Computer repairman who claimed to have Hunter's laptop Closes Shop

[Andylusion]

Fake News. He never really existed in the first place.

It all been a last minute desperation ploy dreamed up by Bannon and Rove.

Right up there with Pizzagate.

Rightwing moroonies bought more pizza this time than last.

Who faked the graphic sex between Crack Pipe Hunter and his young niece?
A porno Spielberg type?

WTF?

Stop spreading bullshit, if there was sex with a minor Biden would be in jail already for statutory rape.

Just like someone would be in jail if they had classified information on an unsecured server in their basement? You folks are funny, possibly totally naive, or both.

You don't know wtf you are talking about. Intent was never established in Clinton's case. Server was secure enough for her emails to never leak and she took measures to keep classified emails out of it. The ones that were found were not marked classified in the heading.

In statutory rape case here intent would be easily established as he of course would know her age.

Oh please.... even you.... even as stupid and ignorant as you personally are.... even you don't believe that.

Hillary Clinton Defends Not Knowing State Department Classification Markings

Hillary Clinton told ABC's David Muir, "There are no excuses."

abcnews.go.com

FBI Director James Comey has said that three email chains with Clinton included at least one paragraph marked "(C)," indicating that the paragraph contained confidential material.​

​

He has called Clinton's handling of classified info "extremely careless" but said there's no evidence to indicate she knew she was sending or receiving classified info.​

​

Clinton told the FBI that she did not know what the "(C)" meant at the beginning of the paragraphs and speculated it was a reference to paragraphs marked in alphabetical order — something she reiterated in ABC's exclusive interview.​

Let me simplify that clip from the article.

Hillary Clinton.... a woman that has been in the highest levels of government since the 1990s... so for nearly 20 years....

In fact, I've read that governors have access to classified information too, which means she likely had contact to classified information when she was first lady of Arkansas, which means from 1983 to 2013 she should have known how to determine if information was classified.

And here she is saying to Federal investigators, that she had no idea how to tell if any information she got was classified or not.

Pleading ignorance was the only reason Hillary Clinton was not prosecuted for illegally having classified information on an non-secured server.

Not knowing what was classified, and what was not classified, after decades in high office?

And she was Secretary of State? Secretary of State deals with classified information all the time.

That leads us to only two possible conclusions to be made from this. Only two. These are the only two possible conclusions that any rational thinking person can come to, if they have any integrity at all.

A: Hillary Clinton is the absolute number one, most completely and utterly incompetent and ignorant, and unqualified politician to have ever been in politics since this countries founding, and is completely disqualified to be in any public office of any level.

To put that in perspective, the service staff at the white house are trained on identifying classified information, for such times as when they are required to deliver a message to the president. That makes Hillary Clinton, dumber than the guy who delivers a ham sandwich to the President. That makes Hillary Clinton unqualified to work as service staff for a President, at the White House!

B: Hillary Clinton as bold face, and serial liar, and is corrupt to her very core.

I'm willing to bet the answer is B. But either way, I'll be fine with whichever option you think is true, because it's one or the other. The facts don't give you another option.

Either she is a pathological liar, and corrupt to her very core.... or she makes Forest Gump look like an astrophysicist.

What is and is not classified is not as clear cut as you seem to imagine it to be.

In your quote Comey tells you that there is no evidence of intent and his judgement stood the test of multiple reviews by Trump's DOJ including extensive 2018 review by the IG that found conclusion reasonable and consistent with how the department handled these cases in the past.

No one in their right mind is seeing Clinton intentionally trying to leak classified info here and at the end of the day that's what the law intended to prevent and that's how FBI and DOJ have been treating these cases.

How many years will you nutters be selectively obsessing over Clinton emails already?? Time to move the f on already.

See you just made up a false claim, and attacked it. No one anywhere, said she "intentional" tried to leak classified information.

That is a false claim.

The question is, after 30 years in high office, was Hillary Clinton completely incompetent about classified information, or was she a liar?

You are basically claiming she was incompetent. That after 30 years in close relation to public offices that routinely involved classified information, that Hillary Clinton was so utterly idiotic and mindless, that she still after decades in high office, had no ability to handle classified information.

That makes her utterly disqualified to be in any office. Again, people who deliver a ham sandwich to the president, are trained to identify classified information, in the unlikely event they have to deliver a message by hand. That means Hillary Clinton, after decades in high office, wasn't even qualified to give a ham sandwich to the real president as part of White House staff.

Or more likely.... she was a corrupt, evil, rotten to her core, worst politician in recent US history.

You can deny that, but that just makes you wrong.

 

[Andylusion]

Fake News. He never really existed in the first place.

It all been a last minute desperation ploy dreamed up by Bannon and Rove.

Right up there with Pizzagate.

Rightwing moroonies bought more pizza this time than last.

Who faked the graphic sex between Crack Pipe Hunter and his young niece?
A porno Spielberg type?

WTF?

Stop spreading bullshit, if there was sex with a minor Biden would be in jail already for statutory rape.

Just like someone would be in jail if they had classified information on an unsecured server in their basement? You folks are funny, possibly totally naive, or both.

You don't know wtf you are talking about. Intent was never established in Clinton's case. Server was secure enough for her emails to never leak and she took measures to keep classified emails out of it. The ones that were found were not marked classified in the heading.

In statutory rape case here intent would be easily established as he of course would know her age.

Oh please.... even you.... even as stupid and ignorant as you personally are.... even you don't believe that.

Hillary Clinton Defends Not Knowing State Department Classification Markings

Hillary Clinton told ABC's David Muir, "There are no excuses."

abcnews.go.com

FBI Director James Comey has said that three email chains with Clinton included at least one paragraph marked "(C)," indicating that the paragraph contained confidential material.​

​

He has called Clinton's handling of classified info "extremely careless" but said there's no evidence to indicate she knew she was sending or receiving classified info.​

​

Clinton told the FBI that she did not know what the "(C)" meant at the beginning of the paragraphs and speculated it was a reference to paragraphs marked in alphabetical order — something she reiterated in ABC's exclusive interview.​

Let me simplify that clip from the article.

Hillary Clinton.... a woman that has been in the highest levels of government since the 1990s... so for nearly 20 years....

In fact, I've read that governors have access to classified information too, which means she likely had contact to classified information when she was first lady of Arkansas, which means from 1983 to 2013 she should have known how to determine if information was classified.

And here she is saying to Federal investigators, that she had no idea how to tell if any information she got was classified or not.

Pleading ignorance was the only reason Hillary Clinton was not prosecuted for illegally having classified information on an non-secured server.

Not knowing what was classified, and what was not classified, after decades in high office?

And she was Secretary of State? Secretary of State deals with classified information all the time.

That leads us to only two possible conclusions to be made from this. Only two. These are the only two possible conclusions that any rational thinking person can come to, if they have any integrity at all.

A: Hillary Clinton is the absolute number one, most completely and utterly incompetent and ignorant, and unqualified politician to have ever been in politics since this countries founding, and is completely disqualified to be in any public office of any level.

To put that in perspective, the service staff at the white house are trained on identifying classified information, for such times as when they are required to deliver a message to the president. That makes Hillary Clinton, dumber than the guy who delivers a ham sandwich to the President. That makes Hillary Clinton unqualified to work as service staff for a President, at the White House!

B: Hillary Clinton as bold face, and serial liar, and is corrupt to her very core.

I'm willing to bet the answer is B. But either way, I'll be fine with whichever option you think is true, because it's one or the other. The facts don't give you another option.

Either she is a pathological liar, and corrupt to her very core.... or she makes Forest Gump look like an astrophysicist.

What is and is not classified is not as clear cut as you seem to imagine it to be.

In your quote Comey tells you that there is no evidence of intent and his judgement stood the test of multiple reviews by Trump's DOJ including extensive 2018 review by the IG that found conclusion reasonable and consistent with how the department handled these cases in the past.

How many years will you nutters be obsessing over Clinton's emails already?? How many times will we go over this? Time to move the f on already.

So you are saying that Hitlery is too fucking stupid to know SAP info is classified.

Got it.

That is the position of the left-wing. They will make up whatever excuses they have to, to support their worthless politicians.

 

[AntonToo]

Fake News. He never really existed in the first place.

It all been a last minute desperation ploy dreamed up by Bannon and Rove.

Right up there with Pizzagate.

Rightwing moroonies bought more pizza this time than last.

Who faked the graphic sex between Crack Pipe Hunter and his young niece?
A porno Spielberg type?

WTF?

Stop spreading bullshit, if there was sex with a minor Biden would be in jail already for statutory rape.

