COVID is just like the flu.

What defines the virus being under control? We can’t say this thread is doing scientific discourse: there are at least two separate populations of COVID-19. The one in nature and the one occurring in Homo sapiens. C-19’s biology in farmed minks can’t be scientifically or credibly included in the discourse about either population. The same goes for these time-windows purported on this thread: ‘6-12 hours’, but that’s a replication time-window in a non-natural host and is biased for only one of the COVID-19 populations. Variants (specific groups of mutations) are also occurring in both C-19 populations, not just one of them.
 
Of course you can deliberately infect millions with the same virus strain at about the same time, if you want.
Its called variolation.
And ancient tried and true method to achieve herd immunity as quickly as possible.
The advantage is that you can then pick only healthy volunteers who are likely to survive, thus protecting the elderly and weak who would be much more likely to die.

I really don't think you understand what variolation is.
It was only used, briefly, for smallpox.
It is giving actual smallpox from a human (a mild case is chosen) to others (Martha Washington held a smallpox party, like people used to host chickenpox parties in the '50s, but that was just to spread it by air and that is not variolation).
They puncture a smallpox lesion on the active case and inoculate it by scratching the skin open on the HAND or lower arm, so it doesn't take hold as bad centrally. Mortality is about 2%. Since smallpox mortality is naturally at best around 30% and can be much worse, variolation was viewed as better than natural spread. It was quite controversial and the vaccine a little later was MUCH less lethal than that.

It's not true that variolation can be used for millions! They needed an active (and willing) case and it could only be spread to the people right there, usually families or soldiers. It was a live transmission, obviously. Mild case and inoculated on the hand or lower arm, those were the secrets to it not being as bad as the actual natural contagion.

ONLY smallpox, Rigby: variolation does not apply to ANY other disease, and is no longer used. Well, because smallpox is extinct, for now. I do think you should look these things up before posting about them.
 
What defines the virus being under control? We can’t say this thread is doing scientific discourse: there are at least two separate populations of COVID-19. The one in nature and the one occurring in Homo sapiens. C-19’s biology in farmed minks can’t be scientifically or credibly included in the discourse about either population. The same goes for these time-windows purported on this thread: ‘6-12 hours’, but that’s a replication time-window in a non-natural host and is biased for only one of the COVID-19 populations. Variants (specific groups of mutations) are also occurring in both C-19 populations, not just one of them.
The term "under control in regard to an epidemic means different things to different people. The general public considers and epidemic under control when they feel confident about going about their daily lives with no fear of infection to themselves, family, and friends. Epidemiologists define an epidemic as being under control when the percent of positive tests are minimized, usually less than 4% or 5%. About half the states in the US are now testing under 5%.

Once we have an epidemic as large as covid-19, it is nearly impossible to eliminate all of the virus. The Spanish Flu, caused by the H1N1 virus is still with us. It is just one of many types of flu today.
 
I want to remind everyone that Germ "Theory" is just a theory because it hasn't been proven. But the big pharma medical cartel uses the theory to make trillions on un-informed and indoctrinated people.
 
What defines the virus being under control? We can’t say this thread is doing scientific discourse: there are at least two separate populations of COVID-19. The one in nature and the one occurring in Homo sapiens. C-19’s biology in farmed minks can’t be scientifically or credibly included in the discourse about either population. The same goes for these time-windows purported on this thread: ‘6-12 hours’, but that’s a replication time-window in a non-natural host and is biased for only one of the COVID-19 populations. Variants (specific groups of mutations) are also occurring in both C-19 populations, not just one of them.
The term "under control in regard to an epidemic means different things to different people. The general public considers and epidemic under control when they feel confident about going about their daily lives with no fear of infection to themselves, family, and friends. Epidemiologists define an epidemic as being under control when the percent of positive tests are minimized, usually less than 4% or 5%. About half the states in the US are now testing under 5%.

Once we have an epidemic as large as covid-19, it is nearly impossible to eliminate all of the virus. The Spanish Flu, caused by the H1N1 virus is still with us. It is just one of many types of flu today.

The epidemic has been fear brought to you by the MSM on an illness that has not been proven to be a virus that 99% of the people survive.
 
