Conservative SCOTUS may very well hand Republicans complete control of the government for years to come

[Ben Thomson]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

 

[sarahgop]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

What you are saying makes no sense. Its not your fault. Liberalism may well be a mental malady. The rich, mega donors, and corporations largely support the fascist dems.

 

[Mac-7]

Unless an asteroid falls on chief justice roberts during trumps second term the repubs are far from having a conservative majority

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

Protecting gerrymandering has been a court precedent for well over 100 years in various state and federal courts throughout the country. It has nothing to do with a conservative SCOTUS. If people are tired of gerrymandering then it's up to them to elect state legislators to change the state law as to who creates the districts. Several states have already done this.

 

[sarahgop]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

Protecting gerrymandering has been a court precedent for well over 100 years in various state and federal courts throughout the country. It has nothing to do with a conservative SCOTUS. If people are tired of gerrymandering then it's up to them to elect state legislators to change the state law as to who creates the districts. Several states have already done this.

I will be happy to be the nationwide district creating czar.

 

[toobfreak]

Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear....

AAAAAIIIIIIIYYYYYAAAAAHHHHHH!

 

[Jets]

Quelle surprise….

 

[d0gbreath]

Unless an asteroid falls on chief justice roberts during trumps second term the repubs are far from having a conservative majority

Trump's second term will involve cuddling the skeleton of Jimmy Hoffa.

 

[BluesLegend]

Unless an asteroid falls on chief justice roberts during trumps second term the repubs are far from having a conservative majority

Trump's second term will involve cuddling the skeleton of Jimmy Hoffa.

^^^ has my vote for most likely to get a visit from the secret service.

 

[whitehall]

Once again whiny lefties pretend that they lost the election.

 

[Ben Thomson]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

What you are saying makes no sense. Its not your fault. Liberalism may well be a mental malady. The rich, mega donors, and corporations largely support the fascist dems.

The GOP has proven to be an even 'greater threat' to US democracy than Trump in 2021, experts warn

 

[Augustine_]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

What you are saying makes no sense. Its not your fault. Liberalism may well be a mental malady. The rich, mega donors, and corporations largely support the fascist dems.

You already vote to give them everything they want. They don't need to bother convincing you.

 

[hunarcy]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

Never read the Constitution? The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription Try Article II

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

Gerrymandering: it was only cool when it helped democrats

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

Welcome to the 60+ years post-FDR when he had appointed 8 of the 9 SCOTUS justices.

Feel sorry for you, I do not. Take your fucking medicine.

 

[Ben Thomson]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

Welcome to the 60+ years post-FDR when he had appointed 8 of the 9 SCOTUS justices.

Feel sorry for you, I do not. Take your fucking medicine.

Take your fucking medicine??..ah, so you agree with what I said..thanks

 

[bendog]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

Protecting gerrymandering has been a court precedent for well over 100 years in various state and federal courts throughout the country. It has nothing to do with a conservative SCOTUS. If people are tired of gerrymandering then it's up to them to elect state legislators to change the state law as to who creates the districts. Several states have already done this.

The dems dilemma is that gerrymandering need not be racially motivated. Sometimes it's just that some "groups" vote dem more often than gop

 

[bendog]

Warren said in a opinion that voters had the right to elect people to federal office. Recent decisions by this conservative majority court as nullified that opinion. They say legislatures are the ones who should ultimately decide if there is any dispute. That they also have every right to gerrymander to keep their party in power and that mega donors like corporations have every right to donate as much as they want to candidates. Some red states are taking the power to certify elections away from their Secretary of States and giving that power to 'appointed officials'. If the votes from certain districts come in in favor of a democrat that appointed official can simply refuse to certify those votes due to 'abnormalities'. Democracy as we have known it is about to disappear. ...Analysis: How the Supreme Court has tilted election law to favor the Republican Party

Welcome to the 60+ years post-FDR when he had appointed 8 of the 9 SCOTUS justices.

Feel sorry for you, I do not. Take your fucking medicine.

Well it does seem not coincidental that despite the dems winning the WH 5 times to the gop's 3, the gop has controlled the nomination process. McConnell ensured that RBG could not retire because he wasn't going to confirm a 3rd. It's the dems own fault. The dems could have done the same to Reagan or HW