Democrats Decide to Call Witnesses After Case Collapses

[RoshawnMarkwees]

DEMOCRAT IMPEACHMENT DAY 5:
Senate Reconvenes at 10 AM ET – Democrats Decide to Call Witnesses After Case Collapses
​

DEMOCRAT IMPEACHMENT DAY 5: Senate Reconvenes at 10 AM ET - Democrats Decide to Call Witnesses After Case Collapses -- LIVE STREAM VIDEO (thegatewaypundit.com)
13 Feb 2021 ~~ By Jim Hoft

The US Senate will reconvene at 10 AM ET on Saturday morning.
This is after devastating testimony on Friday, including 13 minutes of video clips showing Democrats doing the exact same thing they accuse President Trump of doing.
Friday was a devastating day for Democrats. Whenever the American public gets to see them for who they are it is never a good day for them.
Democrats depend on the liberal media to be their shield.
Trump's Lawyers Destroy Democrats Showing Everyone Using the Word "Fight" (rumble.com)
Saturday’s session could feature the vote on whether to convict or acquit Trump. Democrat Senator Patrick Leahy is presiding over the sham impeachment and will also vote to convict.
A guilty vote by Republicans will effectively end the Republican Party so Democrats aare keeping their fingers crossed
Democrats need 17 Republicans to convict President Trump of organizing an “insurrection” against the US Capitol.
This was after the 2020 election was stolen from President Trump by a dementia patient in a basement.
Today will include closing comments and then a vote to acquit.


Comment:
The real jurors are the PEOPLE not the Senators and Democrats proseciting this "Impeachment" know taht after yesterday they lost. Now they are trying a Perry Mason last minute ploy of calling witnesses. All this does is extend the process..
The whole Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Leftist dog and pony show is moot. Just like the election this whole impeachment is illegitimate and not even constitutional. Where is the Chief Justice that must preside over the preceding by law? Where in the rules for impeachment include impeachment of a private citizen?
100% illegitimate and outside the bounds of the law as written.
There has been ample evidence of election fraud. We just saw that judicial system has collapsed on itself, the Republic as a governing system is not functioning.
Communism is not evidence based. What court should Donald J Trump and patriots cheated out of victory take their case to?
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats tampered with Evidence and charges should be brought against all of them.

Breaking: --

Breaking: Trump Legal Team Asks to Call in Speaker Nancy Pelosi and DC Mayor Bowser to Testify on Inside Info They May Have Had on Capitol Breach | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

YES!

www.thegatewaypundit.com

At this point only the Democrat Cult is buying their BS

Unfortunately, the entire of mainstream media and internet platforms are part of that cult.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

that was as hilarious as watching the awfuk acting in a 1950's sci fi movie.

Some of the '50s scifi was damn fine acting.

View attachment 456708

And then there was a movie about a tree stump terrifying an entire island.
From Hell It Came...

 

[georgephillip]

Doesn't matter how many judges there were.

All of the judges read all of Trump's "evidence" and found it frivolous; what do you know the judges missed?

 

[DudleySmith]

that was as hilarious as watching the awfuk acting in a 1950's sci fi movie.

Some of the '50s scifi was damn fine acting.

View attachment 456708

lol The robot had more acting personality than the rest of the cast combined. I liked the robot.

 

[DudleySmith]

that was as hilarious as watching the awfuk acting in a 1950's sci fi movie.

Some of the '50s scifi was damn fine acting.

View attachment 456708

And then there was a movie about a tree stump terrifying an entire island.
From Hell It Came...

View attachment 456774

I never saw that one.

 

[DudleySmith]

Democrats will never stop this shit with Trump. They're obsessed. They're also too stupid to figure out what else to do. Unqualified to rule. We traded in a Rolls for a worn out pair of sneakers. Man did the US get screwed on this Binden dude.