I want to remind everyone that Germ "Theory" is just a theory because it hasn't been proven. But the big pharma medical cartel uses the theory to make trillions on un-informed and indoctrinated people.
How many times are we to hear a "Theory" is just a theory because it hasn't been proven. In science, there is no higher acceptance level than a scientific theory. Every scientific theory is open to debate. In a court of law, a jury or judge may determines when something has been proved. The gavel is banged and it is law. That does not happen in science today. The last step in the scientific method that leads to a theory is not a statement declaring proof but a statement of the theory which is always open for debate and change. The only proof in science are mathematical proofs.

There was a time when a scientific theory was proved or disproved. It was called the dark ages when secular or religious authorizes made that decision and that decision was not open to debate.
 
Last edited:
What defines the virus being under control? We can’t say this thread is doing scientific discourse: there are at least two separate populations of COVID-19. The one in nature and the one occurring in Homo sapiens. C-19’s biology in farmed minks can’t be scientifically or credibly included in the discourse about either population. The same goes for these time-windows purported on this thread: ‘6-12 hours’, but that’s a replication time-window in a non-natural host and is biased for only one of the COVID-19 populations. Variants (specific groups of mutations) are also occurring in both C-19 populations, not just one of them.
The term "under control in regard to an epidemic means different things to different people. The general public considers and epidemic under control when they feel confident about going about their daily lives with no fear of infection to themselves, family, and friends. Epidemiologists define an epidemic as being under control when the percent of positive tests are minimized, usually less than 4% or 5%. About half the states in the US are now testing under 5%.

Once we have an epidemic as large as covid-19, it is nearly impossible to eliminate all of the virus. The Spanish Flu, caused by the H1N1 virus is still with us. It is just one of many types of flu today.

The epidemic has been fear brought to you by the MSM on an illness that has not been proven to be a virus that 99% of the people survive.
Fear is always present in an epidemic with or without the news media. It can be good if it persuades people to follow the rules to prevent the spread or it can be bad if it convinces the public that nothing can be done to stop the spread.

Back in 1918, there were we two major events in the US, WWI, and the Spanish Influenza. The scientist didn't know that it was caused by an airborne virus. In fact, they did know what caused it. They had evidence that it was spread person to person so the only advice they offered the government was quarantine. The administration was not about shut the country down in a time of war so they pressured the newspapers to suppress stories about the epidemic threatening them with sedition. In fact, the goverment turned the epidemic into a political issue, declaring that staying at home from work with the croup was unpatriotic. People who died at work in defense plants were hailed as heroes. The government circulated rumors that the flu came from Huns in Spain and also that scientists believed it was hereditary and nothing could done to stop it. There were 675,000 reported deaths in the US and estimated 30 million cases. Assuming herd immunity at 75% and if the populations size were that of the US today, the number of deaths would have been around 5 million and 225 million cases.
 
Last edited:
I want to remind everyone that Germ "Theory" is just a theory because it hasn't been proven. But the big pharma medical cartel uses the theory to make trillions on un-informed and indoctrinated people.
How many times are we to hear a "Theory" is just a theory because it hasn't been proven. In science, there is no higher acceptance level than a scientific theory. Every scientific theory is open to debate. In a court of law, a jury or judge may determines when something has been proved. The gavel is banged and it is law. That does not happen in science today. The last step in the scientific method that leads to a theory is not a statement declaring proof but a statement of the theory which is always open for debate and change. The only proof in science are mathematical proofs.

There was a time when a scientific theory was proved or disproved. It was called the dark ages when secular or religious authorizes made that decision and that decision was not open to debate.

If you trust putting an experimental injection in you not even cleared by the FDA then that is beyond being an idiot.
 
What defines the virus being under control? We can’t say this thread is doing scientific discourse: there are at least two separate populations of COVID-19. The one in nature and the one occurring in Homo sapiens. C-19’s biology in farmed minks can’t be scientifically or credibly included in the discourse about either population. The same goes for these time-windows purported on this thread: ‘6-12 hours’, but that’s a replication time-window in a non-natural host and is biased for only one of the COVID-19 populations. Variants (specific groups of mutations) are also occurring in both C-19 populations, not just one of them.
The term "under control in regard to an epidemic means different things to different people. The general public considers and epidemic under control when they feel confident about going about their daily lives with no fear of infection to themselves, family, and friends. Epidemiologists define an epidemic as being under control when the percent of positive tests are minimized, usually less than 4% or 5%. About half the states in the US are now testing under 5%.

