Coca-Cola required ID in 2020 shareholder meeting, but slams Georgia for voter ID law

[frigidweirdo]

Hypocrites.

It's so important to protect the sanctity of our shareholders and keep the riff raff out, but, the sanctity of your vote is not important to us.

Coca-Cola required ID in 2020 shareholder meeting, but slams Georgia for voter ID law

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.

www.foxbusiness.com

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.


“At the entrance to the meeting, we will verify your registration and request to see your admission ticket and a valid form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport,” the company wrote in reference to its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, held before the coronavirus pandemic.

Georgia’s new voting law requires a drivers’ license or state ID number be listed to submit an absentee ballot to vote, among other new reforms. The state already required ID to vote in person. It had previously relied on signature matching to verify ballots.

Coca-Cola is based in Atlanta. This week, the beverage company, among other Georgia-based companies, issued statements condemning the new legislation after threats of boycott.

I suppose a Coca-Cola board meeting is a right then.

Voting is a right. To ensure that right, maintaining integrity and reducing the risk of compromise must be an ongoing process. Providing State-issued identification is a step in that direction. Look how many other facets of our lives where we have rights and must provide state-issued identification and validation. Why the resistance when it comes to voting?

problem is, the whole system lacks integrity.

When you vote, your vote should count the same as everyone else's, but it doesn't.

maybe in China but in the USA it does...at least for now

No, it doesn't.

Gerrymandering in House elections, weighted nonsense in Presidential elections.... it's all a con. And the FPTP is the worst of all. Making so many votes count for NOTHING.

Many Americans are not comfortable with lax voter authentication. A judge just ruled in Michigan that the Michigan Secretary of State was unlawful in the 2020 Elections waived the signature verification requirement. Her actions exposed a vulnerability that could have left many votes count for nothing; or, a bad situation worse.

So, voters "are not comfortable with lax voter authentication" but they're perfectly happy with the rich stealing elections with gerrymandering and other tactics.

Nice.

It's like pigs complaining that their truck to the slaughterhouse is a little uncomfortable.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Hypocrites.

It's so important to protect the sanctity of our shareholders and keep the riff raff out, but, the sanctity of your vote is not important to us.

Coca-Cola required ID in 2020 shareholder meeting, but slams Georgia for voter ID law

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.

www.foxbusiness.com

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.


“At the entrance to the meeting, we will verify your registration and request to see your admission ticket and a valid form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport,” the company wrote in reference to its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, held before the coronavirus pandemic.

Georgia’s new voting law requires a drivers’ license or state ID number be listed to submit an absentee ballot to vote, among other new reforms. The state already required ID to vote in person. It had previously relied on signature matching to verify ballots.

Coca-Cola is based in Atlanta. This week, the beverage company, among other Georgia-based companies, issued statements condemning the new legislation after threats of boycott.

I suppose a Coca-Cola board meeting is a right then.

Voting is a right. To ensure that right, maintaining integrity and reducing the risk of compromise must be an ongoing process. Providing State-issued identification is a step in that direction. Look how many other facets of our lives where we have rights and must provide state-issued identification and validation. Why the resistance when it comes to voting?

problem is, the whole system lacks integrity.

When you vote, your vote should count the same as everyone else's, but it doesn't.

maybe in China but in the USA it does...at least for now

No, it doesn't.

Gerrymandering in House elections, weighted nonsense in Presidential elections.... it's all a con. And the FPTP is the worst of all. Making so many votes count for NOTHING.

Many Americans are not comfortable with lax voter authentication. A judge just ruled in Michigan that the Michigan Secretary of State was unlawful in the 2020 Elections waived the signature verification requirement. Her actions exposed a vulnerability that could have left many votes count for nothing; or, a bad situation worse.

So, voters "are not comfortable with lax voter authentication" but they're perfectly happy with the rich stealing elections with gerrymandering and other tactics.

Nice.

It's like pigs complaining that their truck to the slaughterhouse is a little uncomfortable.

you said people are comfortable with rich stealing elections and gerrymandering. I am not comfortable with either as well as vulnerabilities in our voting system. State issued ID as party of voter authentication process is so simple to add compared to legislation needed to outlaw gerrymandering; and, I don’t think one will ever get money out of politics or limited.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Hypocrites.

