Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You have Trump on the brain
Mine was a reference to libs in general
I’m sure many libs who worship Caesar instead of Jesus will agree that government is the answer to every human problem
But they are wrong
You are 100% correctAfter all, many of Israel's problems in the Old Testament happened when their Kings and other leaders didn't follow God's word.
No, that's why I was asking for a quote, you were just talking out of your ass.1. I did post a quote from FDR praising Stalin. YOur denial of that is confused.
FDR didn't suck Stalin's dick , like Trump.2. Trump was being diplomatic. Just like FDR.
No, he wasn't.3. Oh, Hannity did it? SO that makes it right for you to do it too? That makes no sense on any level. My point stands. Trump was being diplomatic.
You are 100% correct
All of man’s troubles are caused by disobedience from God
And the worst are libs who reject the true God and turn to government instead
No, that's why I was asking for a quote, you were just talking out of your ass.
FDR didn't suck Stalin's dick , like Trump.
“I was really being tough and so was he. And we would go back and forth. And then we fell in love, ok? No really. He wrote me beautiful letters. And they’re great letters. And then we fell in love.”
Definition of diplomacy
1: the art and practice of conducting negotiations between nations.
What was Dotard negotiating?
WHEN he was going to give Kim some oral?
No, he wasn't.
'Oh, Hannity did it? SO that makes it right for you to do it too'?
Being a hypocrite?
No, I'm not, I'm pointing out GQP hypocrisy, you and Sean's.
That was Churchill, you moron.1. FDR trusted Stalin to hold free elections in eastern europe after the war. That was a lot more than "oral" you freak.
Normal diplomacy took place in Singapore and in Vietnam, not in W. Virginia.2. Never really paid attention to what Trump's goal was in Korea. I assumed it was a long shot and if anything good came of it, it would be all gravy, imo. Really I was annoyed he was not more focused on domestic issues.
3. You are the one attacking Trump for normal diplomacy, while whining about republicans attacking Obama. That makes YOU the hypocrite.
That was Churchill, you moron.
In February 1945, when they were confident of an Allied victory, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Stalin met near Yalta, Crimea, to discuss the reorganization of post-WWII Europe.
Each country’s leader had his own set of ideas for rebuilding and re-establishing order in the war-torn continent. Roosevelt wanted Soviet participation in the newly formed United Nations and immediate support from the Soviets in fighting the ongoing war in the Pacific against Japan.
Churchill argued for free and fair elections leading to democratic regimes in Central and Eastern Europe, especially Poland.
Stalin, on the other hand, wanted Soviet “sphere of influence” in Central and Eastern Europe, starting with Poland, in order to provide the Soviet Union with a geopolitical buffer zone between it and the western capitalist world.
Soon after the conference it became clear that Stalin had no intension of holding up his end of negotiations. He eventually allowed for elections in Poland, but not before sending in Soviet troops to eliminate any and all opposition to the communist party in control of the provisional government. The 1947 “elections” solidified communist rule in Poland and its place as one of the first Soviet satellite states.
Normal diplomacy took place in Singapore and in Vietnam, not in W. Virginia.
Trump was gushing, like a teenage school girl.
Wrong. Churchill didn't trust Stalin. FDR was the sap.That was Churchill, you moron.
In February 1945, when they were confident of an Allied victory, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Stalin met near Yalta, Crimea, to discuss the reorganization of post-WWII Europe.
Each country’s leader had his own set of ideas for rebuilding and re-establishing order in the war-torn continent. Roosevelt wanted Soviet participation in the newly formed United Nations and immediate support from the Soviets in fighting the ongoing war in the Pacific against Japan.
Churchill argued for free and fair elections leading to democratic regimes in Central and Eastern Europe, especially Poland.
Stalin, on the other hand, wanted Soviet “sphere of influence” in Central and Eastern Europe, starting with Poland, in order to provide the Soviet Union with a geopolitical buffer zone between it and the western capitalist world.
Soon after the conference it became clear that Stalin had no intension of holding up his end of negotiations. He eventually allowed for elections in Poland, but not before sending in Soviet troops to eliminate any and all opposition to the communist party in control of the provisional government. The 1947 “elections” solidified communist rule in Poland and its place as one of the first Soviet satellite states.
Normal diplomacy took place in Singapore and in Vietnam, not in W. Virginia.
Trump was gushing, like a teenage school girl.
I've been asking for their definition of communism throughout the entire thread. None has been forthcoming, even though the term was used six (6) times in the OP. When definitions are different, communication breaks down.Why should the left condemn a dead economic ideal? You keep on and on about the left being "communists" simply to deflect from your own fascism and authoritarianism? Why do Republicans promote authoritarianism and fight democracy?
I've been asking for their definition of communism throughout the entire thread. None has been forthcoming, even though the term was used six (6) times in the OP. When definitions are different, communication breaks down.
They don't even know what they're talking about, even though the definition of the word isn't exactly difficult to find. They just spit the word out without thinking, like a weird Trumpster Tourette's.
Modern day Archie Bunkers, nothing more.
Just exposing GQP lies.YOu are just trolling now, Troll boy.
Right, the GQP is trying to rewrite even 75 year old history?Wrong. Churchill didn't trust Stalin. FDR was the sap.
Naturally, on a political discussion site, there is a lot of discussion about communism. The pattern that I see over and over is condemnation of communism from righties, and support and defense of communism from lefties. Why don't we see lefties condemning communism? Even in this very thread, we will see lefties trying to protect communism with attempts to derail the thread instead of condemning communism. Why don't lefties condemn it?
She says, while simply parroting the usual democrat party lies about Republicans...Even those who claim a knowledge of economics simply parrot the usual Republican lies about leftist policies. .
Ever wonder if anyone takes you seriously?NObody who understands anything about economics takes right-wingers seriously.
You beat me to it.Ever wonder if anyone takes you seriously?
Not anyone who only has fallacy instead of any valid argment.Ever wonder if anyone takes you seriously?
The guy who posted post #414 defended communism by evading the discussion of communism as described in the opening post.Show me one instance where lefties have defended communism and show one government policy which is communist to the core.
See how good you are now.
