Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There's evidence. Of course the FBI will say it's out of the chain of custody so they can't prove anything came from Ground Zero....etc...... nobody's giving anything away yet.Thanks for confessing there was no evidence of explosives or thermite.
Not this shit again...
Fake Science <> NIST ScienceOh this one?
its the one that destroys the NIST fraud, you like that huh
so you couldnt find any thermite or explosives huh
lets see the data from your investigation
I need proof that you know wtf you are doing
of course demanding proof from deflunky deblunderers is always demented, how dare me!You're beyond demented. In reality, it took 14 seconds for building 7 to collapse.
you already posted it, not my problem if you arent brite enough to know how to analyze it.Sure, as soon as you post evidence that the antenna on the north tower started falling before the roof.....
candy you lil troll, who did you bribe to let you on this site?Just wait...it gets worse.
He insists that the planes that crashed didn't crash because he says someone didn't jot down a serial number from the wreckage when they found it or some bullshit like that.
only the truly uninformed believes the crap deblunders are posting.WHO THE FUCK BELIEVES THIS CRAP and ASSOCIATES.
It hurts my reputation of being aJust wait...it gets worse.
He insists that the planes that crashed didn't crash because he says someone didn't jot down a serial number from the wreckage when they found it or some bullshit like that.
"of course demanding proof from deflunky deblunderers is always demented, how dare me!"of course demanding proof from deflunky deblunderers is always demented, how dare me!
you already posted it, not my problem if you arent brite enough to know how to analyze it.
candy you lil troll, who did you bribe to let you on this site?
Yeh thats standard roe, sorry
only the truly uninformed believes the crap deblunders are posting.
I know this is a real stretch, but in fairness I will at least ask.
Anyone here smart enough to challenge the forensic analysis proving the demolition of wtc7?
The Forensic Reevaluation of World Trade Center 7 Collapse
https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf
Not too brite eh? Flunked English I see.What I posted shows the antenna falling with the roof, not before it.
FAIL. Like all the other flunky deblunderersI posted the proof.
So? Who cares you said that? You see things that aren't there as it didn't. That's evident in the video I posted as well as in the frames Gamolon posted. You're welcome to continue lying but no one is obligated to accept your lies.Not too brite eh? Flunked English I see.
I said the antenna dropped about 6" BEFORE the roof moved.
FAIL. Like all the other flunky deblunderers
You SAID!?I said the antenna dropped about 6" BEFORE the roof moved.
I have slomo, obviously you dont!You see things that aren't there as it didn't.
projecting againYou're welcome to continue lying but no one is obligated to accept your lies.
faun posted it for meWhat you say means NOTHING without supporting evidence.
you wouldnt need slo mo to see that gam, still dodging the wtc7 demolition eh?I mean really Koko. I could say you have three heads, six arms, and a fat ass and that the proof is out there on the internet for people to find.
Not at all.still dodging the wtc7 demolition eh?
LOLOLI have slomo, obviously you dont!
projecting again
faun posted it for me
you wouldnt need slo mo to see that gam, still dodging the wtc7 demolition eh?
Does that now make you KokoSlomomoJojo?I have slomo, obviously you dont!
its easy to know its a lie when its not quotedNot at all.
To borrow some from your debate tactics...
"Your full of crap, I addressed this before, it's all on the internet, I'm not wasting my time repeating myself."
Sound familiar? It should as it's taken straight from you.
dementia is when you pretend you can see sync of fast moving objects in realtime.LOLOL
It's adorable how you think a video which shows the antenna falling in synch with the roof is evidence it began falling first. You clearly suffer from dementia.
yep I slomo everything, thats why Im so smart and taught you everything you know about freefall lolDoes that now make you KokoSlomomoJojo?
Dumbfuck, that's what slow motion is for.dementia is when you pretend you can see sync of fast moving objects in realtime.
glad to see you agree with me and by doing so admit its you with dementiaDumbfuck, that's what slow motion is for.
There is no evidence.There's evidence. Of course the FBI will say it's out of the chain of custody so they can't prove anything came from Ground Zero....etc...... nobody's giving anything away yet.
Keep digging boys.
Once again none of this proves intentional demolition.of course demanding proof from deflunky deblunderers is always demented, how dare me!
you already posted it, not my problem if you arent brite enough to know how to analyze it.
candy you lil troll, who did you bribe to let you on this site?
Yeh thats standard roe, sorry
only the truly uninformed believes the crap deblunders are posting.
I know this is a real stretch, but in fairness I will at least ask.
Anyone here smart enough to challenge the forensic analysis proving the demolition of wtc7?
The Forensic Reevaluation of World Trade Center 7 Collapse
https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf
There must be at least some visual evidence, since much of it was recorded on video( and audio) otherwise thousands of architects, engineers, construction and demolition experts wouldn't all agree that the NIST conclusions are fictional at best.There is no evidence.
You have never posted any and neither has the moron Koko
There are no such thousands of experts who agree.There must be at least some visual evidence, since much of it was recorded on video( and audio) otherwise thousands of architects, engineers, construction and demolition experts wouldn't all agree that the NIST conclusions are fictional at best.