Just like someone would be in jail if they had classified information on an unsecured server in their basement? You folks are funny, possibly totally naive, or both.

You don't know wtf you are talking about. Intent was never established in Clinton's case. Server was secure enough for her emails to never leak and she took measures to keep classified emails out of it. The ones that were found were not marked classified in the heading.

In statutory rape case here intent would be easily established as he of course would know her age.

Oh please.... even you.... even as stupid and ignorant as you personally are.... even you don't believe that.

Hillary Clinton Defends Not Knowing State Department Classification Markings

Hillary Clinton told ABC's David Muir, "There are no excuses."

abcnews.go.com

FBI Director James Comey has said that three email chains with Clinton included at least one paragraph marked "(C)," indicating that the paragraph contained confidential material.​

​

He has called Clinton's handling of classified info "extremely careless" but said there's no evidence to indicate she knew she was sending or receiving classified info.​

​

Clinton told the FBI that she did not know what the "(C)" meant at the beginning of the paragraphs and speculated it was a reference to paragraphs marked in alphabetical order — something she reiterated in ABC's exclusive interview.​

Let me simplify that clip from the article.

Hillary Clinton.... a woman that has been in the highest levels of government since the 1990s... so for nearly 20 years....

In fact, I've read that governors have access to classified information too, which means she likely had contact to classified information when she was first lady of Arkansas, which means from 1983 to 2013 she should have known how to determine if information was classified.

And here she is saying to Federal investigators, that she had no idea how to tell if any information she got was classified or not.

Pleading ignorance was the only reason Hillary Clinton was not prosecuted for illegally having classified information on an non-secured server.

Not knowing what was classified, and what was not classified, after decades in high office?

And she was Secretary of State? Secretary of State deals with classified information all the time.

That leads us to only two possible conclusions to be made from this. Only two. These are the only two possible conclusions that any rational thinking person can come to, if they have any integrity at all.

A: Hillary Clinton is the absolute number one, most completely and utterly incompetent and ignorant, and unqualified politician to have ever been in politics since this countries founding, and is completely disqualified to be in any public office of any level.

To put that in perspective, the service staff at the white house are trained on identifying classified information, for such times as when they are required to deliver a message to the president. That makes Hillary Clinton, dumber than the guy who delivers a ham sandwich to the President. That makes Hillary Clinton unqualified to work as service staff for a President, at the White House!

B: Hillary Clinton as bold face, and serial liar, and is corrupt to her very core.

I'm willing to bet the answer is B. But either way, I'll be fine with whichever option you think is true, because it's one or the other. The facts don't give you another option.

Either she is a pathological liar, and corrupt to her very core.... or she makes Forest Gump look like an astrophysicist.

What is and is not classified is not as clear cut as you seem to imagine it to be.

In your quote Comey tells you that there is no evidence of intent and his judgement stood the test of multiple reviews by Trump's DOJ including extensive 2018 review by the IG that found conclusion reasonable and consistent with how the department handled these cases in the past.

No one in their right mind is seeing Clinton intentionally trying to leak classified info here and at the end of the day that's what the law intended to prevent and that's how FBI and DOJ have been treating these cases.

How many years will you nutters be selectively obsessing over Clinton emails already?? Time to move the f on already.

See you just made up a false claim, and attacked it. No one anywhere, said she "intentional" tried to leak classified information.

That is a false claim.

The question is, after 30 years in high office, was Hillary Clinton completely incompetent about classified information, or was she a liar?

Dummy, mens rea, that is to say "intentional"ity is a standard DOJ criteria for prosecution based on those statutes.

Did Clinton screw up? Absolutely. She appologized for it too. Want to make a whole character call out of it? Knock yourself out, but the conversation is not about Hillary's character, it's about law enforcement and the ridiculous "Democrats always get away with it" insinuation I was responding to.

Bottom line is that Hunter would be prosecuted for statutory rape if FBI found on his laptop what another poster falsely described as explicit sex with a minor. #rememberWeiner

 

[Mac-7]

No. Now you are sounding like a Democrat, saying accusations against Bret Kavanough are all that is required.

Not quite

I am not about to put blind faith into strangers in black robes who continually abuse their power just because you will call me dirty names if I dont

We are supposed to be the party of evidence. If you have clear evidence, by all means provide it.

But this "every single judge is corrupt, without evidence" is like Democrats saying "Believe all women without evidence!".

Sorry, but I'm not a partisan bigot, and I'll call out anyone when they start doing this crazy left-wing style "Trump-Russia must be true, because I refuse to accept he's my president" nonsense.

When Right-wing people start talking like mindless left-wingers, I'm going to call them out.

You want people to take you seriously, by all means provide real evidence. I'd love to see real evidence. But just because left-wingers are mindless idiots these days, doesn't mean I'm going to join them in the 'no need for evidence' mantra.

we have evidence but somehow your side manages to sweep it all way just as you managed to stuff the ballot boxes in the first place

the evidence of poll workers in georgia counting ballots after everyone else had gone home for the evening is damning

 

[Nostra]

Fake News. He never really existed in the first place.

It all been a last minute desperation ploy dreamed up by Bannon and Rove.

Right up there with Pizzagate.

Rightwing moroonies bought more pizza this time than last.

Who faked the graphic sex between Crack Pipe Hunter and his young niece?
A porno Spielberg type?

WTF?

Stop spreading bullshit, if there was sex with a minor Biden would be in jail already for statutory rape.

Just like someone would be in jail if they had classified information on an unsecured server in their basement? You folks are funny, possibly totally naive, or both.

You don't know wtf you are talking about. Intent was never established in Clinton's case. Server was secure enough for her emails to never leak and she took measures to keep classified emails out of it. The ones that were found were not marked classified in the heading.

In statutory rape case here intent would be easily established as he of course would know her age.

Oh please.... even you.... even as stupid and ignorant as you personally are.... even you don't believe that.

Hillary Clinton Defends Not Knowing State Department Classification Markings

Hillary Clinton told ABC's David Muir, "There are no excuses."

abcnews.go.com

FBI Director James Comey has said that three email chains with Clinton included at least one paragraph marked "(C)," indicating that the paragraph contained confidential material.​

​

He has called Clinton's handling of classified info "extremely careless" but said there's no evidence to indicate she knew she was sending or receiving classified info.​

​

Clinton told the FBI that she did not know what the "(C)" meant at the beginning of the paragraphs and speculated it was a reference to paragraphs marked in alphabetical order — something she reiterated in ABC's exclusive interview.​

Let me simplify that clip from the article.

Hillary Clinton.... a woman that has been in the highest levels of government since the 1990s... so for nearly 20 years....

In fact, I've read that governors have access to classified information too, which means she likely had contact to classified information when she was first lady of Arkansas, which means from 1983 to 2013 she should have known how to determine if information was classified.

And here she is saying to Federal investigators, that she had no idea how to tell if any information she got was classified or not.

Pleading ignorance was the only reason Hillary Clinton was not prosecuted for illegally having classified information on an non-secured server.

Not knowing what was classified, and what was not classified, after decades in high office?

And she was Secretary of State? Secretary of State deals with classified information all the time.

That leads us to only two possible conclusions to be made from this. Only two. These are the only two possible conclusions that any rational thinking person can come to, if they have any integrity at all.

A: Hillary Clinton is the absolute number one, most completely and utterly incompetent and ignorant, and unqualified politician to have ever been in politics since this countries founding, and is completely disqualified to be in any public office of any level.

To put that in perspective, the service staff at the white house are trained on identifying classified information, for such times as when they are required to deliver a message to the president. That makes Hillary Clinton, dumber than the guy who delivers a ham sandwich to the President. That makes Hillary Clinton unqualified to work as service staff for a President, at the White House!

B: Hillary Clinton as bold face, and serial liar, and is corrupt to her very core.

I'm willing to bet the answer is B. But either way, I'll be fine with whichever option you think is true, because it's one or the other. The facts don't give you another option.

Either she is a pathological liar, and corrupt to her very core.... or she makes Forest Gump look like an astrophysicist.

What is and is not classified is not as clear cut as you seem to imagine it to be.

In your quote Comey tells you that there is no evidence of intent and his judgement stood the test of multiple reviews by Trump's DOJ including extensive 2018 review by the IG that found conclusion reasonable and consistent with how the department handled these cases in the past.

No one in their right mind is seeing Clinton intentionally trying to leak classified info here and at the end of the day that's what the law intended to prevent and that's how FBI and DOJ have been treating these cases.

