Deep Throat: The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified info

[miketx]

This guy has been giving information for 10 years. That means he was a proven source of information. The CIA would call him gold.
He said that Putin ordered the hacking of the DNC servers. He said that Putin wanted Trump and ordered his people to help trump get elected and they did.

If Trump knew this guy was there inside Russia, he definitely would’ve told Vladimir Putin.

Duct tape yourself to the nearest light pole.... your losing it.

I’m not a traitor who supports the Russians attacking this country. Are you?

I see, we're going THERE now. Look, the CNN story was fake as disclosed by the CIA... that means its bullshit. How many different ways does someone need to describe it to you before you wander off into fantasy land?
So your calling the foreign ministry of Russia spies? and you think you can pick up on this huh? but not the CIA?
Maybe if you would stop carrying your marbles around in your socks you would stop losing them.

He's not lost anything but his integrity and his right to be an American, if he ever was American. He's a lying pos that does what he does. Bet ya a week's pay he keeps his mouth shut in public.

Trump never had integrity. And Republicans have lost about all of theirs.

You are the lyingest vile beast I have ever seen.

 

[B. Kidd]

Duct tape yourself to the nearest light pole.... your losing it.

I’m not a traitor who supports the Russians attacking this country. Are you?

I see, we're going THERE now. Look, the CNN story was fake as disclosed by the CIA... that means its bullshit. How many different ways does someone need to describe it to you before you wander off into fantasy land?
So your calling the foreign ministry of Russia spies? and you think you can pick up on this huh? but not the CIA?
Maybe if you would stop carrying your marbles around in your socks you would stop losing them.

Spies collect information. Trump gave that information to those spies. Whatever their official titles are, they’re still spies. Everybody knows it.

Wow!
Impressive!!
You must've been a spy!!!

I just read the paper and watch the news. You should try it sometime, you might learn something.

Keep going!
Knock yourself out!
At least you ARE posting in the right USMB section.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Hours after CNN reported Trump's handling of classified information was the inciting incident leading to this spy's extraction, a follow-up story from the New York Times cited sources who insisted media scrutiny alone is what jeopardized the safety of this source. Holes poked in CNN report blaming Trump for alarm that led to extraction of Kremlin informant

 

[westwall]

It’s like if you took somebody and you told them look there’s dog shit there on the ground and they said where I don’t see any dog shit. So you grab them and you made them get down on the ground and you shove their face and smeared it all over their face and then said that dog shit. And they said there’s dog shit, where? And you said it’s all over your face can’t you feel it can’t you smell it? And they said you’re a liar. As they walked away with flies buzzing around their head because of all the dog shit.

That’s what the Russians, Trump, and the Republicans remind me of. The Russians are the dog shit that Trump knows is there and the Republicans refuse to see.

So what was the information Obama handed over to the Russians?

Well ?

Well ??

Thought so.

He didn't do shit when the russkis invaded Crimea. Your hero, the obummer, abandoned a Treaty, a real honest to gosh Treaty, so he could help his master pootin. Just like you do with your incessant lies. You are a pootin putz, just like obummer, your hero.

 

[B. Kidd]

Hours after CNN reported Trump's handling of classified information was the inciting incident leading to this spy's extraction, a follow-up story from the New York Times cited sources who insisted media scrutiny alone is what jeopardized the safety of this source. Holes poked in CNN report blaming Trump for alarm that led to extraction of Kremlin informant

CNN is a threat to national security.
They should lose their broadcasting license.

 

[lennypartiv]

Super fake news.

If it's coming from a Democrat, it's fake news.

 

[Yarddog]

This guy has been giving information for 10 years. That means he was a proven source of information. The CIA would call him gold.
He said that Putin ordered the hacking of the DNC servers. He said that Putin wanted Trump and ordered his people to help trump get elected and they did.

If Trump knew this guy was there inside Russia, he definitely would’ve told Vladimir Putin.

Duct tape yourself to the nearest light pole.... your losing it.

I’m not a traitor who supports the Russians attacking this country. Are you?