Once we have an epidemic as large as covid-19, it is nearly impossible to eliminate all of the virus. The Spanish Flu, caused by the H1N1 virus is still with us. It is just one of many types of flu today.

The epidemic has been fear brought to you by the MSM on an illness that has not been proven to be a virus that 99% of the people survive.
Fear is always present in an epidemic with or without the news media. It can be good if it persuades people to follow the rules to prevent the spread or it can be bad if it convinces the public that nothing can be done to stop the spread.

Back in 1918, there were we two major events in the US, WWI, and the Spanish Influenza. The scientist didn't know that it was caused by an airborne virus. In fact, they did know what caused it. They had evidence that it was spread person to person so the only advice they offered the government was quarantine. The administration was not about shut the country down in a time of war so they pressured the newspapers to suppress stories about the epidemic threatening them with sedition. In fact, the goverment turned the epidemic into a political issue, declaring that staying at home from work with the croup was unpatriotic. People who died at work in defense plants were hailed as heroes. The government circulated rumors that the flu came from Huns in Spain and also that scientists believed it was hereditary and nothing could done to stop it. There were 675,000 reported deaths in the US and estimated 30 million cases. Assuming herd immunity at 75% and if the populations size were that of the US today, the number of deaths would have been around 5 million and 225 million cases.

The fact is Germ Theory is a theory because it can't be proven and in fact has been proven to be a fraud. The only reason the theory is so popular is because big pharma makes trillions off of it. That don't make it a good theory at all but their is good money on the fraud. People love to live a life of illusions and love to believe in lies and falsehoods. I am not one of those people as yourself.
 
I want to remind everyone that Germ "Theory" is just a theory because it hasn't been proven. But the big pharma medical cartel uses the theory to make trillions on un-informed and indoctrinated people.
How many times are we to hear a "Theory" is just a theory because it hasn't been proven. In science, there is no higher acceptance level than a scientific theory. Every scientific theory is open to debate. In a court of law, a jury or judge may determines when something has been proved. The gavel is banged and it is law. That does not happen in science today. The last step in the scientific method that leads to a theory is not a statement declaring proof but a statement of the theory which is always open for debate and change. The only proof in science are mathematical proofs.

There was a time when a scientific theory was proved or disproved. It was called the dark ages when secular or religious authorizes made that decision and that decision was not open to debate.

If you trust putting an experimental injection in you not even cleared by the FDA then that is beyond being an idiot.
An experimental vaccine is one that is laboratory tests. Every vaccine in use today has successful passed through lab tests and clinical trials with tens of thousands of participates.

Over 167 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through April 5, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 2,794 reports of death (0.00167%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA physicians review each case report of death as soon as notified and CDC requests medical records to further assess reports. A review of available clinical information including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records revealed no evidence that vaccination contributed to a single patient's deaths. Compared to previous vaccines, the Covid-19 vaccines are on course to be safest vaccines every produced.
COVID-19 Vaccination
 
What defines the virus being under control? We can’t say this thread is doing scientific discourse: there are at least two separate populations of COVID-19. The one in nature and the one occurring in Homo sapiens. C-19’s biology in farmed minks can’t be scientifically or credibly included in the discourse about either population. The same goes for these time-windows purported on this thread: ‘6-12 hours’, but that’s a replication time-window in a non-natural host and is biased for only one of the COVID-19 populations. Variants (specific groups of mutations) are also occurring in both C-19 populations, not just one of them.
The term "under control in regard to an epidemic means different things to different people. The general public considers and epidemic under control when they feel confident about going about their daily lives with no fear of infection to themselves, family, and friends. Epidemiologists define an epidemic as being under control when the percent of positive tests are minimized, usually less than 4% or 5%. About half the states in the US are now testing under 5%.

Once we have an epidemic as large as covid-19, it is nearly impossible to eliminate all of the virus. The Spanish Flu, caused by the H1N1 virus is still with us. It is just one of many types of flu today.

The epidemic has been fear brought to you by the MSM on an illness that has not been proven to be a virus that 99% of the people survive.
Fear is always present in an epidemic with or without the news media. It can be good if it persuades people to follow the rules to prevent the spread or it can be bad if it convinces the public that nothing can be done to stop the spread.

