Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention

[American_Jihad]

I know it from the Puffington Post, Oh the horror, the horror...
The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too
04/06/2016 09:32 am ET | Updated Apr 06, 2016

In the run-up to the Wisconsin primary, RealClearPolitics, the top polling aggregator in the United States, predicted that Bernie Sanders would win Wisconsin by 2.6 points. Harry Enten, one of the top analysts for the nation’s top standalone polling website, FiveThirtyEight.com, was a little more generous: he predicted a 5-point Sanders win.

Based on the data analyses I’ve been conducting over my last nineteen articles for The Huffington Post (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), I predicted on social media yesterday afternoon — in preparation for this, my twentieth article on the Democratic primary race — that Bernie Sanders would defeat Hillary Clinton in the Wisconsin primary by 16 points (58 percent to 42 percent).

It may have seemed, on the face of it, a blindly partisan prediction, given that not a single poll in America had ever shown Sanders winning Wisconsin by more than 8 points — and indeed two polls released in just the last week actually showed Hillary Clinton in the lead in Wisconsin. While it’s true that I’ve been very transparent about supporting Senator Sanders in the primary race, my projection for Wisconsin was based on data — granted, data the mainstream media has ignored and various media personalities (Philip Bump of The Washington Post, Gideon Resnick of The Daily Beast, Nate Cohn of The New York Times, and the aforementioned Harry Enten, to name a few) have snarked repeatedly — and the data said to me that Sanders would win Wisconsin by far more than any poll anywhere had ever predicted.


...

But most importantly, the math would show, in this scenario, that not only had all the comparisons to the 2008 primary race been inapt, but that all the references to primary “math” as algebraic had occluded the fact that, in actuality, what we’re dealing with here is a very complicated — and deeply human — calculus.

And that calculus is leading the Democratic Party straight to a contested convention in Philadelphia this summer.

The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too

 

[S.J.]

All this talk about a Republican contested convention and we end up seeing a repeat of the 1968 Democratic Convention instead. That would be GREAT!

 

[American_Jihad]

All this talk about a Republican contested convention and we end up seeing a repeat of the 1968 Democratic Convention instead. That would be GREAT!

They would kill each other...

Violence Batters 1968 Democratic Convention

 

[S.J.]

All this talk about a Republican contested convention and we end up seeing a repeat of the 1968 Democratic Convention instead. That would be GREAT!

They would kill each other...

Violence Batters 1968 Democratic Convention

BLM shitheads would clash with the union thugs. It would be great entertainment.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I know it from the Puffington Post, Oh the horror, the horror...
The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too
04/06/2016 09:32 am ET | Updated Apr 06, 2016

In the run-up to the Wisconsin primary, RealClearPolitics, the top polling aggregator in the United States, predicted that Bernie Sanders would win Wisconsin by 2.6 points. Harry Enten, one of the top analysts for the nation’s top standalone polling website, FiveThirtyEight.com, was a little more generous: he predicted a 5-point Sanders win.

Based on the data analyses I’ve been conducting over my last nineteen articles for The Huffington Post (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), I predicted on social media yesterday afternoon — in preparation for this, my twentieth article on the Democratic primary race — that Bernie Sanders would defeat Hillary Clinton in the Wisconsin primary by 16 points (58 percent to 42 percent).

It may have seemed, on the face of it, a blindly partisan prediction, given that not a single poll in America had ever shown Sanders winning Wisconsin by more than 8 points — and indeed two polls released in just the last week actually showed Hillary Clinton in the lead in Wisconsin. While it’s true that I’ve been very transparent about supporting Senator Sanders in the primary race, my projection for Wisconsin was based on data — granted, data the mainstream media has ignored and various media personalities (Philip Bump of The Washington Post, Gideon Resnick of The Daily Beast, Nate Cohn of The New York Times, and the aforementioned Harry Enten, to name a few) have snarked repeatedly — and the data said to me that Sanders would win Wisconsin by far more than any poll anywhere had ever predicted.


