task0778
Diamond Member
Well now. There's a question up for debate:
California 'sanctuary city' declares itself a Constitutional Republic to fight COVID mandates
A city council in California overwhelmingly voted to declare the city a "Constitutional Republic City" to protect "our citizens’ rights as much as we can" in light of federal and state mandates.
"What we are doing is protecting our citizens' rights as much as we can on the local level. In a way, we are acting as a sanctuary city for our citizens and their rights and freedoms protected by the US and state constitutions. Gavin Newsom modeled this type of declaration for us when he declared San Francisco a sanctuary city for what he believed to be overreach by the federal government against his citizens," Oroville Vice Mayor Scott Thompson told Fox News Digital.
Thompson requested the measure, which was passed 6-1 by the city council on Nov. 2. The resolution is intended to allow the city to opt-out of enforcing "any executive orders issued by the state of California or by the United States federal government that are overreaching or clearly violate our constitutionally protected rights."
It is not tied to one specific mandate, such as President Biden's vaccine mandate on businesses, with Thompson telling ABC 7 that it’s in response to "the large amount of mandates that are affecting every aspect of our lives and our kids' lives."
The resolution states that the city believes "in the separation of powers, individual rights, and the rule of law outlined in the United States Constitution, including the freedom for local government to have local control over issues related to the citizens who reside within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries."
"It’s about local government taking care of its citizens period and that what we’re doing," Councilor Dave Pittman said, according to the East Bay Times.
Thompson told Fox News that each mandate will be handled differently and that the city council would handle any potential legal fights based on a majority vote.
"Each and every mandate will be handled differently. Although we realize this virus is serious; we also believe that protecting the constitutional freedoms our citizens have is also something we take seriously. Our state representatives have been trying to get through to our governor for him to hear that just because something works well for big cities like Sacramento or San Francisco does not mean that the same thing holds true for rural areas like Oroville," Thompson said. Oroville is located in Northern California, about 70 miles north of Sacramento.
.
.
The resolution can be modified at any time, which will not put it at risk of losing funding, according to City Attorney Scott Huber.
"I am quite certain that this would not result in any loss of funding for the city," Huber told ABC7. "In the event that it could in the future you could revise this and do what you will but this is not going to put it jeopardy any state or federal funding."
.
.
"With all of these emergencies and leaders declaring emergencies it puts one person in charge and they can do pretty much what they want even when the emergency is no longer an immediate threat, they were they are reluctant to give up that power," said Reynolds.
.
.
"The American culture and way of life is being challenged at its very core and perverted by radicalized politicians who have forgotten that, as a republic, the power belongs to the people," Thompson said in comments of the resolution.
What the hell, if the CA governor can declare a city to be immune from federal law then why can't a city to the same as far as federal AND state law? Don't know if the idea would stand up in court if it ever got that far, but I kinda like it. Maybe it depends on the particular state's constitution as to where the line is between the state and it's cities and counties. Sanctuary cities are themselves contradicting federal law, true? Or just not enforcing it, which in reality is pretty much the same thing.
California 'sanctuary city' declares itself a Constitutional Republic to fight COVID mandates
A city council in California overwhelmingly voted to declare the city a "Constitutional Republic City" to protect "our citizens’ rights as much as we can" in light of federal and state mandates.
"What we are doing is protecting our citizens' rights as much as we can on the local level. In a way, we are acting as a sanctuary city for our citizens and their rights and freedoms protected by the US and state constitutions. Gavin Newsom modeled this type of declaration for us when he declared San Francisco a sanctuary city for what he believed to be overreach by the federal government against his citizens," Oroville Vice Mayor Scott Thompson told Fox News Digital.
Thompson requested the measure, which was passed 6-1 by the city council on Nov. 2. The resolution is intended to allow the city to opt-out of enforcing "any executive orders issued by the state of California or by the United States federal government that are overreaching or clearly violate our constitutionally protected rights."
It is not tied to one specific mandate, such as President Biden's vaccine mandate on businesses, with Thompson telling ABC 7 that it’s in response to "the large amount of mandates that are affecting every aspect of our lives and our kids' lives."
The resolution states that the city believes "in the separation of powers, individual rights, and the rule of law outlined in the United States Constitution, including the freedom for local government to have local control over issues related to the citizens who reside within the City’s jurisdictional boundaries."
"It’s about local government taking care of its citizens period and that what we’re doing," Councilor Dave Pittman said, according to the East Bay Times.
Thompson told Fox News that each mandate will be handled differently and that the city council would handle any potential legal fights based on a majority vote.
"Each and every mandate will be handled differently. Although we realize this virus is serious; we also believe that protecting the constitutional freedoms our citizens have is also something we take seriously. Our state representatives have been trying to get through to our governor for him to hear that just because something works well for big cities like Sacramento or San Francisco does not mean that the same thing holds true for rural areas like Oroville," Thompson said. Oroville is located in Northern California, about 70 miles north of Sacramento.
.
.
The resolution can be modified at any time, which will not put it at risk of losing funding, according to City Attorney Scott Huber.
"I am quite certain that this would not result in any loss of funding for the city," Huber told ABC7. "In the event that it could in the future you could revise this and do what you will but this is not going to put it jeopardy any state or federal funding."
.
.
"With all of these emergencies and leaders declaring emergencies it puts one person in charge and they can do pretty much what they want even when the emergency is no longer an immediate threat, they were they are reluctant to give up that power," said Reynolds.
.
.
"The American culture and way of life is being challenged at its very core and perverted by radicalized politicians who have forgotten that, as a republic, the power belongs to the people," Thompson said in comments of the resolution.
What the hell, if the CA governor can declare a city to be immune from federal law then why can't a city to the same as far as federal AND state law? Don't know if the idea would stand up in court if it ever got that far, but I kinda like it. Maybe it depends on the particular state's constitution as to where the line is between the state and it's cities and counties. Sanctuary cities are themselves contradicting federal law, true? Or just not enforcing it, which in reality is pretty much the same thing.
