Black conservative tea party backers take heat

I wonder if they know they're in a movement where the following is the mainstream...

Yes, Bill Ves, calling from (inaudible) I ain't gonna get no health insurance, tell that son of a bitch that, I ain't getting the damned health insurance. That goddamned ******, don't tell me I gotta get some goddamned health insurance. I ain't paying no goddamned fine. Tell that ****** he can come put my ass in jail if he don't like it. Goddamn worthless ******, and all them other ******* that voted for him. That ****** Obama and them white trash honkies that voted for that damned communist, socialist stuff. Dumb motherfuckers, Goddamn! I ain't getting the goddamned mandatory health insurance from some bitch motherfuckers! Goddamn bunch of ******,white trash honkies, sone of a bitch communist who voted for this shit. I didn't go fight in no goddamned wart so I could be forced to do something I don't want to do. So fuck all y'all *******. Fuck you John Lewis, you goddamned worthless, communist ******.

Setup and a forgery probably by an SEIU thug.
 
In the US House in the original house version only 20% (138-34) of the Republicans voted against the legislation while 39% (96 of 152) voted against it amongst the Democrats. Almost exactly 3 times as many Democrats as Republicans voted against it.

In the original US Senate version amongst the republicans 18% voted against it (27-6) and amongst the Dems 31% (46-21) voted against it. Three-and-a-half times as many Dems as Reps voted against it.

Who besides Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms "bolted" to the Republican Party? It does appear that those two were conservatives, and they left for a more conservative party; who were the others?

What? Nearly the entire population of conservatives. Why do you think the Republican party of today is 90% white and only three blacks have been elected to congress from the Republican Party since the 60s while more than 90 black Democrats have been elected.

You can't seriously say that a party that is 90% white and whose elected officials nationwide are more than 96% white is a "leader" in civil rights. Surely you can see that's laughable?

The Democrat party is the sponsoring party of ABORTION. The great proportion of victims of abortion are black babies. The D party has made too many of the survivors "wards of the state," keeping them on the liberal planation.

Quote: In her own words, Margaret Sanger, The founder of Planned Parenthood, a eugenicist:

"The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind."

Margaret Sanger, quoted in Charles Valenza. "Was Margaret Sanger a Racist?" Family Planning Perspectives, January-February 1985, page 44.

EDIT: Thirty-seven percent of [all] abortions occur to black women, 34% to non-Hispanic white women, 22% to Hispanic women and 8% to women of other races. Considering that only 12% of the US population is black, and 37% of all abortions are by black women, the effect is egregious to black people.

:clap2::clap2::clap2:

BTW, how do I give people reputation points? As a newbie, I really don't know. :redface:
 
"Democrat opposition had forced the Republicans to weaken their 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts" never happened, because both bills were Democratic proposals. In fact, Strom Thurmond (R-SC) performed the longest filibuster in history over the Civil Rights Act of 1957. And, interestingly, the opposition came from senators complaining that the bill was "an example of the Federal government wanting to impose its laws on states". That sure sounds like a modern movement I know...

More Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because the Republican Party was very small in the south. No matter where you went in the country, the Republicans were far stronger opponents of the bill. An Iowa Republican was more likely to be opposed than an Iowa Democrat, and a Texas Republican was more likely to be opposed than a Texas Democrat.
 
I wonder if they know they're in a movement where the following is the mainstream...

Yes, Bill Ves, calling from (inaudible) I ain't gonna get no health insurance, tell that son of a bitch that, I ain't getting the damned health insurance. That goddamned ******, don't tell me I gotta get some goddamned health insurance. I ain't paying no goddamned fine. Tell that ****** he can come put my ass in jail if he don't like it. Goddamn worthless ******, and all them other ******* that voted for him. That ****** Obama and them white trash honkies that voted for that damned communist, socialist stuff. Dumb motherfuckers, Goddamn! I ain't getting the goddamned mandatory health insurance from some bitch motherfuckers! Goddamn bunch of ******,white trash honkies, sone of a bitch communist who voted for this shit. I didn't go fight in no goddamned wart so I could be forced to do something I don't want to do. So fuck all y'all *******. Fuck you John Lewis, you goddamned worthless, communist ******.

Setup and a forgery probably by an SEIU thug.

I'm guessing the tons of racist signs at the protests are all SEIU plants too.
 
I wonder if they know they're in a movement where the following is the mainstream...

Setup and a forgery probably by an SEIU thug.

I'm guessing the tons of racist signs at the protests are all SEIU plants too.
There are bound to be some that are authentic. But, on the other hand, there were instigators there too. You and I both know that is the way of the left. It's spelled out in left literature.
 
MORON, you are to stupid for words. You may want to go back and review just who voted for and passed the Civil Rights legislation. It was not the Democrats, they voted against it in droves.

