Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would take longer than that. Chinese logistics are no better and probably worse that Russian logistics. Remember all those truck tires that couldn’t hold air? They were Chinese military tires.Military organizations are constantly gaming different scenarios so this is "ho hum" at best.
China could retake it in a week based on Russia's current underperformance.
Considering just how large and complex their logistics are just to keep their manufacturing supplied and products delivered the evidence clearly says otherwise.It would take longer than that. Chinese logistics are no better and probably worse that Russian logistics. Remember all those truck tires that couldn’t hold air? They were Chinese military tires.
Considering just how large and complex their logistics are just to keep their manufacturing supplied and products delivered the evidence clearly says otherwise.
Of course, the Chinese don't care how many of their own die in the attempt. They've got an excess population right now of 300,000,000 or more working age men and women which will double in the next decade as more and more of their manufacturing is modernized, computerized and robots replace more and more workers.
Highly doubtful, at least not anytime soon. Geopolitical allies change all the time, but Xi and Putin are tpals, even as they have their own national agendas.
They definitely do. They have more than a hundred million people doing "make work jobs" now and that is only going to increase with modernization.China is staring down perhaps the greatest demographic implosion in history. They do not have "excess population."
Take a look at China's demographic circumstances and consider the now unavoidable consequences of the stupid one child law that was only recently rescinded. While you're at it, take a look at what fueled China's historic economic growth of the past 4-5 decades.They definitely do. They have more than a hundred million people doing "make work jobs" now and that is only going to increase with modernization.
They definitely do. They have more than a hundred million people doing "make work jobs" now and that is only going to increase with modernization.
Civilian logistics and military logistics are two different things. Plus, I believe most of China's imports and exports are shipped in bottoms owned by other countries and managed by companies NOT based in or controlled by the PRC>Considering just how large and complex their logistics are just to keep their manufacturing supplied and products delivered the evidence clearly says otherwise.
Of course, the Chinese don't care how many of their own die in the attempt. They've got an excess population right now of 300,000,000 or more working age men and women which will double in the next decade as more and more of their manufacturing is modernized, computerized and robots replace more and more workers.
They definitely do. They have more than a hundred million people doing "make work jobs" now and that is only going to increase with modernization.
Take a look at China's demographic circumstances and consider the now unavoidable consequences of the stupid one child law that was only recently rescinded. While you're at it, take a look at what fueled China's historic economic growth of the past 4-5 decades.
IN THE TEXT FORMAT :China has nearly 35 million more men in the population than women. This is due to the family size restrictions - one family, one child, in place until 2016. Families aborted female babies, wanting a boy child, not girls. This has created tremendous social problems in both China and India where dowries are necessary to marry off their daughters.
One would think a shortage of women would make people value them more, but the opposite is true. Rape and sex trafficking are rampant. Violence is rising.
Military organizations are constantly gaming different scenarios so this is "ho hum" at best.
China could retake it in a week based on Russia's current underperformance.