What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

CDZ California, Worst to First on COVID

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
73,989
Reaction score
5,030
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
That link or quote makes and proves both my points:
1. the vaccinated have nothing at all to fear and yet seem to be in a state of paranoia since receiving the jab [you then tried to make it about children]which I warned you was a slippery slope
2. that by holding up the vaccine the agencies responsible either put childrens lives on the line or outright caused their deaths
and as a door prize:
3. that you are now trying to say nothing at all while pretending there is some kind of hidden merit here/there
Sorry, you miss the point. Children below a certain age should not be vaccinated yet with current technology.

This is what we are trying to avoid:

From September through November of 1918, the death rate from the Spanish flu skyrocketed. In the United States alone, 195,000 Americans died from the Spanish flu in just the month of October. And unlike a normal seasonal flu, which mostly claims victims among the very young and very old, the second wave of the Spanish flu exhibited what’s called a “W curve”—high numbers of deaths among the young and old, but also a huge spike in the middle composed of otherwise healthy 25- to 35-year-olds in the prime of their life.

“That really freaked out the medical establishment, that there was this atypical spike in the middle of the W,”
says Harris.
 

Frankeneinstein

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
8,456
Reaction score
1,268
Points
280
Sorry, you miss the point. Children below a certain age should not be vaccinated yet with current technology.
Actually I was right on point because I only addressed the claim you made..and does the above mean that children of a certain age may be in more danger from the shot than covid?

This is what we are trying to avoid:

From September through November of 1918, the death rate from the Spanish flu skyrocketed. In the United States alone, 195,000 Americans died from the Spanish flu in just the month of October. And unlike a normal seasonal flu, which mostly claims victims among the very young and very old, the second wave of the Spanish flu exhibited what’s called a “W curve”—high numbers of deaths among the young and old, but also a huge spike in the middle composed of otherwise healthy 25- to 35-year-olds in the prime of their life.
trying to avoid it in who? the unvaccinated or the vaccinated? if vaccinations work you have nothing to worry about if you are still at risk then what is the point in the unvaccinated getting the shot, in fact if they can still get sick then they are the sane ones here...and again what was the reason now for putting some children at risk by not allowing them the vaccine due to age? your quote from the link makes it perfectly clear that they are high risk

“That really freaked out the medical establishment, that there was this atypical spike in the middle of the W,” says Harris.
the entire pro-vaccine argument seems to be a circular argument...nothing concrete [except of course a few cement heads with social educations] that run from pillar to post trying to justify their stance...
Your quotes and links, if they are to be taken at face value and given any weight at all makes the same claim I do, that you have nothing to fear from covid, which makes all the paranoia that much more suspect when it comes to the shots
 
Last edited:

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
73,989
Reaction score
5,030
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Actually I was right on point because I only addressed the claim you made


trying to avoid it in who? the unvaccinated or the vaccinated? if vaccinations work you have nothing to worry about if you are still at risk then what is the point in the unvaccinated getting the shot, in fact if they can still get sick then they are the sane ones here...and again what was the reason now for putting some children at risk by not allowing them the vaccine due to age? your quote from the link makes it perfectly clear that they are high risk


the entire pro-vaccine argument seems to be a circular argument...nothing concrete [except of course a few cement heads with social educations] that run from pillar to post trying to justify their stance...
Your quotes and links, if they are to be taken at face value and given any weight at all makes the same claim I do, that you have nothing to fear from covid, which makes all the paranoia that much more suspect when it comes to the shots
This is the only "concrete" evidence accumulating so far:
 

Frankeneinstein

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
8,456
Reaction score
1,268
Points
280
This is the only "concrete" evidence accumulating so far:
which proves the vaccinated paranoia is unwarranted...and it only seems to occur in most folks after the shots have been administered
 

Gracie

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2013
Messages
66,724
Reaction score
26,550
Points
2,290
Location
On my Path
Careful....Carmel is pretty liberal. You might get brain washed.

Yes, there are about eight people in Carmel. I'm all over Orange County seven days a week, with 3 million plus people and most every one honors the masking or it sure seems like it. Many, like my self, still mask after having both shots. Better safe than sorry.
Yeah? You are all over Cali, eh? Well, I live here. Full time. Northern Cali.

Went into a docs office today and a sign said on the door "No mask necessary if you are uncomfortable wearing one. You ARE welcome to wear one if it makes you feel safe". I was surprised..and very pleased to see that. Northern Cali is a whole different mindset than central and southern Cali. Thankfully, I discovered this, but sadly, too late. But I will stay here north of Sac, and be with people who are sane.
 

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
72,499
Reaction score
36,500
Points
2,605
Location
Left Coast, Classified

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
72,499
Reaction score
36,500
Points
2,605
Location
Left Coast, Classified
Special pleading is what right-wingers are Best at; being disingenuous while alleging to be for the "gospel Truth" according to Scripture.

ChiCom Flu death rates per your data:
California: 245 per 100k
Florida: 102

Thanks for the links.
 

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
72,499
Reaction score
36,500
Points
2,605
Location
Left Coast, Classified

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
72,499
Reaction score
36,500
Points
2,605
Location
Left Coast, Classified
Methinks, right-wingers prefer to be disingenuous because there are not enough morals to go around on the right-wing.

Are you factoring for population size differences?
Google what ‘per capita’ means.
Knowledge is the key of life.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top