Da GUV LIED WE DIED! 9/11 Intentional Destruction PROVEN!

LIES
you wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying.
No you are stating lies> You copy outright what others say because you have been crushed and defeated and like those other two you whine like a cry baby bitch
 
No you are stating lies> You copy outright what others say because you have been crushed and defeated and like those other two you whine like a cry baby bitch
LIES
you wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying.
 
LIES
you wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying.
Facts not lies you emulate your gay lovers perfectly

You are the proven liar and troll

You lie about this very thread. You Op has been diesproven and destroyed and you know it bitch.

you have no original material and you are a fucking liar
 
Facts not lies you emulate your gay lovers perfectly

You are the proven liar and troll

You lie about this very thread. You Op has been diesproven and destroyed and you know it bitch.

you have no original material and you are a fucking liar
LIES
you wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying.
 
LIES
you wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying.
Nope you are lying and everyone knows it.

Tiur OP has been disproven and you do nothing but repeat tired crap from others.
 
Nope you are lying and everyone knows it.

Tiur OP has been disproven and you do nothing but repeat tired crap from others.
LIES
The OP is PROVEN FACT, you wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube? Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying. Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
 
Last edited:
LIES
The OP is PROVEN FACT, you wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying.
That is a lie.

I and many others on this thread have disproven and destroyed the OP. Everyone knows it and you know it also but you are too much of a childish fool to admit the truth.

Your op is PROVEN false and that is afact YOU have been owned and you can ONLY sling shit in defeat like Angelo and LARAM do all the time

You copy others and uese the same tiuured debunked arguments obver and obver
 
LIES
The OP is PROVEN FACT, evan Gam ran for the ills! LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube? Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying. Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube

TROLL LIES!

The TRUTH: 148 posts not one flunky ass'd debunker even attempted to address the physics of wtc7 posted in the OP. 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS!
 
Last edited:
LIES
The OP is PROVEN FACT, you wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube? Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying. Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
That is a lie.

The OP has been factually and irrefiutably destroyed and disproven by Myself and many others on here.

Your entire MO has been a copy of LARAM and Angelo who can only sling shit in defeat as you are doing.

You and your gay lovers LARAM and Angelo are the only trolls and you all three tell the same lies consistently
 
LIES
The OP is PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here.

We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube

Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying

SOUPLINE NAZI = TROLLING LIAR!

The TRUTH: 150 posts not one flunky ass'd debunker even attempted to address the physics of wtc7 posted in the OP. 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS!
 
LIES
The OP is PROVEN FACT, evan Gam ran for the ills! LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here. We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube? Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying. Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube

TROLL LIES!

The TRUTH: 148 posts not one flunky ass'd debunker even attempted to address the physics of wtc7 posted in the OP. 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS!
That is a bald faced and cowardly lie. No one ran at all your OP has been disproven and crushed by factual evidence

The op was more than challenged it was proven false scientifically

You are worthless copy cat repeatign debunked lies from your lovers LARAM and Angelo

Everything I post is factually true and everyone knows it even you
 
WOW! Just look at all Nazis BUTTHURT!

LIES

The OP is PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here.

We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube

Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying

SOUPLINE NAZI = TROLLING LIAR!

The TRUTH: 150 posts not one flunky ass'd debunker even attempted to address the physics of wtc7 posted in the OP. 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS!
 
WOW! JUst look at all Nazis BUTTHURT!

LIES

The OP is PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here.

We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube

Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying

SOUPLINE NAZI = TROLLING LIAR!

The TRUTH: 150 posts not one flunky ass'd debunker even attempted to address the physics of wtc7 posted in the OP. 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS!
No one ran.

The op is proven false and you are denying that fact but you know it is true.

You are the king troll and liar who copied your posts from Angelo and lARAM your faggot lovers.
 
NIST claim, Failure of Columns 76 to 81, this is how the building would have fell if that were true!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif











tE54mlb.jpeg

N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”



WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.



After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition




WOW! Just look at all Nazis BUTTHURT!

LIES

The OP is PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here.

