Barrett The Least Popular Nominee

She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.


Ahhh, it feels so good to be WINNING!!!
You dolt loser.....
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.

Oh for fuck's sake, are you this stupid to figure out why, Bozo?
It's not the nominee you dimwit, it's Trump.
You know....the never ever Trump mantra. Now go crawl back under your rock.
idiot
Have you ever not acted like a dimwit? I read your drivel. Sorry for saying it, but it's true.
Damn right it's true what I posted. At least you're honest enough to admit it.
There's hope for your sorry ass yet.
 
All those nominees getting LOWER AND LOWER ratings is more CORRELATED with the increasing polarization and partisan tribal wars than it is with ANYTHING to do with their abilities or credentials.. MORONS can explain that to you.. But here ya are quoting margins and odds.

Republicans shamelessly refusing Obama's nomination for almost a year while Trump's nominee gets express confirmation a few weeks before election is the polarizer here.

We'll see how you like 2 more liberal judges on the court if Democrats take the Senate and WH.
 
All those nominees getting LOWER AND LOWER ratings is more CORRELATED with the increasing polarization and partisan tribal wars than it is with ANYTHING to do with their abilities or credentials.. MORONS can explain that to you.. But here ya are quoting margins and odds.

Republicans shamelessly holding up Obama's nomination for 8 months while Trump's nomenee gets express confirmation a few weeks before election is the polarizer here.

We'll see how you like 2 more liberal judges on the court if Democrats take the Senate and WH.
Butthurt???

Like your Magical Muslim Faggot said, "ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES!!!!" :dance:


And BTW, the Democrats can't increase the number of seats on the SCOTUS unless they control the HOUSE, SENATE, AND HAVE THE WHITE HOUSE, and can't put in any Justices without increasing the number of seats unless Justices die or retire!!!!
 
All those nominees getting LOWER AND LOWER ratings is more CORRELATED with the increasing polarization and partisan tribal wars than it is with ANYTHING to do with their abilities or credentials.. MORONS can explain that to you.. But here ya are quoting margins and odds.

Republicans shamelessly refusing Obama's nomination for almost a year while Trump's nominee gets express confirmation a few weeks before election is the polarizer here.

We'll see how you like 2 more liberal judges on the court if Democrats take the Senate and WH.

Refused for "almost a year"??? Which nomination was that? If the president IS definately not returning and doesn't HAVE party control of the Senate --- there MIGHT be a excuse for "letting voters decide".. But IMO -- there shouldn't BE a rule designed by PARTY warriors at all.. Just FOLLOW the freaking great Constitution...
 
As ranking high in popularity polls is not a requirment to be nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court or to be confirmed the poll means less than nothing. I suspect if you broke her popularity down by party affilation she would rank very high with Republicans very low with Democrats and be split pretty evenly with Indpendents which gives you pretty much a 50/50 split give or take a few points and that is the norm in today's political climate.
 
DhNkARrXcAAaVMJ
 
Seems strange that the "Economist" alleged historical popularity gauge of Supreme Court Justice nominees seems to omit the left wing outrage over Justice Clarence Thomas.
 
Cory Booker asked Barrett to condemn White Supremacy, knowing that she is the mother of two adopted Black children. He then proceeded to blame Trump for having to ask the question
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.



The Economist just proved their own bias. Absolutely no one is saying Barrett isn't qualified to sit on the court.

.
 
All those nominees getting LOWER AND LOWER ratings is more CORRELATED with the increasing polarization and partisan tribal wars than it is with ANYTHING to do with their abilities or credentials.. MORONS can explain that to you.. But here ya are quoting margins and odds.

Republicans shamelessly refusing Obama's nomination for almost a year while Trump's nominee gets express confirmation a few weeks before election is the polarizer here.

We'll see how you like 2 more liberal judges on the court if Democrats take the Senate and WH.

Refused for "almost a year"??? Which nomination was that?

Merrick Garland. DUH
 
She'll be confirmed the upcoming week.

Three SCOTUS judges pays dividends for my 2016 vote.

"Happy dance"
 


The American Bar Association rated Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett “well qualified” ahead of the nominee’s hearings on Capitol Hill.

“The Standing committee confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament,” ABA Standing Committee Chair Randall D. Noel wrote in a Sunday letter to Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the chairman and ranking member, respectively, of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“A substantial majority of the Standing Committee determined that Judge Barrett is ‘Well Qualified,’ and a minority is of the opinion that she is “Qualified” to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States,” the letter continued. “The majority rating represents the Standing Committee’s official rating.”
Has zip to do with a popularity poll now does it?
1603594712240.png
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.

That bitch needs to get her ass back in the kitchen

According to progressive woke slate :p


View attachment 400925

Can we burn that shithole place down.

This kind of thing really pisses me off.
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.

LMAO @ Raw Story.

I guess you psycho Leftist missed just how "unpopular" Kavanaugh was during his character assassination hearings ....

You Useful Idiots will believe ANYTHING the Fake News MSM tells you.

Dumbasses ...
 
She could be good for the country. She could be bad.

But her popularity? According to The Economist she is the least popular in 27 years.

"The Economist lists nine Supreme Court nominees, going back to Ginsburg in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. The least popular of the nine, The Economist reports, is Barrett — and the second least popular is Justice Brett Kavanuagh, nominated by Trump in 2018. The third least popular, according to The Economist, is another Trump nominee: Justice Neil Gorsuch, who Trump nominated in 2017 to fill the seat once held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia."

The polling data that The Economist used for its list came not only from its own polling, but also, from polling by Gallup and CNN. All of that polling showed that Trump’s three nominees have been the least popular.

Yeah, ok. "Least popular" nominee among some random group of people. And in 3 weeks she will be the "least popular" judge sitting in RBG's seat.
In order to be popular with the Democrats, you have to love abortion, hate guns and consider the Constitution irrelevant.
 

Forum List

Back
Top