COVID19 Deaths Down about 20% from a Few Days Ago

China with 1.4 Billion people has approx. 81,000 infected and 3400 deaths (virus under control).
US with only a quarter of the population has approx 340,000 infected and over 10,000 deaths (virus running rampant).
This is how incompetent Trump is and how much Trump is devastating America.

When comparing numbers to China, all the Trumpers cry fake numbers. This is what we know: China has the virus under control in their country or else they wouldn't be sending out fleets of doctors and supplies to help hundreds of countries. And we know in the U.S. the virus is running rampant
Fun fact: China reported zero deaths at Tienimen Square.
 
China with 1.4 Billion people has approx. 81,000 infected and 3400 deaths (virus under control).
US with only a quarter of the population has approx 340,000 infected and over 10,000 deaths (virus running rampant).
This is how incompetent Trump is and how much Trump is devastating America.

When comparing numbers to China, all the Trumpers cry fake numbers. This is what we know: China has the virus under control in their country or else they wouldn't be sending out fleets of doctors and supplies to help hundreds of countries. And we know in the U.S. the virus is running rampant
Fun fact: China reported zero deaths at Tienimen Square.
What? People died there at Tienamen Square?

Thats not what their journalists say.

:D
 
Are we finally seeing a 'flattening of the curve?
I think we may. Rates have been holding steady and not rising higher the past week.

View attachment 319769

Damn. This could be a real problem. If things flatten out and we don't see the apocalyptic rates the Democrats hoped for, they will have to scramble fast looking for a new excuse for keeping Senile Joe off the front pages away from the TV cameras.

They may just shuffle him off to the back room while dragging Cuomo into the "hero" spotlight.
 
Are we finally seeing a 'flattening of the curve?
I think we may. Rates have been holding steady and not rising higher the past week.

View attachment 319769

Damn. This could be a real problem. If things flatten out and we don't see the apocalyptic rates the Democrats hoped for, they will have to scramble fast looking for a new excuse for keeping Senile Joe off the front pages away from the TV cameras.
Now you trust the numbers??

Cool...welcome to the rest of the world...
 
Are we finally seeing a 'flattening of the curve?
I think we may. Rates have been holding steady and not rising higher the past week.

View attachment 319769

Damn. This could be a real problem. If things flatten out and we don't see the apocalyptic rates the Democrats hoped for, they will have to scramble fast looking for a new excuse for keeping Senile Joe off the front pages away from the TV cameras.

They may just shuffle him off to the back room while dragging Cuomo into the "hero" spotlight.
1586290012081.png
 
What we are likely seeing is a failure of the models.....causing an over reaction to the virus......pushed by the democrats to get the economy into a shutdown to effect Trump's chances in the next election....


According to these numbers, we appear to be dealing with a viral infection that, as far as its deadliness is concerned, lies within the range of previous years' flu epidemics, apparently with a more aggressive respiratory profile than we are used to, but not with exceptionally high mortality. Yet neither in Sweden nor anywhere else did the seasonal flu epidemics of past years, with mortality ratios comparable to the current pandemic, lead to lockdowns or other drastic measures.

------

Government policy influenced by models whose predictions can change by a factor of 25 from one day to the next is a reality that is most uncomfortable to contemplate. The fact that predictions from such fickle models find their way into government policy affecting the lives and livelihoods of millions is ominous. While the coronavirus is the current focus of expert advice regarding massive government intervention in the lives of citizens, it was but a few months ago that hardly a day went by without calls being issued for drastic governmental measures to avert a climate catastrophe claimed to threaten us on the basis of models that climatologists such as MIT's Richard Lindzen regard as woefully incomplete.


Idiots probably used the climate change doom and gloom models and then tweaked them for the China Virus.
 
"I think part of the importance of getting the American public’s attention that these models did, we really need the American public to be fully engaged now with great rigor and vigilance on the social distancing. As you pointed out, those models that were done, they assume only about 50 percent of the American public would pay attention to the recommendations. In fact, what we’re seeing is a large majority of the American public are taking the social distancing recommendations to heart. And I think that’s the direct consequence of why you’re seeing the numbers are going to be much, much, much lower than would have been predicted by the models. "
 

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro warned in a late January memo the coronavirus could cost the United States trillions without a travel ban on China.

Navarro called for an immediate travel ban on China in the memo, dated January 29, that predicted a coronavirus pandemic would cost the United States over $3.8 trillion.
 

The number of people hospitalized across the United States as a result of the novel coronavirus illness (COVID-19) is reportedly only a fraction of what some health experts projected a few days ago.

On Monday, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo told reporters that in his state alone, the epicenter of the viral outbreak in the United States, new coronavirus hospitalizations dropped by about 75 percent, from 1,427 four days ago to 358 on Sunday.
 
Are we finally seeing a 'flattening of the curve? This is from April 4, the second is from April 3rd, a 13% drop in a couple of days.

View attachment 319765

View attachment 319766

HORSE SHIT.

Worldometer updates CONTINUOUSLY through the day with the exception of China, which updates once a day. If you want to make any "new" number look bigger or smaller all you have to do is paste the table at the beginning or end of the reporting day, which turns at 00h00 UTC (EDT plus 4 hours).

For instance, right now it says:

Search:

Country,
Other
Total
Cases
New
Cases
Total
Deaths
New
Deaths
Total
Recovered
Active
Cases
Serious,
Critical
Tot Cases/
1M pop
Deaths/
1M pop
Total
Tests
Tests/
1M pop
World1,425,032+78,99681,932+7,278301,7711,041,32947,91218310.5
USA395,277+28,27312,784+1,91321,674360,8199,1691,194392,064,4216,237


That look like a 'decrease' to you?

Don't sit on this board and try to sell bullshit --- you WILL be called on it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top