Confiscation of man's 'Cops Ahead' signs violated First Amendment rights, appeals court says

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2011
76,688
36,452
2,290
In a Republic, actually
'A police officer’s confiscation of two signs reading “Cops Ahead” violated the First Amendment rights of the man who was holding them, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at New York revived Michael Friend’s claims that the Stamford, Connecticut, police officer violated his First Amendment right to free speech and his Fourth Amendment right against malicious prosecution. But the appeals court ruled against Friend on his 14th Amendment claims regarding his $25,000 bail.

Friend was alerting drivers to an enforcement operation ahead that targeted cellphone use while driving.

“There was no basis for suggesting that Friend’s speech does not receive the protection of the First Amendment,” the 2nd Circuit said in a Feb. 27 decision.

In addition, the appeals court said, the officer’s actions were not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. Although the government has an interest in saving lives and enforcing distracted driving laws, the officer has not explained how issuing citations is a compelling interest, the 2nd Circuit said.'


Very good.

Liberty is safeguarded when the authority of the state is subject to limits and restrictions.
 
Guess I'll have to stop flashing my brights at oncoming cars after I passed a cop a mile back.

Or maybe be cool a get a CB radio...

1384fe6a29eadb78018e35c936c927e8
 
This right has been well established in Canada for many years. I think it may not have even been disputed in a courtroom.
 
Guess I'll have to stop flashing my brights at oncoming cars after I passed a cop a mile back.

Or maybe be cool a get a CB radio...

1384fe6a29eadb78018e35c936c927e8
Here's a tip for Americans!

I flash my lights at cars that are obviously speeding excessively and especially motorcycles.

Seeing the result in the rearview mirror is worth it!
And of course it contributes to the safety of good drivers on the roads with the speeders!
 
'A police officer’s confiscation of two signs reading “Cops Ahead” violated the First Amendment rights of the man who was holding them, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at New York revived Michael Friend’s claims that the Stamford, Connecticut, police officer violated his First Amendment right to free speech and his Fourth Amendment right against malicious prosecution. But the appeals court ruled against Friend on his 14th Amendment claims regarding his $25,000 bail.

Friend was alerting drivers to an enforcement operation ahead that targeted cellphone use while driving.

“There was no basis for suggesting that Friend’s speech does not receive the protection of the First Amendment,” the 2nd Circuit said in a Feb. 27 decision.

In addition, the appeals court said, the officer’s actions were not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. Although the government has an interest in saving lives and enforcing distracted driving laws, the officer has not explained how issuing citations is a compelling interest, the 2nd Circuit said.'


Very good.

Liberty is safeguarded when the authority of the state is subject to limits and restrictions.
Damn good indeed.

I love it when anti-Fascists prevail.
 
That's good news for liberty & our rights.

Police entrapment of any sort is antithetical to the foundation of a free society.
Whether it is local cops with checkpoints & traffic cameras or Feds instigating/enabling/directing kidnapping plots on a Governor or a fake insurrection, it is all fruit of the poisoned tree of totalitarianism
 

Forum List

Back
Top