...

But most importantly, the math would show, in this scenario, that not only had all the comparisons to the 2008 primary race been inapt, but that all the references to primary “math” as algebraic had occluded the fact that, in actuality, what we’re dealing with here is a very complicated — and deeply human — calculus.

And that calculus is leading the Democratic Party straight to a contested convention in Philadelphia this summer.

The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous.

It’s also pathetic and childish partisanism – that the GOP is in complete disarray you try to contrive the lie that democrats are likewise.

 

[HUGGY]

Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention

What you smokin Willis?

 

[easyt65]

Contested convention? Libs instead of the GOP? Good...perhaps after the wnd or 3rd ballot they will come out with a candulidate who is NOT an admitted Socialist or one under investigation for crimes under the Espionage Act.

 

[American_Jihad]

I know it from the Puffington Post, Oh the horror, the horror...
The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too
04/06/2016 09:32 am ET | Updated Apr 06, 2016

In the run-up to the Wisconsin primary, RealClearPolitics, the top polling aggregator in the United States, predicted that Bernie Sanders would win Wisconsin by 2.6 points. Harry Enten, one of the top analysts for the nation’s top standalone polling website, FiveThirtyEight.com, was a little more generous: he predicted a 5-point Sanders win.

Based on the data analyses I’ve been conducting over my last nineteen articles for The Huffington Post (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), I predicted on social media yesterday afternoon — in preparation for this, my twentieth article on the Democratic primary race — that Bernie Sanders would defeat Hillary Clinton in the Wisconsin primary by 16 points (58 percent to 42 percent).

It may have seemed, on the face of it, a blindly partisan prediction, given that not a single poll in America had ever shown Sanders winning Wisconsin by more than 8 points — and indeed two polls released in just the last week actually showed Hillary Clinton in the lead in Wisconsin. While it’s true that I’ve been very transparent about supporting Senator Sanders in the primary race, my projection for Wisconsin was based on data — granted, data the mainstream media has ignored and various media personalities (Philip Bump of The Washington Post, Gideon Resnick of The Daily Beast, Nate Cohn of The New York Times, and the aforementioned Harry Enten, to name a few) have snarked repeatedly — and the data said to me that Sanders would win Wisconsin by far more than any poll anywhere had ever predicted.


...

But most importantly, the math would show, in this scenario, that not only had all the comparisons to the 2008 primary race been inapt, but that all the references to primary “math” as algebraic had occluded the fact that, in actuality, what we’re dealing with here is a very complicated — and deeply human — calculus.

And that calculus is leading the Democratic Party straight to a contested convention in Philadelphia this summer.

The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous.

It’s also pathetic and childish partisanism – that the GOP is in complete disarray you try to contrive the lie that democrats are likewise.

...

 

[HenryBHough]

Contested?

Democrats?

Not on.

George Soros will tell them who to run and they'll snap to.

Right now I'd rank the possibilities as:

Fauxahontas
King Ketchup
Plugs

Expect Her Thighness to get a copy of the memo via email to one of her most private servers and feign some illness - maybe tip over in public - to explain why she's not there to crawl under the bus in person.

I could be wrong - but do you really think so?

No, really?

 

[jon_berzerk]

All this talk about a Republican contested convention and we end up seeing a repeat of the 1968 Democratic Convention instead. That would be GREAT!

better then great

pass the popcorn

--LOL

 

[American_Jihad]

George Soros will tell them who to run and they'll snap to.

...

 

[oreo]

I really don't know why we're still talking about Bernie Sanders. This race was over after he got clobbered in New York. He really should have dropped out and donated his left over campaign cash to other Democrats. Instead he sent out another mass email for donations--and David Plouffe, Obama's former campaign manager called him a fraud for that.

So he collected another 28 million dollars and spent it on Pennsylvania, Delaware, Connecticut, Maryland and again got clobbered in those 4 states. And he looked ridiculous when he said there's still a chance.

