Capitalism is NOT Democratic: Democracy is NOT Capitalist

[danielpalos]

people equal…in their poverty and slavery to the state

Like this inequality? An individual is disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits if the director finds that he or she left his or her most recent work voluntarily without good cause or that he or she has been discharged for misconduct connected with his or her most recent work.

 

[danielpalos]

That's equality before the law, not the equality of results that socialist have on their agenda

Equality isn't freedom, turd brain.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

 

[struth]

Like this inequality? An individual is disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits if the director finds that he or she left his or her most recent work voluntarily without good cause or that he or she has been discharged for misconduct connected with his or her most recent work.

how’s that unequal? everyone is treated the same under the law. It applies to all that apply

how would it be equal to give people that get fired for poor behavior or leave a job on their own access to insurance for people that actually need it?

that would be grossly unfair…which in reality is what socialism is all about

 

[dblack]

Like this: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

More like this: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."

Also known as, "It sucks to have abilities"

 

[danielpalos]

how’s that unequal? everyone is treated the same under the law. It applies to all that apply

how would it be equal to give people that get fired for poor behavior or leave a job on their own access to insurance for people that actually need it?

that would be grossly unfair…which in reality is what socialism is all about

What are you talking about? How is everyone treated the same under the law? The law is employment at the will of either party not just the wealthiest parties under our form of Capitalism.

There can be no legal or moral prejudice for faithfully executing our own laws.

 

[danielpalos]

More like this: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

 

[struth]

What are you talking about? How is everyone treated the same under the law? The law is employment at the will of either party not just the wealthiest parties under our form of Capitalism.

There can be no legal or moral prejudice for faithfully executing our own laws.

because even the wealthy can. be employed at will…not sure where it says any different.

everyone can be employed on an at-will bases and can be fired for cause by their employer absent a contract. All races, all cases. That equality under the law.

you want the law to be different so that you can be get unemployment insurance claims for being fired for cause, or because you decided you not longer want to work…that’s not only insurance laws are written currently. That doesn’t mean the current law isn’t equally applicable. nobody of any class can get unemployed insurance for those reasons.

 

[danielpalos]

because even the wealthy can. be employed at will…not sure where it says any different.

everyone can be employed on an at-will bases and can be fired for cause by their employer absent a contract. All races, all cases. That equality under the law.

you want the law to be different so that you can be get unemployment insurance claims for being fired for cause, or because you decided you not longer want to work…that’s not only insurance laws are written currently. That doesn’t mean the current law isn’t equally applicable. nobody of any class can get unemployed insurance for those reasons.

The point is, the Capitalist (as the wealthiest) is not sanctioned for lack of good cause; why is Labor (as the least wealthy)?

Right-wingers make it seem like they believe less in equality and more in classism.

 

[struth]

The point is, the Capitalist (as the wealthiest) is not sanctioned for lack of good cause; why is Labor (as the least wealthy)?

Right-wingers make it seem like they believe less in equality and more in classism.

capitalist (the wealthy) can be fire for cause…happens all the time. Moreover, labor, the least wealth are generally capitalist too…i don’t know any that don’t want to enjoy the fruits of their labor any own private property

 

[danielpalos]

capitalist (the wealthy) can be fire for cause…happens all the time. Moreover, labor, the least wealth are generally capitalist too…i don’t know any that don’t want to enjoy the fruits of their labor any own private property

Your apology for the Rich point?

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

By the way, is there such a thing as a motion for federal judicial review of procedural and substantive due process by a State Court?

 

[struth]

Your apology for the Rich point?

“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

― Anatole France

By the way, is there such a thing as a motion for federal judicial review of procedural and substantive due process by a State Court?

huh?

If you want the Federal Court to hear your denial of UE insurance, you are going to have to go through the State process first.

If you want to sue the State because you believe the law violates your Due Process, in that it's unconstitutional, you need to bring action in Federal Court.

 

[georgephillip]

1) they elected the people that created policies that made it more advantageous for businesses to do that.

How many choices did those voters have?

Corporate Democrats told their base to vote Republican if they didn't like NAFTA; someone would have to be the very definition of gullible to believe corporate capitalism's compatible with democracy.

 

[danielpalos]

huh?

If you want the Federal Court to hear your denial of UE insurance, you are going to have to go through the State process first.

If you want to sue the State because you believe the law violates your Due Process, in that it's unconstitutional, you need to bring action in Federal Court.

I was merely documenting how I felt at the time. It could be for mere documentation purposes.

They are "getting Paid" to do their job.

 

[georgephillip]

2) that’s no surprise, Cuomo and Newsom shut down the businesses on Main Street…not the Amazons on the world that are publicly traded

The MAGA virus shut down Main Street.
See what happens when you elect a malignant narcissist with a room temperature IQ as your POTUS?

Trump campaign rallies led to more than 30,000 coronavirus cases, Stanford researchers say

 

[georgephillip]

Just because people are laid off, doesn’t mean people are buying and selling stocks and investing in the market…likely actually a good time to look at your investments when you are laid off.

The stock market has been on Federal Reserve life-support since 2008, and the richest ten percent of Americans own 90% of all US stocks. Telling productive workers to mind their investments during a lay-off makes me think you live in a bubble.
The wealthiest 10% of Americans own a record 89% of all U.S. stocks

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The stock market has been on Federal Reserve life-support since 2008

You should have bought some........

 

[georgephillip]

We could have solved simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, yesterday but for the right-wing having a problem that the Poor may benefit under our form of Capitalism.

Imho, the right is resurrecting political disinformation first seen during Reconstruction with the same intention of restricting the right of low-income voters to cast a meaningful ballot:

February 23, 2020

"It warns us that the (2021) Democrats are ushering in 'socialism' to America, but this warning is a throwback to Reconstruction, when black men began to vote just as the government instituted national taxes.

"Racist opponents began to argue that African Americans were voting to redistribute the wealth of hardworking white taxpayers into their own pockets through government projects.

"In this telling, giving men of color civil rights and a voice in their own government meant a redistribution of wealth. In 1871, opponents of black voting began to call this 'socialism.'"

 

[georgephillip]

thats funny,,
I am on another thread right now with a moron with TDS saying trump needs to be silenced,,

If Twitter had existed in 1933 Germany, would you have silenced Hitler?

 

[danielpalos]

"Racist opponents began to argue that African Americans were voting to redistribute the wealth of hardworking white taxpayers into their own pockets through government projects.

Who came up with black codes, right-wingers.

 

[progressive hunter]

If Twitter had existed in 1933 Germany, would you have silenced Hitler?

hitler wasnt in america dumbass,, but if he was I wouldnt have silenced him,,