Bill Maher Attacks Amy Coney Barrett On Her Faith

[DGS49]

There are already five practicing Catholics on the Supreme Court. (Joe Biden describes himself as a practicing Catholic). Boy, they've really fucked things up, haven't they?

It is becoming wearisome in the extreme to watch, hear, and read Leftists blather on about one thing and another, when their only real concern is the irrational one about losing the Court-created "right" to get an abortion. And they treasure this "right" mainly because it tends to keep the Negro population down...they fear it would balloon out of control without abortion, because they assume that Negroes are too stupid/irresponsible to use BC.

The abortion issue itself is much over-hyped and misrepresented in the Media in any event. A complete overturning of Roe v Wade would merely shift the question back to the States, which would immediately render it perfectly legal in all but a few of the states in the country. And indeed, if there were the consensus on the issue that Leftists claim, it should be a fairly simple matter to get all 52 state legislatures on board with legalizing it and having it paid for with public dollars. Right?

What some of them actually fear (though they would never admit it) is a Court REINFORCING the rule of Roe, which would allow states to completely outlaw abortions once the fetus is arguably viable (third trimester), and REGULATE abortions in the second trimester. The fact is, they profess love of Roe v Wade, but want no part of its actual holding.

As for Maher, in this as in everything, his knowledge is a mile wide and an inch deep. Most of what he says is intended to be profound for high school sophomores - nobody wiser than that.

 

[JusticeHammer]

To Secularist wack jobs like Maher, refusing to use birth control means you are not qualified to sit on the SCOTUS.

Maher rips Barrett, Trump's expected Supreme Court pick: 'She's a f---ing nut'

"Real Time" host Bill Maher tore into President Trump's likely Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Friday night -- and warned about the consequences that may follow her confirmation.

www.foxnews.com

Democrats are abandoning people of Faith for whom their faith over-rides their politics, to them that is CRAY-CRAY.

I have news to you Trumpettes. A USSC justice rules based on writtren law & the US Constitution. Not the fucking Bible.

You all know damn well is a Muslim was nominated, you asdsfucks wiould be running through the streets, waving your arms about & screaming "Sharia Law!!!! Sharia Law!!!!"

Too bad God's word makes you scum Satan worshipers piss your panties.

 

[Likkmee]

I don't really ever recall hearing Catholics pushing the idea of speaking in tongues.

Biden is CathyLick....

 

[Pilate]

To Secularist wack jobs like Maher, refusing to use birth control means you are not qualified to sit on the SCOTUS.

Maher rips Barrett, Trump's expected Supreme Court pick: 'She's a f---ing nut'

"Real Time" host Bill Maher tore into President Trump's likely Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Friday night -- and warned about the consequences that may follow her confirmation.

www.foxnews.com

Democrats are abandoning people of Faith for whom their faith over-rides their politics, to them that is CRAY-CRAY.

I dunno why he’s so worried. Technically, the right was supposed to have a majority with Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. But shit, I don’t see storm troopers, death camps, and whatever else. In fact, it seems that they’ve made virtually no difference. The fact is that these Supreme Court nominees are usually milquetoast and inoffensive.

 

[Lysistrata]

When can we have a serious discussion about whether people "of faith" who are given positions of power and public trust will remain neutral when acting on behalf the American People or will abuse the power given them to impose the tenets of their particular faith on the public? People opposed JFK because they thought that he would take orders from the Pope. Same here. If appointed to a life position, will Barrett rule in a manner that would impose her faith on the entire American Public, which is comprised of people of all faiths and no faith? She is known to take extremist positions on issues regarding sex and reproduction to the point that she should be a Duggar by now.

Moreover, Roman Catholics are always split on which of the Catholic Church's teachings they wish to follow. How many Catholics follow this church's teachings opposing the death penalty and how to treat strangers and care for others, for instance? How many Catholics practice racial discrimination? Fail to oppose injustice? Fail to oppose violence? I mean actually acting in accordance with these teachings, not just giving them one line of lip-service in a speech somewhere.

.....it's undeniable, MOST blacks given positions of power do not remain neutral when acting on behalf of the American people.....they think more of RACE--blacks
...so, let's be fair

I said nothing about race. My comment was about keeping the right to religious liberty free from having any form of government impose a sectarian belief on all citizens.

When can we have a serious discussion about whether people "of faith" who are given positions of power and public trust will remain neutral when acting on behalf the American People

You mean like RBG?

