Boehner Has A Problem With Definitions

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
John Boehner still doesn’t get it:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmQRUO4vLZY]Boehner: Far right has lost credibility - YouTube[/ame]​

Tea parties are a splinter party within the Republican party. I think most conservatives don’t give a rat’s ass for the Republican party; certainly not Boehner’s 1960s party.

Definition seems to be Boehner’s problem:


I'm as conservative as anybody around this place.

Before and after Ronald Reagan the Republicans “. . . around this place.” never did one goddamned thing to stop the spread of Socialism let alone turn it back. When they had the Congress and the White House they did not padlock one parasite bureaucracy. Indeed, they increased funding for the Democrat party’s most influential constituency, as well as the most ravenous nest of parasites in the federal government, the Department of Education.

Boehner wisely avoided the Republican party’s long history of collaborating with Socialists when he invoked his three years:


All the things we've done in the three years I've been Speaker have not violated any conservative principles, not once.

Judge Andrew Napolitano disagrees in this brief video:

You knew Napolitano was right the instant Juan Williams defended Boehner.

Boehner dismissed future government shutdowns in four words:


Are you kidding me?

Boehner should stop kidding conservatives. Government shutdowns should not be justification for doing nothing conservative. In addition to Boehner not knowing what rank & file conservatives really think about “Republican conservatism” he does not seem to understand that the media and the pollsters, NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, blamed Republicans for the shutdown.

Boehner should stop kidding himself and take a good look at which Americans actually opposed the shutdown. It was Democrats and the entire parasite class. Had Republicans done a better job of laying the blame where it belonged government shutdowns would no longer be a weapon in the Left’s arsenal.

Let me close with a suggestion regarding repealing HillaryCare II.

Republicans are saying they must present a comprehensive plan rather than simply being against the ACA. My suggestion. A comprehensive plan should mean fixing one problem at a time in separate bills. Easy to read, easy to understand, one or two page bills. If nothing else, douche bags like Nancy Pelosi won’t get away with saying:


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=hV-05TLiiLU]Pelosi: "We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It" - YouTube[/ame]​
 
Boehner is trying to keep the majority in the House in 2014. He well realizes that one more fiasco like the shutdown, and the GOP becomes the minority in the House and Senate. Just a bunch of old geezers in the back of the bus along for the ride.
 
Boehner is trying to keep the majority in the House in 2014. He well realizes that one more fiasco like the shutdown, and the GOP becomes the minority in the House and Senate. Just a bunch of old geezers in the back of the bus along for the ride.

obama/ democrats lied
THE END.
 
The GOP can now concentrate on the campaigns with ACA at the center.

All the other stuff has proven to be hurtful to that goal.
 
Bohner has an even bigger problem party IDENTIFICATION

To bigrebnc1775: Immigration reform is doublespeak for amnesty for illegals. It’s too soon to know, but Boehner might very well identify with the Democrat party on that one. Hiring a former McCain staffer is not a good sign. See this 41 second video:


Republicans talk about first winning elections in order to enact conservative legislation, yet McCain’s support for amnesty for illegals was a major contributing factor in his 2008 defeat. Here’s something else Boehner still doesn’t get. Republicans cannot win without the conservative vote just as Democrats cannot win without the black vote. The trick for conservatives is grab Republicans by the short hairs the same way blacks have Democrats.

Boehner is trying to keep the majority in the House in 2014. He well realizes that one more fiasco like the shutdown, and the GOP becomes the minority in the House and Senate. Just a bunch of old geezers in the back of the bus along for the ride.

obama/ democrats lied
THE END.

To Old Rocks: Barack Taqiyya is so terrible there is not a chance Democrats are going to hang onto the Senate or regain the House; bigrebnc1775 is right on target. Add in the fact that a substantial number of black Americans draw the line at voting for a known liar’s supporters in Congress. Everything considered puts the numbers on the side of conservatism.

The GOP can now concentrate on the campaigns with ACA at the center.

All the other stuff has proven to be hurtful to that goal.

To JakeStarkey: The part I like best is that HillaryCare II is going to punish Democrats twice; once in 2014, and once again in 2016. That’s assuming Karl Rove’s Republicans don’t blow it as they did in 2010 and 2012.
 
Flanders, the more accurate designation for the ACA is RomneyCare. After all, it was modeled after the Massechusetts system. In fact, it has a great many parts that were reccomended by the Heritage Foundation before President Obama adapted them.
 
Flanders, the more accurate designation for the ACA is RomneyCare. After all, it was modeled after the Massechusetts system. In fact, it has a great many parts that were reccomended by the Heritage Foundation before President Obama adapted them.

however romneycare isn't the law of the land obamatax is.
 
Flanders, the more accurate designation for the ACA is RomneyCare. After all, it was modeled after the Massechusetts system. In fact, it has a great many parts that were reccomended by the Heritage Foundation before President Obama adapted them.

To Old Rocks: Romneycare is really Kennedycare. The ACA and Kennedy/Romneycare are the offspring of HillaryCare. If you’re looking for truth in labeling, HillaryCare II is the appropriate title.
 
John Boehner taking a victory lap for a his phoney budget deal has me wondering what is going on with amnesty for illegals? I have no answer, but I sense that he is angling for a fight with conservatives —— and a majority of Americans —— when he should be fighting Democrats and standing up to threats from a vocal minority.

Pelosi: Boehner Told Me to Wait Until Next Year for Immigration Reform
by Tony Lee 13 Dec 2013, 12:52 AM PDT

Pelosi: Boehner Told Me to Wait Until Next Year for Immigration Reform

Being somewhat of a cynic it occurred to me that repealing HillaryCare II is the last thing Republicans want to deal with in 2017. So wall to wall media coverage of amnesty for illegals will take the spotlight off of HillaryCare II until after the midterm elections. Misdirection now buys time for 2016 when they can all say the ACA is working even though it will never work for anybody except the parasites.

Incidentally, a “To hell with the American people” governing philosophy that drives every shady deal by Congress is in play again. The philosophy that led to shoving HillaryCare II down the public’s throat is already visible in amnesty for illegals —— including a sales campaign wrapped in a bunch of lies. The only difference I can see at this point is that RINO will vote for amnesty; whereas, not one Republican voted for HillaryCare II.
 
flanders, the more accurate designation for the aca is romneycare. After all, it was modeled after the massechusetts system. In fact, it has a great many parts that were reccomended by the heritage foundation before president obama adapted them.

not a single solitary republican voted for it. Not a single one. The democrats own it lock stock and barrel. Tattoo it on your forehead so you can remember it.
 
The far right reactionaries have problems with definitions.

Get on board the election express or stay at the station because you aren't driving this train.
 
:lol: You are loony tunes.

At least one half to to two thirds of the 33 TeaPs left in the house will be gone after next year.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top