His arguement was that if we don't withdrawal our troop presence, that the Afghanis will always remain dependent on us and never stand up for themselves and defend themselves.
Think about that for a little bit. That argument completely underminds the past century of Democrat politics.
His arguement was that if we don't withdrawal our troop presence, that the Afghanis will always remain dependent on us and never stand up for themselves and defend themselves.
Think about that for a little bit. That argument completely underminds the past century of Democrat politics.
I think Paul Ryan's point was if you give a date to leave the enemy will hold back then attack. My opinion also was that his point was they don't have the tools to do the job
The point is, he doesn't seem to realize his argument completely undermines the last century of Democrat welfare state policies.
The point is, he doesn't seem to realize his argument completely undermines the last century of Democrat welfare state policies.
You mean like a work requirement if you receive welfare? Cuz that's how it is since Clinton.
The point is, he doesn't seem to realize his argument completely undermines the last century of Democrat welfare state policies.
You mean like a work requirement if you receive welfare? Cuz that's how it is since Clinton.
The point is, he doesn't seem to realize his argument completely undermines the last century of Democrat welfare state policies.
You mean like a work requirement if you receive welfare? Cuz that's how it is since Clinton.
No it doesn't! We got no business being there in the first place. Our invasion of that country is illegal. And we certainly don't have the right to tell sovereign nations who they can (and cannot) have as their leaders. We booted the Taliban from power and installed one of the most corrupt puppet governments on the planet.His arguement was that if we don't withdrawal our troop presence, that the Afghanis will always remain dependent on us and never stand up for themselves and defend themselves.
Think about that for a little bit. That argument completely underminds the past century of Democrat politics.
No it doesn't! We got no business being there in the first place. Our invasion of that country is illegal. And we certainly don't have the right to tell sovereign nations who they can (and cannot) have as their leaders. We booted the Taliban from power and installed one of the most corrupt puppet governments on the planet.His arguement was that if we don't withdrawal our troop presence, that the Afghanis will always remain dependent on us and never stand up for themselves and defend themselves.
Think about that for a little bit. That argument completely underminds the past century of Democrat politics.
Both Biden and Ryan lied about what's going on in Afghanistan. We have lost that war. We cannot get rid of the Taliban. We cannot curb the volume of IED's being put in the ground around the country. We tried 2 tactics, 1) go out there ourselves with all our technology and root'em out, that didn't work, so 2) we tried to bribe the local tribes to turn these guys in and the amount of IED incidents went up!
That means only thing. Afghani's hate the Taliban less than US. They are sick of the occupation. They are sick of all the drone strikes killing their family members (of coarse, after their dead, we re-classify them as insurgents). They want us out of their country and so do I.
Why are we re-building that country when ours if falling apart?
His argument was that if we don't withdrawal our troop presence, that the Afghanis will always remain dependent on us and never stand up for themselves and defend themselves.
Think about that for a little bit. That argument completely underminds the past century of Democrat politics.
Oh, I read it. I might of misunderstood it. But I did read it.you clearly didn't read what I actually wrote.
BTW I agree that we should be out of Afghanistan. I just dont think we should advertise when we get out.
His argument was that if we don't withdrawal our troop presence, that the Afghanis will always remain dependent on us and never stand up for themselves and defend themselves.
"Iran's vital seaborne trade is buckling under the weight of Western sanctions, deepening hardship for a population deprived of basic imports and heaping intense pressure on Tehran over its nuclear program.
Many of Iran's imports, including food and consumer goods, arrive on container, bulker and other ships, but the number of vessels calling at its ports has dived by more than half this year as the United States and European Union tighten the screws.
Analysts doubt the Iranian economy is near collapse, even though its rial currency has plunged in the last few weeks, but they say some shortages and rising prices of imported goods could provoke public unrest directed at Tehran's leadership."
. 