I see, we're going THERE now. Look, the CNN story was fake as disclosed by the CIA... that means its bullshit. How many different ways does someone need to describe it to you before you wander off into fantasy land?
So your calling the foreign ministry of Russia spies? and you think you can pick up on this huh? but not the CIA?
Maybe if you would stop carrying your marbles around in your socks you would stop losing them.

Spies collect information. Trump gave that information to those spies. Whatever their official titles are, they’re still spies. Everybody knows it.

So Trump barred the US news media from the room but that doesn't mean there were not other Americans in the room. Just the news media. While I may not agree with that, I do understand that elements of the news media have been trying to destroy him and his family for the last couple years based on hearsay made to look as factual evidence, so i guess I can understand him wanting to snub them now and then. and why not? they deserve it... just like the basis of this thread was a lie made to trigger people like yourself. And so what information did Trump give them from the oval office? And what is your source?

 

[TRFjr]

Loose lips sink ships. Is Trump Putin's deep throat in the USA?

The First Blabbermouth has now exposed a CIA Russian asset to risk of exposure from Trump's boasting and revelation of secrets to all within earshot of Trump.

Russia, China, and Iran are sending spies to Trump rallies to record all the secrets Trump is blabber-mouthing to his howling mob.

The real question is what did Trump reveal to Putin in Helsinki when Trump confiscated the US translators's notes.

Trump has been under suspicion as a Russian agent. "FBI had opened an investigation into whether Trump was an agent for Russia in response to his controversial firing of former FBI Director James Comey. "

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting
Sonam Sheth 8h

US officials were so alarmed by President Donald Trump's decision to reveal classified intelligence to Russian officials during an Oval Office meeting in 2017 that they extracted a top-secret source from Russia shortly after, CNN reported on Monday.

Intelligence officials typically extract sources when they believe the person's life is in immediate danger.
The information Trump shared with the Russians wasn't directly connected to the source, but CNN reported that its disclosure prompted officials to "renew earlier discussions" about the potential risk that the source would be exposed.

The president has repeatedly been accused of mishandling classified information that could compromise the US's intelligence-gathering methods and put lives at risk.

The US was forced to extract a top-secret source from Russia after President Donald Trump revealed classified information to two Russian officials in 2017, CNN reported on Monday.
A person directly involved with the discussions told the outlet the US was concerned that Trump and his administration routinely mishandled classified intelligence and that their actions could expose the covert source as a spy within the Russian government.

Trump stunned the national-security apparatus and intelligence community when it surfaced that in an Oval Office meeting in May 2017 he shared the information with Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, and Sergey Kislyak, then Russia's ambassador to the US.

Trump's disclosure was not specifically about the Russian spy. But his disregard of strict intelligence-sharing rules to protect highly placed sources "prompted intelligence officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk" that the source in Russia would be exposed, CNN reported.

At the Oval Office meeting, which took place one day after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, the president is said to have boasted to the Russians that firing "nut job" Comey had taken "great pressure" off him. Comey had been spearheading the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US election.

Trump then went on to share with Lavrov and Kislyak intelligence connected to the Islamic State in Syria. The information came from Israel, which had not given the US permission to share it with the Russians because it could have compromised an Israeli source in the region.

The report said that Mike Pompeo, the CIA director at the time, also told other senior Trump administration officials after the meeting that too much information was coming out regarding the US asset in Russia.

This is not the first time national-security veterans have expressed concerns that Trump's actions could reveal sensitive information about US intelligence-gathering processes and human sources working abroad.
Late last month, the president's tweet about US military information he received during a classified intelligence briefing earlier that day immediately set off alarm bells because it included a satellite photo of an Iranian launchpad that was of a much higher resolution and better quality than the commercial satellite images of the site that were publicly available.

It also contained markers indicating that it was taken by USA-224, one of the US's most secretive spy satellites.
Intelligence veterans said the president's tweet would be a gold mine for hostile foreign powers.
"One doesn't use intel for the purposes of taunting. The Russians and the Chinese will be very happy to study this," Robert Deitz, a former top lawyer at the CIA and the National Security Agency, told Insider.
Last year, Trump also made the unusual decision to authorize the declassification of a highly controversial memo about the origins of the Russia investigation by Devin Nunes, then the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, for political purposes.

