Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Using their own cherry picked facts. Your bias is clear. Either the House has a right of oversight or they don't. You're saying a Democratic run House has oversight powers but a Republican run House should not have oversight powers.Actually, yeah, I would say that's true most of the time. Both parties like to put on a show for their audiences, I won't deny, but Democrats (generally, though not always) live in a fact-based world.
Using their own cherry picked facts. Your bias is clear. Either the House has a right of oversight or they don't. You're saying a Democratic run House has oversight powers but a Republican run House should not have oversight powers.
Simply fascistic behavior by Biden and Reichsleiter Merrick Garland.
The Biden administration had āno legitimate basisā to deploy federal counterterrorism resources against parents who protested against local education officials, according to an interim report on Attorney General Merrick Garlandās 2021 school boards memo released by the House Judiciary Committee.Citing a trove of recently obtained documents, lawmakers behind Judiciaryās weaponization subcommittee probe into the controversial memo said the Biden administration āmisused federal law-enforcement and counterterrorism resources for political purposes.ā āThe Justice Departmentās own documents demonstrate that there was no compelling nationwide law-enforcement justification for the Attorney Generalās directive or the Department componentsā execution thereof,ā the interim report reads. The panel released documents on Tuesday as part of the report. The documents show āstrong negative reactionsā to Mr. Garlandās memo by local law enforcement officials days after it was issued. Several U.S. Attorneys reported back to DOJ headquarters with objections by their local law enforcement counterparts in issues involving local school board meetings in the weeks following the memo. William Ihlenfeld II, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of West Virginia, wrote in a report to DOJ headquarters that there had been āa handfulā of local school board meetings where attendees had ābeen boisterous and disruptiveā but that those incidents should be handled by local police. U.S. Attorney Steven D. Weinhoeft of the Southern District of Illinois reported that Mr. Garlandās memo was āvery poorly receivedā among local law enforcement officials, some of whom described the threats outlined in the memo as āa manufactured issue.ā āNo one I spoke with in law enforcement seemed to think that there is a serious national threat directed at school boards, which gave the impression that our priorities are misapplied,ā Mr. Weinhoft reported to DOJ headquarters. āSome expressed concerns that the federal government was meddling in an area where it does not belong,ā he added. Despite the lack of a compelling need for federal resources, the FBI acknowledged to the House panel that it opened 25 threat assessments known as āGuardian assessmentsā in response to concerns raised over threats against school boards, six of which were conducted but the FBI Counterterrorism Division. āThese admissions supplement whistleblower disclosures about the FBIās actions, including disclosures the FBI investigated a mom because she belonged to a āright-wing momās groupā and āis a gun ownerā and a dad because āhe rails against the government,āā the committee said in Tuesdayās report....
Biden admin used counterterrorism powers against parents without cause: House Judiciary report
The Biden administration had āno legitimate basisā to deploy federal counterterrorism resources against parents who protested against local education officials, according to an interim report on Attorney General Merrick Garlandās 2021 school boards memo released by the House Judiciary Committee.www.washingtontimes.com
This is joey xiden's fascist america.
talk about a threat to our democracy....using the full force of the White House to go after parents asking questions at school board meetings.....sick stuff
itās a local school board iām sure everyone knows where people live.Yelling that they know where you live is not asking questions.
Is Google hard for you fuckup?Do you have proof that people making threats at a school board meetings? Yeah, i didnt so. Youre dumb, bro.
Nah, you get sloppy seconds.me first?
Stupid leftard... ^^^
Are you going to provide a source for your claim, or not?Is Google hard for you fuckup?
G O O G L EAre you going to provide a source for your claim, or not?
so noG O O G L E
Bing?so no
Simply fascistic behavior by Biden and Reichsleiter Merrick Garland.
The Biden administration had āno legitimate basisā to deploy federal counterterrorism resources against parents who protested against local education officials, according to an interim report on Attorney General Merrick Garlandās 2021 school boards memo released by the House Judiciary Committee.Citing a trove of recently obtained documents, lawmakers behind Judiciaryās weaponization subcommittee probe into the controversial memo said the Biden administration āmisused federal law-enforcement and counterterrorism resources for political purposes.ā āThe Justice Departmentās own documents demonstrate that there was no compelling nationwide law-enforcement justification for the Attorney Generalās directive or the Department componentsā execution thereof,ā the interim report reads. The panel released documents on Tuesday as part of the report. The documents show āstrong negative reactionsā to Mr. Garlandās memo by local law enforcement officials days after it was issued. Several U.S. Attorneys reported back to DOJ headquarters with objections by their local law enforcement counterparts in issues involving local school board meetings in the weeks following the memo. William Ihlenfeld II, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of West Virginia, wrote in a report to DOJ headquarters that there had been āa handfulā of local school board meetings where attendees had ābeen boisterous and disruptiveā but that those incidents should be handled by local police. U.S. Attorney Steven D. Weinhoeft of the Southern District of Illinois reported that Mr. Garlandās memo was āvery poorly receivedā among local law enforcement officials, some of whom described the threats outlined in the memo as āa manufactured issue.ā āNo one I spoke with in law enforcement seemed to think that there is a serious national threat directed at school boards, which gave the impression that our priorities are misapplied,ā Mr. Weinhoft reported to DOJ headquarters. āSome expressed concerns that the federal government was meddling in an area where it does not belong,ā he added. Despite the lack of a compelling need for federal resources, the FBI acknowledged to the House panel that it opened 25 threat assessments known as āGuardian assessmentsā in response to concerns raised over threats against school boards, six of which were conducted but the FBI Counterterrorism Division. āThese admissions supplement whistleblower disclosures about the FBIās actions, including disclosures the FBI investigated a mom because she belonged to a āright-wing momās groupā and āis a gun ownerā and a dad because āhe rails against the government,āā the committee said in Tuesdayās report....
Biden admin used counterterrorism powers against parents without cause: House Judiciary report
The Biden administration had āno legitimate basisā to deploy federal counterterrorism resources against parents who protested against local education officials, according to an interim report on Attorney General Merrick Garlandās 2021 school boards memo released by the House Judiciary Committee.
I'm telling you. Republic pols are pervs for children.I'm telling you. Democrats are after children
Wake up
Your side throws objects and beats political opponents and justifies it as āfree speechā. Your side also rips innocent people from their cars and beat the. because they made a wrong turn during one of your āsocial justiceā protests.You mean adults who called threats of violence against school officials and cry that they got called out.
I say fuck em.
The right tries an insurrection, blows up buildings (Ok city), murders doctors and threatens violence at every turn.Your side throws objects and beats political opponents and justifies it as āfree speechā. Your side also rips innocent people from their cars and beat the. because they made a wrong turn during one of your āsocial justiceā protests.
Optics are everything and you are fucked.
The optics are you just pussied out by not arresting him. God hope that none of your flock decides to take their frustrations out by shooting an open field of Republicans or loot an immigrantās store.The right tries an insurrection, blows up buildings (Ok city), murders doctors and threatens violence at every turn.
And now a former 1-term president threatens death & destruction while announcing a rally at Waco.
How are those optics...
The optics you previously pussied out are not germane to his coming arrest. Mythical gods can't hope that any flock will decide to take out their white grievance by threatening violence upon anyone that threatens it.The optics are you just pussied out by not arresting him. God hope that none of your flock decides to take their frustrations out by shooting an open field of Republicans or loot an immigrantās store.
Shit or get off the pot. Arrest him. If not, youāve fed him. He owns your head.The optics you previously pussied out are not germane to his coming arrest. Mythical gods can't hope that any flock will decide to take out their white grievance by threatening violence upon anyone that threatens it.
