therightsideofhistory
Member
That had more moving parts than I could follow but accusations against Trump were personality based. Hillary's involved national security and job performance so hell yes it was more important.actually i don't know about that. at the time, i thought comey releasing those details were good and in the interest of transparency and i still hold that belief. more of the blame can be put on the media for erroneously pitting hillary's faults as equal to or greater than donald's in some ways. and we cannot forget the voters, i mean the greatest blame can be allotted there imo, unless you were someone who was jobless because of climate reform policies (a position where you care not for other issues because you need to survive), the choice was clear (and 60 million voters are not in this position). ESPECIALLY if you voted against hillary or didn't vote at all because of the email scandal which utterly pales in comparison to the rhetoric (both policy-wise and otherwise) of DT.
I believe Comey came out when he did under pressure from the administration, it's the only thing that makes sense. Many things about her interview were not kosher. She was exonerated in the lefts' eye because she wasn't charged.
I seriously doubt the FBI had any effect on the election, if it did it was pure karma.
lol personality based, yes, and that is more evidence to the fact that the media is partially to blame. you honestly believe that DT foreign policy indicates he has any clue what he's talking about? cutting ties with japan if they won't pay for protections, having them build their own nuclear weapons? come on man. the media rarely focused on policy, and if they did, more liberals would have realized exactly what was potentially at stake. and the fact that you believe her private email server (on which ~110 classified emails were found, a much smaller number classified at the higher levels) is a bigger deal than his personal positions (particularly on foreign policy) is absurd.