The memo and its release sparked a firestorm on Capitol Hill and within the intelligence community. Top intelligence officials met multiple times with senior White House staff to urge against releasing the document for fear that it could expose sources and methods.

The Justice Department and the FBI also took the extraordinary step of releasing statements cautioning against its release by the House Intelligence Committee without giving officials enough time to review it.

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

 

[Denizen]

This guy has been giving information for 10 years. That means he was a proven source of information. The CIA would call him gold.
He said that Putin ordered the hacking of the DNC servers. He said that Putin wanted Trump and ordered his people to help trump get elected and they did.

If Trump knew this guy was there inside Russia, he definitely would’ve told Vladimir Putin.

Duct tape yourself to the nearest light pole.... your losing it.

I’m not a traitor who supports the Russians attacking this country. Are you?

I see, we're going THERE now. Look, the CNN story was fake as disclosed by the CIA... that means its bullshit. How many different ways does someone need to describe it to you before you wander off into fantasy land?
So your calling the foreign ministry of Russia spies? and you think you can pick up on this huh? but not the CIA?
Maybe if you would stop carrying your marbles around in your socks you would stop losing them.

He's not lost anything but his integrity and his right to be an American, if he ever was American. He's a lying pos that does what he does. Bet ya a week's pay he keeps his mouth shut in public.

Trump never had integrity. And Republicans have lost about all of theirs.

Gop lawmakers have become invisible and disposable as Donald Trump has obstructed them from participating in governing the USA.

 

[Denizen]

Loose lips sink ships. Is Trump Putin's deep throat in the USA?

The First Blabbermouth has now exposed a CIA Russian asset to risk of exposure from Trump's boasting and revelation of secrets to all within earshot of Trump.

Russia, China, and Iran are sending spies to Trump rallies to record all the secrets Trump is blabber-mouthing to his howling mob.

The real question is what did Trump reveal to Putin in Helsinki when Trump confiscated the US translators's notes.

Trump has been under suspicion as a Russian agent. "FBI had opened an investigation into whether Trump was an agent for Russia in response to his controversial firing of former FBI Director James Comey. "

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting
Sonam Sheth 8h

US officials were so alarmed by President Donald Trump's decision to reveal classified intelligence to Russian officials during an Oval Office meeting in 2017 that they extracted a top-secret source from Russia shortly after, CNN reported on Monday.

Intelligence officials typically extract sources when they believe the person's life is in immediate danger.
The information Trump shared with the Russians wasn't directly connected to the source, but CNN reported that its disclosure prompted officials to "renew earlier discussions" about the potential risk that the source would be exposed.

The president has repeatedly been accused of mishandling classified information that could compromise the US's intelligence-gathering methods and put lives at risk.

The US was forced to extract a top-secret source from Russia after President Donald Trump revealed classified information to two Russian officials in 2017, CNN reported on Monday.
A person directly involved with the discussions told the outlet the US was concerned that Trump and his administration routinely mishandled classified intelligence and that their actions could expose the covert source as a spy within the Russian government.

Trump stunned the national-security apparatus and intelligence community when it surfaced that in an Oval Office meeting in May 2017 he shared the information with Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, and Sergey Kislyak, then Russia's ambassador to the US.

Trump's disclosure was not specifically about the Russian spy. But his disregard of strict intelligence-sharing rules to protect highly placed sources "prompted intelligence officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk" that the source in Russia would be exposed, CNN reported.

At the Oval Office meeting, which took place one day after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, the president is said to have boasted to the Russians that firing "nut job" Comey had taken "great pressure" off him. Comey had been spearheading the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US election.

Trump then went on to share with Lavrov and Kislyak intelligence connected to the Islamic State in Syria. The information came from Israel, which had not given the US permission to share it with the Russians because it could have compromised an Israeli source in the region.

The report said that Mike Pompeo, the CIA director at the time, also told other senior Trump administration officials after the meeting that too much information was coming out regarding the US asset in Russia.

This is not the first time national-security veterans have expressed concerns that Trump's actions could reveal sensitive information about US intelligence-gathering processes and human sources working abroad.
Late last month, the president's tweet about US military information he received during a classified intelligence briefing earlier that day immediately set off alarm bells because it included a satellite photo of an Iranian launchpad that was of a much higher resolution and better quality than the commercial satellite images of the site that were publicly available.

