Changes in the intensity of the Sun?

[ding]

View attachment 450495View attachment 450496
View attachment 450498

Charts are pretty, but let's see the math ... no correlation is there? ... 1,360 W/m^2 then, now, and in the future ...

Math is for eggheads.

Speaking of eggheads...

Milankovitch (Orbital) Cycles and Their Role in Earth's Climate â Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

Small cyclical variations in the shape of Earth's orbit, its wobble and the angle its axis is tilted play key roles in influencing Earth's climate over timespans of tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of years.

climate.nasa.gov

Apparently the sun's intensity doesn't have to change for the sun to play a role in our climate. That coupled with certain background conditions can explain our climate changes.

 

[gipper]

When you google "the intensity of the Sun" you get mostly gibberish or propaganda but no real data. Apparently there is no scientific assessment available to the public regarding the (changing ?) intensity of the force that regulates life on Earth. A relatively recent geophysical event that shifted the axis of the earth in the Fukashima earthquake failed to get the attention of NASA geeks. Shouldn't the couple of degrees shift in the world's axis uncover certain areas that were once frigid and influence geothermal shifts? It seems that there is no data available to the public that pertains to the radiation from the Sun and it's effect on global warming other than propaganda.

The Sun is a weak variable but its essentially steady output is what has allowed life to develop over billions of years. If you know where to look, you can find data.

Under a Variable Sun

In their continued effort to understand the Sun, solar physicists of the 21st century have used satellite data to study how much energy reaches the outskirts of the Earth’s atmosphere and whether or how much that amount varies over time. Recently published research claims that the amount of...

earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Solar Variability and Terrestrial Climate - NASA Science

Jan. 8, 2013: In the galactic scheme of things, the Sun is a remarkably constant star. While some stars exhibit dramatic pulsations, wildly yo-yoing in size and brightness, and sometimes even exploding, the luminosity of our own sun varies a measly 0.1% over the course of the 11-year solar...

science.nasa.gov

View attachment 449513


View attachment 449514

Weak? The sun is weak? Doubt that. A micro nova will change your mind.

The sun has a major effect on just about everything on earth. We are due for a big event which some think will cause a pole shift, leading to a catastrophic event for mankind.

 

[whitehall]

It seems to me that a daily (weekly) (monthly) assessment of the energy fluctuations of the gigantic nuclear powerball in the sky should be part of the global warming argument and data.

 

[Quasar44]

When you google "the intensity of the Sun" you get mostly gibberish or propaganda but no real data. Apparently there is no scientific assessment available to the public regarding the (changing ?) intensity of the force that regulates life on Earth. A relatively recent geophysical event that shifted the axis of the earth in the Fukashima earthquake failed to get the attention of NASA geeks. Shouldn't the couple of degrees shift in the world's axis uncover certain areas that were once frigid and influence geothermal shifts? It seems that there is no data available to the public that pertains to the radiation from the Sun and it's effect on global warming other than propaganda.

It does not appear there are any changes in the sun

 

[Quasar44]

Global warming??
Yes there is a slight warning but it’s irrelevant

 

[Crick]

The response of the level of the world's oceans to the warming we have already experienced tells us that it is most assuredly not.

 

[whitehall]

Even pop-weather networks should be aware that that gigantic nuclear reactor in the sky dictates the environmental impact of life on earth but it seems that the weather people including NASA and NOAH seem reluctant to include the fluctuations in the Sun when predicting weather. You almost gotta laugh that pop-weather channels rely on crazy predictions by Hollywood and a failed politician who had no experience in science but they worry about my freaking V-8 instead of the Sun.

 

[ReinyDays]

Even pop-weather networks should be aware that that gigantic nuclear reactor in the sky dictates the environmental impact of life on earth but it seems that the weather people including NASA and NOAH seem reluctant to include the fluctuations in the Sun when predicting weather. You almost gotta laugh that pop-weather channels rely on crazy predictions by Hollywood and a failed politician who had no experience in science but they worry about my freaking V-8 instead of the Sun.

Why do you think the Sun's output fluctuates all that much? ...