How many years will you nutters be selectively obsessing over Clinton emails already?? Time to move the f on already.

See you just made up a false claim, and attacked it. No one anywhere, said she "intentional" tried to leak classified information.

That is a false claim.

The question is, after 30 years in high office, was Hillary Clinton completely incompetent about classified information, or was she a liar?

Dummy, mens rea, that is to say "intentional"ity is a standard DOJ criteria for prosecution based on those statutes.

Did Clinton screw up? Absolutely. She appologized for it too. Want to make a whole character call out of it? Knock yourself out, but the conversation is not about Hillary's character, it's about law enforcement and the ridiculous "Democrats always get away with it" insinuation I was responding to.

Bottom line is that Hunter would be prosecuted for statutory rape if FBI found on his laptop what another poster falsely described as explicit sex with a minor. #rememberWeiner

"Intent" is not a requirement in the statute in question. Comey made that up.

 

[Faun]

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

Nah, Trump did in fact lose. All of the bad votes added together in any state, is not nearly enough to change the outcome. He did in fact lose the election.

The way he lost, is still because of lies and evil in the media, and a failure of Americans to care about truth.

But they did in fact vote for that openly corrupt Biden. So... it is what it is.

Not giving up yet. It matters not how many votes if the election was fraudulent, because who knows how deep the fraud went

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

LOLOL

Yes, he lost. All of the swing states have certified their respective elections.

Biden officially has enough electoral college votes to win the presidency after California became the latest state to certify its election results

California's 55 electors put Biden over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win, while Trump continues to contest the election in court.

www.businessinsider.com

Certification means nothing if the election is over turned. Trust me when I say that their are literally hundreds of thousands of citizen's praying this bullcrap election is overturned. Biden and Harris are losers.. They have just benefitted temporarily from a criminally run election by the deep state.

Who cares what you pray for? Biden won. Trump lost. The sooner you accept reality the better off you'll be. Or let it eat away at you for the rest of your life. No skin off my back.

I'm not hundreds of thousands of voters, but I'm only one of the hundreds of thousands across this nation who are praying for Trump to prevail, and justice to win the day.

No skin off my back upon what you think either.

LOL

A million people can pray for that. It's over. Enough states have certified their respective elections to give Biden the win. No state is going to tell a majority of their voters ... we counted your votes and Biden won... we canvassed your votes and Biden won... we certified your votes and Biden won... but fuck you and your votes, we're giving our electoral votes to Trump.

It's over, you lost. Deal with it, loser.

It doesn't matter, because if it was a fraudulent election, then it is null and voided. A do over is either nessesary or Trump wins because if the amount of fraud and illegal votes counted is proven, and it looks like that it will be the case, then Trump won the election. You can hoop and hollar all you want about this reason or that, but get ready for the do over or maybe because of the fraud in which is being proven as we speak, Trump automatically wins.

There will be no do over and no one is handing Trump the election he lost. You will have to go through the rest of your life miserable in the belief that Impeached Trump was robbed.

I can live with that. You deserve it for believing such a huckster who sold you bill of goods.

Glad you think it's over, so stay tuned because it ain't even close to being over.

You poor thing, this is gonna haunt you for life.

No, you are wrong on that one, but if Biden has to concede, it will devastate you because you have way to much invested in your leftism ideology in order to be set back again.

"...if Biden has to concede..."

So you are ok with corruption ? Why am I not surprised ?

As I never said I'm ok with corruption, I'm not surprised you're a fucking imbecile who suffers from delusions.

But Biden wasn't even hidden behind stupidity of "I don't know what is classified information or not" type corruption.

Biden was open, blatant, in your face, I saved my son and his $50 Million for a few months cronies from a prosecutor, type corruption.

Biden's corruption was so clear, so obvious, so open... that either you should not support Biden over Trump, or you support corruption.

It isn't even up for debate. We now know for a fact, without even the slightest of questions, that Biden is openly corrupt.

So do you want Biden as president? If yes, then you support corruption. End of story.

You can deny that until the end of time, we've seen the videos, we read the emails, we know the story. Biden didn't deny it, and he was openly boasting about it.

You support open corruption if you want Biden to be president. End of the story, sir. That is the only position one can have, and support Biden.

That's been debunked. There was no active investigation into his son when he forced the issue of firing that corrupt prosecutor.

That claim you just made, is what was debunked.

However, Shokin, at the time, according to the interview, was investigating Mykola Zlochevsky, the former minister of ecology and natural resources of Ukraine — also the founder of Burisma. Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of the firm, which Shokin claimed was an appointment made by Zlochevsky “in order to protect himself.”​

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show

The fired prosecutor at the center of the Ukraine controversy said during a private interview with President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani earlier this year that he was told to back off an investigation into a natural gas firm that was linked to Joe Biden’s son, according to details of...

www.foxnews.com

Moreover.....

“Mr. Shokin attempted to continue the investigations but on or around June or July of 2015, the U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt told him that the investigation has to be handled with white gloves, which according to Mr. Shokin, that implied do nothing,” the notes from the interview stated. The notes also claimed Shokin was told Biden had held up U.S. aid to Ukraine over the investigation.​

​

Shokin was fired in April 2016, and his case was “closed by the current Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko,” according to the notes. Despite his claims, Shokin, on both sides of the Atlantic, had been widely accused of corruption.​

So let's review.

The investigation into Burisma was dormant. Not closed. Only after he was fired, did the new Prosecutor General close the investigation.

Why was it dormant? Because Shokin had been threatened, because Biden's son was on the board of directors.

End of story dude. This was clear undeniable corruption. The facts prove it. You are wrong. You elected an openly corrupt president, in the name of getting rid of corruption. You, and all the mindless playthings of the left, have been played for complete and total fools, and you are.

Nice try, but no. That's what Shokin said last year when talking with Giuliani. But in reality...

​

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

​

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.​

​

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”​

​

[...]​

​

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.​

​

[...]​

​

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

So right there in your own post.......... You make my point.

“It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

*YOU* posted that. Correct? You posted that from your own link. YOU SAID IT.

When was Hunter Biden added to the board of directors at Burisma?

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf

This is from the Senate Governments own investigation.

Page 3, paragraph 2, please read....

​

On April 16, 2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon after was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.” The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April 28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma, and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.​

So..... then as you pointed out... magically from 2014 to 2015, the investigation was shelved, and they did not purse it.

Directly after Hunter Biden joined the board of directors at Bursima, which was literally 14 days after British officials seized assets of the owner of the company for corruption.

Let's recap again...

• Burisma is being investigated for corruption.
• British officials seize assets of a corrupt oligarch.
• Hunter Biden joins corrupt oligarch's company board of directors.
• Investigation is shelved.
• Hunter Biden is paid tens of millions.
• Joe Biden demands prosecutor who will not dismiss the case, to be fired.
• Prosecutor is fired, new prosecutor dismisses case.
• Joe Biden brags about protecting son's lucrative deal with corrupt oligarch by getting the prosecutor fired.

Democrats voted in favor of clear, unambiguous, bold faced corruption, at the highest levels of the US government.

End of story. That's is all there is to it. You support corruption. Then end. Game over. Thanks for playing, but you are a supporter of corruption.

LOLOLOL

One little problem with your "recap" -- it was Shokin who shelved the investigation in 2014 and 2015. According to you, Joe Biden blackmailed Poroshenko to fire the prosecutor who wasn't actively investigating Burisma.

 

[jc456]

Update on Mac Isaac, the computer repairman that claimed he had Hunter Biden's laptop. According to USA Today:

Ten days after the election, a sign on the repair shop’s door said it had closed. A neighbor said the owner, Mac Isaac had left town.

Read full article below
Computer repairman in Hunter Biden laptop saga closes up shop.

That corrupt MFer got to running like...

Well yeah. Remember, left-wingers are terrorists. No doubt he was threatened repeatedly by the terrorist Democrats.

Wait a minute, I have a few friends that are Democrats and they didn't get the terrorist membership cards. Please let the Order of Terrorist Brotherhood know this so they can get the proper forms sent to all Democrats.

Did you complain about terrorism when BLM was burning cities? Or did you blame Trump?

Black Lives Matter leader states if US 'doesn't give us what we want, then we will burn down this system'

"I just want black liberation and black sovereignty, by any means necessary."

www.foxnews.com

When this guy who is a leader of the BLM said openly that he'll engage in violence if he doesn't get what he wants.... did you oppose that? Or blame Trump?

Because last I checked threatening violence to get political change, is the very definition of terrorism.

