Biden one of the unmaskers. Lol

[B. Kidd]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Congressman have discussions with Russian Reps as a normal course of business but are not targeted.
This was a politicized hit job on Flynn. That's why.

Congressmen, at least this who respect the separation of powers, aren’t engaged in foreign policy. Flynn’s phone call was inappropriate and inexcusable. There is only one president at a time. Flynn made himself a target by having this conversation. There was nothing inappropriate in unmasking Flynn. Collecting foreign intelligence is what any administration would be doing.

Requests for unmasking Flynn came AFTER a series of leaks to the press that weaponized his identity.
You can thank Comey for circumventing the usual procedure of unmasking.

 

[The Original Tree]

Good one!

List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them

Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of former national security adviser Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

www.foxnews.com

He has NO CHANCE IN HELL to be elected.

 

[The Original Tree]

Good one!

List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them

Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of former national security adviser Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

www.foxnews.com

So?

Treason requires blood. Does Joe actually have any in his veins or did they already start pumping him full of embalming fluid?

 

[The Original Tree]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Congressman have discussions with Russian Reps as a normal course of business but are not targeted.
This was a politicized hit job on Flynn. That's why.

Congressmen, at least this who respect the separation of powers, aren’t engaged in foreign policy. Flynn’s phone call was inappropriate and inexcusable. There is only one president at a time. Flynn made himself a target by having this conversation. There was nothing inappropriate in unmasking Flynn. Collecting foreign intelligence is what any administration would be doing.

It was neither inappropriate, nor illegal, nor inexcusable. Flynn did nothing wrong and as a member of an incoming administration, this is perfectly legal.

Now, John Kerry on the other hand with Iran after he was no longer in office? Yah, that was illegal.

 

[colfax_m]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Congressman have discussions with Russian Reps as a normal course of business but are not targeted.
This was a politicized hit job on Flynn. That's why.

Congressmen, at least this who respect the separation of powers, aren’t engaged in foreign policy. Flynn’s phone call was inappropriate and inexcusable. There is only one president at a time. Flynn made himself a target by having this conversation. There was nothing inappropriate in unmasking Flynn. Collecting foreign intelligence is what any administration would be doing.

Requests for unmasking Flynn came AFTER a series of leaks to the press that weaponized his identity.
You can thank Comey for circumventing the usual procedure of unmasking.

You know that’s untrue. Right? It’s easily disproven. So easily that you obviously just made it up. All you have to do is look at the original article in the thread and find out when the requests were made. Then look up when the first story was published about Flynn talking to Kislyak.

 

[B. Kidd]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Congressman have discussions with Russian Reps as a normal course of business but are not targeted.
This was a politicized hit job on Flynn. That's why.

Congressmen, at least this who respect the separation of powers, aren’t engaged in foreign policy. Flynn’s phone call was inappropriate and inexcusable. There is only one president at a time. Flynn made himself a target by having this conversation. There was nothing inappropriate in unmasking Flynn. Collecting foreign intelligence is what any administration would be doing.

Requests for unmasking Flynn came AFTER a series of leaks to the press that weaponized his identity.
You can thank Comey for circumventing the usual procedure of unmasking.

You know that’s untrue. Right? It’s easily disproven. So easily that you obviously just made it up. All you have to do is look at the original article in the thread and find out when the requests were made. Then look up when the first story was published about Flynn talking to Kislyak.

No matter how you circle the wagons, IT IS ILLEGAL TO UNMASK A U.S. CITIZEN FOR POLITICAL REASONS!

This makes today a good day towards proving this!

Adios, for now...... .

 

[colfax_m]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Congressman have discussions with Russian Reps as a normal course of business but are not targeted.
This was a politicized hit job on Flynn. That's why.

Congressmen, at least this who respect the separation of powers, aren’t engaged in foreign policy. Flynn’s phone call was inappropriate and inexcusable. There is only one president at a time. Flynn made himself a target by having this conversation. There was nothing inappropriate in unmasking Flynn. Collecting foreign intelligence is what any administration would be doing.

Requests for unmasking Flynn came AFTER a series of leaks to the press that weaponized his identity.
You can thank Comey for circumventing the usual procedure of unmasking.

You know that’s untrue. Right? It’s easily disproven. So easily that you obviously just made it up. All you have to do is look at the original article in the thread and find out when the requests were made. Then look up when the first story was published about Flynn talking to Kislyak.

No matter how you circle the wagons, IT IS ILLEGAL TO UNMASK A U.S. CITIZEN FOR POLITICAL REASONS!

This makes today a good day towards proving this!

Adios, for now...... .

They didn’t unmask for political reasons. They did so because it was a legitimate source of useful foreign intelligence.

 

[miketx]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Can't prove it.

 

[colfax_m]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Can't prove it.

Can’t prove what?

 

[miketx]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Can't prove it.

Can’t prove what?

Lol classic dim shill babble. You clowns need a new instructor.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Biden's future is with the undertaker.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

Should we really be unmasking people during the Virus. They might spread it.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Congressman have discussions with Russian Reps as a normal course of business but are not targeted.
This was a politicized hit job on Flynn. That's why.

