Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Isn't the internet great, you get to say anything you want and never have to back it up.Sure, puppy, I'll publish all their names right here.Please point me to a biomedical researcher that does not believe in evolution.You never heard of research?
I personally know and go to MDs who have had entire hospital wings built for them.
It must be pretty cool for you to be worshiped by high schoolers.
Being worshiped by high schoolers is your fantasy, not mine.
I know dozens of biomedical researchers and about 1% think evolution of low level life forms may be possible.
It's for sure from your posts that you're not a scientist who asks critical questions.
I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
You posed a not totally stupid post..I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
Aren't you theposterimposter that claimed he would no longer respond to my posts?
So.. I’ll take this to mean that your flaming tirade to not respond to my posts was just attention seeking on your part.You posed a not totally stupid post..I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
Aren't you theposterimposter that claimed he would no longer respond to my posts?
Nope. That's a crock.You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.Nope!Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.Nope!Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
No...you’re ignorant.So.. I’ll take this to mean that your flaming tirade to not respond to my posts was just attention seeking on your part.You posed a not totally stupid post..I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
Aren't you theposterimposter that claimed he would no longer respond to my posts?
What dinosaur bones?BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.Nope!Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
And God buried dinosaur bones to trick us into thinking they lived 65 million years before humans.
Y r u embarrassing yourself?Nope. That's a crock.You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.Nope!Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.
Can you even name a single "Darwinist" ?The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.
My IQ is fine. Your petulant tirades do nothing to support your “organ reversal” nonsense.No...you’re ignorant.So.. I’ll take this to mean that your flaming tirade to not respond to my posts was just attention seeking on your part.You posed a not totally stupid post..I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
Aren't you theposterimposter that claimed he would no longer respond to my posts?
I just hope your IQ is capable of studying a subject.
ID’iot YEC’ists are a hoot.What dinosaur bones?BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.Nope!Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
And God buried dinosaur bones to trick us into thinking they lived 65 million years before humans.
The ones that don’t fit together?
www.cnn.com
Ask an obstetrician, moron.My IQ is fine. Your petulant tirades do nothing to support your “organ reversal” nonsense.No...you’re ignorant.So.. I’ll take this to mean that your flaming tirade to not respond to my posts was just attention seeking on your part.You posed a not totally stupid post..I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
Aren't you theposterimposter that claimed he would no longer respond to my posts?
I just hope your IQ is capable of studying a subject.
I did. Your comment was nonsense.Ask an obstetrician, moron.My IQ is fine. Your petulant tirades do nothing to support your “organ reversal” nonsense.No...you’re ignorant.So.. I’ll take this to mean that your flaming tirade to not respond to my posts was just attention seeking on your part.You posed a not totally stupid post..I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
Aren't you theposterimposter that claimed he would no longer respond to my posts?
I just hope your IQ is capable of studying a subject.
Your existence is nonsense.I did. Your comment was nonsense.Ask an obstetrician, moron.My IQ is fine. Your petulant tirades do nothing to support your “organ reversal” nonsense.No...you’re ignorant.So.. I’ll take this to mean that your flaming tirade to not respond to my posts was just attention seeking on your part.You posed a not totally stupid post..I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
Aren't you theposterimposter that claimed he would no longer respond to my posts?
I just hope your IQ is capable of studying a subject.
I bet you don’t know how these model makers “think” they know what dinosaurs look like.ID’iot YEC’ists are a hoot.What dinosaur bones?BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.Nope!Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
And God buried dinosaur bones to trick us into thinking they lived 65 million years before humans.
The ones that don’t fit together?
10 of the world's best dinosaur museums
Has seeing "Jurassic World" got you raring to learn more about tyrannosaurs and raptors? Here are some real life dino exhibits to dig.
Away with you and your silly conspiracy theories.
Scoot.
Doesn't help your nonsense “organ reversal” lie.Your existence is nonsense.I did. Your comment was nonsense.Ask an obstetrician, moron.My IQ is fine. Your petulant tirades do nothing to support your “organ reversal” nonsense.No...you’re ignorant.So.. I’ll take this to mean that your flaming tirade to not respond to my posts was just attention seeking on your part.You posed a not totally stupid post..I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
Aren't you theposterimposter that claimed he would no longer respond to my posts?
I just hope your IQ is capable of studying a subject.
I bet you don’t know how these model makers “think” they know what dinosaurs look like.ID’iot YEC’ists are a hoot.What dinosaur bones?BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.Nope!Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
And God buried dinosaur bones to trick us into thinking they lived 65 million years before humans.
The ones that don’t fit together?
10 of the world's best dinosaur museums
Has seeing "Jurassic World" got you raring to learn more about tyrannosaurs and raptors? Here are some real life dino exhibits to dig.
Away with you and your silly conspiracy theories.
Scoot.
Look it up; it’s a beautiful scam.
And there it is.What dinosaur bones?BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!Nice...you didn't address a scientific fact.So an intelligent being purposely designed a human baby to go through 20+ organ reversals? Yeah that makes much more sense.You do know that a human baby goes through 20+ organ reversals during the birth process.No proof, sorry. Mountains of evidence though.Nope!Scientists don't discuss Darwin (except in historical terms), they talk about abiogenesis, descent from a common ancestor, natural selection, punctuated equilibrium, etc. It is only creationists that muddy the discussion by bringing up Darwin.The hateful bile leveled against anyone who dares challenge Darwin's Tautology ALWAYS involves Darwinists thumping the Bible. You can try to discuss science, but THEY bring up religion, trying to change the subject.
You can point out the countless failures and errors from insuperable biochemical synthesis to the Cambrian Explosion to innumerable laboratory failures to create new species of houseflies. THEY ALWAYS call you a "creation scientist" when the subject is Darwin's failure NOT creation.
Science must be discussed specifically. Darwin's Bible thumpers cannot do this. Point it out to them every time they thump a Bible that WE didn't bring up.
It's up to you guys to provide proof that everything we see today is due to accidents and survival over hundreds of millions of years.
If all are not successful within 3 minutes, the baby dies.
Evolution is a crock.
An intelligence designed it that way to make people who believe in evolution seem as stupid as they are.
And God buried dinosaur bones to trick us into thinking they lived 65 million years before humans.
The ones that don’t fit together?
So you're stating that a fetus operates exactly like a baby.Doesn't help your nonsense “organ reversal” lie.Your existence is nonsense.I did. Your comment was nonsense.Ask an obstetrician, moron.My IQ is fine. Your petulant tirades do nothing to support your “organ reversal” nonsense.No...you’re ignorant.So.. I’ll take this to mean that your flaming tirade to not respond to my posts was just attention seeking on your part.You posed a not totally stupid post..I suspect whatever ''tribe'' you think you belong to has no knowledge that you have made yourself a member.There are perks to being a member of The Tribe.On the weekends, you also command the French forces at Waterloo, right?Hospitals, such as NYU Langone and various Universities where believing in evolution is optional.Interesting, what organizations do they belong to?Enough to know I have to trust the scientists I know.How many credentials do you have?
I presume they're not lying to me because they don't belong to organizations with agendas.
I'd say about 10% of them are what you would consider to be Liberals in terms of politics, but not in terms of science.
The downside is being kicked out of countries every now and then.
Aren't you theposterimposter that claimed he would no longer respond to my posts?
I just hope your IQ is capable of studying a subject.