We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube

Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying

SOUPLINE NAZI = TROLLING LIAR!

The TRUTH: 150 posts not one flunky ass'd debunker even attempted to address the physics of wtc7 posted in the OP. 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS!

Debunked and disproven.

The resumption is that the towers had to fall according to the model

This has bveeb
NIST claim, Failure of Columns 76 to 81, this is how the building would have fell if that were true!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif











tE54mlb.jpeg

N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”



WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.



After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition




WOW! Just look at all Nazis BUTTHURT!

LIES

The OP is PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here.

We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube

Thats all you are good for is trolling and lying

SOUPLINE NAZI = TROLLING LIAR!

The TRUTH: 150 posts not one flunky ass'd debunker even attempted to address the physics of wtc7 posted in the OP. 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS!

Wrong

Sorry but you are a proven liar.

These models and studies have veen disproven by many on here including me

They come from AR911 truth which is a worthless fraudulent organization.

The models state a false hood which is that the towers had to fall according to a prediction which is a fallacy.

you lose troll you are defeated and your OP disproven
 
WOW! Just look Nazi is BUTTHURT TROLLING LIAR!
TRUTH:
155 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP! 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! WAITING!

NIST LIED WTC7 = FORENSIC PROVEN DEMOLITION! LOOK!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif









https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf
tE54mlb.jpeg
N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into

www.nist.gov
www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition



WOW! Just look at all Nazis BUTTHURT!

LIES

The OP is PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here.

We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
That is a proven lie as everyone knows.

Your op has been disproven and you are a lying trolling windbag
 
WOW! Just look THE NAZI IS A BUTTHURT TROLLING LIAR!
TRUTH:
155 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP! 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! WAITING!

NIST LIED WTC7 = FORENSIC PROVEN DEMOLITION! LOOK!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif









https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf
tE54mlb.jpeg
N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into

www.nist.gov
www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition



WOW! Just look at all Nazis BUTTHURT!

LIES

The OP is PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here.

We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
You are stating baldfaced lies.

The fact si I and many others here have disproven and crushed your OP

The OP is proven false and everyone knows it
 
WOW! Just look THE NAZI IS BUTTHURT TROLLING LIAR!
TRUTH:
161 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP! 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! WAITING!

NIST LIED WTC7 = FORENSIC PROVEN DEMOLITION! LOOK!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif









https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf
tE54mlb.jpeg
N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into

www.nist.gov
www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition



WOW! Just look at all Nazis BUTTHURT!

LIES

The OP is PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on

WOW! Just look THE NAZI IS BUTTHURT TROLLING LIAR!
TRUTH:
161 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP! 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! WAITING!

NIST LIED WTC7 = FORENSIC PROVEN DEMOLITION! LOOK!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif









https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf
tE54mlb.jpeg
N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into

www.nist.gov
www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition



WOW! Just look at all Nazis BUTTHURT!

LIES

The OP is PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here.

We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
The op has been disproven and you know it.

I and many others have shredded it with facts.

you have failed and are a proven liar in denial of fact
 
WOW! Just look THE NAZI IS BUTTHURT TROLLING LIAR!
TRUTH:
162 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP! 2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! WAITING!

NIST LIED! FEA FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!


Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif

https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf
tE54mlb.jpeg
N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into

www.nist.gov

www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition



WOW! Just look at all Nazis BUTTHURT!

LIES

The OP is a PROVEN FACT, even Gam ran for the hills!

LIES You wont find anything I said anywhere on the net but from yours truly right here.

We get it, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
You are not waiting.

your OP has been disproven with facts and hyou know it

No one ran and you have been proven a liar and a fool
 
WOW! LOOK AT NAZI THE FELCHING BUTT HURT LYING TROLL!
164 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP!
2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! GETTING GRAY WAITING HERE!

NIST LIED! FEA+FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!
Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif


https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf

tE54mlb.jpeg


N7R3s00.jpeg


4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into


www.nist.gov


www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

We get it nazi, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
No flunky addressed it because many including me simply proved it a fallacy.

Your OP has been disproven and you know it
 

Forum List

Back
Top