It also contained markers indicating that it was taken by USA-224, one of the US's most secretive spy satellites.
Intelligence veterans said the president's tweet would be a gold mine for hostile foreign powers.
"One doesn't use intel for the purposes of taunting. The Russians and the Chinese will be very happy to study this," Robert Deitz, a former top lawyer at the CIA and the National Security Agency, told Insider.
Last year, Trump also made the unusual decision to authorize the declassification of a highly controversial memo about the origins of the Russia investigation by Devin Nunes, then the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, for political purposes.

The memo and its release sparked a firestorm on Capitol Hill and within the intelligence community. Top intelligence officials met multiple times with senior White House staff to urge against releasing the document for fear that it could expose sources and methods.

The Justice Department and the FBI also took the extraordinary step of releasing statements cautioning against its release by the House Intelligence Committee without giving officials enough time to review it.

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Trump has a different method of circular reporting. Trump's anal emissions are inhaled by Trump, biologically and brainlessly magnified, and transmitted to the joyous howling mob through Trump's mouth who then experience mass hysteria.

 

[dudmuck]

Loose lips sink ships. Is Trump Putin's deep throat in the USA?

The First Blabbermouth has now exposed a CIA Russian asset to risk of exposure from Trump's boasting and revelation of secrets to all within earshot of Trump.

Russia, China, and Iran are sending spies to Trump rallies to record all the secrets Trump is blabber-mouthing to his howling mob.

The real question is what did Trump reveal to Putin in Helsinki when Trump confiscated the US translators's notes.

Trump has been under suspicion as a Russian agent. "FBI had opened an investigation into whether Trump was an agent for Russia in response to his controversial firing of former FBI Director James Comey. "

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting
Sonam Sheth 8h

US officials were so alarmed by President Donald Trump's decision to reveal classified intelligence to Russian officials during an Oval Office meeting in 2017 that they extracted a top-secret source from Russia shortly after, CNN reported on Monday.

Intelligence officials typically extract sources when they believe the person's life is in immediate danger.
The information Trump shared with the Russians wasn't directly connected to the source, but CNN reported that its disclosure prompted officials to "renew earlier discussions" about the potential risk that the source would be exposed.

The president has repeatedly been accused of mishandling classified information that could compromise the US's intelligence-gathering methods and put lives at risk.

The US was forced to extract a top-secret source from Russia after President Donald Trump revealed classified information to two Russian officials in 2017, CNN reported on Monday.
A person directly involved with the discussions told the outlet the US was concerned that Trump and his administration routinely mishandled classified intelligence and that their actions could expose the covert source as a spy within the Russian government.

Trump stunned the national-security apparatus and intelligence community when it surfaced that in an Oval Office meeting in May 2017 he shared the information with Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, and Sergey Kislyak, then Russia's ambassador to the US.

Trump's disclosure was not specifically about the Russian spy. But his disregard of strict intelligence-sharing rules to protect highly placed sources "prompted intelligence officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk" that the source in Russia would be exposed, CNN reported.

At the Oval Office meeting, which took place one day after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, the president is said to have boasted to the Russians that firing "nut job" Comey had taken "great pressure" off him. Comey had been spearheading the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US election.

Trump then went on to share with Lavrov and Kislyak intelligence connected to the Islamic State in Syria. The information came from Israel, which had not given the US permission to share it with the Russians because it could have compromised an Israeli source in the region.

The report said that Mike Pompeo, the CIA director at the time, also told other senior Trump administration officials after the meeting that too much information was coming out regarding the US asset in Russia.

This is not the first time national-security veterans have expressed concerns that Trump's actions could reveal sensitive information about US intelligence-gathering processes and human sources working abroad.
Late last month, the president's tweet about US military information he received during a classified intelligence briefing earlier that day immediately set off alarm bells because it included a satellite photo of an Iranian launchpad that was of a much higher resolution and better quality than the commercial satellite images of the site that were publicly available.

