China starts with a blue water navy

Munin

VIP Member
Dec 5, 2008
1,308
96
83
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsHq8qa4gig]China Unveils It's First Aircraft Carrier - YouTube[/ame]





"The Chinese navy takes a much-heralded step forward but its intentions are vague


000cf1bdd03f0fad6b6502.jpg

It’s definitely big, and it floats


ON AUGUST 10th, after years of secretive work, the Chinese navy launched its first aircraft-carrier on its maiden voyage. The Chinese media hailed the vessel as a sign of China’s emergence as a sea power, one they insist has only peaceful intent. Its neighbours are not so delighted.

State-controlled media had been predicting the ship’s imminent launch for weeks, prompting Chinese military enthusiasts to converge on the north-eastern port city of Dalian in the hope of seeing it set out. One newspaper said a fire escape on a nearby IKEA store was a good vantage point, but the Chinese navy kept quiet about when the date would be.

In this section
Yingluck to the fore
»Name and purpose to be determined
Weak fences, bad neighbours
Hot concern
Getting back its mojo
In the name of the father
Reprints
Related topics
China
It has reason to be diffident. The ship is hardly a symbol of China’s prowess in technology. It was bought in 1998 from Ukraine, where it had been rusting half-finished since its first launch a decade earlier. The Ukrainians were told it would be used as a floating casino (they sold it without weapons or engines). But unlike two other ex-Soviet carriers in China that ended up as theme parks, this one was taken to a navy shipyard where, in 2005, it got a telltale coat of Chinese military paint. It was not until July that China confirmed it had been refitting the ship.

China has been mulling plans to build an aircraft-carrier since at least the 1970s. Officials debated how useful one would be in a conflict over Taiwan, the military planners’ main preoccupation until a few years ago. Land-based aircraft and missiles could be deployed easily across the Taiwan Strait. But in the past decade China has become more focused on acquiring the means to project power farther afield, the better to defend shipping lanes, it says, and to help relief efforts.

Other countries in the region believe China also wants to assert territorial claims in the South China Sea more vigorously. Vietnam and the Philippines have been complaining in recent months about what they see as a more aggressive posture by China in that area. There had been speculation that the aircraft-carrier would be launched in time for the Communist Party’s 90th birthday on July 1st. It is possible that its leaders decided that a lower-key affair a few weeks later might avoid stoking the neighbours’ suspicions.

For the time being the region’s pre-eminent naval power, America, is showing little sign of concern. The Chinese carrier’s actual deployment might yet be years away. China will take longer still to gain the expertise needed to deploy a carrier-based battle group, with all its supporting vessels. It is reportedly building two more aircraft-carriers (from scratch, this time). But the Americans worry more about other bits of China’s rapidly improving arsenal, from carrier-busting missiles to submarines and land-based fighter jets.

Unlike the Soviets, the Chinese appear not to be trying to match the size and capability of America’s huge fleet. Officials describe the aircraft-carrier programme partly as a prestige project. China has been acutely conscious of being the only permanent member of the United Nations without a carrier. Its rival India has long had one. Thailand has one too. Japan, another rival, has a carrier for helicopters that could be adapted for fighters.

China’s ship does not yet have a name. In Soviet hands it was the Varyag (a sister ship is the only operational carrier in Russia’s navy). Chinese internet users have made many suggestions. Some believe it should be named after a province. Chinese heroes are also popular, especially Shi Lang, a Chinese admiral who conquered Taiwan in the 17th century. Officials would be wise to avoid that one."

source

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13684013
 
Last edited by a moderator:
China still has a long way to go to be able to compete with the world's greatest Navy. The US Navy has more gross tunnage than the next 17 largest navies combined. The greatest threat from China is the ownership of United States debt and the habit of spending that this great country has adopted. There is not a war or conflict that the US military would lose if allowed to unleash its full force and effect.

Screw China.
 
China's power is in its commerce, and it would be smart for them to stick with that. Wasting resources on trying to become some kind of sea power will only hurt them.
 
Taiwan readies anti-ship missile for China's carrier...
:eusa_eh:
Taiwan sends not-so-subtle signal on China’s carrier
Thu, Aug 11, 2011 : In a blunt departure from tradition, the military yesterday displayed a model Hsiung Feng (“Brave Wind”) III (HF-3) anti-ship missile with, as a backdrop, a large picture of a burning aircraft carrier that bore a striking resemblance to China’s retrofitted Varyag, which embarked on its maiden voyage earlier in the day.
The booth, set at a prominent location at the Taipei Aerospace and Defense Technology Exhibition (TADTE), which opens today, was the center of attention of reporters who were given a chance to take a look around during a pre-show visit. The HF-3, a ramjet-powered supersonic anti-ship missile, can be launched from land and surface platforms, such as Taiwan’s Perry-class frigates. The 130km-range, single-warhead missile has been in development at the Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology since 1995. It entered production in about 2007 and is believed to have entered service the following year. The CSIST is administered by the Ministry of National Defense’s Armaments Bureau.