It's so important to protect the sanctity of our shareholders and keep the riff raff out, but, the sanctity of your vote is not important to us.

Coca-Cola required ID in 2020 shareholder meeting, but slams Georgia for voter ID law

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.

www.foxbusiness.com

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.


“At the entrance to the meeting, we will verify your registration and request to see your admission ticket and a valid form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport,” the company wrote in reference to its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, held before the coronavirus pandemic.

Georgia’s new voting law requires a drivers’ license or state ID number be listed to submit an absentee ballot to vote, among other new reforms. The state already required ID to vote in person. It had previously relied on signature matching to verify ballots.

Coca-Cola is based in Atlanta. This week, the beverage company, among other Georgia-based companies, issued statements condemning the new legislation after threats of boycott.

I suppose a Coca-Cola board meeting is a right then.

Voting is a right. To ensure that right, maintaining integrity and reducing the risk of compromise must be an ongoing process. Providing State-issued identification is a step in that direction. Look how many other facets of our lives where we have rights and must provide state-issued identification and validation. Why the resistance when it comes to voting?

problem is, the whole system lacks integrity.

When you vote, your vote should count the same as everyone else's, but it doesn't.

maybe in China but in the USA it does...at least for now

No, it doesn't.

Gerrymandering in House elections, weighted nonsense in Presidential elections.... it's all a con. And the FPTP is the worst of all. Making so many votes count for NOTHING.

Many Americans are not comfortable with lax voter authentication. A judge just ruled in Michigan that the Michigan Secretary of State was unlawful in the 2020 Elections waived the signature verification requirement. Her actions exposed a vulnerability that could have left many votes count for nothing; or, a bad situation worse.

So, voters "are not comfortable with lax voter authentication" but they're perfectly happy with the rich stealing elections with gerrymandering and other tactics.

Nice.

It's like pigs complaining that their truck to the slaughterhouse is a little uncomfortable.

you said people are comfortable with rich stealing elections and gerrymandering. I am not comfortable with either as well as vulnerabilities in our voting system. State issued ID as party of voter authentication process is so simple to add compared to legislation needed to outlaw gerrymandering; and, I don’t think one will ever get money out of politics or limited.

The problem is that most are. Most like the current system.

Write a thread about "proportional representation" and you'll get people saying it's "mob rule", as if DEMOCRACY is mob rule.

Because they like having the two team political fight, it's easy for them to understand, they can insult to their hearts content.

They don't need more than two bad choices for president. The worse the president, the better they feel.

 

[struth]

Hypocrites.

It's so important to protect the sanctity of our shareholders and keep the riff raff out, but, the sanctity of your vote is not important to us.

Coca-Cola required ID in 2020 shareholder meeting, but slams Georgia for voter ID law

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.

www.foxbusiness.com

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.


“At the entrance to the meeting, we will verify your registration and request to see your admission ticket and a valid form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport,” the company wrote in reference to its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, held before the coronavirus pandemic.

Georgia’s new voting law requires a drivers’ license or state ID number be listed to submit an absentee ballot to vote, among other new reforms. The state already required ID to vote in person. It had previously relied on signature matching to verify ballots.

Coca-Cola is based in Atlanta. This week, the beverage company, among other Georgia-based companies, issued statements condemning the new legislation after threats of boycott.

I suppose a Coca-Cola board meeting is a right then.

Voting is a right. To ensure that right, maintaining integrity and reducing the risk of compromise must be an ongoing process. Providing State-issued identification is a step in that direction. Look how many other facets of our lives where we have rights and must provide state-issued identification and validation. Why the resistance when it comes to voting?

problem is, the whole system lacks integrity.

When you vote, your vote should count the same as everyone else's, but it doesn't.

maybe in China but in the USA it does...at least for now

No, it doesn't.

Gerrymandering in House elections, weighted nonsense in Presidential elections.... it's all a con. And the FPTP is the worst of all. Making so many votes count for NOTHING.

Gerrymandering in the House, has nothing to do with Presidential elections. Presidential elections, are based on the entire popular vote of a state. How a district is laid out has nothing to do with it. WOW...just wow

Not sure what the FPTP stands for

Did I say gerrymandering in the House had anything to do with presidential elections?

No. So....

And you have the WHOLE INTERNET at your fingertips and you don't even know what FPTP is? Do you want to be taken seriously in this conversation?

