Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
View attachment 340717Are some states violating people's 1st amendment rights?
Freedom of Religion
First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They are if any thing other than EMS, fire fighters, police, or free food banks, are open for business.
If this is a real pandemic then close everything until the emergency is over.
*****SMILE*****
I don't think essential services have ever been closed during an epidemic - people must have a way to get food, medicine, money.
View attachment 340723
We've never had the government telling people to close down and stay at home during a epidemic either.
I allowed EMS and the free food banks to remain open.
Why do you need money? WalMart won't be open unless they want to start handing out free food in the parking lot.
*****SMILE*****
Yes the govt. has told people to wear masks and stay at home and there are instances when travelers have entered into a quarantine zone to be forced into quarantine in US history. This is not a new occurence to humans and the world.
View attachment 340728
If you want martial law in a district because of a "pandemic" then lock it down totally.
"Essential Services Only"
I provided the essentials by leaving EMS, police, fire fighters, and free food banks.
Stay home because nothing else is open except perhaps energy, water, and sewage, providers and they're brown bagging and only on the job if absolutely necessary.
Retail stores are unessential. Ran out of liquor? Want to shop for a new dress? Don't like the can of beans the free food bank gave you?
Well that's too damn bad you're in lock down!
*****SMILE*****
The little town I live by never shut down, the restaurants didn't close..Every damn thing was open for business. The campgrounds let people stay for free and the state stopped checking for fishing license so it was gratis....What is yer obsession with stay at home orders to protect people? I managed to do several jobs during the period and shook hands with people, I use no masks ever. Why are you trying to over dramatize this period in time?
View attachment 340745
Then leave the churches decide whether they want to open or not.
Otherwise lock it all down!
*****CHUCKLE*****
It's just that easy...No constitutional question in this at all.
There IS NO constitution.
Hasn't been since day one of Regime Obama when the little shit shredded and smoked it for the hemp content of the paper.
Get over it.
View attachment 340717Are some states violating people's 1st amendment rights?
Freedom of Religion
First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
They are if any thing other than EMS, fire fighters, police, or free food banks, are open for business.
If this is a real pandemic then close everything until the emergency is over.
*****SMILE*****
I don't think essential services have ever been closed during an epidemic - people must have a way to get food, medicine, money.
View attachment 340723
We've never had the government telling people to close down and stay at home during a epidemic either.
I allowed EMS and the free food banks to remain open.
Why do you need money? WalMart won't be open unless they want to start handing out free food in the parking lot.
*****SMILE*****
Yes, we actually have - during the 1918 flue epidemic. If only free food banks were allowed to be open and not grocery stores - they would be swamped and emptied in days. They aren't equip to handle the entire public and the entire public doesn't need their charity.
San Francisco had the 1918 flu under control. And then it lifted the restrictions.
A cautionary tale about the dangers of reopening too soon.www.nbcnews.com
View attachment 340741
Then I suppose the grocery stores can donate what they have to the food banks to feed the public or have it confiscated by the government to do so.
*****SMILE*****
I think that's a recipe for riots.
View attachment 340717Are some states violating people's 1st amendment rights?
Freedom of Religion
First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
They are if any thing other than EMS, fire fighters, police, or free food banks, are open for business.
If this is a real pandemic then close everything until the emergency is over.
*****SMILE*****
I don't think essential services have ever been closed during an epidemic - people must have a way to get food, medicine, money.
View attachment 340723
We've never had the government telling people to close down and stay at home during a epidemic either.
I allowed EMS and the free food banks to remain open.
Why do you need money? WalMart won't be open unless they want to start handing out free food in the parking lot.
*****SMILE*****
Yes the govt. has told people to wear masks and stay at home and there are instances when travelers have entered into a quarantine zone to be forced into quarantine in US history. This is not a new occurence to humans and the world.
View attachment 340728
If you want martial law in a district because of a "pandemic" then lock it down totally.
"Essential Services Only"
I provided the essentials by leaving EMS, police, fire fighters, and free food banks.
Stay home because nothing else is open except perhaps energy, water, and sewage, providers and they're brown bagging and only on the job if absolutely necessary.
Retail stores are unessential. Ran out of liquor? Want to shop for a new dress? Don't like the can of beans the free food bank gave you?
