Comparing The Red State 2014 Fluke: What? GOP No Chance For 2016 CA Senate?

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
Democratic candidates, in 2015, were unable to correctly name the President of the United State(?). A California Governor once noted that in California, the Republicans are even losing at the box office(?)! Even now, there is apparently a "Terminator" sequel in the works, or something(?)! Mostly, for the third time in a row, the Republicans have no chance at winning--actually much of anything--in 2016, especially in California.

In California apos s U.S. Senate race GOP again sees only slim chance - LA Times

The undercurrent is clear, compared with 2014. The national elections tend to be more diversity-based, including a larger youth vote. The real sitting President of the United States--who does have a name--is from a diversity-based Blue State, originally himself--Hawaii. The Blue State based worldwide internet has created information about all cultures, among all cultures. The new foreign policy approach of Obama-Biden can be compared with the Ted Cruz brand. An Arab Spring could and did occur. Senator Cruz most recently has noted that Europe is leaderless without an easily named(?), U. S. President. The tendency to relate to an older, "Bwana" based approach to international relations--even defines the problem with the Republicans in nationalized elections.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Who was that Mascale, anyway?!" "He's, The Lo-o-o-ne White Male! Tune In, and see if he's dead yet!")
 
There are conservatives living outside of L.A., San Francisco and San Diego...just not enough to derail those bastions of liberal communism in the large populated cities.
 
"The conservatives living outside of L.A., San Francisco, and San Diego," are famously in the red counties along the Nevada border, in the virtually unpopulated mountains. Some of the areas are famously cliffside, or plateaus, where "down" is a half-mile or more below. The views are majestic, but employment centers these are not. Where there are employed people, then the article cited in the link holds the key to 2016.

"Democrats already have a steep advantage over Republicans in voter registration in California — 43% to 28%. That edge could be magnified in 2016 because the ballot will feature a presidential contest, which typically attracts more young and minority voters who tend toward the Democratic Party."

The national referendum may soon center more on employment and wage issues, where even in Kentucky, a Democratic candidate may be able to name correctly, the President of the United States. The other explanation is that the junior Kentucky, GOP Senator, needs to fit a new pair of glasses, on one or more of the Democratic candidates, from there.

Vacation spots of the upper 1% are not likely to be the key to the next election.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Yodle Odle Ladee Who! Yodle Odle Ladee Whoo! Yodle Odle Ladee Whoooooooooo. . . .!"
 
There are conservatives living outside of L.A., San Francisco and San Diego...just not enough to derail those bastions of liberal communism in the large populated cities.


Yes there are conservatives in all the rural areas of the nation. Including California and my state.

The conservative's problem is that there are too few of them in the rural areas.

The liberal urban areas have more people and they will always have more votes than the rural areas.

Too bad for conservatives. They're very outnumbered in the Blue Wall states.

Get used to it.
 
Hey OP. That Arab Spring you're talking about is zip. Nada. Nothing. Bye bye.

:lol:

Jihadist pool parties at the US Embassy in Tripoli.

887395-b8c6ee5e-33e2-11e4-981b-74995293b57c.jpg
 
Too bad for conservatives. They're very outnumbered in the Blue Wall states.

Get used to it.

Already use to it...absolutely destroying this country for votes of illegal aliens, non-citizens and welfare leeches... thanks to you fucking democrats.



I've been a registered Independent since I first registered to vote in 1978.

I don't vote for a party. I vote for a liberal.

However illegal aliens non citizens can't vote. People on welfare can vote however not many of them do.

I know it was in the 20th century and nearly 20 years ago but Clinton reformed the welfare system. No one can be on welfare for life anymore. How long a person can stay on it depends on the state but I think it's a life maximum of 4 years. Plus welfare for women and children is around 1% of the national budget. So it's pointless to complain about people on welfare.

The welfare you should be concerned with is corporate welfare. It's a waste of money and it goes to those who are already rich who don't need it. It's a much larger percentage of our national budget.

It's good that you're used to being in the minority. Now stop complaining and deal with it.
 
Democratic candidates, in 2015, were unable to correctly name the President of the United State(?). A California Governor once noted that in California, the Republicans are even losing at the box office(?)! Even now, there is apparently a "Terminator" sequel in the works, or something(?)! Mostly, for the third time in a row, the Republicans have no chance at winning--actually much of anything--in 2016, especially in California.

In California apos s U.S. Senate race GOP again sees only slim chance - LA Times

The undercurrent is clear, compared with 2014. The national elections tend to be more diversity-based, including a larger youth vote. The real sitting President of the United States--who does have a name--is from a diversity-based Blue State, originally himself--Hawaii. The Blue State based worldwide internet has created information about all cultures, among all cultures. The new foreign policy approach of Obama-Biden can be compared with the Ted Cruz brand. An Arab Spring could and did occur. Senator Cruz most recently has noted that Europe is leaderless without an easily named(?), U. S. President. The tendency to relate to an older, "Bwana" based approach to international relations--even defines the problem with the Republicans in nationalized elections.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("Who was that Mascale, anyway?!" "He's, The Lo-o-o-ne White Male! Tune In, and see if he's dead yet!")

Yes we know one far left drone will be replaced with another far left drone.

That is not news, that is just California as they continue to show they are not connected to reality..
 
However illegal aliens non citizens can't vote. People on welfare can vote however not many of them do.

