Because He Said So

[BWK]

Nothing to do with the laws that were broken in AZ.

Except there were no laws broken as you have already proven to us with your non-existing proof that there was. You soon forget that you are the loser. The laws that were broken were with the fake electors; After the 2020 election, fake presidential electors tried to reverse Arizona's presidential election

 

[BWK]

Still nothing to do with the laws broken during the election. What are you stupid?

I'm just the guy who is kicking your ass over your non-existent debate.

 

[Lastamender]

Except there were no laws broken as you have already proven to us with your non-existing proof that there was. You soon forget that you are the loser. The laws that were broken were with the fake electors; After the 2020 election, fake presidential electors tried to reverse Arizona's presidential election

You are off topic. The election's 0 integrity is the subject. Why don't you just hit the road?

 

[BWK]

You are off topic. The elections 0 integrity is the subject. Why don't you just hit the road?

You haven't proven that, so your argument is moot. Try again.

 

[Lastamender]

You haven't proven that, so your argument is moot. Try again.

If you think what when on is acceptable you got serious problems.

 

[schmidlap]

I just wanted to post this topic because I got to thinking about something daveman said in a previous topic. It has to do with the difference between conservatives and liberals.


You ask a conservative why they believe it was a stolen election and they have responses like the voting numbers didn't add up, or the eye witness reports along with Biden's inability to function like a normal human being let alone president of The United States. Then you ask a liberal of why they believe he legimately won and all they have to show for it is because he (or they actually) told me so. -___-

The first opinion is faith-based and rationalized by self-serving crackpot conspiracy theories unsupported by all the Republican governors and Republican attorneys general who certified their states' vote totals, often after multiple recounts, audits, and dozens of frivolous court challenges, summarily dismissed by even Trump-appointed judges.

The sentiment expressed by the American electorate in the election is entirely consistent with what had been expressed, relentlessly, in a wide range of public surveys over four years, that invariably registered the majority position that Trump stinks.

Those who accept the election's results respect the preponderance of data that confirms the empirical reality.

Over a year after Trump's goons attacked Congress in an attempt to trash the democratic will, not a single suspect in the Loser's fantastical vast conspiracy has been named, and there is no Trumpy litigant anywhere in America pursuing the overthrow of the election in any legal venue where credible evidence is required.

There are only vendetta-driven grievance jamborees for losers.

Trump’s own officials say 2020 was America’s most secure election in history


McConnell's final remark to Trump was "You lost the election!"


Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud
​

Christie Reminds Trump He 'Lost To Joe Biden'​

 

[schmidlap]

I agree we need to move on from this stolen election.focus on what’s going on NOW.

Yes, the trials of the Trump goons who attacked Congress and the various legitimate investigations into what Trump is desperate to hide in multiple legal venues is far more cogent.

With all legitimate challenges to reality abandoned - not a single suspect in the Loser's fantastical vast conspiracy named, and no Trumpy litigant anywhere in America pursuing the overthrow of the election, it is time to focus on what is now being exposed.

There are still the vendetta-driven grievance jamborees for the losers who require such diversions..

 

[Lastamender]

Yes, the trials of the Trump goons who attacked Congress and the various legitimate investigations into what Trump is desperate to hide in multiple legal venues is far more cogent.

With all legitimate challenges to reality abandoned - not a single suspect in the Loser's fantastical vast conspiracy named, and no Trumpy litigant anywhere in America pursuing the overthrow of the election, it is time to focus on what is now being exposed.

There are still the vendetta-driven grievance jamborees for the losers who require such diversions..

Killary is being exposed. If they can spy on a president they can steal an election.

 

[BWK]

Killary is being exposed. If they can spy on a president they can steal an election.

The Durham report never said Hillary was spying. That's made up.

 

[hunarcy]

Mail-in voting was overwhelmingly supported by Republican legislators in Pennsylvania, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the proper procedure had not been followed in its adoption.

There is no suggestion that the vote was illegitimate or inaccurate and, consequently, no Republican is contesting it in any legal venue anywhere. That does not mean that the cult of Trumpery has accepted reality.

Some losers are still ineffectually whining about it.

In her ruling, Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt, a Republican, wrote: “No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania. If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment to end the Article VII, Section 1 requirement of in-person voting is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting can 'be placed upon our statute books'.”​

​

... Representatives from the Trump campaign have spouted fiery rhetoric about electoral fraud on a grand scale. But in courts of law, where proof is required and where there are penalties for lying, they haven’t provided evidence or alleged that even one vote in Pennsylvania was deliberately cast illegally. Rather, their legal efforts have been aimed at disqualifying votes that all evidence shows were legitimately cast under rules they disagree with.​

​

As Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, said in dismissing one campaign challenge last month: “Calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”​

Fact-checking false claims about Pennsylvaniaâs presidential election by Trump and his allies

President Donald Trump’s relentless and false attacks on the results in Pennsylvania as the product of widespread fraud are completely disconnected from reality.

www.inquirer.com

​

​

In Pennsylvania, the GOP’s website promotes voting by mail: "Vote Safe: By mail. From home!”​

​

Unconstitutional is unconstitutional. Sorry, you lose.