What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bachmann Say's Immigration System Worked Well In U.S. Until Mid 60's Liberal Changes

USArmyRetired

Rookie
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
360
Points
0
I intend to agree with Bachmann on this. A good way to reduce immigration from third world cesspools is to insist that all applicants take some kind of standardized test. Although I agree that it would be a pretty good test at keeping the scum out.... There have been calls to just give a literacy test in order to vote in this country... and blacks and Jews have complained that that is racist. Any test of intelligence (even basic reading skills) is too much for them to handle. Bachmann said this below link:


Bachmann claims immigration worked ‘very well’ before 1960s reforms, when nonwhites were excluded | The Washington Independent

… I think that the American way is not to give taxpayer subsidized benefits to people who have broken our laws or who are here in the United States illegally. That is not the American way. Because the immigration system in the United States worked very, very well up until the mid-1960s when liberal members of Congress changed the immigration laws.
What works is to have people come into the United States with a little bit of money in their pocket legally with sponsors so that if anything happens to them, they don’t fall back on the taxpayers to take care of them. And then they also have to agree to learn the speak the English language, learn American history and our constitution. That’s the American way.
 
Last edited:

DaGoose

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2010
Messages
4,347
Reaction score
666
Points
153
Location
Illinois
Bachmann??? Who is she again? :confused:

.
 
OP
USArmyRetired

USArmyRetired

Rookie
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
360
Points
0
Bachmann??? Who is she again? :confused:

.
Maybe you need to take a illiteracy test since you don't know who Michelle Bachmann is.
 

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
105,365
Reaction score
17,838
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
Oh, so you've switched from Palin to Bachmann? Gee, I wonder why...
 
OP
USArmyRetired

USArmyRetired

Rookie
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
360
Points
0
Oh, so you've switched from Palin to Bachmann? Gee, I wonder why...
What the hell are you talking about? I only support Palin. I do not support Bachmann for the presidency but I do support her stance on this invasion we are having by illegal immigrants. Do you agree with her?
 

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
105,365
Reaction score
17,838
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
caption-contest-michele-bachmann-and-her-hot-dog-25912-1313287540-12.jpg


Well, looks like that rolled her eyes back in her head...
 

PeteEU

VIP Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
329
Reaction score
54
Points
78
Location
Malaga region, Spain
I intend to agree with Bachmann on this. A good way to reduce immigration from third world cesspools is to insist that all applicants take some kind of standardized test. Although I agree that it would be a pretty good test at keeping the scum out.... There have been calls to just give a literacy test in order to vote in this country... and blacks and Jews have complained that that is racist. Any test of intelligence (even basic reading skills) is too much for them to handle. Bachmann said this below link:


Bachmann claims immigration worked ‘very well’ before 1960s reforms, when nonwhites were excluded | The Washington Independent

… I think that the American way is not to give taxpayer subsidized benefits to people who have broken our laws or who are here in the United States illegally. That is not the American way. Because the immigration system in the United States worked very, very well up until the mid-1960s when liberal members of Congress changed the immigration laws.
What works is to have people come into the United States with a little bit of money in their pocket legally with sponsors so that if anything happens to them, they don’t fall back on the taxpayers to take care of them. And then they also have to agree to learn the speak the English language, learn American history and our constitution. That’s the American way.

Seriously? You need to read some history books about how racist the 1960s pre reform years were...Backman could join you, since she clearly needs to learn as well.. anyone advocating a return to the pre-reform years of the 1960s clearly has an issue with mental health or is a closet racist.
 

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
105,365
Reaction score
17,838
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
This is my recollection of pre-reform 60s:

rockwell-large.jpg
 
OP
USArmyRetired

USArmyRetired

Rookie
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
360
Points
0
I intend to agree with Bachmann on this. A good way to reduce immigration from third world cesspools is to insist that all applicants take some kind of standardized test. Although I agree that it would be a pretty good test at keeping the scum out.... There have been calls to just give a literacy test in order to vote in this country... and blacks and Jews have complained that that is racist. Any test of intelligence (even basic reading skills) is too much for them to handle. Bachmann said this below link:


Bachmann claims immigration worked ‘very well’ before 1960s reforms, when nonwhites were excluded | The Washington Independent

… I think that the American way is not to give taxpayer subsidized benefits to people who have broken our laws or who are here in the United States illegally. That is not the American way. Because the immigration system in the United States worked very, very well up until the mid-1960s when liberal members of Congress changed the immigration laws.
What works is to have people come into the United States with a little bit of money in their pocket legally with sponsors so that if anything happens to them, they don’t fall back on the taxpayers to take care of them. And then they also have to agree to learn the speak the English language, learn American history and our constitution. That’s the American way.

Seriously? You need to read some history books about how racist the 1960s pre reform years were...Backman could join you, since she clearly needs to learn as well.. anyone advocating a return to the pre-reform years of the 1960s clearly has an issue with mental health or is a closet racist.

I was alive and well back then and it wasn't racist at all. What we need to do is bring back President Eisenhowers plan that he used in dealing with illegal aliens. It was very successful. I can't think of the name of it off hand.
 

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
105,365
Reaction score
17,838
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
I was alive and well back then and it wasn't racist at all.

You're either retarded or a natural born liar! I'm 65, and it sure as hell was racist back then! It was just quiet, because back then blacks knew their place.
 

DaGoose

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2010
Messages
4,347
Reaction score
666
Points
153
Location
Illinois
Bachmann??? Who is she again? :confused:

.
Maybe you need to take a illiteracy test since you don't know who Michelle Bachmann is.

Anyone who refers to it as an IL-literacy test ought to take a Literacy Test. Especially if they don't know when to use "a" or "an" before a word.

.
 

DaGoose

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2010
Messages
4,347
Reaction score
666
Points
153
Location
Illinois
I was alive and well back then and it wasn't racist at all.

You're either retarded or a natural born liar! I'm 65, and it sure as hell was racist back then! It was just quiet, because back then blacks knew their place.

Correction......back when "negroes" knew their place.

.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$240.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top