If dead people are voting...rest assured illegal aliens/non citizens/non registered voters could vote. Crooked liberals can accomplish anything and have on numerous occasions as long as they control voting precincts in liberally populated areas of the country.
 
A Liberal will win in a liberal state is anyone supposed to be surprised by this? That's like being surprised that Greg Abbott defeated Wendy Davis for Governor here by 20 points.
 
What self respecting conservative would want that seat? CA man talk about your illegal alien measles crime tax infested liberal shit hole.
 
The Republican House Majority Leader comes from California, clearly not qualified--not able to run for an open U. S. Senate seat. The every-so-often House Committee Leaders, from California, are easily said empty chairs. Republican liberals from California still do make war movies, though some call them anti-war movies. Arizona Republican leaders take their wars on their own initiatives. While 55,000 were getting killed in Vietnam, the Sedona brand crawled out behind the lines, and sat the whole thing out.

Senator Cruz has been critical of the President--a name at least he can spell--for not being more Bwana in the U. S. approach to diplomacy. The outcome of that gets reported on ABC Sunday morning with George. . . .last name S. "Last Week, the Pentagon had no names to release of anyone killed in Afghanistan or Iraq.

And so there is basis to compare and contrast the brands, and apparently what they see as passing for qualifications for higher level office.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Funny White Eyes governing party seems to want to win based on votes from where nobody lives(?)!)
 
Last edited:
However illegal aliens non citizens can't vote. People on welfare can vote however not many of them do.

If dead people are voting...rest assured illegal aliens/non citizens/non registered voters could vote. Crooked liberals can accomplish anything and have on numerous occasions as long as they control voting precincts in liberally populated areas of the country.



Dead people aren't voting.

You're going to have to show some honest and credible proof that dead people, illegal aliens, residents but not citizen and citizens who aren't registered are voting.

The bush boy and republicans tried to prove it but the only thing they came up with is that they couldn't prove it.

So put up or shut up.
 
However illegal aliens non citizens can't vote. People on welfare can vote however not many of them do.

If dead people are voting...rest assured illegal aliens/non citizens/non registered voters could vote. Crooked liberals can accomplish anything and have on numerous occasions as long as they control voting precincts in liberally populated areas of the country.



Dead people aren't voting.

You're going to have to show some honest and credible proof that dead people, illegal aliens, residents but not citizen and citizens who aren't registered are voting.

The bush boy and republicans tried to prove it but the only thing they came up with is that they couldn't prove it.

So put up or shut up.

In St. Louis, MO...everything about this city is controlled by democrats. Even politicians who have been dead for YEARS have voted . And truth be known there are more than 1.8 million dead people on the voting rolls in this damn country.

gr_VotingInfographic300.gif
 
Whites were 92% of the national elections vote in the 1990's, but only 72% of the national election vote in 2012. The concept of the dead voting goes back multiple decades, generally attributed to sloppy work in local offices. Some people in some counties had the same names and birth dates, in real life. It is not clear that such clerical problems ever constituted even a viable minority of the vote. Likely Catholic Cardinals attributed the rumors in Chicago to a parish or two, likely rising to vote for a Catholic for U. S. President, even before there was someone from South Chicago! Millions would be said to be able to note the comparison, (but probably shouldn't).

The lesson in California likely easily applies nationwide. Republicans won't even try to field a winning candidate, except in the areas where no person has ever lived, at all(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Not Since George Bush tried to strike a match, on the relatively statue-like Al Gore, has there been so much interest in products, coming from Cuba(?)!)
 
Actually, the Republicans want to focus, now, on income inequality, wealth inequality, and the various Senator Elizabeth Warren kinds of agenda. More likely the Republicans will attack by crawling behind the lines, finding a campsite, and sitting out any meaningful contribution to any problem resolution. They may do some press conferences to help prolong the basis concept, of no-help at all, for anything ongoing.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Mighty White Eyes Warrior, find scum even in tub at luxury spa(?). . .In the drought(?)!)
 
However illegal aliens non citizens can't vote. People on welfare can vote however not many of them do.

If dead people are voting...rest assured illegal aliens/non citizens/non registered voters could vote. Crooked liberals can accomplish anything and have on numerous occasions as long as they control voting precincts in liberally populated areas of the country.



Dead people aren't voting.

You're going to have to show some honest and credible proof that dead people, illegal aliens, residents but not citizen and citizens who aren't registered are voting.

The bush boy and republicans tried to prove it but the only thing they came up with is that they couldn't prove it.

So put up or shut up.

In St. Louis, MO...everything about this city is controlled by democrats. Even politicians who have been dead for YEARS have voted . And truth be known there are more than 1.8 million dead people on the voting rolls in this damn country.

gr_VotingInfographic300.gif



I guess I wasn't as clear as you needed me to be.

I said honest and credible proof.

Got a link to your accusations? Or is it from some stupid far right wing source who is lying through their teeth?

Oh and just because a person is still listed as a voter even though their dead, having the name listed isn't voting. You'll have to come up with a link to credible sources to back up your accusations.

Yes there have been a few instances that people were registered in two places and voted in both. ann coulter did it. So did denish de sousa and bruce fleming. There could be some democrats doing it too and if they are they should face the same consequences that ann coulter, bruce fleming and denish de sousa faced. Which wasn't any real sort of consequence. They didn't spend one minute in prison or jail.
 

Forum List

Back
Top