Democrat-Lite...(R) candidates

[Lumpy 1]

Republicans can't win elections with Democrat-lite candidates for President, Conservative Republicans just wont vote for them.

Examples McCain, Mitt and Bush was a very close call.

Reagan kicked ass...

 

[occupied]

Republicans can't win elections with Democrat-lite candidates for President, Conservative Republicans just wont vote for them.

Examples McCain, Mitt and Bush was a very close call.

Reagan kicked ass...

That makes no sense whatsoever, there is no distinction other than acting ability.

 

[Kosh]

Well have to remember that the Democrats have moved so far to the left that it is hard to see anyone in the middle.

 

[williepete]

Republicans can't win elections with Democrat-lite candidates for President, Conservative Republicans just wont vote for them.

Obama got about 66 million while Romney got about 61 million votes.
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php

93 million saw no use in voting for either:

"Despite an increase of over eight million citizens in the eligible population, turnout declined from 131 million voters in 2008 to an estimated 126 million voters in 2012 when all ballots are tallied. Some 93 million eligible citizens did not vote."
2012 Voter Turnout | Bipartisan Policy Center

You've got three choices:
1. The party of big intrusive government, big debt and big deficit spending.
2. The party of bigger intrusive government, bigger debt and bigger deficit spending.
3. Stay at home.

 

[AquaAthena]

Republicans can't win elections with Democrat-lite candidates for President, Conservative Republicans just wont vote for them.

Examples McCain, Mitt and Bush was a very close call.

Reagan kicked ass...

As of this post in time, it is a conundrum.

“What's the difference between a jeweler and a jailer?” “One sells watches and the other watches cells.”

 

[Lumpy 1]

Republicans can't win elections with Democrat-lite candidates for President, Conservative Republicans just wont vote for them.

Obama got about 66 million while Romney got about 61 million votes.
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php

93 million saw no use in voting for either:

"Despite an increase of over eight million citizens in the eligible population, turnout declined from 131 million voters in 2008 to an estimated 126 million voters in 2012 when all ballots are tallied. Some 93 million eligible citizens did not vote."
2012 Voter Turnout | Bipartisan Policy Center

You've got three choices:
1. The party of big intrusive government, big debt and big deficit spending.
2. The party of bigger intrusive government, bigger debt and bigger deficit spending.
3. Stay at home.

Thank You, those were interesting and rather short links.. (the best kind)...

 

[Lumpy 1]

Republicans can't win elections with Democrat-lite candidates for President, Conservative Republicans just wont vote for them.

Examples McCain, Mitt and Bush was a very close call.

Reagan kicked ass...

As of this post in time, it is a conundrum.

“What's the difference between a jeweler and a jailer?” “One sells watches and the other watches cells.”

.. I'd rather hug you, either way..

 

[AquaAthena]

Republicans can't win elections with Democrat-lite candidates for President, Conservative Republicans just wont vote for them.

Examples McCain, Mitt and Bush was a very close call.

Reagan kicked ass...

As of this post in time, it is a conundrum.

“What's the difference between a jeweler and a jailer?” “One sells watches and the other watches cells.”

.. I'd rather hug you, either way..

Let's do that, then.... darlin`!