Well that's too damn bad you're in lock down!
*****SMILE*****
The little town I live by never shut down, the restaurants didn't close..Every damn thing was open for business. The campgrounds let people stay for free and the state stopped checking for fishing license so it was gratis....What is yer obsession with stay at home orders to protect people? I managed to do several jobs during the period and shook hands with people, I use no masks ever. Why are you trying to over dramatize this period in time?
View attachment 340745
Then leave the churches decide whether they want to open or not.
Otherwise lock it all down!
*****CHUCKLE*****
Run for office, change rules, don't tell me
Are some states violating people's 1st amendment rights?
Freedom of Religion
First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
View attachment 340717Are some states violating people's 1st amendment rights?
Freedom of Religion
First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
They are if any thing other than EMS, fire fighters, police, or free food banks, are open for business.
If this is a real pandemic then close everything until the emergency is over.
*****SMILE*****
I don't think essential services have ever been closed during an epidemic - people must have a way to get food, medicine, money.
View attachment 340723
We've never had the government telling people to close down and stay at home during a epidemic either.
I allowed EMS and the free food banks to remain open.
Why do you need money? WalMart won't be open unless they want to start handing out free food in the parking lot.
*****SMILE*****
Yes, we actually have - during the 1918 flue epidemic. If only free food banks were allowed to be open and not grocery stores - they would be swamped and emptied in days. They aren't equip to handle the entire public and the entire public doesn't need their charity.
San Francisco had the 1918 flu under control. And then it lifted the restrictions.
A cautionary tale about the dangers of reopening too soon.
View attachment 340741
Then I suppose the grocery stores can donate what they have to the food banks to feed the public or have it confiscated by the government to do so.
*****SMILE*****
I think that's a recipe for riots.
View attachment 340746
There's already protests and civil disobedience in states and cities where lock downs are being extended on only certain businesses and organizations for forever and day.
What difference does it make?
Let those governors and mayors in those locked down states call out the national guard and police and have someone shot in the name of their tyranny and see what happens.
*****FLAMING CHUCKLE*****
They were singled out and were to remain closed...and they have tighter restrictions in a cap on how many may be inside despite fact distancing would allow moreYou can agree or disagree with the restrictions, but they aren't being singled out for their religion. They're being asked to follow the same restrictions as people who want to go to a bar, and get drunk.
I don't think it has anything do do with Freedom of Religion... More about being able to peacefully assemble. I'm... Pretty sure that if those people who were arrested for gathering in groups decided to sue they would win. Thing is they are arresting poor people, and like it has been for quite some time, the media isn't doing it's job.Are some states violating people's 1st amendment rights?
Freedom of Religion
First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
The Constitution isn't written on paper.No constitutional question in this at all.
There IS NO constitution.
Hasn't been since day one of Regime Obama when the little shit shredded and smoked it for the hemp content of the paper.
Get over it.
These restrictions apply to all religions so how has anyone been singled out? Is one religion entitled to special rights?
I didn't know that... Thanks. I'll be damned... Written on animal skin.The Constitution isn't written on paper.No constitutional question in this at all.
There IS NO constitution.
Hasn't been since day one of Regime Obama when the little shit shredded and smoked it for the hemp content of the paper.
Get over it.
Are some states violating people's 1st amendment rights?
Freedom of Religion
First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
These restrictions apply to all religions so how has anyone been singled out? Is one religion entitled to special rights?
[/QU
So what you're saying is that you're singling out all religions and those who believe in the name of your pandemic tyranny?
*****FLAMING CHUCKLE*****
This obviously is NOT what I said. The US Supreme Court has held that religious people are subject to laws (laws of "general applicability") that apply to everyone. You cannot claim that your religious affiliation excuses you from obeying speed limits, for example, even if you are speeding because you are late for a religious meeting.
Do tell what "tyranny" is going on.
This obviously is NOT what I said. The US Supreme Court has held that religious people are subject to laws (laws of "general applicability") that apply to everyone. You cannot claim that your religious affiliation excuses you from obeying speed limits, for example, even if you are speeding because you are late for a religious meeting.
Do tell what "tyranny" is going on.