When did RBG ever impose the beliefs of her particular sect of Judaism on Americans who practice other forms of Judaism or non-Jews, be they of other faiths or no faith?

Unfortunately, there are some religious sects that have beliefs regarding other people that are not based on the religion of these other people, but are based on other characteristics, such as sex, race, sexual orientation, etc. These other people are entitled to equal protection.

 

[Slade3200]

There are already five practicing Catholics on the Supreme Court. (Joe Biden describes himself as a practicing Catholic). Boy, they've really fucked things up, haven't they?

It is becoming wearisome in the extreme to watch, hear, and read Leftists blather on about one thing and another, when their only real concern is the irrational one about losing the Court-created "right" to get an abortion. And they treasure this "right" mainly because it tends to keep the Negro population down...they fear it would balloon out of control without abortion, because they assume that Negroes are too stupid/irresponsible to use BC.

The abortion issue itself is much over-hyped and misrepresented in the Media in any event. A complete overturning of Roe v Wade would merely shift the question back to the States, which would immediately render it perfectly legal in all but a few of the states in the country. And indeed, if there were the consensus on the issue that Leftists claim, it should be a fairly simple matter to get all 52 state legislatures on board with legalizing it and having it paid for with public dollars. Right?

What some of them actually fear (though they would never admit it) is a Court REINFORCING the rule of Roe, which would allow states to completely outlaw abortions once the fetus is arguably viable (third trimester), and REGULATE abortions in the second trimester. The fact is, they profess love of Roe v Wade, but want no part of its actual holding.

As for Maher, in this as in everything, his knowledge is a mile wide and an inch deep. Most of what he says is intended to be profound for high school sophomores - nobody wiser than that.

Who is “They”? does Bill Maher and a faction of others speak for everybody on the left now?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Has anyone cited a case in which Judge Barret has ruled against abortion or contraception?

 

[Unkotare]

Filthy bigots like the Catholic-hater trolling this thread always try to justify their hatred on the absurd basis that they really, really want to believe they're 'right.'

 

[Billiejeens]

... People opposed JFK because they thought that he would take orders from the Pope. Same here....

"Same here"? Did JFK take orders from the Pope, you irrational bigot?

You didn't read my post. The people who opposed JFK before he was elected did so on the ground that they thought that, if elected, he would take orders from the Pope. You're comment is based on what he did or didn't do after he was elected, when it was too late one way or the other.

It is not being an "irrational bigot" to question whether a person who already has advanced extreme sectarian views can be trusted to put these views aside when representing the public or rule in a manner that will impose these views on the public by creating legal precedent. This applies to all faiths. How many people would reject a Muslim candidate who advanced extremist Muslim views on the basis that they don't want Muslim religious law imposed on them?

You are setting up a situation in which Americans have to reject candidates based on what religion they belong to. For instance, I have voted for three Southern Baptists in the past. But due to the antics of the Southern Baptist religion in the last few decades, I now can't vote for a Southern Baptist. They are just off my list due to fears that they will use their power to impose the tenets of the Southern Baptist religion on all Americans. This is a really uncomfortable situation to have to deal with. Is this what you want?

How about Governmentalists that worship an all knowing all powerful Government?
A government that has actual earthy powers.
Those religious zealots are much more terrifying.

 

[Billiejeens]

To Secularist wack jobs like Maher, refusing to use birth control means you are not qualified to sit on the SCOTUS.

Maher rips Barrett, Trump's expected Supreme Court pick: 'She's a f---ing nut'

"Real Time" host Bill Maher tore into President Trump's likely Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Friday night -- and warned about the consequences that may follow her confirmation.

www.foxnews.com

Democrats are abandoning people of Faith for whom their faith over-rides their politics, to them that is CRAY-CRAY.

I have news to you Trumpettes. A USSC justice rules based on writtren law & the US Constitution. Not the fucking Bible.

You all know damn well is a Muslim was nominated, you asdsfucks wiould be running through the streets, waving your arms about & screaming "Sharia Law!!!! Sharia Law!!!!"

Is it weird that some of the left leaning justices including ginsburg, stated that it was not our Constitution and laws?

 

[Billiejeens]

When can we have a serious discussion about whether people "of faith" who are given positions of power and public trust will remain neutral when acting on behalf the American People or will abuse the power given them to impose the tenets of their particular faith on the public? People opposed JFK because they thought that he would take orders from the Pope. Same here. If appointed to a life position, will Barrett rule in a manner that would impose her faith on the entire American Public, which is comprised of people of all faiths and no faith? She is known to take extremist positions on issues regarding sex and reproduction to the point that she should be a Duggar by now.