Yes you did....or at least you it sounded like you did "Gerrymandering in House elections, weighted nonsense in Presidential elections.... it's all a con"

Sorry...a lot of things come up....Friends Peace Team Projects?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Hypocrites.

It's so important to protect the sanctity of our shareholders and keep the riff raff out, but, the sanctity of your vote is not important to us.

Coca-Cola required ID in 2020 shareholder meeting, but slams Georgia for voter ID law

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.

www.foxbusiness.com

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.


“At the entrance to the meeting, we will verify your registration and request to see your admission ticket and a valid form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport,” the company wrote in reference to its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, held before the coronavirus pandemic.

Georgia’s new voting law requires a drivers’ license or state ID number be listed to submit an absentee ballot to vote, among other new reforms. The state already required ID to vote in person. It had previously relied on signature matching to verify ballots.

Coca-Cola is based in Atlanta. This week, the beverage company, among other Georgia-based companies, issued statements condemning the new legislation after threats of boycott.

I suppose a Coca-Cola board meeting is a right then.

Voting is a right. To ensure that right, maintaining integrity and reducing the risk of compromise must be an ongoing process. Providing State-issued identification is a step in that direction. Look how many other facets of our lives where we have rights and must provide state-issued identification and validation. Why the resistance when it comes to voting?

problem is, the whole system lacks integrity.

When you vote, your vote should count the same as everyone else's, but it doesn't.

maybe in China but in the USA it does...at least for now

No, it doesn't.

Gerrymandering in House elections, weighted nonsense in Presidential elections.... it's all a con. And the FPTP is the worst of all. Making so many votes count for NOTHING.

Gerrymandering in the House, has nothing to do with Presidential elections. Presidential elections, are based on the entire popular vote of a state. How a district is laid out has nothing to do with it. WOW...just wow

Not sure what the FPTP stands for

Did I say gerrymandering in the House had anything to do with presidential elections?

No. So....

And you have the WHOLE INTERNET at your fingertips and you don't even know what FPTP is? Do you want to be taken seriously in this conversation?

Yes you did....or at least you it sounded like you did "Gerrymandering in House elections, weighted nonsense in Presidential elections.... it's all a con"

Sorry...a lot of things come up....Friends Peace Team Projects?

I'm sorry you can't do basic grammar.

Really, these conversations are kind of tiring.

 

[struth]

Hypocrites.

It's so important to protect the sanctity of our shareholders and keep the riff raff out, but, the sanctity of your vote is not important to us.

Coca-Cola required ID in 2020 shareholder meeting, but slams Georgia for voter ID law

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.

www.foxbusiness.com

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.


“At the entrance to the meeting, we will verify your registration and request to see your admission ticket and a valid form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport,” the company wrote in reference to its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, held before the coronavirus pandemic.

Georgia’s new voting law requires a drivers’ license or state ID number be listed to submit an absentee ballot to vote, among other new reforms. The state already required ID to vote in person. It had previously relied on signature matching to verify ballots.

Coca-Cola is based in Atlanta. This week, the beverage company, among other Georgia-based companies, issued statements condemning the new legislation after threats of boycott.

I suppose a Coca-Cola board meeting is a right then.

Voting is a right. To ensure that right, maintaining integrity and reducing the risk of compromise must be an ongoing process. Providing State-issued identification is a step in that direction. Look how many other facets of our lives where we have rights and must provide state-issued identification and validation. Why the resistance when it comes to voting?

problem is, the whole system lacks integrity.

When you vote, your vote should count the same as everyone else's, but it doesn't.

maybe in China but in the USA it does...at least for now

No, it doesn't.

Gerrymandering in House elections, weighted nonsense in Presidential elections.... it's all a con. And the FPTP is the worst of all. Making so many votes count for NOTHING.

Gerrymandering in the House, has nothing to do with Presidential elections. Presidential elections, are based on the entire popular vote of a state. How a district is laid out has nothing to do with it. WOW...just wow

Not sure what the FPTP stands for

Did I say gerrymandering in the House had anything to do with presidential elections?

No. So....

And you have the WHOLE INTERNET at your fingertips and you don't even know what FPTP is? Do you want to be taken seriously in this conversation?