After civil rights legislation passed, conservatives bolted from the Democratic Party and swelled the rank of the Republican party becoming the Confederate Republican Party we know today. Since that legislation was passed, only three blacks have been elected to congress from the Republican party while more than 90 from the Democrats. What you are talking about is Conservative vs Liberal, NOT Democrat vs Republican.

That's a lie told over and over by Democrats, but it is still a BIG FREAKING LIE.

Connolly didn't change parties. He remained Democrat.

Bryd didn't change parties. He is STILL in the Senate and is STILL A DEMOCRAT.

Al Gore Senior didn't change parties. He was a Democrat until he died.

Wallace didn't change parties. He remained Democrat.

That bullshit lie that "conservatives" changed parties after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ignores what party in the Senate had to PASS the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and that was the Republicans.

As for who put more blacks into power.

Colin Powel was put in by a Republican.

Our first black Secretary of state (Condi Rice) was put in by a Republican.

Clarence Thomas was put in by a Republican.

First Hispanic DOJ was put in by a Republican.

First Woman USSC member was put in by a Republican.

I have heard that lie about "conservatives all became Republicans" for years.

Having lived through those years, I know it is a lie. It works on those who were born AFTER the Civil Rights years, but it doesn't work on those who actually remember those times.

This is why liberals don't want real history taught in public schools. They can't lie about history if real history is taught in schools.

You know, it's really wonderful that all these black people were "appointed" to work for white people. And how did Bush treat Colin Powell? I think Colin learned his lesson well. Because he endorsed, well, you know.

The FACT remains that only three blacks from the Republican Party have been elected to congress since the 60s. Only three. Why is congress better? Because they actually make law. They aren't just working for the "white guy".

I'm just wondering. Did you list every black ever appointed by Republicans?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Setup and a forgery probably by an SEIU thug.

I'm guessing the tons of racist signs at the protests are all SEIU plants too.
There are bound to be some that are authentic. But, on the other hand, there were instigators there too. You and I both know that is the way of the left. It's spelled out in left literature.

Life as a Republican is really easy. You're always on the side of "personal responsibility", because when someone on your side does something stupid, it must be because they're an opposition plant.
 
After civil rights legislation passed, conservatives bolted from the Democratic Party and swelled the rank of the Republican party becoming the Confederate Republican Party we know today. Since that legislation was passed, only three blacks have been elected to congress from the Republican party while more than 90 from the Democrats. What you are talking about is Conservative vs Liberal, NOT Democrat vs Republican.

In the US House in the original house version only 20% (138-34) of the Republicans voted against the legislation while 39% (96 of 152) voted against it amongst the Democrats. Almost exactly 3 times as many Democrats as Republicans voted against it.

In the original US Senate version amongst the republicans 18% voted against it (27-6) and amongst the Dems 31% (46-21) voted against it. Three-and-a-half times as many Dems as Reps voted against it.

Who besides Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms "bolted" to the Republican Party? It does appear that those two were conservatives, and they left for a more conservative party; who were the others?

What? Nearly the entire population of conservatives. Why do you think the Republican party of today is 90% white and only three blacks have been elected to congress from the Republican Party since the 60s while more than 90 black Democrats have been elected.

You can't seriously say that a party that is 90% white and whose elected officials nationwide are more than 96% white is a "leader" in civil rights. Surely you can see that's laughable?

Are you retarded? It took white MEN to pass the Civil Rights bill. Dumb ASS.
 
Why do you think the Republican party of today is 90% white and only three blacks have been elected to congress from the Republican Party since the 60s while more than 90 black Democrats have been elected.

The welfare nanny state.

It's that kind of dialog that keeps blacks away from the Republican party.

And yet 37 are running FOR the Republican Party. Obama has done what no white man ever managed, he has brought blacks in droves to the Republican party.
 
Black conservative tea party backers take heat - Yahoo! News

Remind us again how the tea party is racist. Remind us again how Liberals support free speech and the exchange of ideas. Remind us again how the Black Caucus kicked out a black republican cause he was not a Democrat.


:cuckoo::cuckoo: I don't get it either. I think the mindless liberals in this country--along with the main stream liberal media--has "branded" all blacks as being some kind of welfare receipiant--therefore holdouts to the democrat party--who keeps dishing out the tax payer dollars to the disavantaged or should I say LAZY in this country.

At our tea party meeting our main speaker was BLACK.

Hello--a Black Conservative--that didn't kiss Obama's BUTT--HELLO--HELLO--HOORAY!

It's true.
 
Last edited:
Black conservative tea party backers take heat - Yahoo! News

Remind us again how the tea party is racist. Remind us again how Liberals support free speech and the exchange of ideas. Remind us again how the Black Caucus kicked out a black republican cause he was not a Democrat.


