Democrats: A secular socialist coalition?

[manifold]

Newt Gingrich recently referred to democrats as a "secular socialist coalition seeking to change America radically."

Is this fair comment?

 

[TheSuaveOne]

I'd say it's correct for the far left of the party.

-TSO

 

[slackjawed]

newt might be overstating it a little bit, but there is some truth to it, IMHO>

 

[manifold]

I'd say it's correct for the far left of the party.

-TSO

So you think it's incorrect for the majority of democrats?

 

[Oddball]

Democrats: A secular socialist coalition?

They're not secular at all.

They have a God: Big Daddy Big Gubmint.

 

[manifold]

newt might be overstating it a little bit, but there is some truth to it, IMHO>

There would also be some truth in saying Republicans are a Jesus pimping, fascist coalition. But it wouldn't necessarily be fair comment.

 

[slackjawed]

newt might be overstating it a little bit, but there is some truth to it, IMHO>

There would also be some truth in saying Republicans are a Jesus pimping, fascist coalition. But it wouldn't necessarily be fair comment.

no, but in both cases there some that it fits. not most, some.
so there is some truth to it, but it is overstated.
and newts comment was much more polite than your crude drivel.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

I'd say it's correct for the far left of the party.

-TSO

So you think it's incorrect for the majority of democrats?

It sounds like he said the FAR LEFT not the majority....unless you consider the majority of democrats far left.

 

[TheSuaveOne]

I would guess if they were polled, the majority of the non-far left wing of the democtratic party, you would find many of them are religous. Hell for that matter, a bunch of the far leftists are religious too. Kerry, Obama, Clinton just to name a few.

-TSO

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Wow.. a liberal calling someone else fascist??? Funny.

 

[slackjawed]

I would guess if they were polled, the majority of the non-far left wing of the democtratic party, you would find many of them are religous. Hell for that matter, a bunch of the far leftists are religious too. Kerry, Obama, Clinton just to name a few.

-TSO

They ALL prfess to have some type of faith when it is to their political benefit.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Democrats: A secular socialist coalition?

They're not secular at all.

They have a God: Big Daddy Big Gubmint.

Not only do they have a god, they are trying to one up constantly



"Oh yeah? My Bigger Daddy, Bigger Gubmint is bigger than your Big Daddy Big Gubmint"

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

newt might be overstating it a little bit, but there is some truth to it, IMHO>

There would also be some truth in saying Republicans are a Jesus pimping, fascist coalition. But it wouldn't necessarily be fair comment.

Now if you said those comments about "the religious right" I wouldn't call you innacurate but if you made a blanket statement about republicans in the same vein I would say you were wrong.

Do we have a link to the context of that Newt Comment?

Speaking of newt...check this out

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mTVFjx9lPY]YouTube - Ali G with Newt Gingrich[/ame]


the full video is below but i think you have to sign in to watch it because of "profanity"

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skv-wWCvGyw[/ame]

 

[NYcarbineer]

We're a secular nation with a secular government.

 

[manifold]

Settle down Pee Pee!

I said it wouldn't necessarily be fair comment didn't I?

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Settle down Pee Pee!

I said it wouldn't necessarily be fair comment didn't I?

Hey I agreed with you depending on context

I thought I was being good

Im gonna make a new thread now

 

[manifold]

I'd say it's correct for the far left of the party.

-TSO

So you think it's incorrect for the majority of democrats?

It sounds like he said the FAR LEFT not the majority....unless you consider the majority of democrats far left.

Of course not. It was a point of clarification is all. He said "correct," but qualified it. I was simply asking if that means he thinks it's incorrect sans the qualification.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

So you think it's incorrect for the majority of democrats?

It sounds like he said the FAR LEFT not the majority....unless you consider the majority of democrats far left.

Of course not. It was a point of clarification is all. He said "correct," but qualified it. I was simply asking if that means he thinks it's incorrect sans the qualification.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...cking-mainfold-stupid-ass-pieces-of-shit.html

 

[manifold]

you didn't even spell it right.

but at least you didn't capitalize it, so that earns you a few extra points.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

you didn't even spell it right.

but at least you didn't capitalize it, so that earns you a few extra points.

did you read it though

c'mon just read it...trust me