From Tiffany to Target, stores are boarding up windows in case of election unrest

Retailers across the country are stepping up security measures to try to head off any damages to their stores during election-related protests in the coming days.

www.cnn.com

Why were stores boarding up?

Because right-wing conservatives where threatening to burn down cities if they didn't get what they wanted?

Really? Where? Who?

Or was it left-wingers threatening mass violence to get what they want?

Democrats are the party of terrorists. That's just a fact now. It's not a debatable point. It's not some random insult.... it just is the truth.

Did Biden or anyone anywhere on the left-wing at any point, condemn BLM, or Antifa, or any of the riots and attacks on the Federal Court building?

Or did you blame Trump?

You who else used that same strategy of violence for political change, other than terrorists? I'll give you a hint.... might have happened in Germany almost a 100 years ago.

I never said anything about the looting and rioting other than it was criminal acts and should be stopped. You seem to read in whatever pops into that mush you have for a brain.

"I never said"... Since when I do care what you specifically said?

Your leadership of the Democrap party has never once directly condemned, and told off the BLM or any other terrorist group for committing violence.

You want to prove me wrong? List all the statements by Democrat leadership in response to BLM threatening violence for political change.

Let see the quotes condemning clear terrorist statements.

Oh you can't? That I don't care what you said. Your party is the party of terrorism, and not one Democrap can even attempt a counter argument, because you all know I'm right.

One huge problem. I am a republican. Now,don't you feel foolish.

No, I don't feel foolish at all. That's like having webbed feet, quacking, feathers, and having a beak, and then saying "I'm a Turnip. Now don't you feel foolish.".

No, I don't. In all the years I've known you on this forum, I can't think of single post of yours that I have read, that seemed even remotely Republican in nature.

If you have made posts that show you have any non-Democrat values, I must have missed them.

And maybe I have. But that doesn't change the impression you have made over more than a few years.

I just did a site search for every post you've made for the past 2 days, and read through them. Not one shows any traditional Republican-like values.

Regardless.... I stand by everything I stated about Democrats, whether you do or don't believe those statements apply to you specifically.

If you can find anything, showing the Leadership opposed clear terrorist statements and actions by BLM and Antifa, feel free to post their condemnation.

In fact in some ways BLM actually acknowledged there tactic was terrorism, and that it worked to win Biden the Presidency.

BLM activists threaten unrest if Trump does not immediately 'concede'

Protest groups have been mobilized in cities including Philadelphia, New York and DC to demand the counting of votes continues in crucial swing states that will decide the election.

www.dailymail.co.uk

What do you think THREATENING "If you don't concede, then we'll have unrest!" is? That's terrorism.

Biden himself basically said this.

BLM co-founder sends message to Biden: 'We want something for our vote'

Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors requested a meeting with President-elect Joe Biden to discuss the movement's agenda and lay out expectations for the incoming administration.

www.foxnews.com

“The African American community stood up again for me. They always have my back, and I’ll have yours,” Biden said at the Chase Center in Wilmington, Del. “I said from the outset I wanted a campaign that represented America, and I think we did that. Now that’s what I want the administration to look like.”

Really? The community that set fire to cities? They have your back?

Well they did. Their violence won Biden the election. Terrorism was allowed to succeed in the US. That's what the Democrats are, whether they admit it or not.

You want "Traditional" Republican Values? Here they are. And just how many of these "Values" have your and yours stomped into the ground.

Republican Party Platform of 1956

Which of those would you consider traditional Republican party values? Certainly not all of that. That was more likely an election pitch, than a traditional Republican value.

You are wrong. Ike was real and lived what you saw in that plank. He tried to impress on his Administration those same values. When he said something, he meant it.

You are used to fakes who say a lot of things and don't mean a damned thing. And I am not just speaking of one side or the other. When a real leader comes along they get beaten to the ground quickly. Like Jim West form the Dems. I would mention a Republican but right now, there just aren't any that comes to mind.

I would mention a Republican but right now, there just aren't any that comes to mind.

I see. So you are not a left-wing flaming socialist anti-capitalist.... and you are a republican..... but you have to go back all the way to Ike, and can't think of a single Republican today that has any of your values.

I think I have all I need to know about you. Thanks.

Then you just hit on the crux of the problem with the modern "Republicans". Lack of ethics, morals, patriotism and love of Americans well being. If that isn't put back into the republican party, the Republicans won't win another President race for the next 100 years.

And the dimo's have all that going for them eh ?? You are one ignorant political hack if you think people are somehow gullible enough to believe the bullcrap you write.

I don't defend the Democrats. I condemn the Party of the Rumpers including you. I want to put the Republican Party back when it really WAS the Grand Old Party. Let the Democrats deal with that.

You lie, but that's ok. Running from the Democrats now ain't going to cut it. You have defended their bullcrap for way to long now.

So you would rather install an Emperor to combat something else. The democratic given right to take the election to the courts have ended. The rest of it is that of a wanna be dictator. It's gone way past being good for the Nation. Instead of a Democratic Election, you would just install an Emperor. You are too ignorant to see where this would quickly lead. Better to have 4 years of Demcoratic President where we can keep an eye on them and get the Democracy back into the Republican Party for right now, it's just one man and that's not Democracy, that's Dictatorship.

I thought whistleblowers were supposed to be believed? that's what all of you said. So there are 100 affidavits, which is the equivalent to whistleblowers. Why is it your opinion they shouldn't be heard? explain that for me.

 

[jc456]

No. Now you are sounding like a Democrat, saying accusations against Bret Kavanough are all that is required.

Not quite

I am not about to put blind faith into strangers in black robes who continually abuse their power just because you will call me dirty names if I dont

We are supposed to be the party of evidence. If you have clear evidence, by all means provide it.

But this "every single judge is corrupt, without evidence" is like Democrats saying "Believe all women without evidence!".

Sorry, but I'm not a partisan bigot, and I'll call out anyone when they start doing this crazy left-wing style "Trump-Russia must be true, because I refuse to accept he's my president" nonsense.

When Right-wing people start talking like mindless left-wingers, I'm going to call them out.

You want people to take you seriously, by all means provide real evidence. I'd love to see real evidence. But just because left-wingers are mindless idiots these days, doesn't mean I'm going to join them in the 'no need for evidence' mantra.

we have evidence but somehow your side manages to sweep it all way just as you managed to stuff the ballot boxes in the first place

the evidence of poll workers in georgia counting ballots after everyone else had gone home for the evening is damning

Mac, the demofks told us whistleblowers must be heard. Why is this different is the question to ask them?

 

[jc456]

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

Nah, Trump did in fact lose. All of the bad votes added together in any state, is not nearly enough to change the outcome. He did in fact lose the election.

The way he lost, is still because of lies and evil in the media, and a failure of Americans to care about truth.

But they did in fact vote for that openly corrupt Biden. So... it is what it is.

Not giving up yet. It matters not how many votes if the election was fraudulent, because who knows how deep the fraud went

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

LOLOL

Yes, he lost. All of the swing states have certified their respective elections.

Biden officially has enough electoral college votes to win the presidency after California became the latest state to certify its election results

California's 55 electors put Biden over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win, while Trump continues to contest the election in court.

www.businessinsider.com

Certification means nothing if the election is over turned. Trust me when I say that their are literally hundreds of thousands of citizen's praying this bullcrap election is overturned. Biden and Harris are losers.. They have just benefitted temporarily from a criminally run election by the deep state.

Who cares what you pray for? Biden won. Trump lost. The sooner you accept reality the better off you'll be. Or let it eat away at you for the rest of your life. No skin off my back.

I'm not hundreds of thousands of voters, but I'm only one of the hundreds of thousands across this nation who are praying for Trump to prevail, and justice to win the day.

No skin off my back upon what you think either.

LOL

A million people can pray for that. It's over. Enough states have certified their respective elections to give Biden the win. No state is going to tell a majority of their voters ... we counted your votes and Biden won... we canvassed your votes and Biden won... we certified your votes and Biden won... but fuck you and your votes, we're giving our electoral votes to Trump.

It's over, you lost. Deal with it, loser.

It doesn't matter, because if it was a fraudulent election, then it is null and voided. A do over is either nessesary or Trump wins because if the amount of fraud and illegal votes counted is proven, and it looks like that it will be the case, then Trump won the election. You can hoop and hollar all you want about this reason or that, but get ready for the do over or maybe because of the fraud in which is being proven as we speak, Trump automatically wins.

There will be no do over and no one is handing Trump the election he lost. You will have to go through the rest of your life miserable in the belief that Impeached Trump was robbed.