:cuckoo::cuckoo: I don't get it either. I think the mindless liberals in this country--along with the main stream liberal media--has "branded" all blacks as being some kind of welfare receipiant--therefore holdouts to the democrat party--who keeps dishing out the tax payer dollars to the disavantaged or should I say LAZY in this country.

At our tea party meeting our main speaker was BLACK.

Hello--a Black Conservative--that didn't kiss Obama's BUTT--HELLO--HELLO--HOORAY!

It's true.

You guys keep saying, "liberal media--has "branded" all blacks as being some kind of welfare receipiant", but I have never seen that. Only from conservatives either saying it or saying that liberals say it. But I never heard a liberal say it.
 
"Democrat opposition had forced the Republicans to weaken their 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts" never happened, because both bills were Democratic proposals. In fact, Strom Thurmond (R-SC) performed the longest filibuster in history over the Civil Rights Act of 1957. And, interestingly, the opposition came from senators complaining that the bill was "an example of the Federal government wanting to impose its laws on states". That sure sounds like a modern movement I know...

More Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because the Republican Party was very small in the south. No matter where you went in the country, the Republicans were far stronger opponents of the bill. An Iowa Republican was more likely to be opposed than an Iowa Democrat, and a Texas Republican was more likely to be opposed than a Texas Democrat.

I'm sorry but your BS is just that, BS.

How could more Republicans vote for it in the Senate because there were fewer Republicans in the South? Huh?

That doesn't change more Republicans vote for it.

And if the Republicans more opposed the bill explain why the ONLY OPPONENTS OF IT in the Senate WERE ALL DEMOCRATS.

I hate to break it to you but Richard Nixon was a supporter of the Civil Rights Movement.

Kennedy feared the yellow dog Democrats and only became a supporter of Civil Rigthts after meeting with MLK and being assured by his advisors he would be more popular for it.

I'm sorry but you can make up rationalizations all you want, but the history, tells a different story.

All those who filibustered, WERE DEMOCRATS.

:lol::lol::lol:
 
Black conservative tea party backers take heat - Yahoo! News

Remind us again how the tea party is racist. Remind us again how Liberals support free speech and the exchange of ideas. Remind us again how the Black Caucus kicked out a black republican cause he was not a Democrat.


:cuckoo::cuckoo: I don't get it either. I think the mindless liberals in this country--along with the main stream liberal media--has "branded" all blacks as being some kind of welfare receipiant--therefore holdouts to the democrat party--who keeps dishing out the tax payer dollars to the disavantaged or should I say LAZY in this country.

At our tea party meeting our main speaker was BLACK.

Hello--a Black Conservative--that didn't kiss Obama's BUTT--HELLO--HELLO--HOORAY!

It's true.

That's amazing. Where did you find him?
 
The welfare nanny state.

It's that kind of dialog that keeps blacks away from the Republican party.

And yet 37 are running FOR the Republican Party. Obama has done what no white man ever managed, he has brought blacks in droves to the Republican party.



It sure looks like it to me. Maybe Blacks in this country are tired of being used by the Democrat party--as some kind of mindless--worthless individual--that needs a continual handout from the government.

Blacks are very successful people in this country. They are hard workers, they are business owners, they are teachers, they are physicians, they are lawyers, they are politicians, they are police, they are firefighters, and they are highly educated--etc. etc. etc.

It's high time they look toward conservatism--because this big spending--out of control--government comes out of their pockets too. (The government does not discriminate when it comes to paying taxes.)
 
Last edited:
"Democrat opposition had forced the Republicans to weaken their 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts" never happened, because both bills were Democratic proposals. In fact, Strom Thurmond (R-SC) performed the longest filibuster in history over the Civil Rights Act of 1957. And, interestingly, the opposition came from senators complaining that the bill was "an example of the Federal government wanting to impose its laws on states". That sure sounds like a modern movement I know...

More Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because the Republican Party was very small in the south. No matter where you went in the country, the Republicans were far stronger opponents of the bill. An Iowa Republican was more likely to be opposed than an Iowa Democrat, and a Texas Republican was more likely to be opposed than a Texas Democrat.

I'm sorry but your BS is just that, BS.

How could more Republicans vote for it in the Senate because there were fewer Republicans in the South? Huh?

That doesn't change more Republicans vote for it.

And if the Republicans more opposed the bill explain why the ONLY OPPONENTS OF IT in the Senate WERE ALL DEMOCRATS.

I hate to break it to you but Richard Nixon was a supporter of the Civil Rights Movement.

Kennedy feared the yellow dog Democrats and only became a supporter of Civil Rigthts after meeting with MLK and being assured by his advisors he would be more popular for it.

I'm sorry but you can make up rationalizations all you want, but the history, tells a different story.

