Batch of votes counted for LA Mayor. 13,000 votes for Dem Bass, 0 votes for Spencer Pratt.

As I explained to someone else, here is ONE of the ways this election will be stolen from Pratt. When you have long delays in vote count, the Democrats know how many votes they need. So all of a sudden, Pratt ballots start getting kicked out for failing "signature verification" (A total JOKE btw). And all of a sudden all of Raman's ballots have pristine signatures. The vote counters keep this up until low and behold she has a big enough lead that they call the election for Bass and Raman and Pratt is eliminated. Did you understand that jackson?
Then... why... have you not ever proved it?
 
Then... why... have you not ever proved it?
It just was proven. Zero votes? Really? And suddenly the biggest vote getter in the race just happens to be the third person in the ranks, gets more than the winner and suddenly comes in second.

For the party worried about democracy they sure don’t want to practice it.
 
It just was proven. Zero votes? Really? And suddenly the biggest vote getter in the race just happens to be the third person in the ranks, gets more than the winner and suddenly comes in second.

For the party worried about democracy they sure don’t want to practice it.
That's not proof, merely an event that may have several meanings.

You have to prove yours was deliberately withholding from Pratt.

Do it if you can.
 
The funny part about the left saying there’s no fraud happening is it took them 5 days to commit it. They can’t have voter ID, or a single voting day, or even a vote tally within 24 hours. It takes a few days to decide how many votes need to be manufactured.
 
That's not proof, merely an event that may have several meanings.

You have to prove yours was deliberately withholding from Pratt.

Do it if you can.
It has one meaning. It’s statistically impossible yet only happens for Democrat politicians that benefit.

Something mathematically impossible keeps happening. But only for one party.

Amazing.
 
It just was proven. Zero votes? Really? And suddenly the biggest vote getter in the race just happens to be the third person in the ranks, gets more than the winner and suddenly comes in second.

For the party worried about democracy they sure don’t want to practice it.
Hilarious

Still lovin the commitment to a lie.
 
It just was proven. Zero votes? Really? And suddenly the biggest vote getter in the race just happens to be the third person in the ranks, gets more than the winner and suddenly comes in second.

For the party worried about democracy they sure don’t want to practice it.
What was "proven" again.

Can you post that proof?
 
Statistically impossible.

The steal is on.Democrats will count until they get the result they want.


hhnnnnhujjjjjjjhhhhhgggggggggggggbb.webp
 
The real question now is "What are the dumocraps so afraid of if an outsider should win LA?" It's obvious they are going to extremes to keep Pratt far away from the mayor's office. WHY? Look like the house of cards is definitely going to fall very soon. When Pratt loses there will be tens of thousands of Nick Shirleys digging for the answer.

On another note, seeing that the dumocraps will pull this kind of shit to win, does it really encourage the independents to vote for them in November? This is not a party I would ever want to get power again.
 
The real question now is "What are the dumocraps so afraid of if an outsider should win LA?" It's obvious they are going to extremes to keep Pratt far away from the mayor's office. WHY? Look like the house of cards is definitely going to fall very soon. When Pratt loses there will be tens of thousands of Nick Shirleys digging for the answer.

On another note, seeing that the dumocraps will pull this kind of shit to win, does it really encourage the independents to vote for them in November? This is not a party I would ever want to get power again.
They’re passing the Nick Shirley law to stop that part from happening.
 
They’re passing the Nick Shirley law to stop that part from happening.
Again, what are they so afraid of that they have to steal elections and make it illegal to uncover the steal? What is going on in CA makes the 2020 general election even more suspicious. Evidently the fallout from openly stealing elections is far less than the fallout of an outsider getting in and revealing all the gargantuan fraud that goes on in LA and CA. And the most hilarious thing of all is that the dumocraps want Gavin Newsom to become the next POTUS, after they tried to get Tim Walz in as VP.
 
15th post
Every single voter got a mail in ballot, whether they requested one or not in LA.

That seems ripe for fraud.

Also, one can vote in person, and one can send in a mail in ballot.

Newsom signed a law that removed signature verification as well.

The commies who post on this board know if they were involved in counting votes, they would cheat to help their fellow commies win…so there is not a chance they would not count a mail in ballot sent in if the person already voted in person….or someone else used the ballot.

Universal mail in ballots
No signature verification
Random drop boxes

We all know why Cali is conducting elections in this way. TO CHEAT.

Pratt will drop to 3rd. Bass may well go above 50% by the time this is over,

THERE IS A SOLID CHANCE ALL THE VOTES WILL NOT BE COUNTED UNTIL AFTER THE JULY 4, AMERICA 250 CELEBRATION.
 
Back
Top Bottom