Back in 1918, there were we two major events in the US, WWI, and the Spanish Influenza. The scientist didn't know that it was caused by an airborne virus. In fact, they did know what caused it. They had evidence that it was spread person to person so the only advice they offered the government was quarantine. The administration was not about shut the country down in a time of war so they pressured the newspapers to suppress stories about the epidemic threatening them with sedition. In fact, the goverment turned the epidemic into a political issue, declaring that staying at home from work with the croup was unpatriotic. People who died at work in defense plants were hailed as heroes. The government circulated rumors that the flu came from Huns in Spain and also that scientists believed it was hereditary and nothing could done to stop it. There were 675,000 reported deaths in the US and estimated 30 million cases. Assuming herd immunity at 75% and if the populations size were that of the US today, the number of deaths would have been around 5 million and 225 million cases.

The fact is Germ Theory is a theory because it can't be proven and in fact has been proven to be a fraud. The only reason the theory is so popular is because big pharma makes trillions off of it. That don't make it a good theory at all but their is good money on the fraud. People love to live a life of illusions and love to believe in lies and falsehoods. I am not one of those people as yourself.
Where in world do you come up such nonsense.
There has probably been more proof of Germ Theory than any scientific theory. Italian Agostino Bassi was the first person to prove that a disease was caused by a microorganism when he conducted a series of experiments between 1808 and 1813, demonstrating that a "vegetable parasite" caused a disease in silkworms known as calcinaccio which was devastating the French silk industry at the time. The greatest proof of germ theory is it's application in preventing and treating the spread of diseases. Germ Theory provided the foundation for disease prevention and treatment for over 150 years. From develop of simple antiseptics, treatment of waste water, developments antibiotics, and antivirals are all based on the simple concept of Germ theory that certain diseases are caused by the invasion of the body by microorganisms.
 
Remember when that was one of the WH talking points in the early stages of the pandemic? No reason to panic. COVID will go away when the weather gets warm. It's all under control.

Turns out, they were wrong..........in too many ways to discuss. One of the more demonstrably provable things they were wrong about was the comparison to the flu.

[IMG]

We wiped out the flu this year. Could we do it again?

That's what happens to influenza type viruses when people wear masks and practice social distancing. Unfortunately, COVID is a highly transmissible virus. More so than the regular flu.

The point being the COVID protocols dismissed as ineffective, infringements on freedom, a waste of time by conservatives.........they work. And if we had not implemented them, if we had not locked down the economy for a while, the infection rate and death toll would be far worse than it is.
h8wozmkeyf571.jpg
 
Remember when that was one of the WH talking points in the early stages of the pandemic? No reason to panic. COVID will go away when the weather gets warm. It's all under control.

Turns out, they were wrong..........in too many ways to discuss. One of the more demonstrably provable things they were wrong about was the comparison to the flu.

[IMG]

We wiped out the flu this year. Could we do it again?

That's what happens to influenza type viruses when people wear masks and practice social distancing. Unfortunately, COVID is a highly transmissible virus. More so than the regular flu.

The point being the COVID protocols dismissed as ineffective, infringements on freedom, a waste of time by conservatives.........they work. And if we had not implemented them, if we had not locked down the economy for a while, the infection rate and death toll would be far worse than it is.
h8wozmkeyf571.jpg
If you cared about peoples rights that meme might have some meaning. But you don't, so it it is just more crap coming from you. Same shit, different day.
 
What defines the virus being under control? We can’t say this thread is doing scientific discourse: there are at least two separate populations of COVID-19. The one in nature and the one occurring in Homo sapiens. C-19’s biology in farmed minks can’t be scientifically or credibly included in the discourse about either population. The same goes for these time-windows purported on this thread: ‘6-12 hours’, but that’s a replication time-window in a non-natural host and is biased for only one of the COVID-19 populations. Variants (specific groups of mutations) are also occurring in both C-19 populations, not just one of them.
The term "under control in regard to an epidemic means different things to different people. The general public considers and epidemic under control when they feel confident about going about their daily lives with no fear of infection to themselves, family, and friends. Epidemiologists define an epidemic as being under control when the percent of positive tests are minimized, usually less than 4% or 5%. About half the states in the US are now testing under 5%.

Once we have an epidemic as large as covid-19, it is nearly impossible to eliminate all of the virus. The Spanish Flu, caused by the H1N1 virus is still with us. It is just one of many types of flu today.