It also contained markers indicating that it was taken by USA-224, one of the US's most secretive spy satellites.
Intelligence veterans said the president's tweet would be a gold mine for hostile foreign powers.
"One doesn't use intel for the purposes of taunting. The Russians and the Chinese will be very happy to study this," Robert Deitz, a former top lawyer at the CIA and the National Security Agency, told Insider.
Last year, Trump also made the unusual decision to authorize the declassification of a highly controversial memo about the origins of the Russia investigation by Devin Nunes, then the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, for political purposes.

The memo and its release sparked a firestorm on Capitol Hill and within the intelligence community. Top intelligence officials met multiple times with senior White House staff to urge against releasing the document for fear that it could expose sources and methods.

The Justice Department and the FBI also took the extraordinary step of releasing statements cautioning against its release by the House Intelligence Committee without giving officials enough time to review it.

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Loose lips sink ships. Is Trump Putin's deep throat in the USA?

The First Blabbermouth has now exposed a CIA Russian asset to risk of exposure from Trump's boasting and revelation of secrets to all within earshot of Trump.

Russia, China, and Iran are sending spies to Trump rallies to record all the secrets Trump is blabber-mouthing to his howling mob.

The real question is what did Trump reveal to Putin in Helsinki when Trump confiscated the US translators's notes.

Trump has been under suspicion as a Russian agent. "FBI had opened an investigation into whether Trump was an agent for Russia in response to his controversial firing of former FBI Director James Comey. "

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting
Sonam Sheth 8h

US officials were so alarmed by President Donald Trump's decision to reveal classified intelligence to Russian officials during an Oval Office meeting in 2017 that they extracted a top-secret source from Russia shortly after, CNN reported on Monday.

Intelligence officials typically extract sources when they believe the person's life is in immediate danger.
The information Trump shared with the Russians wasn't directly connected to the source, but CNN reported that its disclosure prompted officials to "renew earlier discussions" about the potential risk that the source would be exposed.

The president has repeatedly been accused of mishandling classified information that could compromise the US's intelligence-gathering methods and put lives at risk.

The US was forced to extract a top-secret source from Russia after President Donald Trump revealed classified information to two Russian officials in 2017, CNN reported on Monday.
A person directly involved with the discussions told the outlet the US was concerned that Trump and his administration routinely mishandled classified intelligence and that their actions could expose the covert source as a spy within the Russian government.

Trump stunned the national-security apparatus and intelligence community when it surfaced that in an Oval Office meeting in May 2017 he shared the information with Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, and Sergey Kislyak, then Russia's ambassador to the US.

Trump's disclosure was not specifically about the Russian spy. But his disregard of strict intelligence-sharing rules to protect highly placed sources "prompted intelligence officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk" that the source in Russia would be exposed, CNN reported.

At the Oval Office meeting, which took place one day after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, the president is said to have boasted to the Russians that firing "nut job" Comey had taken "great pressure" off him. Comey had been spearheading the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US election.

Trump then went on to share with Lavrov and Kislyak intelligence connected to the Islamic State in Syria. The information came from Israel, which had not given the US permission to share it with the Russians because it could have compromised an Israeli source in the region.

The report said that Mike Pompeo, the CIA director at the time, also told other senior Trump administration officials after the meeting that too much information was coming out regarding the US asset in Russia.

This is not the first time national-security veterans have expressed concerns that Trump's actions could reveal sensitive information about US intelligence-gathering processes and human sources working abroad.
Late last month, the president's tweet about US military information he received during a classified intelligence briefing earlier that day immediately set off alarm bells because it included a satellite photo of an Iranian launchpad that was of a much higher resolution and better quality than the commercial satellite images of the site that were publicly available.

It also contained markers indicating that it was taken by USA-224, one of the US's most secretive spy satellites.
Intelligence veterans said the president's tweet would be a gold mine for hostile foreign powers.
"One doesn't use intel for the purposes of taunting. The Russians and the Chinese will be very happy to study this," Robert Deitz, a former top lawyer at the CIA and the National Security Agency, told Insider.
Last year, Trump also made the unusual decision to authorize the declassification of a highly controversial memo about the origins of the Russia investigation by Devin Nunes, then the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, for political purposes.

