Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We have the FAA to deal with many of the complexities of airports, but in terms of maintaining a given airport, the responsibility usually falls under local control. Not every airport even has the same security standards, for example.Every airport effects every other airport. And states aren't allowed to coordinate their efforts without the consent of congress.Actually, spending on airports is probably better done locally. If a big city needs a new one, that's not a federal issue.
Most spending in general is better to do on the state or local level.
On the novelty of Biden calling Putin a killer - The Washington ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2021/03/18
Mar 18, 2021 — Biden's comment about the Russian president broke with Trump's approach — and evoked a strong reaction.
That's why I posted the link. You wanna know. How about reading it.When did he say these things standing next to Putin in front of the world press?
you should be more worried about the BIDENS dark money coming from CHINA and going through the Biden family who then give the "big guy" money which he hasn't even been reporting on his taxes as he has released his tax returns showing that he spends more than he makes and hasn't been reporting the extra income.Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, far-right activist Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, have quite the scheme going. She takes in dark money contributions to her Tea Party-connected nonprofit, Liberty Central, and organizes Republicans on exactly the kind of issues that often reach the Supreme Court. He sits on the Supreme Court and never recuses himself as justices are called on by federal law to do in certain situations, including ones where their spouses have financial interests.
And this is going on while Justice Stephen Breyer is solemnly warning that expanding the Supreme Court might be a problem because “Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence can only feed” the perception that the court is guided by politics, “further eroding that trust.” As if that ship had not long since sailed.
Clarence and Virginia Thomas have an impressively corrupt activist/judge scheme going
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, far-right activist Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, have quite the scheme going. She takes in dark money contributions to her Tea Party-connected nonprofit, Liberty Central, and organizes Republicans on...www.dailykos.com
This current court is corrupt beyond all recognition. The Republicans in Congress have destroyed any precept that the court is independent, unbiased, or in any way represents the people or the very laws by which they are tasked to interpret. The Democrats have an absolute mandate to repair the damage done to the federal judiciary by a minority that has appointed it in a mistaken and corrupt sense of entitlement, the majority of the country disagrees with, and the Constitution does not recognize.
He supposedly said it on a phone call that we don't have a recording of.On the novelty of Biden calling Putin a killer - The Washington ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2021/03/18
Mar 18, 2021 — Biden's comment about the Russian president broke with Trump's approach — and evoked a strong reaction.That's why I posted the link. You wanna know. How about reading it.When did he say these things standing next to Putin in front of the world press?
You were in denial Biden said it at all? Now you want the details of where he said it.
Well TRY READING.
BTW, I can't read it because it's behind a paywall.On the novelty of Biden calling Putin a killer - The Washington ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2021/03/18
Mar 18, 2021 — Biden's comment about the Russian president broke with Trump's approach — and evoked a strong reaction.That's why I posted the link. You wanna know. How about reading it.When did he say these things standing next to Putin in front of the world press?
You were in denial Biden said it at all? Now you want the details of where he said it.
Well TRY READING.
Every airport effects every other airport. And states aren't allowed to coordinate their efforts without the consent of congress.
This proves your ignorance. The constitution specifically prevents states from coordinating without the consent of congress.The later claim isn't true and the former claim is bullshit. That would rule out states making any of their own laws.
... but in terms of maintaining a given airport, the responsibility usually falls under local control.
In short, there's no evidence he said what you claim, and he certainly didn't say it standing next to Putin in front of the world press.
Really? Where? "No state shall" what?Every airport effects every other airport. And states aren't allowed to coordinate their efforts without the consent of congress.This proves your ignorance. The constitution specifically prevents states from coordinating without the consent of congress.The later claim isn't true and the former claim is bullshit. That would rule out states making any of their own laws.
Section 10: Powers Denied to the States
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, ...
10% for the Big Guy?Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, far-right activist Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, have quite the scheme going. She takes in dark money contributions to her Tea Party-connected nonprofit, Liberty Central, and organizes Republicans on exactly the kind of issues that often reach the Supreme Court. He sits on the Supreme Court and never recuses himself as justices are called on by federal law to do in certain situations, including ones where their spouses have financial interests.
And this is going on while Justice Stephen Breyer is solemnly warning that expanding the Supreme Court might be a problem because “Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence can only feed” the perception that the court is guided by politics, “further eroding that trust.” As if that ship had not long since sailed.
Clarence and Virginia Thomas have an impressively corrupt activist/judge scheme going
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, far-right activist Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, have quite the scheme going. She takes in dark money contributions to her Tea Party-connected nonprofit, Liberty Central, and organizes Republicans on...www.dailykos.com
This current court is corrupt beyond all recognition. The Republicans in Congress have destroyed any precept that the court is independent, unbiased, or in any way represents the people or the very laws by which they are tasked to interpret. The Democrats have an absolute mandate to repair the damage done to the federal judiciary by a minority that has appointed it in a mistaken and corrupt sense of entitlement, the majority of the country disagrees with, and the Constitution does not recognize.
This proves your ignorance. The constitution specifically prevents states from coordinating without the consent of congress.
Section 10: Powers Denied to the States
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, ...
Jeeeezzzz.... I showed you were in the constitution it was. I thought you read the constitution, and only needed a hint of where to find it.Really? Where? "No state shall" what?
Really? Where? "No state shall" what?Every airport effects every other airport. And states aren't allowed to coordinate their efforts without the consent of congress.This proves your ignorance. The constitution specifically prevents states from coordinating without the consent of congress.The later claim isn't true and the former claim is bullshit. That would rule out states making any of their own laws.
Section 10: Powers Denied to the States
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, ...
You lied about what it said, dumbass.This proves your ignorance. The constitution specifically prevents states from coordinating without the consent of congress.
Section 10: Powers Denied to the States
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, ...Jeeeezzzz.... I showed you were in the constitution it was. I thought you read the constitution, and only needed a hint of where to find it.Really? Where? "No state shall" what?
I didn't realize you're a complete dumbass when it comes to what is in the constitution.
You think I'm supposed to believe what Biden says?What did Biden talk with Putin about.
Well the white house told you
He also raised other matters of concern, including the SolarWinds hack, reports of Russia placing bounties on United States soldiers in Afghanistan, interference in the 2020 United States election, and the poisoning of Aleksey Navalny.
You're not even capable of reading the next paragraph.Really? Where? "No state shall" what?
" No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Control of the Congress. "
All that says is that states can't impose tariffs on each other.
Wrong again.
Biden told it directly to Putin on the phone. And Biden released the readout of what he told Putin to the press.
If he doesn't say it in front of the press with Putin standing beside him, then it's not comparable.
I was talking about spending in general, not specifically the recent stimulus/infrastructure bill, but I can at least support more federal funding for Interstate Highways, since those are specifically federally owned and maintained.... but in terms of maintaining a given airport, the responsibility usually falls under local control.
Bidens package has nothing to do with the maintenance of airports.
This is an infrastructure package. It's building new stuff, not maintaining current stuff.
Jeeeezzzzzzzzzzz.
Well, what do you know, it does say that. Someone should tell the states that because they make agreements with each other all the time. For instance, they agreed to help enforce each other's traffic tickets.You're not even capable of reading the next paragraph.Really? Where? "No state shall" what?
" No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Control of the Congress. "
All that says is that states can't impose tariffs on each other.
Wrong again.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, ... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State,
You demonstrate you inability to function above a 3rd grade level once again. And you call other people an idiot.