Congressmen, at least this who respect the separation of powers, aren’t engaged in foreign policy. Flynn’s phone call was inappropriate and inexcusable. There is only one president at a time. Flynn made himself a target by having this conversation. There was nothing inappropriate in unmasking Flynn. Collecting foreign intelligence is what any administration would be doing.

Requests for unmasking Flynn came AFTER a series of leaks to the press that weaponized his identity.
You can thank Comey for circumventing the usual procedure of unmasking.

You know that’s untrue. Right? It’s easily disproven. So easily that you obviously just made it up. All you have to do is look at the original article in the thread and find out when the requests were made. Then look up when the first story was published about Flynn talking to Kislyak.

No matter how you circle the wagons, IT IS ILLEGAL TO UNMASK A U.S. CITIZEN FOR POLITICAL REASONS!

This makes today a good day towards proving this!

Adios, for now...... .

They didn’t unmask for political reasons. They did so because it was a legitimate source of useful foreign intelligence.

Thanks for dancing a fine Cha-Cha all over my thread. You're damned good.

 

[colfax_m]

UNMASKING: a term used when the identity of a U.S. citizen or lawful resident is revealed in classified intelligence reports.

This should disqualify Biden from holding any kind of future Gov't security clearance along with being a nominee for President of these United States!
(Drop the Mic......).

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Congressman have discussions with Russian Reps as a normal course of business but are not targeted.
This was a politicized hit job on Flynn. That's why.

Congressmen, at least this who respect the separation of powers, aren’t engaged in foreign policy. Flynn’s phone call was inappropriate and inexcusable. There is only one president at a time. Flynn made himself a target by having this conversation. There was nothing inappropriate in unmasking Flynn. Collecting foreign intelligence is what any administration would be doing.

Requests for unmasking Flynn came AFTER a series of leaks to the press that weaponized his identity.
You can thank Comey for circumventing the usual procedure of unmasking.

You know that’s untrue. Right? It’s easily disproven. So easily that you obviously just made it up. All you have to do is look at the original article in the thread and find out when the requests were made. Then look up when the first story was published about Flynn talking to Kislyak.

No matter how you circle the wagons, IT IS ILLEGAL TO UNMASK A U.S. CITIZEN FOR POLITICAL REASONS!

This makes today a good day towards proving this!

Adios, for now...... .

They didn’t unmask for political reasons. They did so because it was a legitimate source of useful foreign intelligence.

Thanks for dancing a fine Cha-Cha all over my thread. You're damned good.

This thread has a lot more cute replies than facts.

 

[Markle]

Good one!

List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them

Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of former national security adviser Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

www.foxnews.com

I've seen Sleepy Joe Biden, and I don't believe it. The gentleman doesn't know where he's at. If I was on his jury, and Biden got on the stand and said "I know nothing", I'd be inclined to believe him.

Comey and Obama, they are guilty but not Joe.

Joe was VP. At least he knew it then.lol

Joe might known he was Vice President, but it doesn't mean that he knew anything about Flynn or unmasking- even if it can be shown he was at the meeting. If Comey and Obama were to testify that Biden was the brains of the operation, I'd have a tough time believing it.

Have you not read the information that was released? Vice President Joe Biden is one of the
Democrats that REQUESTED the unmasking. He's up to his neck in this mess.

 

[Markle]

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

You need to kick it DOWN a notch. The requests for the unmasking came between the election and the inauguration. The call in question had not yet taken place. Gen. Flynn was part of the incoming administration and there could be nothing nefarious about him talking to the Russian Ambassador.

You REALLY need to seek information from some other source than CNN, MSNBC, Media Matters, the DailyKOS, and Facebook. Right now you're just starting to see the beginning of a historic scandal that will make Watergate look like a parking ticket by comparison.

This is HUGE!

 

[Markle]

Explain to me what’s so bad about unmasking Flynn’s name.

It is a violation of the Fourth Amendment AND it is illegal.

 

[Markle]

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Unconstitutional and illegal. You really need to do some research someplace besides CNN, MSNBC, Media Matters, the DailyKOS, and Facebook. You are woefully misinformed and you embarrassing yourself.

 

[colfax_m]

Why? Flynn was having discussions with the Russian government about how they might react to Obama’s sanctions. This was legitimate foreign intelligence and they were completely justified in unmasking Flynn.

Unconstitutional and illegal. You really need to do some research someplace besides CNN, MSNBC, Media Matters, the DailyKOS, and Facebook. You are woefully misinformed and you embarrassing yourself.

Ha! Dude. I know way more about this than you do. You need to do research someplace besides listening to Sean Hannity all day.

 

[colfax_m]

Explain to me what’s so bad about unmasking Flynn’s name.

It is a violation of the Fourth Amendment AND it is illegal.

False. There’s a procedure for unmasking. Criteria to be met. It’s not illegal. It happens hundreds of times every year.