The memo and its release sparked a firestorm on Capitol Hill and within the intelligence community. Top intelligence officials met multiple times with senior White House staff to urge against releasing the document for fear that it could expose sources and methods.

The Justice Department and the FBI also took the extraordinary step of releasing statements cautioning against its release by the House Intelligence Committee without giving officials enough time to review it.

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Bramell ls like the kellyanne conway of the CIA.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

 

[westwall]

Loose lips sink ships. Is Trump Putin's deep throat in the USA?

The First Blabbermouth has now exposed a CIA Russian asset to risk of exposure from Trump's boasting and revelation of secrets to all within earshot of Trump.

Russia, China, and Iran are sending spies to Trump rallies to record all the secrets Trump is blabber-mouthing to his howling mob.

The real question is what did Trump reveal to Putin in Helsinki when Trump confiscated the US translators's notes.

Trump has been under suspicion as a Russian agent. "FBI had opened an investigation into whether Trump was an agent for Russia in response to his controversial firing of former FBI Director James Comey. "

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting
Sonam Sheth 8h

US officials were so alarmed by President Donald Trump's decision to reveal classified intelligence to Russian officials during an Oval Office meeting in 2017 that they extracted a top-secret source from Russia shortly after, CNN reported on Monday.

Intelligence officials typically extract sources when they believe the person's life is in immediate danger.
The information Trump shared with the Russians wasn't directly connected to the source, but CNN reported that its disclosure prompted officials to "renew earlier discussions" about the potential risk that the source would be exposed.

The president has repeatedly been accused of mishandling classified information that could compromise the US's intelligence-gathering methods and put lives at risk.

The US was forced to extract a top-secret source from Russia after President Donald Trump revealed classified information to two Russian officials in 2017, CNN reported on Monday.
A person directly involved with the discussions told the outlet the US was concerned that Trump and his administration routinely mishandled classified intelligence and that their actions could expose the covert source as a spy within the Russian government.

Trump stunned the national-security apparatus and intelligence community when it surfaced that in an Oval Office meeting in May 2017 he shared the information with Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, and Sergey Kislyak, then Russia's ambassador to the US.

Trump's disclosure was not specifically about the Russian spy. But his disregard of strict intelligence-sharing rules to protect highly placed sources "prompted intelligence officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk" that the source in Russia would be exposed, CNN reported.

At the Oval Office meeting, which took place one day after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, the president is said to have boasted to the Russians that firing "nut job" Comey had taken "great pressure" off him. Comey had been spearheading the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US election.

Trump then went on to share with Lavrov and Kislyak intelligence connected to the Islamic State in Syria. The information came from Israel, which had not given the US permission to share it with the Russians because it could have compromised an Israeli source in the region.

The report said that Mike Pompeo, the CIA director at the time, also told other senior Trump administration officials after the meeting that too much information was coming out regarding the US asset in Russia.

This is not the first time national-security veterans have expressed concerns that Trump's actions could reveal sensitive information about US intelligence-gathering processes and human sources working abroad.
Late last month, the president's tweet about US military information he received during a classified intelligence briefing earlier that day immediately set off alarm bells because it included a satellite photo of an Iranian launchpad that was of a much higher resolution and better quality than the commercial satellite images of the site that were publicly available.

It also contained markers indicating that it was taken by USA-224, one of the US's most secretive spy satellites.
Intelligence veterans said the president's tweet would be a gold mine for hostile foreign powers.
"One doesn't use intel for the purposes of taunting. The Russians and the Chinese will be very happy to study this," Robert Deitz, a former top lawyer at the CIA and the National Security Agency, told Insider.
Last year, Trump also made the unusual decision to authorize the declassification of a highly controversial memo about the origins of the Russia investigation by Devin Nunes, then the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, for political purposes.

The memo and its release sparked a firestorm on Capitol Hill and within the intelligence community. Top intelligence officials met multiple times with senior White House staff to urge against releasing the document for fear that it could expose sources and methods.

The Justice Department and the FBI also took the extraordinary step of releasing statements cautioning against its release by the House Intelligence Committee without giving officials enough time to review it.

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Loose lips sink ships. Is Trump Putin's deep throat in the USA?