I can live with that. You deserve it for believing such a huckster who sold you bill of goods.

Glad you think it's over, so stay tuned because it ain't even close to being over.

You poor thing, this is gonna haunt you for life.

No, you are wrong on that one, but if Biden has to concede, it will devastate you because you have way to much invested in your leftism ideology in order to be set back again.

"...if Biden has to concede..."

So you are ok with corruption ? Why am I not surprised ?

He isn't and neither am I. We worked to get rid of Rump, the most corrupt President. But you must support it vehemently.

corrupt election isn't a way to take out a sitting president legally. To think we haven't figured it out, you're mistaken. You all have been trying since November 9 2016. it's that simple. you lost, admit it. they say that's the first step of recovery program.

 

[Mac-7]

Mac, the demofks told us whistleblowers must be heard. Why is this different is the question to ask them?

Libs dont mind cheating to get what they want

 

[jc456]

Mac, the demofks told us whistleblowers must be heard. Why is this different is the question to ask them?

Libs dont mind cheating to get what they want

it's who they are as a cult. brainwashed puppies.

 

[BlindBoo]

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

Nah, Trump did in fact lose. All of the bad votes added together in any state, is not nearly enough to change the outcome. He did in fact lose the election.

The way he lost, is still because of lies and evil in the media, and a failure of Americans to care about truth.

But they did in fact vote for that openly corrupt Biden. So... it is what it is.

Not giving up yet. It matters not how many votes if the election was fraudulent, because who knows how deep the fraud went

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

LOLOL

Yes, he lost. All of the swing states have certified their respective elections.

Biden officially has enough electoral college votes to win the presidency after California became the latest state to certify its election results

California's 55 electors put Biden over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win, while Trump continues to contest the election in court.

www.businessinsider.com

Certification means nothing if the election is over turned. Trust me when I say that their are literally hundreds of thousands of citizen's praying this bullcrap election is overturned. Biden and Harris are losers.. They have just benefitted temporarily from a criminally run election by the deep state.

Who cares what you pray for? Biden won. Trump lost. The sooner you accept reality the better off you'll be. Or let it eat away at you for the rest of your life. No skin off my back.

I'm not hundreds of thousands of voters, but I'm only one of the hundreds of thousands across this nation who are praying for Trump to prevail, and justice to win the day.

No skin off my back upon what you think either.

LOL

A million people can pray for that. It's over. Enough states have certified their respective elections to give Biden the win. No state is going to tell a majority of their voters ... we counted your votes and Biden won... we canvassed your votes and Biden won... we certified your votes and Biden won... but fuck you and your votes, we're giving our electoral votes to Trump.

It's over, you lost. Deal with it, loser.

It doesn't matter, because if it was a fraudulent election, then it is null and voided. A do over is either nessesary or Trump wins because if the amount of fraud and illegal votes counted is proven, and it looks like that it will be the case, then Trump won the election. You can hoop and hollar all you want about this reason or that, but get ready for the do over or maybe because of the fraud in which is being proven as we speak, Trump automatically wins.

There will be no do over and no one is handing Trump the election he lost. You will have to go through the rest of your life miserable in the belief that Impeached Trump was robbed.

I can live with that. You deserve it for believing such a huckster who sold you bill of goods.

Glad you think it's over, so stay tuned because it ain't even close to being over.

You poor thing, this is gonna haunt you for life.

No, you are wrong on that one, but if Biden has to concede, it will devastate you because you have way to much invested in your leftism ideology in order to be set back again.

"...if Biden has to concede..."

So you are ok with corruption ? Why am I not surprised ?

He isn't and neither am I. We worked to get rid of Rump, the most corrupt President. But you must support it vehemently.

corrupt election isn't a way to take out a sitting president legally. To think we haven't figured it out, you're mistaken. You all have trying since November 9 2016. it's that simple. you lost, admit it. they say that's the first step of recovery program.

Accusations of corruption are easy to come by but as you've found out, the courts found that they were not grounds for overturning the results in any of the 50+ elections we had for President on Nov. 3rd.

We can thank Trumpybear and his Banana Republicans for your confusion, later.

Putin still smiles on you.

 

[jc456]

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

Nah, Trump did in fact lose. All of the bad votes added together in any state, is not nearly enough to change the outcome. He did in fact lose the election.

The way he lost, is still because of lies and evil in the media, and a failure of Americans to care about truth.

But they did in fact vote for that openly corrupt Biden. So... it is what it is.

Not giving up yet. It matters not how many votes if the election was fraudulent, because who knows how deep the fraud went

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

LOLOL

Yes, he lost. All of the swing states have certified their respective elections.

Biden officially has enough electoral college votes to win the presidency after California became the latest state to certify its election results

California's 55 electors put Biden over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win, while Trump continues to contest the election in court.

www.businessinsider.com

Certification means nothing if the election is over turned. Trust me when I say that their are literally hundreds of thousands of citizen's praying this bullcrap election is overturned. Biden and Harris are losers.. They have just benefitted temporarily from a criminally run election by the deep state.

Who cares what you pray for? Biden won. Trump lost. The sooner you accept reality the better off you'll be. Or let it eat away at you for the rest of your life. No skin off my back.

I'm not hundreds of thousands of voters, but I'm only one of the hundreds of thousands across this nation who are praying for Trump to prevail, and justice to win the day.

No skin off my back upon what you think either.

LOL

A million people can pray for that. It's over. Enough states have certified their respective elections to give Biden the win. No state is going to tell a majority of their voters ... we counted your votes and Biden won... we canvassed your votes and Biden won... we certified your votes and Biden won... but fuck you and your votes, we're giving our electoral votes to Trump.

It's over, you lost. Deal with it, loser.

It doesn't matter, because if it was a fraudulent election, then it is null and voided. A do over is either nessesary or Trump wins because if the amount of fraud and illegal votes counted is proven, and it looks like that it will be the case, then Trump won the election. You can hoop and hollar all you want about this reason or that, but get ready for the do over or maybe because of the fraud in which is being proven as we speak, Trump automatically wins.

There will be no do over and no one is handing Trump the election he lost. You will have to go through the rest of your life miserable in the belief that Impeached Trump was robbed.

I can live with that. You deserve it for believing such a huckster who sold you bill of goods.

Glad you think it's over, so stay tuned because it ain't even close to being over.

You poor thing, this is gonna haunt you for life.

No, you are wrong on that one, but if Biden has to concede, it will devastate you because you have way to much invested in your leftism ideology in order to be set back again.

"...if Biden has to concede..."

So you are ok with corruption ? Why am I not surprised ?

He isn't and neither am I. We worked to get rid of Rump, the most corrupt President. But you must support it vehemently.

corrupt election isn't a way to take out a sitting president legally. To think we haven't figured it out, you're mistaken. You all have trying since November 9 2016. it's that simple. you lost, admit it. they say that's the first step of recovery program.

Accusations of corruption are easy to come by but as you've found out, the courts found that they were not grounds for overturning the results in any of the 50+ elections we had for President on Nov. 3rd.

We can thank Trumpybear and his Banana Republicans for your confusion, later.

Putin still smiles on you.

well evidence can't be heard until one is in court. corrupt courts is just that, corrupt. All whistleblowers must be heard. you all said so.

 

[Andylusion]

Fake News. He never really existed in the first place.

It all been a last minute desperation ploy dreamed up by Bannon and Rove.

Right up there with Pizzagate.

Rightwing moroonies bought more pizza this time than last.

Who faked the graphic sex between Crack Pipe Hunter and his young niece?
A porno Spielberg type?

WTF?

Stop spreading bullshit, if there was sex with a minor Biden would be in jail already for statutory rape.

Just like someone would be in jail if they had classified information on an unsecured server in their basement? You folks are funny, possibly totally naive, or both.

You don't know wtf you are talking about. Intent was never established in Clinton's case. Server was secure enough for her emails to never leak and she took measures to keep classified emails out of it. The ones that were found were not marked classified in the heading.

In statutory rape case here intent would be easily established as he of course would know her age.

Oh please.... even you.... even as stupid and ignorant as you personally are.... even you don't believe that.

Hillary Clinton Defends Not Knowing State Department Classification Markings

Hillary Clinton told ABC's David Muir, "There are no excuses."

abcnews.go.com

FBI Director James Comey has said that three email chains with Clinton included at least one paragraph marked "(C)," indicating that the paragraph contained confidential material.​

​

He has called Clinton's handling of classified info "extremely careless" but said there's no evidence to indicate she knew she was sending or receiving classified info.​

​

Clinton told the FBI that she did not know what the "(C)" meant at the beginning of the paragraphs and speculated it was a reference to paragraphs marked in alphabetical order — something she reiterated in ABC's exclusive interview.​

Let me simplify that clip from the article.

