Breyer to Retire: Anita Hill Should Take His Place

63m8hd.jpg
haha that's funny, but the Biden Rule only applies to Presidential election years.
 
you have no proof he took advantage of welfare program..
Where did I claim he did?
it’s sad you all have to attack the man’s family though…what’s great is she was able to get off welfare, sadly one of his nephews turned to dealing crack…not sure what happened to him…but that’s the life the demafascist plantation masters wanted.
He attacked his sister as a welfare cheat, you have no argument to defend this clown so you are just throwing out bullshit.
 
Thomas is however he only member of the court that was selected by a president and had appointed by a senate controlled by the opposing party

obviously that shows just how qualified he was for the job
It shows nothing of the kind.
Thomas was perceived as an intellectually empty vessel and ideological hack, someone who could be counted on to back corporate oligarchy without any second thoughts:


Clarence Thomas Celebrates 30 Years Of Eroding Basic Constitutional Rights - Above the Law

"On the Court, Thomas slotted into a standard arch-conservative role, championing doctrines like originalism and textualism and then jettisoning those deeply held principles any time they failed to produce the policy preference of the contemporary Republican Party.

"Like in Parents Involved v. Seattle Schools, when Thomas refused to even nod at the original public meaning of the 14th Amendment in deriding school integration as 'hypersensitivity to elite sensibilities.'

"In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, Thomas completely traded originalism in for wacky hyperbole in comparing affirmative action to slavery.

"Which isn’t to say he won’t ride originalism to the hilt when it backs his agenda.

"On that score, he’s so committed that his closest ally on the Supreme Court publicly called him a nut."
 
Ah a commie vermin troll thread. But, Biden will nominate somebody Maxine Waters likes, stupid and racist.


A lot of spitshining spent on that raving loon, for sure.
What lunacy (hypocrisy) has Clarence's version of "originalism" brought to SCOTUS?

Clarence Thomas Celebrates 30 Years Of Eroding Basic Constitutional Rights - Above the Law

"But whether he’s flipped the originalism switch on or off for any specific case, like all self-proclaimed originalists, Thomas is a political operative cosplaying as a jurist.

"Grandiose judicial philosophies are part of the façade, but when it’s down to brass tacks any justification that gets from point A to point GOP will do.

"John Marshall said corporations weren’t people?

"Well… so much for the 'original' part of originalism!"
 
It shows nothing of the kind.
Thomas was perceived as an intellectually empty vessel and ideological hack, someone who could be counted on to back corporate oligarchy without any second thoughts:


Clarence Thomas Celebrates 30 Years Of Eroding Basic Constitutional Rights - Above the Law

"On the Court, Thomas slotted into a standard arch-conservative role, championing doctrines like originalism and textualism and then jettisoning those deeply held principles any time they failed to produce the policy preference of the contemporary Republican Party.

"Like in Parents Involved v. Seattle Schools, when Thomas refused to even nod at the original public meaning of the 14th Amendment in deriding school integration as 'hypersensitivity to elite sensibilities.'

"In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, Thomas completely traded originalism in for wacky hyperbole in comparing affirmative action to slavery.

"Which isn’t to say he won’t ride originalism to the hilt when it backs his agenda.

"On that score, he’s so committed that his closest ally on the Supreme Court publicly called him a nut."
nah that’s clearly what that shows

if the dems didn’t think he was qualified they wouldn’t of let him sit
 
yes, partial birth abortion is horrible. It’s ourlawed in most cases nationally
How common is late term abortion and how late is late?

Late termination of pregnancy - Wikipedia

"Late', in this context, is not precisely defined, and different medical publications use varying gestational age thresholds.[3]

"In 2015 in the United States, about 1.3% of abortions took place after the 21st week,[4] and less than 1% occur after 24 weeks.[5]

"Reasons for late terminations of pregnancy include circumstances where a pregnant woman's health is at risk or when lethal fetal abnormalities have been detected."

Explain how society benefits from killing a mother as she gives birth to a fetal abnormality?
 
How common is late term abortion and how late is late?

Late termination of pregnancy - Wikipedia

"Late', in this context, is not precisely defined, and different medical publications use varying gestational age thresholds.[3]

"In 2015 in the United States, about 1.3% of abortions took place after the 21st week,[4] and less than 1% occur after 24 weeks.[5]

"Reasons for late terminations of pregnancy include circumstances where a pregnant woman's health is at risk or when lethal fetal abnormalities have been detected."

Explain how society benefits from killing a mother as she gives birth to a fetal abnormality?
not sure it does…most states allow accepts for the life of the mother
 
not sure it does…most states allow accepts for the life of the mother
I think that was true under Roe v Wade doctrine, but perhaps that is now subject to change?

Abortion Laws by State 2022
  • "1st trimester: Governments could not outlaw abortion. However, abortions must be performed by a licensed physician.
  • 2nd trimester: Governments could enact medical regulations regarding abortions as long as they were tailored to protect the mother's health.
  • 3rd trimester (during which the fetus becomes viable outside the womb, typically at around 24-28 weeks): Governments could legally prohibit all abortions unless the procedure was necessary to protect the mother's life or health."
 

Forum List

Back
Top