Yes you did....or at least you it sounded like you did "Gerrymandering in House elections, weighted nonsense in Presidential elections.... it's all a con"

Sorry...a lot of things come up....Friends Peace Team Projects?

I'm sorry you can't do basic grammar.

Really, these conversations are kind of tiring.

I don't disagree they are. Dems always seem to whine when our system of Govt doesn't give them one party rule.

 

[Utilitarian]

Hypocrites.

It's so important to protect the sanctity of our shareholders and keep the riff raff out, but, the sanctity of your vote is not important to us.

Coca-Cola required ID in 2020 shareholder meeting, but slams Georgia for voter ID law

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.

www.foxbusiness.com

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.


“At the entrance to the meeting, we will verify your registration and request to see your admission ticket and a valid form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport,” the company wrote in reference to its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, held before the coronavirus pandemic.

Georgia’s new voting law requires a drivers’ license or state ID number be listed to submit an absentee ballot to vote, among other new reforms. The state already required ID to vote in person. It had previously relied on signature matching to verify ballots.

Coca-Cola is based in Atlanta. This week, the beverage company, among other Georgia-based companies, issued statements condemning the new legislation after threats of boycott.

I suppose a Coca-Cola board meeting is a right then.

Since voting is a right, you have to make sure those doing it actually are entitled to that right. Non-citizens do not have that right, so verification of citizenship is a logical prerequisite.

Ok then tell me, how is closing voting places at 5pm, only allowing 1 ballot box drop off in each county and only in a voting place, not allowing someone to give people water, giving the legislature power to override the Secretary of State, reducing the number of voting days and reducing the number of voting places going to prevent an undocumented person from voting?

And also, please give me the names of those undocumented illegal voters who have voted in past elections.

I'm not saying I agree with all of the provisions of the Georgia legislation. I mostly just support voter ID.

As for naming illegal voters, that is a somewhat difficult task, given the fact that the current system has little ability to detect if an illegal votes.

What a lot of the left engages in during this discussion is equivalent to suggesting that if a store starts missing a lot of inventory but has no security cameras, no theft is going on. In order to prove fraud, you actually have to have decent safeguards, like most of our peers have. Since we lack those, it's kind of hard to prove if you're not even looking for it.

 

[Aletheia4u]

Real ID cards needed on domestic flights starting in 2020

The Real ID Act was passed by Congress in 2005 as a way to enforce stricter security measures.

www.witn.com

Hawaii’s Gov. Details Effort to Create Vaccine Passport for Travelers to Skip Quarantine

Although the timeline to implement vaccine passports isn't immediately clear.

www.yahoo.com

What to know about COVID-19 vaccine 'passports' and why they're controversial

Scannable digital certificates to prove vaccination status could help the fully vaccinated gain entry into events or businesses

abcnews.go.com

 

[frigidweirdo]

Hypocrites.

It's so important to protect the sanctity of our shareholders and keep the riff raff out, but, the sanctity of your vote is not important to us.

Coca-Cola required ID in 2020 shareholder meeting, but slams Georgia for voter ID law

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.

www.foxbusiness.com

Coca-Cola has released a statement condemning Georgia’s new voting legislation, but the company requires valid ID to be admitted to its annual meeting of shareholders.


“At the entrance to the meeting, we will verify your registration and request to see your admission ticket and a valid form of photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport,” the company wrote in reference to its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, held before the coronavirus pandemic.

Georgia’s new voting law requires a drivers’ license or state ID number be listed to submit an absentee ballot to vote, among other new reforms. The state already required ID to vote in person. It had previously relied on signature matching to verify ballots.

Coca-Cola is based in Atlanta. This week, the beverage company, among other Georgia-based companies, issued statements condemning the new legislation after threats of boycott.

I suppose a Coca-Cola board meeting is a right then.

Since voting is a right, you have to make sure those doing it actually are entitled to that right. Non-citizens do not have that right, so verification of citizenship is a logical prerequisite.

Ok then tell me, how is closing voting places at 5pm, only allowing 1 ballot box drop off in each county and only in a voting place, not allowing someone to give people water, giving the legislature power to override the Secretary of State, reducing the number of voting days and reducing the number of voting places going to prevent an undocumented person from voting?

And also, please give me the names of those undocumented illegal voters who have voted in past elections.

