Call out on C_Clayton_Jones

[Chuz Life]

>
Did you conclude that I am also happy with the ruling?

If not?

That might have been your first clue as to what the debate is to be about.

This, from the OP.
"This thread is open to all to discuss the challenge, specifics, formats, the poll, etc."

I'm happy to clarify. However, I think you are likely the only one who could not deduce what the basis of my challenge is.

The way you actually framed the debate (not the way you want people to deduced that you framed it) you left open to lose the debate in one "knock out" punch.

The supreme Court already ruled that elective abortion is constitutional. In other words, you lose.

Now you might want to consider framing the debate in a way that you might be able to win.

LoL.

So, it is your opinion that the SCOTUS is infallible, can not be challenged and can never be compelled to overturn any of their previous rulings.

Is that it?

Your call out was to debate the constitutionality of elective abortion. It is constitutional because the SCOTUS ruled so. Whether SCOTUS was correct or should be challenged is a different debate. That is why I was nit-picking you about the way you framed the debate to begin with.

I completely disagree with and reject the (your) premise that something "IS" constitutional just because the SCOTUS ruled it so.

You can reject it all day long, but the US Federal Government recognizes the SCOTUS as the final word on constitutionality. Perhaps someday the SCOTUS will overturn the current ruling or the ruling will be superseded by a constitutional amendment. Until then, rightly or wrongly, our government recognizes elective abortion to be constitutional because the SCOTUS has ruled so.

Perhaps someday, people will even have debates on the Constitutionality of the courts decisions.

Who knows?

Stranger things have happened.

 

[JoeB131]

Leftists don't like structured debate.
Do you know how many of my challenges have been turned down?
A bunch

So? That just tells me you aren't interesting enough to waste time on. Not that anyone is afraid so someone who thinks Lincoln was the Pope.

 

[JoeB131]

Perhaps someday, people will even have debates on the Constitutionality of the courts decisions.

Who knows?

Stranger things have happened.

7 Justices, including 5 Republicans, ruled that abortion laws were unconstitutional... because of the pure impracticality of enforcing them. which was completely in line with earlier and later rulings.

 

[TNHarley]

Leftists don't like structured debate.
Do you know how many of my challenges have been turned down?
A bunch

So? That just tells me you aren't interesting enough to waste time on. Not that anyone is afraid so someone who thinks Lincoln was the Pope.

It doesnt surprise me you dont understand my avatar.

 

[Chuz Life]

Perhaps someday, people will even have debates on the Constitutionality of the courts decisions.

Who knows?

Stranger things have happened.

7 Justices, including 5 Republicans, ruled that abortion laws were unconstitutional... because of the pure impracticality of enforcing them. which was completely in line with earlier and later rulings.

Appeal to traditions and popular opinion fallacies noted.

Got anything else?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You are wasting your time, those shills don't do truth or the American way.

damn you took the words right out of mouth,i could not have said it any better.as a matter of fact i MYSELF was about to the say the same thing,these shills would KILL themselves FIRST before ever addressing evidence and ADMITTING they have been proven wrong. i am not joking,they REALLY would they are that committed to LYING.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Yeah, jones specializes in drive by posting

yep same as USMB's resident troll WRONGwinger,if pesky FACTS dont go along with his warped opinions,he uses evade tactics and runs off.

 

[JoeB131]

It doesnt surprise me you dont understand my avatar.

I'm sure it's some weird ass conspiracy theory involving lizard men.