The First Blabbermouth has now exposed a CIA Russian asset to risk of exposure from Trump's boasting and revelation of secrets to all within earshot of Trump.

Russia, China, and Iran are sending spies to Trump rallies to record all the secrets Trump is blabber-mouthing to his howling mob.

The real question is what did Trump reveal to Putin in Helsinki when Trump confiscated the US translators's notes.

Trump has been under suspicion as a Russian agent. "FBI had opened an investigation into whether Trump was an agent for Russia in response to his controversial firing of former FBI Director James Comey. "

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting
Sonam Sheth 8h

US officials were so alarmed by President Donald Trump's decision to reveal classified intelligence to Russian officials during an Oval Office meeting in 2017 that they extracted a top-secret source from Russia shortly after, CNN reported on Monday.

Intelligence officials typically extract sources when they believe the person's life is in immediate danger.
The information Trump shared with the Russians wasn't directly connected to the source, but CNN reported that its disclosure prompted officials to "renew earlier discussions" about the potential risk that the source would be exposed.

The president has repeatedly been accused of mishandling classified information that could compromise the US's intelligence-gathering methods and put lives at risk.

The US was forced to extract a top-secret source from Russia after President Donald Trump revealed classified information to two Russian officials in 2017, CNN reported on Monday.
A person directly involved with the discussions told the outlet the US was concerned that Trump and his administration routinely mishandled classified intelligence and that their actions could expose the covert source as a spy within the Russian government.

Trump stunned the national-security apparatus and intelligence community when it surfaced that in an Oval Office meeting in May 2017 he shared the information with Sergey Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, and Sergey Kislyak, then Russia's ambassador to the US.

Trump's disclosure was not specifically about the Russian spy. But his disregard of strict intelligence-sharing rules to protect highly placed sources "prompted intelligence officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk" that the source in Russia would be exposed, CNN reported.

At the Oval Office meeting, which took place one day after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, the president is said to have boasted to the Russians that firing "nut job" Comey had taken "great pressure" off him. Comey had been spearheading the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US election.

Trump then went on to share with Lavrov and Kislyak intelligence connected to the Islamic State in Syria. The information came from Israel, which had not given the US permission to share it with the Russians because it could have compromised an Israeli source in the region.

The report said that Mike Pompeo, the CIA director at the time, also told other senior Trump administration officials after the meeting that too much information was coming out regarding the US asset in Russia.

This is not the first time national-security veterans have expressed concerns that Trump's actions could reveal sensitive information about US intelligence-gathering processes and human sources working abroad.
Late last month, the president's tweet about US military information he received during a classified intelligence briefing earlier that day immediately set off alarm bells because it included a satellite photo of an Iranian launchpad that was of a much higher resolution and better quality than the commercial satellite images of the site that were publicly available.

It also contained markers indicating that it was taken by USA-224, one of the US's most secretive spy satellites.
Intelligence veterans said the president's tweet would be a gold mine for hostile foreign powers.
"One doesn't use intel for the purposes of taunting. The Russians and the Chinese will be very happy to study this," Robert Deitz, a former top lawyer at the CIA and the National Security Agency, told Insider.
Last year, Trump also made the unusual decision to authorize the declassification of a highly controversial memo about the origins of the Russia investigation by Devin Nunes, then the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, for political purposes.

The memo and its release sparked a firestorm on Capitol Hill and within the intelligence community. Top intelligence officials met multiple times with senior White House staff to urge against releasing the document for fear that it could expose sources and methods.

The Justice Department and the FBI also took the extraordinary step of releasing statements cautioning against its release by the House Intelligence Committee without giving officials enough time to review it.

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Bramell ls like the kellyanne conway of the CIA.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

Obummer, your hero, is pootins putz, not trump.

 

[dudmuck]

Loose lips sink ships. Is Trump Putin's deep throat in the USA?

The First Blabbermouth has now exposed a CIA Russian asset to risk of exposure from Trump's boasting and revelation of secrets to all within earshot of Trump.

Russia, China, and Iran are sending spies to Trump rallies to record all the secrets Trump is blabber-mouthing to his howling mob.

The real question is what did Trump reveal to Putin in Helsinki when Trump confiscated the US translators's notes.