I'm not saying I agree with all of the provisions of the Georgia legislation. I mostly just support voter ID.

As for naming illegal voters, that is a somewhat difficult task, given the fact that the current system has little ability to detect if an illegal votes.

What a lot of the left engages in during this discussion is equivalent to suggesting that if a store starts missing a lot of inventory but has no security cameras, no theft is going on. In order to prove fraud, you actually have to have decent safeguards, like most of our peers have. Since we lack those, it's kind of hard to prove if you're not even looking for it.

Well, I'm not opposed to voter ID. The problem I have is why many people who are opposed to national ID schemes, ie, the Republicans, are in favor of ID for voting. It's kind of obvious why.

1) It's a diversionary policy, so that people can get all excited about something, while ignoring what the powers that be are up to.

and 2) it's people who want to stop certain people from voting simply because they like cheating.

 

[Utilitarian]

Well, I'm not opposed to voter ID. The problem I have is why many people who are opposed to national ID schemes, ie, the Republicans, are in favor of ID for voting. It's kind of obvious why.

1) It's a diversionary policy, so that people can get all excited about something, while ignoring what the powers that be are up to.

and 2) it's people who want to stop certain people from voting simply because they like cheating.

And fighting the concepts of voter ID and vote security overall is something that much of the left engages in, which also lends itself to cheating. Like blocking signature verification measures.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well, I'm not opposed to voter ID. The problem I have is why many people who are opposed to national ID schemes, ie, the Republicans, are in favor of ID for voting. It's kind of obvious why.

1) It's a diversionary policy, so that people can get all excited about something, while ignoring what the powers that be are up to.

and 2) it's people who want to stop certain people from voting simply because they like cheating.

And fighting the concepts of voter ID and vote security overall is something that much of the left engages in, which also lends itself to cheating. Like blocking signature verification measures.

Well, all I can say is that every problem I see in US politics comes down to the fact that it won't be solved until the US gets proportional Representation.

 

[Utilitarian]

Well, I'm not opposed to voter ID. The problem I have is why many people who are opposed to national ID schemes, ie, the Republicans, are in favor of ID for voting. It's kind of obvious why.

1) It's a diversionary policy, so that people can get all excited about something, while ignoring what the powers that be are up to.

and 2) it's people who want to stop certain people from voting simply because they like cheating.

And fighting the concepts of voter ID and vote security overall is something that much of the left engages in, which also lends itself to cheating. Like blocking signature verification measures.

Well, all I can say is that every problem I see in US politics comes down to the fact that it won't be solved until the US gets proportional Representation.

I can agree with that to an extent, although even that wouldn't fix the corporate lobbyism issue.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well, I'm not opposed to voter ID. The problem I have is why many people who are opposed to national ID schemes, ie, the Republicans, are in favor of ID for voting. It's kind of obvious why.

1) It's a diversionary policy, so that people can get all excited about something, while ignoring what the powers that be are up to.

and 2) it's people who want to stop certain people from voting simply because they like cheating.

And fighting the concepts of voter ID and vote security overall is something that much of the left engages in, which also lends itself to cheating. Like blocking signature verification measures.

Well, all I can say is that every problem I see in US politics comes down to the fact that it won't be solved until the US gets proportional Representation.

I can agree with that to an extent, although even that wouldn't fix the corporate lobbyism issue.

It actually would. There's much less corruption in PR countries. They'd still lobby, but they'd find it harder to get what they want, and it'd cost them more too.

 

[Utilitarian]

Well, I'm not opposed to voter ID. The problem I have is why many people who are opposed to national ID schemes, ie, the Republicans, are in favor of ID for voting. It's kind of obvious why.

1) It's a diversionary policy, so that people can get all excited about something, while ignoring what the powers that be are up to.

and 2) it's people who want to stop certain people from voting simply because they like cheating.

And fighting the concepts of voter ID and vote security overall is something that much of the left engages in, which also lends itself to cheating. Like blocking signature verification measures.

Well, all I can say is that every problem I see in US politics comes down to the fact that it won't be solved until the US gets proportional Representation.

I can agree with that to an extent, although even that wouldn't fix the corporate lobbyism issue.

It actually would. There's much less corruption in PR countries. They'd still lobby, but they'd find it harder to get what they want, and it'd cost them more too.

If nothing else, I'd be willing to give it a try.