Indiana was insignificant win--another open primary state. Sanders changed his party status to run on the Democrat ticket, and in closed primary states he loses by double digits. IOW--Bernie Sanders will not be welcome at the Democrat National Convention.

The longer he stays in a race he's lost, the more he alienates the Democrat party, and the Super Delegates, and the more credibility, respect and support he loses.
Bernie Sanders insists he can still win. The math says otherwise.

 

[S.J.]

All this talk about a Republican contested convention and we end up seeing a repeat of the 1968 Democratic Convention instead. That would be GREAT!

better then great

pass the popcorn

--LOL

I'd have to open a good bottle of wine for that.

 

[American_Jihad]

I really don't know why we're still talking about Bernie Sanders. This race was over after he got clobbered in New York. He really should have dropped out and donated his left over campaign cash to other Democrats. Instead he sent out another mass email for donations--and David Plouffe, Obama's former campaign manager called him a fraud for that.

So he collected another 28 million dollars and spent it on Pennsylvania, Delaware, Connecticut, Maryland and again got clobbered in those 4 states. And he looked ridiculous when he said there's still a chance.

Indiana was insignificant win--another open primary state. Sanders changed his party status to run on the Democrat ticket, and in closed primary states he loses by double digits. IOW--Bernie Sanders will not be welcome at the Democrat National Convention.

The longer he stays in a race he's lost, the more he alienates the Democrat party, and the Super Delegates, and the more credibility, respect and support he loses.

Sanders should peel off and go third party...

 

[oreo]

I really don't know why we're still talking about Bernie Sanders. This race was over after he got clobbered in New York. He really should have dropped out and donated his left over campaign cash to other Democrats. Instead he sent out another mass email for donations--and David Plouffe, Obama's former campaign manager called him a fraud for that.

So he collected another 28 million dollars and spent it on Pennsylvania, Delaware, Connecticut, Maryland and again got clobbered in those 4 states. And he looked ridiculous when he said there's still a chance.

Indiana was insignificant win--another open primary state. Sanders changed his party status to run on the Democrat ticket, and in closed primary states he loses by double digits. IOW--Bernie Sanders will not be welcome at the Democrat National Convention.

The longer he stays in a race he's lost, the more he alienates the Democrat party, and the Super Delegates, and the more credibility, respect and support he loses.

Sanders should peel off and go third party...

If Sanders did that, he would be the most hated, despised Senator in Washington D.C, He and his policies would be ridiculed for decades to come. I imagine the Democrat party would censor--meaning tape his mouth shut by refusing him any floor time.

You might want to read this article on the math.
npost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/05/02/bernie-sanders-insists-he-can-still-win-the-math-says-otherwise/

The Democrat party is getting very tired and irritated with this nursing home candidate already.\

 

[S.J.]

I really don't know why we're still talking about Bernie Sanders. This race was over after he got clobbered in New York. He really should have dropped out and donated his left over campaign cash to other Democrats. Instead he sent out another mass email for donations--and David Plouffe, Obama's former campaign manager called him a fraud for that.

So he collected another 28 million dollars and spent it on Pennsylvania, Delaware, Connecticut, Maryland and again got clobbered in those 4 states. And he looked ridiculous when he said there's still a chance.

Indiana was insignificant win--another open primary state. Sanders changed his party status to run on the Democrat ticket, and in closed primary states he loses by double digits. IOW--Bernie Sanders will not be welcome at the Democrat National Convention.

The longer he stays in a race he's lost, the more he alienates the Democrat party, and the Super Delegates, and the more credibility, respect and support he loses.

Sanders should peel off and go third party...

If Sanders did that, he would be the most hated, despised Senator in Washington D.C, He and his policies would be ridiculed for decades to come. I imagine the Democrat party would censor--meaning tape his mouth shut by refusing him any floor time.

You might want to read this article on the math.
npost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/05/02/bernie-sanders-insists-he-can-still-win-the-math-says-otherwise/

The Democrat party is getting very tired and irritated with this nursing home candidate already.

