What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Zone1 Belief in God drops to 81 percent

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
99,612
Reaction score
15,152
Points
2,220
Location
Houston
your lost bing ... the example is of trajectory - returning to point of origin without changing direction.
By orbiting another object...
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
99,612
Reaction score
15,152
Points
2,220
Location
Houston
in your case where is your example of a straight line (anywhere in the universe) otherwise as is throughout the spherical universe so would be the finite angles of trajectory that would return the shrapnel back to its origin at the same time without changing direction in a vacuum and reconstitute the grande to its original shape - if not insideout - the boomerang theory. cyclical bb.
This....

1658587325732.png



does not equal...


this...

1658587407984.png
 

BreezeWood

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
13,206
Reaction score
932
Points
85

Once fired a bullet does not return to the barrel.

1658677740398.png


grow up bing, your assertion was wrong - without changing direction ... the basis of the boomerang theory. no it is not the example of the dynamics of the moment after singularity.

your "example" is inaccurate for the matter involved - as would be required, their trajectory ... the errant example shows a finite angle of trajectory whether deliberate or not - as they do not perceive a straight line you obviously do not understand - does not exist.

just the initial detonation of the grande would be instructional in relation to the above diagram - neither of which would or does dispels the cyclical bb.
 

ding

Confront reality
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
99,612
Reaction score
15,152
Points
2,220
Location
Houston
View attachment 674167

grow up bing, your assertion was wrong - without changing direction ... the basis of the boomerang theory. no it is not the example of the dynamics of the moment after singularity.

your "example" is inaccurate for the matter involved - as would be required, their trajectory ... the errant example shows a finite angle of trajectory whether deliberate or not - as they do not perceive a straight line you obviously do not understand - does not exist.

just the initial detonation of the grande would be instructional in relation to the above diagram - neither of which would or does dispels the cyclical bb.
There's no credible science that exists to back up what you are alleging. You can't link to any credible site that discusses this. It's as made up as your so-called religion of antiquity.
 

Redfish

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
44,103
Reaction score
7,251
Points
1,870
Location
The Big Easy
You regurgitated Pascal's wager. Did you think you made it up?
its truth no matter who say it. Bottom line-------I do not care what you believe or where you end up.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$253.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top