Hillary Clinton.... a woman that has been in the highest levels of government since the 1990s... so for nearly 20 years....

In fact, I've read that governors have access to classified information too, which means she likely had contact to classified information when she was first lady of Arkansas, which means from 1983 to 2013 she should have known how to determine if information was classified.

And here she is saying to Federal investigators, that she had no idea how to tell if any information she got was classified or not.

Pleading ignorance was the only reason Hillary Clinton was not prosecuted for illegally having classified information on an non-secured server.

Not knowing what was classified, and what was not classified, after decades in high office?

And she was Secretary of State? Secretary of State deals with classified information all the time.

That leads us to only two possible conclusions to be made from this. Only two. These are the only two possible conclusions that any rational thinking person can come to, if they have any integrity at all.

A: Hillary Clinton is the absolute number one, most completely and utterly incompetent and ignorant, and unqualified politician to have ever been in politics since this countries founding, and is completely disqualified to be in any public office of any level.

To put that in perspective, the service staff at the white house are trained on identifying classified information, for such times as when they are required to deliver a message to the president. That makes Hillary Clinton, dumber than the guy who delivers a ham sandwich to the President. That makes Hillary Clinton unqualified to work as service staff for a President, at the White House!

B: Hillary Clinton as bold face, and serial liar, and is corrupt to her very core.

I'm willing to bet the answer is B. But either way, I'll be fine with whichever option you think is true, because it's one or the other. The facts don't give you another option.

Either she is a pathological liar, and corrupt to her very core.... or she makes Forest Gump look like an astrophysicist.

What is and is not classified is not as clear cut as you seem to imagine it to be.

In your quote Comey tells you that there is no evidence of intent and his judgement stood the test of multiple reviews by Trump's DOJ including extensive 2018 review by the IG that found conclusion reasonable and consistent with how the department handled these cases in the past.

No one in their right mind is seeing Clinton intentionally trying to leak classified info here and at the end of the day that's what the law intended to prevent and that's how FBI and DOJ have been treating these cases.

How many years will you nutters be selectively obsessing over Clinton emails already?? Time to move the f on already.

See you just made up a false claim, and attacked it. No one anywhere, said she "intentional" tried to leak classified information.

That is a false claim.

The question is, after 30 years in high office, was Hillary Clinton completely incompetent about classified information, or was she a liar?

Dummy, mens rea, that is to say "intentional"ity is a standard DOJ criteria for prosecution based on those statutes.

Did Clinton screw up? Absolutely. She appologized for it too. Want to make a whole character call out of it? Knock yourself out, but the conversation is not about Hillary's character, it's about law enforcement and the ridiculous "Democrats always get away with it" insinuation I was responding to.

Bottom line is that Hunter would be prosecuted for statutory rape if FBI found on his laptop what another poster falsely described as explicit sex with a minor. #rememberWeiner

Yeah, I'm sure she apologized for the email server, that she used professional data deletion software to prevent investigators from determining what all was on that server?

Really? "Oops... sorry"? Good enough in your world? Not even close.

If she was even remotely innocent in the matter, then she would have turned over the server entirely to investigators, without professionally erasing the date to prevent them from determining what was on it.

And yes, I will make a very clear character call out of that, because it exposes every aspect of her character.

As for Hunter Biden, he was clearly corrupt, and used his position for personal benefit while protecting known corrupt energy executives in Ukraine that had ties to Russia.

 

[Andylusion]

No. Now you are sounding like a Democrat, saying accusations against Bret Kavanough are all that is required.

Not quite

I am not about to put blind faith into strangers in black robes who continually abuse their power just because you will call me dirty names if I dont

We are supposed to be the party of evidence. If you have clear evidence, by all means provide it.

But this "every single judge is corrupt, without evidence" is like Democrats saying "Believe all women without evidence!".

Sorry, but I'm not a partisan bigot, and I'll call out anyone when they start doing this crazy left-wing style "Trump-Russia must be true, because I refuse to accept he's my president" nonsense.

When Right-wing people start talking like mindless left-wingers, I'm going to call them out.

You want people to take you seriously, by all means provide real evidence. I'd love to see real evidence. But just because left-wingers are mindless idiots these days, doesn't mean I'm going to join them in the 'no need for evidence' mantra.

we have evidence but somehow your side manages to sweep it all way just as you managed to stuff the ballot boxes in the first place

the evidence of poll workers in georgia counting ballots after everyone else had gone home for the evening is damning

If you have the evidence, I would love to start sending a dozen democrats to life in prison. Provide that evidence to world as quickly as possible.

But saying "the other side swept it away" is the same as those dumb Democrats saying "Have the Trump-Russia evidence, and you swept it away".

I'm not a Democrat. I'm not going to buy accusations without evidence, and I don't care about your excuses. Show the evidence. Prove it to me. That's the only thing that will work. Everything else is tin-foil hat conspiracy theories, on the same level as Christine Blasey Ford. I didn't believe her with zero evidence, and I won't believe you, and your conspiracy nuts either.

Give me evidence. Prove it.

 

[Andylusion]

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

Nah, Trump did in fact lose. All of the bad votes added together in any state, is not nearly enough to change the outcome. He did in fact lose the election.

The way he lost, is still because of lies and evil in the media, and a failure of Americans to care about truth.

But they did in fact vote for that openly corrupt Biden. So... it is what it is.

Not giving up yet. It matters not how many votes if the election was fraudulent, because who knows how deep the fraud went

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

LOLOL

Yes, he lost. All of the swing states have certified their respective elections.

Biden officially has enough electoral college votes to win the presidency after California became the latest state to certify its election results

California's 55 electors put Biden over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win, while Trump continues to contest the election in court.

www.businessinsider.com

Certification means nothing if the election is over turned. Trust me when I say that their are literally hundreds of thousands of citizen's praying this bullcrap election is overturned. Biden and Harris are losers.. They have just benefitted temporarily from a criminally run election by the deep state.

Who cares what you pray for? Biden won. Trump lost. The sooner you accept reality the better off you'll be. Or let it eat away at you for the rest of your life. No skin off my back.

I'm not hundreds of thousands of voters, but I'm only one of the hundreds of thousands across this nation who are praying for Trump to prevail, and justice to win the day.

No skin off my back upon what you think either.

LOL

A million people can pray for that. It's over. Enough states have certified their respective elections to give Biden the win. No state is going to tell a majority of their voters ... we counted your votes and Biden won... we canvassed your votes and Biden won... we certified your votes and Biden won... but fuck you and your votes, we're giving our electoral votes to Trump.

It's over, you lost. Deal with it, loser.

It doesn't matter, because if it was a fraudulent election, then it is null and voided. A do over is either nessesary or Trump wins because if the amount of fraud and illegal votes counted is proven, and it looks like that it will be the case, then Trump won the election. You can hoop and hollar all you want about this reason or that, but get ready for the do over or maybe because of the fraud in which is being proven as we speak, Trump automatically wins.

There will be no do over and no one is handing Trump the election he lost. You will have to go through the rest of your life miserable in the belief that Impeached Trump was robbed.

I can live with that. You deserve it for believing such a huckster who sold you bill of goods.

Glad you think it's over, so stay tuned because it ain't even close to being over.

You poor thing, this is gonna haunt you for life.

No, you are wrong on that one, but if Biden has to concede, it will devastate you because you have way to much invested in your leftism ideology in order to be set back again.

"...if Biden has to concede..."

So you are ok with corruption ? Why am I not surprised ?

As I never said I'm ok with corruption, I'm not surprised you're a fucking imbecile who suffers from delusions.

But Biden wasn't even hidden behind stupidity of "I don't know what is classified information or not" type corruption.

Biden was open, blatant, in your face, I saved my son and his $50 Million for a few months cronies from a prosecutor, type corruption.

Biden's corruption was so clear, so obvious, so open... that either you should not support Biden over Trump, or you support corruption.

It isn't even up for debate. We now know for a fact, without even the slightest of questions, that Biden is openly corrupt.

So do you want Biden as president? If yes, then you support corruption. End of story.

You can deny that until the end of time, we've seen the videos, we read the emails, we know the story. Biden didn't deny it, and he was openly boasting about it.

You support open corruption if you want Biden to be president. End of the story, sir. That is the only position one can have, and support Biden.

That's been debunked. There was no active investigation into his son when he forced the issue of firing that corrupt prosecutor.

