Boycott Israel

Over 1,000 Israeli students penned a letter to the Harvard Crimson, Harvard University’s newspaper, calling for the editorial board to move its office off of lands “occupied” from indigenous tribes in a move to highlight the Crimson’s hypocrisy in supporting the BDS movement in an April editorial.


Students for Justice in America, who are supported by Israeli NGO Shurat HaDin, claimed that the Harvard Crimson's offices are situated on lands forcefully taken from the Massachusetts people, which is the indigenous nation of these territories. “The land that the Harvard Crimson operates… is territory that belongs to the Massachusett (indigenous) people. This land, like much other territory in the Boston and Cambridge regions, was taken from these native tribes during its earliest conquest by French and British colonialists and then the American military.”


“Ironically, on April 29th of this past year your Editorial Board published an essay in support of the BDS movement and its ‘blunt approach’ stating that ‘as a board, we are proud to finally lend our support to both Palestinian liberation and BDS - and we call on everyone to do the same,’” the letter continued.



Top Articles
Read More
Modeling agent Shai Avital to be extradited to Israel








This Scarf is Quickly Becoming the Must-have Gift 2022This Scarf is Quickly Becoming the Must-have Gift 2022Sponsored by Fashion In USA


This Shake Almost Tastes Too Good to Be TrueThis Shake Almost Tastes Too Good to Be TrueSponsored by Ka'Chava


[Photos] Why Opie's Mom Was Never Mentioned on the Andy Griffith Show[Photos] Why Opie's Mom Was Never Mentioned on the Andy Griffith ShowSponsored by Last Night On


A+ Walk In Tubs For CheapA+ Walk In Tubs For CheapSponsored by Amazing Walk In Tubs | Search ads



The Harvard Crimson's BDS editorial​

“We are proud to finally lend our support to both Palestinian liberation and BDS — and we call on everyone to do the same.”
Harvard Crimson editorial board

“We are proud to finally lend our support to both Palestinian liberation and BDS — and we call on everyone to do the same,” the Crimson’s editorial board wrote in its much-maligned April editorial. It was a notable shift from the paper’s history of opposing BDS, which the board cited in its editorial.

 BDS ACTIVISTS in action (credit: GALI TIBBON / AFP)
zoom-image-icon.svg
BDS ACTIVISTS in action (credit: GALI TIBBON / AFP)
The editorial went further than most in its condemnation of Israel. Whereas past Crimson editors had called comparisons between Israel and Apartheid-era South Africa “offensive” and “repugnant,” the editorial published Friday favorably compares BDS tactics to the anti-Apartheid movement, while adding that “Israel remains America’s favorite first amendment blindspot” because individuals and companies that criticize Israel regularly face criticism and consequences.

The SJA is not the first to express displeasure about the editorial. In May, 70 Harvard University faculty members – including Alan Dershowitz – issued a statement expressing “dismay” over the editorial.

(full article online)


https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-722750



 
You think instead of just posting a link and forcing us to read it and figure out it's relevance, you could also post a little commentary on what you find so attractive about this story? I mean, isn't that one of the USMB rules that you post a personal opinion along with your link?
 
The slippery slope to the corporate takeover of America.

Free Speech & Palestinian Rights – Weapons/Targets in the Battle Against ESG, ft. Julia Bacha​


 

Forum List

Back
Top