Yeah but it would make for great entertainment.

 

[SwimExpert]

I know it from the Puffington Post, Oh the horror, the horror...
The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too
04/06/2016 09:32 am ET | Updated Apr 06, 2016

In the run-up to the Wisconsin primary, RealClearPolitics, the top polling aggregator in the United States, predicted that Bernie Sanders would win Wisconsin by 2.6 points. Harry Enten, one of the top analysts for the nation’s top standalone polling website, FiveThirtyEight.com, was a little more generous: he predicted a 5-point Sanders win.

Based on the data analyses I’ve been conducting over my last nineteen articles for The Huffington Post (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), I predicted on social media yesterday afternoon — in preparation for this, my twentieth article on the Democratic primary race — that Bernie Sanders would defeat Hillary Clinton in the Wisconsin primary by 16 points (58 percent to 42 percent).

It may have seemed, on the face of it, a blindly partisan prediction, given that not a single poll in America had ever shown Sanders winning Wisconsin by more than 8 points — and indeed two polls released in just the last week actually showed Hillary Clinton in the lead in Wisconsin. While it’s true that I’ve been very transparent about supporting Senator Sanders in the primary race, my projection for Wisconsin was based on data — granted, data the mainstream media has ignored and various media personalities (Philip Bump of The Washington Post, Gideon Resnick of The Daily Beast, Nate Cohn of The New York Times, and the aforementioned Harry Enten, to name a few) have snarked repeatedly — and the data said to me that Sanders would win Wisconsin by far more than any poll anywhere had ever predicted.


...

But most importantly, the math would show, in this scenario, that not only had all the comparisons to the 2008 primary race been inapt, but that all the references to primary “math” as algebraic had occluded the fact that, in actuality, what we’re dealing with here is a very complicated — and deeply human — calculus.

And that calculus is leading the Democratic Party straight to a contested convention in Philadelphia this summer.

The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too

This literally proves that 1 + 1 = 2 constitutes math that is too complex for you.

 

[American_Jihad]

I know it from the Puffington Post, Oh the horror, the horror...
The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too
04/06/2016 09:32 am ET | Updated Apr 06, 2016

In the run-up to the Wisconsin primary, RealClearPolitics, the top polling aggregator in the United States, predicted that Bernie Sanders would win Wisconsin by 2.6 points. Harry Enten, one of the top analysts for the nation’s top standalone polling website, FiveThirtyEight.com, was a little more generous: he predicted a 5-point Sanders win.

Based on the data analyses I’ve been conducting over my last nineteen articles for The Huffington Post (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), I predicted on social media yesterday afternoon — in preparation for this, my twentieth article on the Democratic primary race — that Bernie Sanders would defeat Hillary Clinton in the Wisconsin primary by 16 points (58 percent to 42 percent).

It may have seemed, on the face of it, a blindly partisan prediction, given that not a single poll in America had ever shown Sanders winning Wisconsin by more than 8 points — and indeed two polls released in just the last week actually showed Hillary Clinton in the lead in Wisconsin. While it’s true that I’ve been very transparent about supporting Senator Sanders in the primary race, my projection for Wisconsin was based on data — granted, data the mainstream media has ignored and various media personalities (Philip Bump of The Washington Post, Gideon Resnick of The Daily Beast, Nate Cohn of The New York Times, and the aforementioned Harry Enten, to name a few) have snarked repeatedly — and the data said to me that Sanders would win Wisconsin by far more than any poll anywhere had ever predicted.


...

But most importantly, the math would show, in this scenario, that not only had all the comparisons to the 2008 primary race been inapt, but that all the references to primary “math” as algebraic had occluded the fact that, in actuality, what we’re dealing with here is a very complicated — and deeply human — calculus.

And that calculus is leading the Democratic Party straight to a contested convention in Philadelphia this summer.

The Democrats Are Headed for a Contested Convention Too

This literally proves that 1 + 1 = 2 constitutes math that is too complex for you.

...