www.israel21c.org
Note that using the Federal Reserve creates debt service. If the government prints its own money, as the constitution calls for, there is no national debt and no interest.
How High Are Federal Interest Payments? | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
This year, the federal government will spend $300 billion on interest payments on the national debt.www.crfb.org
Please stop with this issue.Note that using the Federal Reserve creates debt service.
How? Be specific.
If the government prints its own money, as the constitution calls for, there is no national debt and no interest.
The Federal government spent almost $7 trillion in 2021.
You think they should have printed $7 trillion last year to cover that spending?
(COMMENT)Please stop with this issue.
I brought something up with Tinmore, he responded. No need to go on with it on this thread.
We all know what he knows and does not know.
(COMMENT)Note that using the Federal Reserve creates debt service.
How? Be specific.
If the government prints its own money, as the constitution calls for, there is no national debt and no interest.
The Federal government spent almost $7 trillion in 2021.
You think they should have printed $7 trillion last year to cover that spending?
unitedwithisrael.org
www.jpost.com
www.jpost.com
WOW, is that misleading.Alarm bells recently went off among American Jews when Boston BDS, a shadowy group that has no identified members, published a detailed, interactive Mapping Project report online.
The report is a roadmap to anti-Jewish violence: The Mapping Projectbrazenly and openly maps and promotes “dismantling” and “disrupting” long lists of Boston-area Jewish institutions across the political spectrum, synagogues throughout Massachusetts, staff members, Jewish family foundations, schools and numerous other entities that allegedly have some sort of connection, past or present, real or imagined, to American Jews, Judaism, Jewish charities, Jewish education, Jewish donors or Israel.
Congressman Seth Moulton (D-MA) aptly called the Mapping Project a dangerous “antisemitic enemies list with a map attached.” The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) sent a detailed letter to the US attorney-general and FBI director, urging them to investigate, monitor and where appropriate, prosecute the Mapping Project and other groups, such as Within Our Lifetime (WOL), which are mapping, promoting and inciting violence against American Jews and Jewish organizations.
The Boston BDS Mapping Project and groups such as WOL have laid bare the true nature of BDS and the reality of the threats against us. BDS is not a civil rights movement aimed at improving Israel. BDS is a political, propaganda, cultural and economic-warfare campaign to completely dismantle and eradicate Israel, and more. In fact, we are dealing with a warfare campaign against the entire Jewish people, wherever they may be.
(full article online)
The BDS Mapping Project targets every Jew in the US - opinion
The Mapping Project and its ilk demonstrate that Israel-haters will ultimately turn on all of us, because hatred of Israel is ultimately hatred of all Jews.
WOW. Another pointless one-liner.WOW, is that misleading.
A US federal appeals court upheld an Arkansas state law requiring all public contractors to promise they won’t boycott Israel in a Wednesday ruling, overturning an earlier decision that had said the contract violates the First Amendment.
The ruling by the St. Louis-based US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit was a major victory for pro-Israel activists who have pushed around 30 states to adopt so-called “anti-BDS” laws — intended to strike back against the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement targeting Israel — in recent years. The plaintiffs say they plan to appeal to the US Supreme Court, a process that could result in a nationwide showdown over the constitutionality of all anti-boycott laws.
It was the first time a federal appeals court ruled in favor of laws forbidding public contractors from being involved in any Israel boycott movements.
Such laws have been heavily opposed by civil liberties groups and press freedom advocates, who say they violate free speech. Federal courts have previously ruled that similar anti-boycott state laws in Georgia, Arizona, Kansas and Texas are unconstitutional.
But the Eighth Circuit, minus one dissenting judge, found that an anti-boycott contract provision does not infringe on the signer’s free speech rights because it “does not require them to publicly endorse or disseminate a message.” Instead, the court said, the clause requests “compliance” with a financial regulation — which the court says is a form of “noncommunicative” speech not protected by the First Amendment.
[T]he certification requirement here is markedly different from other compelled speech cases. Although it requires contractors to agree to a contract provision they would otherwise not include, it does not require them to publicly endorse or disseminate a message. ....We are not aware of any cases where a court has held that a certification requirement concerning unprotected, nondiscriminatory conduct is unconstitutionally compelled speech. A factual disclosure of this kind, aimed at verifying compliance with unexpressive conduct-based regulations, is not the kind of compelled speech prohibited by the First Amendment.
elderofziyon.blogspot.com
jewishjournal.com
I have read several articles about this. Not one mentioned the reason for the map.WOW. Another pointless one-liner.
Link?I have read several articles about this. Not one mentioned the reason for the map.
BTW, being Jewish is irrelevant.
Are they spraying for lice?