The epidemic has been fear brought to you by the MSM on an illness that has not been proven to be a virus that 99% of the people survive.
Fear is always present in an epidemic with or without the news media. It can be good if it persuades people to follow the rules to prevent the spread or it can be bad if it convinces the public that nothing can be done to stop the spread.

Back in 1918, there were we two major events in the US, WWI, and the Spanish Influenza. The scientist didn't know that it was caused by an airborne virus. In fact, they did know what caused it. They had evidence that it was spread person to person so the only advice they offered the government was quarantine. The administration was not about shut the country down in a time of war so they pressured the newspapers to suppress stories about the epidemic threatening them with sedition. In fact, the goverment turned the epidemic into a political issue, declaring that staying at home from work with the croup was unpatriotic. People who died at work in defense plants were hailed as heroes. The government circulated rumors that the flu came from Huns in Spain and also that scientists believed it was hereditary and nothing could done to stop it. There were 675,000 reported deaths in the US and estimated 30 million cases. Assuming herd immunity at 75% and if the populations size were that of the US today, the number of deaths would have been around 5 million and 225 million cases.

The fact is Germ Theory is a theory because it can't be proven and in fact has been proven to be a fraud. The only reason the theory is so popular is because big pharma makes trillions off of it. That don't make it a good theory at all but their is good money on the fraud. People love to live a life of illusions and love to believe in lies and falsehoods. I am not one of those people as yourself.
You don’t believe in Germ Theory?

Fine. Next time you get a cut, smear a big slab of feces on it and see what happens
 
An intelligent person knows snot rags had nothing to do with flu "disappearing"

Here is what happened in 2009 with another pandemic, no masks, no social distancing and the flu vanished somehow

 
Remember when that was one of the WH talking points in the early stages of the pandemic? No reason to panic. COVID will go away when the weather gets warm. It's all under control.

Turns out, they were wrong..........in too many ways to discuss. One of the more demonstrably provable things they were wrong about was the comparison to the flu.

[IMG]

We wiped out the flu this year. Could we do it again?

That's what happens to influenza type viruses when people wear masks and practice social distancing. Unfortunately, COVID is a highly transmissible virus. More so than the regular flu.

The point being the COVID protocols dismissed as ineffective, infringements on freedom, a waste of time by conservatives.........they work. And if we had not implemented them, if we had not locked down the economy for a while, the infection rate and death toll would be far worse than it is.
Both the flu and COVID-19 are viral respiratory infections and spread in similar ways. The small number of flu cases over the last year are easily explained. The same preventive measures, mask wearing, social distancing, hand washing, and quarantining are effective at preventing both.

There are a number of major differences. The average number deaths from the Flu in the US average about 50,000 a year. The first year of Covid-19 killed about ten times that in US, 500,000. Generally Flu last only 3 to 7 days and in rare cases can last several weeks if pneumonia sets in. Covid cases that are symptomatic generally last about same period. Where they different is the period serious cases last, often a month or more. Also, Covid-19 can have long term side effects that can last months. And finally, Covid-19 vaccines have proven to be more effective that the Flu vaccines.
 
Numerous studies show masks do nothing for the flu. What happened was the flu was lumped into CLI'S. Corona like illnesses and little or no testing was done for the flu. Healthcare facilities got a boatload more money for calling any flu-like illness corona so naturally corona went up, flu down

 
Remember when that was one of the WH talking points in the early stages of the pandemic? No reason to panic. COVID will go away when the weather gets warm. It's all under control.

Turns out, they were wrong..........in too many ways to discuss. One of the more demonstrably provable things they were wrong about was the comparison to the flu.

[IMG]

We wiped out the flu this year. Could we do it again?

That's what happens to influenza type viruses when people wear masks and practice social distancing. Unfortunately, COVID is a highly transmissible virus. More so than the regular flu.

The point being the COVID protocols dismissed as ineffective, infringements on freedom, a waste of time by conservatives.........they work. And if we had not implemented them, if we had not locked down the economy for a while, the infection rate and death toll would be far worse than it is.
It turns out everyone was wrong about Covid. We heard something every day. The only consistent thing was be very afraid. A 99.7% survival rate is not a killer disease.
In the early stages of the epidemic in January and February, people were making educated and uneducated guesses because there was not enough good data. By April medical science had a good idea of what we were facing and how reduce the spread. It was the White House that was making claims that the virus would just go away by summer, by fall, and by election day. There was an election to be won and Covid-19 was a threat so it was downplayed which made preventing the spread more difficult.

