Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I work hard. I take care of my finances. I plan ahead. I invest wisely.
I do all this to leave a legacy to my family when I pass.
However, when I die, the government will take 45 percent of my estate.
Can anybody defend this?
.....the transmission of enormous wealth to young men "does not do them any real service and is of great and genuine detriment to the community at large." T. Roosevelt.
Of course, the ideals and sentiments of the American people seem to have changed. Investment, inheritance and interest are now as respected as earning. What a shame.``The transmission from generation to generation of vast fortunes by will, inheritance or gift,'' declared F.D.R., ``is not consistent with the ideals and sentiments of the American people.
Jeff Weintraub: Teddy Roosevelt & Adam Smith on inheritance taxes (Susan Dunn & Sam Fleischacker)These worries about whether inheritance is justified at all have their source in a central principle of capitalist societies: the principle that social privileges should be earned, should be a reward for contribution to society, rather than handed out by government leaders or passed down by aristocratic dynasties
I work hard. I take care of my finances. I plan ahead. I invest wisely.
I do all this to leave a legacy to my family when I pass.
However, when I die, the government will take 45 percent of my estate.
Can anybody defend this?
"The evidence presented indicates that intergenerational transfers account for the vast majority of aggregate U.S. capital formation." - Obama's own top economic advisor, Larry Summers
The government will not get a dime of my money when I pass. I have and will take the proper steps to ensure this is the case.
I'm going to avoid death.
I plan on taking one thing with me when I die.
"The evidence presented indicates that intergenerational transfers account for the vast majority of aggregate U.S. capital formation." - Obama's own top economic advisor, Larry Summers
The government will not get a dime of my money when I pass. I have and will take the proper steps to ensure this is the case.
Impossible. You'll be dead and you can't do a thing about what happens next. All you can do to KNOW this is give it away before you die. If you have a dime when you die, you'll not be able to do anything about what happens to it. You'll be dead.
What a hoot. People who wish to control their money after death really expose themsleves as the control freaks they must be. You guys understand what death entails, right ? If you're worried about your stuff, you'd better do something with it while you're alive. Consume it, give it away, what ever.
I'm going to avoid death.
I plan on taking one thing with me when I die.
I plan to be creamated and my ashes poured into a vat of molten metal that will then be used to manufacture Cowbells.
"The evidence presented indicates that intergenerational transfers account for the vast majority of aggregate U.S. capital formation." - Obama's own top economic advisor, Larry Summers
A simulation model is developed to account for observed changes in mean household wealth both overall and by age cohort over the 1962–1983 period in the United States. There are three major findings. First, capital gains are the major factor explaining overall wealth changes and account for 77% of the simulated growth in wealth over the entire period. Second, for cohorts under age 40, inheritance and inter vivos transfers dominate observed changes in wealth. Indeed, the oldest age groups appear to have transferred sizable amounts of their wealth to younger generations inter vivos, raising the wealth of these younger groups substantially above what it would be based on saving. Third, while differences in portfolio composition favored the younger cohorts over this period, such differences do not explain a large portion of the great variation in real wealth changes by cohort over the two decade period.
I plan on taking one thing with me when I die.
I plan to be creamated and my ashes poured into a vat of molten metal that will then be used to manufacture Cowbells.
I don't figure on planning anything for death or afterwards. I'll be dead, you see. As much as I don't give a shit now, I care even less then. I'll be dead, you see.
"The evidence presented indicates that intergenerational transfers account for the vast majority of aggregate U.S. capital formation." - Obama's own top economic advisor, Larry Summers
Greenwood and Wolff's Changes in wealth in the United States, 19621983 appears to validate Summers and Koltikoff.
A simulation model is developed to account for observed changes in mean household wealth both overall and by age cohort over the 19621983 period in the United States. There are three major findings. First, capital gains are the major factor explaining overall wealth changes and account for 77% of the simulated growth in wealth over the entire period. Second, for cohorts under age 40, inheritance and inter vivos transfers dominate observed changes in wealth. Indeed, the oldest age groups appear to have transferred sizable amounts of their wealth to younger generations inter vivos, raising the wealth of these younger groups substantially above what it would be based on saving. Third, while differences in portfolio composition favored the younger cohorts over this period, such differences do not explain a large portion of the great variation in real wealth changes by cohort over the two decade period.
But the more important question is why you referred to Summers and Koltikoff. Do you really believe that it's so important for people to receive money that they did not earn? Does the right of a generation to equality of opportunity and its assorted benefits of increased ability to engage in the pursuit of happiness not transcend the right of a dying generation to bequeath massive amounts of wealth earned through state intervention in the primitive accumulation process and protection during the production and circulation processes? The latter won't live to see what's done with their money; what happiness can they thus derive from this?
However, when I die, the government will take 45 percent of my estate.
What a hoot. People who wish to control their money after death really expose themsleves as the control freaks they must be. You guys understand what death entails, right ? If you're worried about your stuff, you'd better do something with it while you're alive. Consume it, give it away, what ever.
You would rather the government get your money than your family?
However, when I die, the government will take 45 percent of my estate.
By estate, do you mean your Cowbell collection?
Cuz I can't imagine there's much else besides your single-wide and your collection of fancy leather suspenders.