Future POTUS material?
"ICIJ (International Consortium of Investigative Journalists) dropped a bombshell investigative report yesterday about money laundering for criminals at some of the biggest banks on Wall Street, but you won’t find a peep about it on the front page of today’s Wall Street Journal or New York Times’ print editions.
"In fact, the New York Times, as of 6:44 a.m. this morning, hasn’t reported the story at all.
"The Wall Street Journal carries an innocuous headline, 'HSBC Stock Hits 25-Year Low,' putting the focus on the British bank, HSBC, when its focus should be on the largest bank in the U.S., JPMorgan Chase, a serial felon."
3-Count Felon, JPMorgan Chase, Caught Laundering More Dirty Money
Jamie Dimon has kept his position at JP Morgan Chase in spite of the bank's pleading guilty to three criminal felony counts since 2014; he would have been gone long ago had either the NYT or WSJ used its editorial page to demand and end to his looting.
Why hasn't that happened?
Can the problem be rectified by "choosing" between Republican or Democrat in the voting booth?
"ICIJ (International Consortium of Investigative Journalists) dropped a bombshell investigative report yesterday about money laundering for criminals at some of the biggest banks on Wall Street, but you won’t find a peep about it on the front page of today’s Wall Street Journal or New York Times’ print editions.
"In fact, the New York Times, as of 6:44 a.m. this morning, hasn’t reported the story at all.
"The Wall Street Journal carries an innocuous headline, 'HSBC Stock Hits 25-Year Low,' putting the focus on the British bank, HSBC, when its focus should be on the largest bank in the U.S., JPMorgan Chase, a serial felon."
3-Count Felon, JPMorgan Chase, Caught Laundering More Dirty Money
Jamie Dimon has kept his position at JP Morgan Chase in spite of the bank's pleading guilty to three criminal felony counts since 2014; he would have been gone long ago had either the NYT or WSJ used its editorial page to demand and end to his looting.
Why hasn't that happened?
Can the problem be rectified by "choosing" between Republican or Democrat in the voting booth?