Except slowing the infection spread rate is what prevents the epidemic from ending, and that eventually accumulated a much LARGER total death amount.
Herd immunity is what ends all epidemics normally, but herd immunity can't end any epidemic if you are "flattening the curve", and in effect conserving hosts for the virus to it can't die out.
Herd immunity was the way epidemics ended before modern medicine but that does not mean it is desirable today.

There two ways to end an epidemic.

1. Allow nature to run it's course with no need for masks, social distancing, or vaccines. Once enough people develop an immunity by becoming infected, we will achieve herd immunity and the virus dies out.
2. Vaccinate to reach herd immunity and use preventive measure to lessen infection and death.

Reaching herd immunity naturally as opposed to vaccinations is bad for the health of the nation as well as the economy. It is estimated that Covid-19 herd immunity will be reached when 70% of the population is immune. After 1 year of covid-19 we have 500,000 dead, 30 million cases. If we relied on natural immunity, we would not reach herd immunity for about 7 years, possibly at lot longer as new strains occur. The number of dead could reach 3 million or more. Under those conditions, it would be impossible to get the country back to normal, and we have a sluggish economy at best for many years.

Wrong.

First of all, there are 2 main ways to end an epidemic.
One is herd immunity, but that has 3 was to happen. Vaccine is one, natural is another, but the third is variolation, or deliberate infection.
But when there is too high of a lethality rate with an epidemic, the second way to end an epidemic is quarantine, with contact tracing. That is how they deal with Ebola.

When you suggest vaccines are safer, of course that is correct, but not once has any epidemic in progress been stopped by vaccines before covid-19. That is because vaccine normally take about 6 years to make and test. For example, the polio epidemic that started in 1948, was pretty much over before the Salk vaccine became available in 1958.

So then no, vaccines are almost irrelevant to ending epidemics in progress.
What they usually are for, it to prevent future epidemics.
Like smallpox vaccine was not to end one, but to wipe it out and prevent another in the future.

And while you are right that covid-19 was estimated to need 70% of the population to be immune in order to end the epidemic with herd immunity, you are wrong about everything else.

The reason covid-19 lasted a year and killed so many people is because we deliberately forced that to happen.
Normally what ends epidemics is the initial spike uses up all the easy available hosts, so then it dies out.
By "flattening the curve", we conserved hosts and ensured the epidemic could not possibly die out.
We artificially stretched the epidemic out much longer than it would have lasted normally, which would have been a couple of months at most.
But we could have accelerated herd immunity even more by deliberately infecting young volunteers who essentially would not have been at any real risk.
We could easily have ended it in less than a month if we have accelerated it as fast as possible.
And the death total then would have been much lower. Since young people are all inherently immune, and half the population is already immune, from the high asymptomatic rate, then only 30 million would have had to get infected and recover, for the 70% herd immunity to be reached. And since the death rate for healthy young people is 40 times less than that of the elderly or compromised, we could have reduced the death rate by a factor of about 200.

So forget about vaccinations as a strategy.
It was just an accident that the 2009 SARs vaccine research was able to be applied to covid-19.
Normally that is not possible, and normally vaccine are NOT the way to end any epidemic in progress.
It simply takes too long.

The purpose of a vaccine is to lower the occurrence of a disease and eventfully eliminating the threat. Measles, rubella, mumps, diphtheria and polio have all but been eliminated in the U.S., largely due to the introduction of vaccination programs. The last known naturally occurring case of smallpox was diagnosed on Oct. 26, 1977, after more that 200 years of vaccinating people.
Did masks really stop the flu?


Just as a baby aspirin a day will not stop heart attacks and strokes, wearing a mask will not stop the Flu, Covid-19, or other respiratory diseases. What these preventive measures will do is reduce your chance of being infected and if most of the community wears them it will reduce your chance even more and reduce the number of infections. It ain't rocket science, put a barrier between you and the virus will help protect you. That barrier may be a mask, a wall, or just plane distance. This is why medical professional have been using masks for over a hundred years. They lessen the probability of spreading air born diseases.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top