Asked to confirm how many missiles were currently in production or had been deployed, Chiang Wu-ing, deputy director of the Hsiung Feng program at CSIST, would not provide figures. While the HF-3 had been on display at previous shows, this was the first time it was shown in a context that prominently identified its intended target. Although no flag or ensign could be seen on the computer-generated rendition of the aircraft carrier and accompanying fleet, the “ski jump” ramp and general outlook were oddly similar to the Varyag China acquired from Ukraine in 1998. Next to the burning carrier were the Chinese characters for “carrier killer,” also the first time the HF-3 had been described as such. It is doubtful, however, that the missile’s 120kg payload would be sufficient to sink an aircraft carrier.

Approached by reporters for comment on the symbolism and timing of the display, a CSIST spokesperson would not directly confirm that the vessel depicted was the Varyag. For his part, Chiang said that when the HF-3 entered development and even after it had entered production, the Taiwanese military and CSIST could not have known that China would acquire and refurbish the Soviet-era Varyag or embark on a program to develop its own carriers, expected to enter service in about 2020. Initial reports had said the 60,000 tonne Kuznetsov-class carrier would embark on its maiden voyage on July 1 to coincide with the 90th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Communist Party, but unexpected developments forced a delay until this month.

Taiwan sends not-so-subtle signal on China?s carrier - Taipei Times

See also:

F-16C/D deal for Taiwan dead: report
Mon, Aug 15, 2011 - THE BIG SURPRISE: It had been anticipated that the US would upgrade Taiwan’s entire fleet of F-16A/Bs. However, it appears only one of the two F-16 wings will be retrofitted
Taiwan will not be getting the 66 F-16C/D aircraft it has been requesting since 2007, a Ministry of National Defense official has confirmed, and fewer of its older F-16s will be retrofitted, news that could strike a blow to President Ma Ying-jeou’s administration as it heads into elections next January. “We are so disappointed in the United States,” the official told Defense News on the sidelines of the Taipei Aerospace and Defense Technology Exhibition (TADTE), which ended on Saturday, blaming the decision on pressure from Beijing.

The article, released last night and written by the magazine’s Asia Bureau chief, Wendell Minnick, said a US Department of Defense delegation had arrived in Taiwan last week to deliver the news to Taipei and that as an alternative it had offered to secure the upgrade package for Taiwan’s ageing fleet of F-16A/B aircraft. “The US Pentagon is here explaining what is in the upgrade package,” a US defense industry source told the magazine. “They are going to split the baby: no C/Ds, but the A/B upgrade is going forward.” “The switch is meant to soften the blow of denying new planes to Taipei,” a source at Lockheed Martin, maker of the F-16, told Defense News.

Part of the deal, which sources said would be made toward the end of this month, would include an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, Defense News said. The AESA radar will likely be Northrop Grumman’s Scalable Agile Beam Radar (SABR) or the Raytheon Advanced Combat Radar (RACR), although a source told the Taipei Times last week that some components of the SABR may yet to have cleared export licensing from the US government. According to the magazine, the upgrade would make Taiwan’s F-16s among the most capable variants of the aircraft, “perhaps second only to the APG-80 AESA-equipped F-16E/Fs flown by the United Arab Emirates.”

However, in a follow-up conversation with the Taipei Times, Minnick said it now appeared that, contrary to initial plans to have the entire 146 F-16A/Bs upgraded, fewer aircraft would be retrofitted. “My sources now indicate the A/B upgrade could be limited to only one of the two F-16 wings” that comprise the Taiwanese air force, he said. It was unclear whether the limited upgrades were decided by the US or Taiwan. The cost for the requested F-16C/Ds was estimated at US$5.5 billion, while the upgrade program for Taiwan’s 146 F-16A/Bs was set at US$4.2 billion. The American Institute in Taiwan yesterday denied a decision had been made on the F-16 C/D sale.

F-16C/D deal for Taiwan dead: report - Taipei Times
 
China still has a long way to go to be able to compete with the world's greatest Navy. The US Navy has more gross tunnage than the next 17 largest navies combined. The greatest threat from China is the ownership of United States debt and the habit of spending that this great country has adopted. There is not a war or conflict that the US military would lose if allowed to unleash its full force and effect.

Screw China.

