What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Democrats: Here's who's to blame for overturning of Roe...

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
55,243
Reaction score
44,072
Points
3,615
Location
On The Way Home To Earth
The Founders didn't believe that there should be political parties.
COMPLETE CRAP

They would be appalled by the hyper partisan Supreme Court we now have
Please spare us your pusillanimous trash. You would have us think Sotomayor and Kagen are the norm and justices adhering strictly to the original intent of the law as the Founders wrote them made it "hyper-partisan?" PLEASE MY ASS. You sick twisted lying America-hating fucks actually think adhering to our laws and traditions is "partisan" while you "normal" people promoting child sex, gender fluidity, abortion on demand and deviant behavior are the norm?

INCREDIBLE how full of CRAP you demented sickos are. Boy are you in for a rude awakening in about 19 weeks when REALITY slaps you upside the head. :laughing0301:
 

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
86,063
Reaction score
68,807
Points
3,615
Location
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
It's not Trump.

Trump gets the credit...he nominated the majority that overturned Roe v Wade... that's his legacy...but the blame from the point of view of the Democrats should lie elsewhere.

Mitch McConnell should get a little.

He didn't change the rules though. He simply made choices unpopular with Democrats within his power by refusing to confirm Merrick Garland.

He also removed the filibuster on Supreme Court Justices confirmations in retaliation for an earlier Democratic Filibuster rule change.


But that's not the person that's really to blame.

Enter Democrat Majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada...the person who initially nuked the filibuster for a considerably short term gain of a few federal judgeships...

Much of the blame falls here.

You should read this one...Harry Reid's interview where he states he has laid the groundwork for Democrats to nuke the Filibuster for Supreme Court nominations if Hillary is Elected President.

Outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said he is confident that he has laid the groundwork for Democrats to nuke the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees if they win back the Senate in November.​
Envisioning Hillary Clinton in the White House and Democrats controlling the Senate, Reid warned that if a Senate Republican minority block her Supreme Court nominee, he is confident the party won’t hesitate to change the filibuster rules again.​



Next...Hillary Clinton. She knew what was on the line...and proceeded to run one of the most ill conceived Presidential campaigns in recent memory, capped with a loss to a challenger with no campaign experience, no political experience and... according to the polling...no chance of winning.

A chunk of blame goes here.

__________

And last but not least...former President Obama.

The leader of the party who without doubt put his personal seal of approval on the fateful decision to send Harry Reid to the floor of the Senate to nuke the filibuster and show those Republicans who is boss.

He believed Hillary was a shoe in for 2016 and there was a good chance Democrats would take the Senate...but mostly I think it was ego, hubris, and short-sighted strategy that contributed to one of the all-time political backfires in US history.

President Obama applauded Senate Democrats Thursday for changing the rules on filibusters, saying too many of his nominees and initiatives have been blocked by Republicans for strictly partisan reasons.​
<Snip>​
The change does not affect nominees for the Supreme Court. Nor does it apply to legislation, though Obama suggested he wouldn't mind seeing that change as well.​




So...there you go...when you are sitting alone at home fuming over the fate of Roe...these should be the targets of your animosity.
I disagree......THEY are responsible for Roe being overturned.

They went from "safe,legal, and rare" to selling aborted fetus parts like they came from junked Buicks, and people like Barry the Boiking and Ralph Northam talking openly about post-birth abortions (i.e. infanticide).

They smoked their own selves out as a death cult, and it turns out that most people are repulsed by such things.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
131,619
Reaction score
50,705
Points
2,290
It's not Trump.

Trump gets the credit...he nominated the majority that overturned Roe v Wade... that's his legacy...but the blame from the point of view of the Democrats should lie elsewhere.

Mitch McConnell should get a little.

He didn't change the rules though. He simply made choices unpopular with Democrats within his power by refusing to confirm Merrick Garland.

He also removed the filibuster on Supreme Court Justices confirmations in retaliation for an earlier Democratic Filibuster rule change.


But that's not the person that's really to blame.

Enter Democrat Majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada...the person who initially nuked the filibuster for a considerably short term gain of a few federal judgeships...

Much of the blame falls here.

You should read this one...Harry Reid's interview where he states he has laid the groundwork for Democrats to nuke the Filibuster for Supreme Court nominations if Hillary is Elected President.

Outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said he is confident that he has laid the groundwork for Democrats to nuke the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees if they win back the Senate in November.​
Envisioning Hillary Clinton in the White House and Democrats controlling the Senate, Reid warned that if a Senate Republican minority block her Supreme Court nominee, he is confident the party won’t hesitate to change the filibuster rules again.​



Next...Hillary Clinton. She knew what was on the line...and proceeded to run one of the most ill conceived Presidential campaigns in recent memory, capped with a loss to a challenger with no campaign experience, no political experience and... according to the polling...no chance of winning.

A chunk of blame goes here.

__________

And last but not least...former President Obama.

The leader of the party who without doubt put his personal seal of approval on the fateful decision to send Harry Reid to the floor of the Senate to nuke the filibuster and show those Republicans who is boss.

He believed Hillary was a shoe in for 2016 and there was a good chance Democrats would take the Senate...but mostly I think it was ego, hubris, and short-sighted strategy that contributed to one of the all-time political backfires in US history.

President Obama applauded Senate Democrats Thursday for changing the rules on filibusters, saying too many of his nominees and initiatives have been blocked by Republicans for strictly partisan reasons.​
<Snip>​
The change does not affect nominees for the Supreme Court. Nor does it apply to legislation, though Obama suggested he wouldn't mind seeing that change as well.​




So...there you go...when you are sitting alone at home fuming over the fate of Roe...these should be the targets of your animosity.
Thank the Lord Garland was kept off of SCOTUS!
 
Last edited:

Lesh

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
47,205
Reaction score
20,329
Points
2,300
COMPLETE CRAP


Please spare us your pusillanimous trash. You would have us think Sotomayor and Kagen are the norm and justices adhering strictly to the original intent of the law as the Founders wrote them made it "hyper-partisan?" PLEASE MY ASS. You sick twisted lying America-hating fucks actually think adhering to our laws and traditions is "partisan" while you "normal" people promoting child sex, gender fluidity, abortion on demand and deviant behavior are the norm?

INCREDIBLE how full of CRAP you demented sickos are. Boy are you in for a rude awakening in about 19 weeks when REALITY slaps you upside the head. :laughing0301:
You realize that you are defending hyper partisanship and using the PeeWee Herman Defense?
 
OP
Missourian

Missourian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2008
Messages
27,553
Reaction score
16,727
Points
1,405
Location
Missouri

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
41,694
Reaction score
36,120
Points
3,615
Notice how the left does not discuss the merits of the case, they just scream nonsense and say racist shit about Thomas.

They are remarkably stupid.

Where in the Constitution does it say a birthing person has a right to an abortion?


There is the text…cite where it says this.
 

Rigby5

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
25,138
Reaction score
8,026
Points
465
Location
New Mexico
Notice how the left does not discuss the merits of the case, they just scream nonsense and say racist shit about Thomas.

They are remarkably stupid.

Where in the Constitution does it say a birthing person has a right to an abortion?


There is the text…cite where it says this.

No real conservative would ever dream of saying something that wrong.
Conservative are supposed to know that rights are NOT at all created by any law, have to pre-exist before laws to defend them are even supposed to be considered, the Constitution does not at all grant any rights, rights are infinite so can never be listed, and the Founders had absolutely NO problem with the fact abortion was perfectly legal in their time.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$55.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top