History will not stop this shit with Trump

More facts will come out.....It is not going to be pretty

Most of that will about your traitor pols and their 'resistance' movement, not Trump. Meanwhile your Uncle Joe is busy encouraging wars to break out and 'denouncing Burma n stuff'.

 

[georgephillip]

Some judges found no credible evidence of election fraud, because the lawyers presenting the cases did not claim election fraud. And judges don't rule on questions not before them. That would be classified as "dicta".
Whether or not they "found no" evidence, is a different question than if they made that as a decision.

Does the following sound accurate to you?

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

"After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost 86 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5][6] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[7]

"Nearly all the suits were dismissed or dropped due to lack of evidence;[8] judges, lawyers, and other observers described the suits as 'frivolous'[9] and 'without merit'.[10]

"In one instance, the Trump campaign and other groups seeking his reelection collectively lost multiple cases in six states on a single day"

 

[meaner gene]

Does the following sound accurate to you?

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

"After the 2020 United States presidential election, the campaign for incumbent President Donald Trump and others filed and lost 86 lawsuits[1][2][3][4][5][6] contesting election processes, vote counting, and the vote certification process in multiple states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.[7]

"Nearly all the suits were dismissed or dropped due to lack of evidence;[8] judges, lawyers, and other observers described the suits as 'frivolous'[9] and 'without merit'.[10]

"In one instance, the Trump campaign and other groups seeking his reelection collectively lost multiple cases in six states on a single day"

Pretty much. Except I would prefer a breakout of contesting election process, vote counting, vote certification, and voter fraud.

As republicans claim that courts did not look at evidence of voter fraud.

 

[georgephillip]

Blah, Blah, Blah--they didn't even look at the evidence, moron. There were NO evidentiary hearings.

Who told you that, Trump?

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

"By November 27, more than thirty of the legal challenges filed since Election Day had failed;[39] by December 14 over fifty lawsuits had been dismissed.

"Federal judges in Georgia and Michigan rejected last-ditch efforts by pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell to overturn the election results on December 7.[40]

"United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Judge Linda Parker wrote, '[T]his lawsuit seems to be less about achieving the relief Plaintiffs seek—as much of that relief is beyond the power of this Court—and more about the impact of their allegations on People's faith in the democratic process and their trust in our government.'

"In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr. wrote, "They want this court to substitute its judgment for two-and-a-half million voters who voted for Joe Biden... And this I am unwilling to do."[41]

"Judges who were nominated by Trump also dismissed the claims and reliefs made by the Trump campaign in the courtrooms"

 

[Concerned American]

Blah, Blah, Blah--they didn't even look at the evidence, moron. There were NO evidentiary hearings.

Who told you that, Trump?

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

"By November 27, more than thirty of the legal challenges filed since Election Day had failed;[39] by December 14 over fifty lawsuits had been dismissed.

"Federal judges in Georgia and Michigan rejected last-ditch efforts by pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell to overturn the election results on December 7.[40]

"United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Judge Linda Parker wrote, '[T]his lawsuit seems to be less about achieving the relief Plaintiffs seek—as much of that relief is beyond the power of this Court—and more about the impact of their allegations on People's faith in the democratic process and their trust in our government.'

"In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr. wrote, "They want this court to substitute its judgment for two-and-a-half million voters who voted for Joe Biden... And this I am unwilling to do."[41]

"Judges who were nominated by Trump also dismissed the claims and reliefs made by the Trump campaign in the courtrooms"

They dismissed them without looking at any evidence, moron. Check GA out--they tried to cover up a lot there, but the elections commission is investigating 30 instances of voter fraud RIGHT NOW.

 

[georgephillip]

hey dismissed them without looking at any evidence, moron. Check GA out--they tried to cover up a lot there, but the elections commission is investigating 30 instances of voter fraud RIGHT NOW

"In direct response to election changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 United States presidential election in Georgia; the Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the election processes of Georgia. All of these cases have been dismissed or dropped."

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election from Georgia - Wikipedia