That claim you just made, is what was debunked.

However, Shokin, at the time, according to the interview, was investigating Mykola Zlochevsky, the former minister of ecology and natural resources of Ukraine — also the founder of Burisma. Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of the firm, which Shokin claimed was an appointment made by Zlochevsky “in order to protect himself.”​

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show

The fired prosecutor at the center of the Ukraine controversy said during a private interview with President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani earlier this year that he was told to back off an investigation into a natural gas firm that was linked to Joe Biden’s son, according to details of...

www.foxnews.com

Moreover.....

“Mr. Shokin attempted to continue the investigations but on or around June or July of 2015, the U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt told him that the investigation has to be handled with white gloves, which according to Mr. Shokin, that implied do nothing,” the notes from the interview stated. The notes also claimed Shokin was told Biden had held up U.S. aid to Ukraine over the investigation.​

​

Shokin was fired in April 2016, and his case was “closed by the current Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko,” according to the notes. Despite his claims, Shokin, on both sides of the Atlantic, had been widely accused of corruption.​

So let's review.

The investigation into Burisma was dormant. Not closed. Only after he was fired, did the new Prosecutor General close the investigation.

Why was it dormant? Because Shokin had been threatened, because Biden's son was on the board of directors.

End of story dude. This was clear undeniable corruption. The facts prove it. You are wrong. You elected an openly corrupt president, in the name of getting rid of corruption. You, and all the mindless playthings of the left, have been played for complete and total fools, and you are.

Nice try, but no. That's what Shokin said last year when talking with Giuliani. But in reality...

​

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

​

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.​

​

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”​

​

[...]​

​

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.​

​

[...]​

​

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

So right there in your own post.......... You make my point.

“It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

*YOU* posted that. Correct? You posted that from your own link. YOU SAID IT.

When was Hunter Biden added to the board of directors at Burisma?

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf

This is from the Senate Governments own investigation.

Page 3, paragraph 2, please read....

​

On April 16, 2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon after was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.” The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April 28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma, and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.​

So..... then as you pointed out... magically from 2014 to 2015, the investigation was shelved, and they did not purse it.

Directly after Hunter Biden joined the board of directors at Bursima, which was literally 14 days after British officials seized assets of the owner of the company for corruption.

Let's recap again...

• Burisma is being investigated for corruption.
• British officials seize assets of a corrupt oligarch.
• Hunter Biden joins corrupt oligarch's company board of directors.
• Investigation is shelved.
• Hunter Biden is paid tens of millions.
• Joe Biden demands prosecutor who will not dismiss the case, to be fired.
• Prosecutor is fired, new prosecutor dismisses case.
• Joe Biden brags about protecting son's lucrative deal with corrupt oligarch by getting the prosecutor fired.

Democrats voted in favor of clear, unambiguous, bold faced corruption, at the highest levels of the US government.

End of story. That's is all there is to it. You support corruption. Then end. Game over. Thanks for playing, but you are a supporter of corruption.

LOLOLOL

One little problem with your "recap" -- it was Shokin who shelved the investigation in 2014 and 2015. According to you, Joe Biden blackmailed Poroshenko to fire the prosecutor who wasn't actively investigating Burisma.

Yeah... it was Shokin who shelved the investigation in 2014...... right after Hunter Biden joined Burisma, and Shokin himself said he was told to deal with Burisma "with kid gloves", which is exactly why he shelved it after Hunter joined Burisma.

You read the time line. The report says exactly what happened when.

• Burisma is being investigated for corruption.
• British officials seize assets of a corrupt oligarch.
• Hunter Biden joins corrupt oligarch's company board of directors.
• Investigation is shelved.
• Hunter Biden is paid tens of millions.
• Joe Biden demands prosecutor who will not dismiss the case, to be fired.
• Prosecutor is fired, new prosecutor dismisses case.
• Joe Biden brags about protecting son's lucrative deal with corrupt oligarch by getting the prosecutor fired.

Investigation opened..

Hunter Biden joins the company...

Investigation shelved.... but not closed.

The time line is laid out perfectly. There is no question why the investigation was shelved. The government, fearing retaliation involving the Bidens, pressured Shokin to shelve the investigation, which he did.

I'm sorry, but the evidence that I provided, and you yourself provided.... makes this undeniable.

You support corruption, if you voted for Joe Biden. End of story. You lose.

 

[Faun]

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

Nah, Trump did in fact lose. All of the bad votes added together in any state, is not nearly enough to change the outcome. He did in fact lose the election.

The way he lost, is still because of lies and evil in the media, and a failure of Americans to care about truth.

But they did in fact vote for that openly corrupt Biden. So... it is what it is.

Not giving up yet. It matters not how many votes if the election was fraudulent, because who knows how deep the fraud went

Sally Yates might become the next Attorney General. Remember Trump fired her. They’re also talking about Merrick garland becoming the next Attorney General. The guy the GOP screwed over

The entire Trump crime family is definitely going to have problems after January 20. I can’t wait.

Trump and IVanka could be a Toofer because he paid her hundreds of thousands of dollars as his tax advisor and then wrote all that off as a tax write off. That’s multiple felonies on different levels.

View attachment 423957
View attachment 423956

I'd fire the IRS then.

Next on Trump's hit list is William Barr The Unloyal.

Hit list ? Rotflmbo.. If Trump was as bad as you and other's here try to paint him as, then you wouldn't be around to freely do your bad mouthing of him and his family like you all have done here. Be glad you are an American, and be thankful that Trump wasn't Hitler like you all wanted him so bad to be. Wouldn't have been as easy for you all if he was Hitler, so be thankful.

By "hit list," I mean people he fires.

So in your world, if you fire the business who does your oil changes on your cars, and go to a different shop to have it done.... you are engaged in having a hit list?

If you fire the company who provides cell phone service, and hire a different company, then you have a hit list?

If you go to a different store? If you fire the guy who mows your lawn, that's a 'hit list'?

You have a very different idea of what a hit list is, compared to most people.

If you fire one or two? No.

When you fire 9 out of 10? Absofuckinglutely...

Tracking turnover in the Trump administration | Brookings

Brookings researchers track turnover among Trump's top staffers and Cabinet members.

www.brookings.edu

When you had corruption and inept backstabbers galore, and they were found to be using their positions for wrongful reason's or just not doing their jobs in a satisfactory way, then of course they end up fired. Something unheard of in these new millennial's brainwashed thought processes, because they have been brainwashed to not recognize injustice or corruption now when they see it. Trump is the cleaner, and Washington wasn't ready for the cleaner. Trump upset the apple cart, and in Washington that is unexceptable because the corruption was so entrenched, and the lifestyles so lavish that how dare anyone challenge it all........How dare a President come in, and try to bring back normalcy to that which had become abnormal in the eyes of most citizen's ? How dare he fire someone for not doing their jobs, I mean that is unheard of in these days and times. Pffft.

LOLOL

Trump needed to clean up his own administration?? Didn't he say he hires no one but the best people?

Well, when you have lifetime government types of individuals who have been in government for years, then you suppose that you can trust keeping them in their respective position's or even moving them into higher position's in government (shuffle them around some), but it appears that the climate Barack Obama and Joe Biden created, had basically ended that way of doing business in the government. Trump should have fired every deep stater he could, and stacked the government with very deserving American's who would have been proud to serve in the government under the right leadership. If Trump wins, he should go through the government like a tornado going through a trailer park, and leave no stone unturned. The people deserve better than what they will end up with under Biden.

LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

He hasn't lost yet, so don't go crazy when he takes office for another 4 years. I'd hate to see you fall in lock step with the criminals.

LOLOL

Yes, he lost. All of the swing states have certified their respective elections.

Biden officially has enough electoral college votes to win the presidency after California became the latest state to certify its election results

California's 55 electors put Biden over the 270 electoral college votes needed to win, while Trump continues to contest the election in court.

www.businessinsider.com

Certification means nothing if the election is over turned. Trust me when I say that their are literally hundreds of thousands of citizen's praying this bullcrap election is overturned. Biden and Harris are losers.. They have just benefitted temporarily from a criminally run election by the deep state.

Who cares what you pray for? Biden won. Trump lost. The sooner you accept reality the better off you'll be. Or let it eat away at you for the rest of your life. No skin off my back.

I'm not hundreds of thousands of voters, but I'm only one of the hundreds of thousands across this nation who are praying for Trump to prevail, and justice to win the day.

No skin off my back upon what you think either.