All those who filibustered, WERE DEMOCRATS.

:lol::lol::lol:

Come on now. Let's get serious. You don't really believe that southern conservatives were FOR civil rights.
 
Oh, so the Tea Party is going to have some black people working for them, helping them try to force the government out of any involvement in anything that might help the economically disadvantaged in this country,

a disproportionate number of whom happen to be black.

That is elegantly repugnant.

Since when has the government EVER been successful in doing anything but making people MORE economically disadvanted?

Look at Obama's economy right now? You think people want a pittance from the government or a JOB???

So stuff that racist "uncle tom" bit about any black that doesn't live on the liberal plantation being a "race traitor."

The only thing racist is liberals assuming all blacks prefer a handout from "liberal white or black massa" instead of a freaking job.

Not everyone drinks the racist plantation koolaid of the liberals.

:lol:



""Social security"" is no longer secure, and it is already broke, and will get far worse sooner now that we have the boomer's retiring.

You sorry liberals only have yourselves to blame, ya know money doesn't grow on trees liberals, you really have to try and understand that.
 
Black conservative tea party backers take heat - Yahoo! News

Remind us again how the tea party is racist. Remind us again how Liberals support free speech and the exchange of ideas. Remind us again how the Black Caucus kicked out a black republican cause he was not a Democrat.


:cuckoo::cuckoo: I don't get it either. I think the mindless liberals in this country--along with the main stream liberal media--has "branded" all blacks as being some kind of welfare receipiant--therefore holdouts to the democrat party--who keeps dishing out the tax payer dollars to the disavantaged or should I say LAZY in this country.

At our tea party meeting our main speaker was BLACK.

Hello--a Black Conservative--that didn't kiss Obama's BUTT--HELLO--HELLO--HOORAY!

It's true.

That's amazing. Where did you find him?

Really--didn't need to find him--He found us--:lol::lol::lol:
 
I wonder if they know they're in a movement where the following is the mainstream...

Setup and a forgery probably by an SEIU thug.

I'm guessing the tons of racist signs at the protests are all SEIU plants too.

When you can show me evidence of "tons of racist signs" at the tea parties let me know.

I CAN DO JUST THAT, when it comes to liberals and their anti-war protests. They HATE Jews.

Put up or shut up, because believe me, I can.

Zionist_Pigs_Jew_devil.jpg

Anti-Semitic sign at the February 16, 2003 "anti-war" rally.

The zombietime Hall of Shame

IMG_7966.JPG


This man at the "Stop the U.S.-Israeli War" rally on August 12, 2006 wants the Nazi kikes to get out of Lebanon.
The zombietime Hall of Shame

126-2634_IMG.JPG


So you really want to go there. Because we conservatives don't have to do a staged "walk" through a liberal protest and lie about something happening we can't prove.

There is more than enough evidence who are the real racists.

Put up or shut up!

:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
"Democrat opposition had forced the Republicans to weaken their 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts" never happened, because both bills were Democratic proposals. In fact, Strom Thurmond (R-SC) performed the longest filibuster in history over the Civil Rights Act of 1957. And, interestingly, the opposition came from senators complaining that the bill was "an example of the Federal government wanting to impose its laws on states". That sure sounds like a modern movement I know...

More Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because the Republican Party was very small in the south. No matter where you went in the country, the Republicans were far stronger opponents of the bill. An Iowa Republican was more likely to be opposed than an Iowa Democrat, and a Texas Republican was more likely to be opposed than a Texas Democrat.

I'm sorry but your BS is just that, BS.

How could more Republicans vote for it in the Senate because there were fewer Republicans in the South? Huh?

That doesn't change more Republicans vote for it.

And if the Republicans more opposed the bill explain why the ONLY OPPONENTS OF IT in the Senate WERE ALL DEMOCRATS.

I hate to break it to you but Richard Nixon was a supporter of the Civil Rights Movement.

Kennedy feared the yellow dog Democrats and only became a supporter of Civil Rigthts after meeting with MLK and being assured by his advisors he would be more popular for it.

I'm sorry but you can make up rationalizations all you want, but the history, tells a different story.

All those who filibustered, WERE DEMOCRATS.

:lol::lol::lol:

Come on now. Let's get serious. You don't really believe that southern conservatives were FOR civil rights.

So now--you want to go back to the 1960's to get a "heartbeat" of what this country thinks today---55 years later!--except of course for KKK Byrd--a democrat who is just about ready to be taken out in a coffin on the senate floor--:lol::lol::lol:

You do realise that most of the hard-core--real racists in this country are now DEAD--don't you? Yet the race card is continually played by politicians--expecially democrats that have blacks in some kind of a choke hold--that they won't let loose on. They're scared to death they might lose this huge voting block.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top