Trump has been under suspicion as a Russian agent. "FBI had opened an investigation into whether Trump was an agent for Russia in response to his controversial firing of former FBI Director James Comey. "

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Loose lips sink ships. Is Trump Putin's deep throat in the USA?

The First Blabbermouth has now exposed a CIA Russian asset to risk of exposure from Trump's boasting and revelation of secrets to all within earshot of Trump.

Russia, China, and Iran are sending spies to Trump rallies to record all the secrets Trump is blabber-mouthing to his howling mob.

The real question is what did Trump reveal to Putin in Helsinki when Trump confiscated the US translators's notes.

Trump has been under suspicion as a Russian agent. "FBI had opened an investigation into whether Trump was an agent for Russia in response to his controversial firing of former FBI Director James Comey. "

The US had to extract a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Bramell ls like the kellyanne conway of the CIA.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

Obummer, your hero, is pootins putz, not trump.

Obama and Putin agreed never to speak to each other.

 

[TRFjr]

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Bramell ls like the kellyanne conway of the CIA.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

Obummer, your hero, is pootins putz, not trump.

Obama and Putin agreed never to speak to each other.

 

[dudmuck]

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Bramell ls like the kellyanne conway of the CIA.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

Obummer, your hero, is pootins putz, not trump.

Obama and Putin agreed never to speak to each other.

Oh yea, it worked real well.

 

[TRFjr]

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Bramell ls like the kellyanne conway of the CIA.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

Obummer, your hero, is pootins putz, not trump.

Obama and Putin agreed never to speak to each other.

Oh yea, it worked real well.

if it worked or not is irrelevant it is the intent that counts

 

[westwall]

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin
CIA slams CNN's 'misguided' and 'simply false' reporting on alleged CIA spy's extraction from Kremlin

Aren't you tired of your fake news liberal media constantly making a fool out of you?
aren't you tired of repeatedly having to wipe egg off your face?

Fox news is referring to an article from "the failing new york times".
NYT states in the article fox refers to says:
The decision to extract the informant was driven "in part" because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence.

Seems to me, NYT is corroborating CNN.

Furthermore, the CNN reporting has been covered extensively, meaning it passes muster according to these other sources.

law and crime.
The Hill.
BBC. etc.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

ever heard of Circular Reporting? its when one news source uses another news source to verify the same anonymous source both used
just because more than one outlet write the same story doesn't mean the information came form different sources of that they corroborate each other

what makes the Fox article different and credible they used a real named source CIA Director for Public Affairs Brittany Bramell

Bramell ls like the kellyanne conway of the CIA.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

Obummer, your hero, is pootins putz, not trump.

Obama and Putin agreed never to speak to each other.

Yeah? So? Medvedev made an excellent cutout, don't you think. Only a true idiot, such as yourself, could ever think that just because they don't talk, they aren't in communication .

That's a common tactic in espionage. Morons, like you, are easily fooled.

 

[dudmuck]

Bramell ls like the kellyanne conway of the CIA.

Intelligence veterans are also corroborating.

Obummer, your hero, is pootins putz, not trump.

Obama and Putin agreed never to speak to each other.

Oh yea, it worked real well.

if it worked or not is irrelevant it is the intent that counts

The intent was what?
To have better relations with Russia?

Very different than being subservient to them.

 

[TRFjr]

Obummer, your hero, is pootins putz, not trump.

Obama and Putin agreed never to speak to each other.

Oh yea, it worked real well.

if it worked or not is irrelevant it is the intent that counts

The intent was what?
To have better relations with Russia?

Very different than being subservient to them.

the intent was to be subservient Obama just had to wait till after the election so to avoid any political consequences for doing so
so his intent wasn't just being subservient but also corrupt

 

[dudmuck]

Obama and Putin agreed never to speak to each other.

Oh yea, it worked real well.

if it worked or not is irrelevant it is the intent that counts

The intent was what?
To have better relations with Russia?

Very different than being subservient to them.

the intent was to be subservient Obama just had to wait till after the election so to avoid any political consequences for doing so
so his intent wasn't just being subservient but also corrupt

so then.. what did Obama do as favor for Russia?