Moreover, Roman Catholics are always split on which of the Catholic Church's teachings they wish to follow. How many Catholics follow this church's teachings opposing the death penalty and how to treat strangers and care for others, for instance? How many Catholics practice racial discrimination? Fail to oppose injustice? Fail to oppose violence? I mean actually acting in accordance with these teachings, not just giving them one line of lip-service in a speech somewhere.

.....it's undeniable, MOST blacks given positions of power do not remain neutral when acting on behalf of the American people.....they think more of RACE--blacks
...so, let's be fair

I said nothing about race. My comment was about keeping the right to religious liberty free from having any form of government impose a sectarian belief on all citizens.

When can we have a serious discussion about whether people "of faith" who are given positions of power and public trust will remain neutral when acting on behalf the American People

You mean like RBG?

When did RBG ever impose the beliefs of her particular sect of Judaism on Americans who practice other forms of Judaism or non-Jews, be they of other faiths or no faith?

Unfortunately, there are some religious sects that have beliefs regarding other people that are not based on the religion of these other people, but are based on other characteristics, such as sex, race, sexual orientation, etc. These other people are entitled to equal protection.

Joe Bidens sect of the Catholic Church apparently teaches that there are rules to being black.

 

[Meister]

Bill was a lousy comedian, and even worse as a political activist.
He is irrelevant with his commentary.

 

[Meister]

I think that our Founding Fathers were aware of issues like this, and came up with 'Separation of Church and State'
to be put in the First Amendment. It's the protection of the person from the government.

 

[toobfreak]

To Secularist wack jobs like Maher, refusing to use birth control means you are not qualified to sit on the SCOTUS.

Maher rips Barrett, Trump's expected Supreme Court pick: 'She's a f---ing nut'

"Real Time" host Bill Maher tore into President Trump's likely Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Friday night -- and warned about the consequences that may follow her confirmation.

www.foxnews.com

Democrats are abandoning people of Faith for whom their faith over-rides their politics, to them that is CRAY-CRAY.

Pretty funny being attacked in the character of YOUR faith from someone who has NONE.

 

[B. Kidd]

Bill was a lousy comedian, and even worse as a political activist.
He is irrelevant with his commentary.

He's turned into a burn out gloom and doomer.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

When can we have a serious discussion about whether people "of faith" who are given positions of power and public trust will remain neutral when acting on behalf the American People or will abuse the power given them to impose the tenets of their particular faith on the public? People opposed JFK because they thought that he would take orders from the Pope. Same here. If appointed to a life position, will Barrett rule in a manner that would impose her faith on the entire American Public, which is comprised of people of all faiths and no faith? She is known to take extremist positions on issues regarding sex and reproduction to the point that she should be a Duggar by now.

Moreover, Roman Catholics are always split on which of the Catholic Church's teachings they wish to follow. How many Catholics follow this church's teachings opposing the death penalty and how to treat strangers and care for others, for instance? How many Catholics practice racial discrimination? Fail to oppose injustice? Fail to oppose violence? I mean actually acting in accordance with these teachings, not just giving them one line of lip-service in a speech somewhere.

Pelosi is Catholic.

 

[Rocko]

He’s one of the assholes that made it cool to be a religious bigot

 

[daveman]

When can we have a serious discussion about whether people "of faith" who are given positions of power and public trust will remain neutral when acting on behalf the American People or will abuse the power given them to impose the tenets of their particular faith on the public? People opposed JFK because they thought that he would take orders from the Pope. Same here. If appointed to a life position, will Barrett rule in a manner that would impose her faith on the entire American Public, which is comprised of people of all faiths and no faith? She is known to take extremist positions on issues regarding sex and reproduction to the point that she should be a Duggar by now.

Moreover, Roman Catholics are always split on which of the Catholic Church's teachings they wish to follow. How many Catholics follow this church's teachings opposing the death penalty and how to treat strangers and care for others, for instance? How many Catholics practice racial discrimination? Fail to oppose injustice? Fail to oppose violence? I mean actually acting in accordance with these teachings, not just giving them one line of lip-service in a speech somewhere.

Oh, you mean like leftists who push Marxism?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Meanwhile, Maher supports Omar’s criticism of Israel.

 

[Aletheia4u]