LOL

A million people can pray for that. It's over. Enough states have certified their respective elections to give Biden the win. No state is going to tell a majority of their voters ... we counted your votes and Biden won... we canvassed your votes and Biden won... we certified your votes and Biden won... but fuck you and your votes, we're giving our electoral votes to Trump.

It's over, you lost. Deal with it, loser.

It doesn't matter, because if it was a fraudulent election, then it is null and voided. A do over is either nessesary or Trump wins because if the amount of fraud and illegal votes counted is proven, and it looks like that it will be the case, then Trump won the election. You can hoop and hollar all you want about this reason or that, but get ready for the do over or maybe because of the fraud in which is being proven as we speak, Trump automatically wins.

There will be no do over and no one is handing Trump the election he lost. You will have to go through the rest of your life miserable in the belief that Impeached Trump was robbed.

I can live with that. You deserve it for believing such a huckster who sold you bill of goods.

Glad you think it's over, so stay tuned because it ain't even close to being over.

You poor thing, this is gonna haunt you for life.

No, you are wrong on that one, but if Biden has to concede, it will devastate you because you have way to much invested in your leftism ideology in order to be set back again.

"...if Biden has to concede..."

So you are ok with corruption ? Why am I not surprised ?

As I never said I'm ok with corruption, I'm not surprised you're a fucking imbecile who suffers from delusions.

But Biden wasn't even hidden behind stupidity of "I don't know what is classified information or not" type corruption.

Biden was open, blatant, in your face, I saved my son and his $50 Million for a few months cronies from a prosecutor, type corruption.

Biden's corruption was so clear, so obvious, so open... that either you should not support Biden over Trump, or you support corruption.

It isn't even up for debate. We now know for a fact, without even the slightest of questions, that Biden is openly corrupt.

So do you want Biden as president? If yes, then you support corruption. End of story.

You can deny that until the end of time, we've seen the videos, we read the emails, we know the story. Biden didn't deny it, and he was openly boasting about it.

You support open corruption if you want Biden to be president. End of the story, sir. That is the only position one can have, and support Biden.

That's been debunked. There was no active investigation into his son when he forced the issue of firing that corrupt prosecutor.

That claim you just made, is what was debunked.

However, Shokin, at the time, according to the interview, was investigating Mykola Zlochevsky, the former minister of ecology and natural resources of Ukraine — also the founder of Burisma. Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of the firm, which Shokin claimed was an appointment made by Zlochevsky “in order to protect himself.”​

Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show

The fired prosecutor at the center of the Ukraine controversy said during a private interview with President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani earlier this year that he was told to back off an investigation into a natural gas firm that was linked to Joe Biden’s son, according to details of...

www.foxnews.com

Moreover.....

“Mr. Shokin attempted to continue the investigations but on or around June or July of 2015, the U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt told him that the investigation has to be handled with white gloves, which according to Mr. Shokin, that implied do nothing,” the notes from the interview stated. The notes also claimed Shokin was told Biden had held up U.S. aid to Ukraine over the investigation.​

​

Shokin was fired in April 2016, and his case was “closed by the current Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko,” according to the notes. Despite his claims, Shokin, on both sides of the Atlantic, had been widely accused of corruption.​

So let's review.

The investigation into Burisma was dormant. Not closed. Only after he was fired, did the new Prosecutor General close the investigation.

Why was it dormant? Because Shokin had been threatened, because Biden's son was on the board of directors.

End of story dude. This was clear undeniable corruption. The facts prove it. You are wrong. You elected an openly corrupt president, in the name of getting rid of corruption. You, and all the mindless playthings of the left, have been played for complete and total fools, and you are.

Nice try, but no. That's what Shokin said last year when talking with Giuliani. But in reality...

​

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

​

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.​

​

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”​

​

[...]​

​

The case against Zlochevsky and his Burisma Holdings was assigned to Shokin, then a deputy prosecutor. But Shokin and others weren’t pursuing it, according to the internal reports from the Ukrainian prosecutor’s office reviewed by Bloomberg.​

​

[...]​

​

Shokin took no action to pursue cases against Zlochevsky throughout 2015, said Kasko, who was Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation and helping in asset-recovery investigations. Kasko said he had urged Shokin to pursue the investigations.​

So right there in your own post.......... You make my point.

“It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”

*YOU* posted that. Correct? You posted that from your own link. YOU SAID IT.

When was Hunter Biden added to the board of directors at Burisma?

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf

This is from the Senate Governments own investigation.

Page 3, paragraph 2, please read....

​

On April 16, 2014, Vice President Biden met with his son’s business partner, Devon Archer, at the White House. Five days later, Vice President Biden visited Ukraine, and he soon after was described in the press as the “public face of the administration’s handling of Ukraine.” The day after his visit, on April 22, Archer joined the board of Burisma. Six days later, on April 28, British officials seized $23 million from the London bank accounts of Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky. Fourteen days later, on May 12, Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma, and over the course of the next several years, Hunter Biden and Devon Archer were paid millions of dollars from a corrupt Ukrainian oligarch for their participation on the board.​

So..... then as you pointed out... magically from 2014 to 2015, the investigation was shelved, and they did not purse it.

Directly after Hunter Biden joined the board of directors at Bursima, which was literally 14 days after British officials seized assets of the owner of the company for corruption.

Let's recap again...

• Burisma is being investigated for corruption.
• British officials seize assets of a corrupt oligarch.
• Hunter Biden joins corrupt oligarch's company board of directors.
• Investigation is shelved.
• Hunter Biden is paid tens of millions.
• Joe Biden demands prosecutor who will not dismiss the case, to be fired.
• Prosecutor is fired, new prosecutor dismisses case.
• Joe Biden brags about protecting son's lucrative deal with corrupt oligarch by getting the prosecutor fired.

Democrats voted in favor of clear, unambiguous, bold faced corruption, at the highest levels of the US government.

End of story. That's is all there is to it. You support corruption. Then end. Game over. Thanks for playing, but you are a supporter of corruption.

LOLOLOL

One little problem with your "recap" -- it was Shokin who shelved the investigation in 2014 and 2015. According to you, Joe Biden blackmailed Poroshenko to fire the prosecutor who wasn't actively investigating Burisma.

Yeah... it was Shokin who shelved the investigation in 2014...... right after Hunter Biden joined Burisma, and Shokin himself said he was told to deal with Burisma "with kid gloves", which is exactly why he shelved it after Hunter joined Burisma.

You read the time line. The report says exactly what happened when.

• Burisma is being investigated for corruption.
• British officials seize assets of a corrupt oligarch.
• Hunter Biden joins corrupt oligarch's company board of directors.
• Investigation is shelved.
• Hunter Biden is paid tens of millions.
• Joe Biden demands prosecutor who will not dismiss the case, to be fired.
• Prosecutor is fired, new prosecutor dismisses case.
• Joe Biden brags about protecting son's lucrative deal with corrupt oligarch by getting the prosecutor fired.

Investigation opened..

Hunter Biden joins the company...

Investigation shelved.... but not closed.

The time line is laid out perfectly. There is no question why the investigation was shelved. The government, fearing retaliation involving the Bidens, pressured Shokin to shelve the investigation, which he did.

I'm sorry, but the evidence that I provided, and you yourself provided.... makes this undeniable.

You support corruption, if you voted for Joe Biden. End of story. You lose.

LOLOL

Again, your idiocy is, to protect Burisma, that Biden blackmailed Poroshenko to fire the prosecutor who wasn't investigating Burisma.

I know that sounds stupid, but that's what your claiming.

 

[candycorn]

You fabricated lies. There was no collusion with Russia. There was no corruption. The only open blatant corruption was Biden. We know this for a fact now. Biden didn't even deny it, he was boasting about it in a video.

You elected the most corrupt president, in the name of getting rid of corruption you invented with lies.

The US Senate confirmed that the 2016 Trump campaign shared data with Russian intel. Its very likely it happened in 2020 as well.

 

[Mac-7]

I'm not a Democrat. I'm not going to buy accusations without evidence,

we can always have irrefutable evidence sinse the dems are very careful about their crimes

for instance in georgia 5 poll workers declared the counting finished and sent press and observers away

then they started counting again

That sure looks like fraud to me

 

[jc456]

You fabricated lies. There was no collusion with Russia. There was no corruption. The only open blatant corruption was Biden. We know this for a fact now. Biden didn't even deny it, he was boasting about it in a video.

You elected the most corrupt president, in the name of getting rid of corruption you invented with lies.

The US Senate confirmed that the 2016 Trump campaign shared data with Russian intel. Its very likely it happened in 2020 as well.

where's that proof?