I m not so sure about that, the cost and speed of making things is a lot cheaper & faster in China. Compare it with the speed of the building projects during the olympic games, the speed at which these things were build were double and sometimes even tripple the speed of that of western buildings being raised. I remember a documentary of the construction of a new very huge airport in China (biggest in the world turns out)The Dragon -Beijing's New Monster Airport while at the same time the airport of heatrow (in the UK) had made a new expansion to its own airport, while the airport in London took a very long time to do an expansion the biggest airport in the world was build in a speed we in the west can only dream of.

As for cost:
We only have to look at the cost of the F22 raptor airplanes to know that some of the US companies are making profites at the expense of US security: less plane beïng bought because of too high price means that the US defense will be weaker compared to a country that can buy products at very low prices because the wages are very very low and the companies are state owned: so no need for profits that drag the price up so only fewer planes can be bought by the government.


Even though the US has the highest budget in the world, I m not sure if the US can compete with the production capacity of China. The price for a ship build in the US can be a lot more than a price of a ship build in China. Besides that: I m not even sure the US will be able to maintain its defense superiority if the economy can not afford it. China is now the 2nd biggest economy in the world, the US still being the 1st economy will still be the biggest but it also has to divide its recources all over the world: Iraq, Afghanistan, Europe, Africa, South America, ... . China has it mind set on Asia where it can focus its military might



China's power is in its commerce, and it would be smart for them to stick with that. Wasting resources on trying to become some kind of sea power will only hurt them.

You know that the exact same thing was said of the USA prior to WWII? (back then the biggest military powers in the World were the UK and France) The economy is the reason to gain a big army, to be able to protect it or to secure the recourses that the economy needs to grow: there are only so many recourses that have to be divided between all of the worlds economies.

I wouldn't really say that the US investment in the military was a waste, seeing how the US took away the might of the UK and France and gained access to all the colonies.
 
Last edited:
The aircraft carrier is meant as a means of gunboat diplomacy against regional states not as a means of attacking the US. The Chinese also will use this as a means of responding to relief missions throughout the world, maybe even making a trip to Cuba! But the main force projection will be enforcing their 200 mile limit in the seas in the region and bullying the Vietnamese and other countries in the areas.
 
China's power is in its commerce, and it would be smart for them to stick with that. Wasting resources on trying to become some kind of sea power will only hurt them.

And..that's not the reason they are doing this.

China recognizes that it must have an effective defensive navy if they are to seriously compete with all major players.
 
@ munin

You make some good points. A few advantages the ChiComs have over the U.S. in manufacturing are:
-No unions
-No EPA
-No law suits holding up projects
-A military being built by the interest payments on debt from the world's largest economy
 
China's power is in its commerce, and it would be smart for them to stick with that. Wasting resources on trying to become some kind of sea power will only hurt them.



No, no. You are short-sighted but China is not. They are taking the first steps along a Mahanian theory of national power via naval strength that certainly served us very well indeed.
 
The aircraft carrier is meant as a means of gunboat diplomacy against regional states not as a means of attacking the US. the main force projection will be enforcing their 200 mile limit in the seas in the region and bullying the Vietnamese and other countries in the areas.



Those things are one and the same.
 
[
I m not so sure about that, the cost and speed of making things is a lot cheaper & faster in China. Compare it with the speed of the building projects during the olympic games, the speed at which these things were build were double and sometimes even tripple the speed of that of western buildings being raised. .


Faster and cheaper, don't forget.
 
[ I m not sure if the US can compete with the production capacity of China. .


The production of cheap, poison toys? No quesiton. The production of military hardware? Consider the role quality plays there. Check out the nifty high-speed rail in China that was so highly touted recently.

And don't forget that the US is still the world's largest manufaturer.
 
[ the US still being the 1st economy will still be the biggest but it also has to divide its recources all over the world: Iraq, Afghanistan, Europe, Africa, South America, ... . China has it mind set on Asia where it can focus its military might.



China most certainly does NOT have its mind focused exclusively in Asia. They are aggressively developing interests in all those places you mentioned.
 
Building a blue water navy is one thing, knowing how to use it is another. The US has 70 years of aircraft carrier experience, while the Chinese have zero.
 
Let's name sure all our allies in the area are well stocked up on anti-ship cruise missiles
 
Last edited:
Fuck with these guys and gals China -

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqaWdkdFb3Y]Navy Carrier Squadron "Pump It" - YouTube[/ame]
 
It looks like we need to build up China as a threat to replace the Soviets and a declining terrorist threat since Bin Laden was killed

More reasons to keep our military at Cold War levels
 
It looks like we need to build up China as a threat to replace the Soviets and a declining terrorist threat since Bin Laden was killed

More reasons to keep our military at Cold War levels
Not sure what you're getting at here. We are now developing a more efficient aircraft carrier. The navy is working to improve the ownership cost of its fleet.
 

Forum List

Back
Top