Atlantic Editor Concedes Central Claim Of Trump Hit Piece Could Be Wrong

[asaratis]

The Atlantic Hoax is Dead – Bring on the Next Hoax!​

The Atlantic Hoax is Dead – Bring on the Next Hoax! – DB DAILY UPDATE

7 Sep 2020 ~~ By David Blackmon

So, The Atlantic’s “Trump hates the military” hoax died on the vine after about a 24-hour run. It died for the simple reason that Trump’s public actions consistently in favor of the interests of the U.S. military and its personnel and retirees rendered the anonymously-sourced hit piece transparently unbelievable to anyone with functioning synapses in their cranial cavity, which of course excludes China Joe Biden.
The obvious hope of the Biden/Harris campaign and its corrupt media toadies was that this particular hoax would lead thousands of Trump supporters to finally abandon him out of disgust. Yeah, that’s not going to happen.
No passenger on the Trump Train is leaping off over this story or for any other reason. The only disgust expressed by any real Trump supporter towards anyone involved in the obvious hoax is toward Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg, the Atlantic’s corrupt owner who is also the poisonous Black Widow of Steve Jobs, and all the other Democrat media toadies like Jake Tapper and Jennifer Griffin who did everything they could to amplify it.
~[snip]~
Think about it: Among your circle of friends, co-workers and acquaintances, do you know a single Trump supporter who has said he/she is going to vote for Creepy Uncle McWifeMolester on November 3? Of course you don’t because those people do not exist.
The corrupt media continues to trot out this parade of “former Bush officials” and “former McCain campaign workers” and “former Romney people” who claim to be all like ‘Republicans’ and stuff and who just hate Trump and have signed a letter condemning him along with 400 of their fellow sippers of cheap zinfandel, but so what?
~[snip]~
The Atlantic hoax has failed. Miserably. Gloriously. A truly epic fail.
Lacking any other alternative, the Democrats and their media toadies will simply mount the next hoax. We don’t know what form it will take or exactly when it will come, but we do know this: It will also be an epic fail, and it will be glorious.
That is all.




Comment:

What they did was put out the ultimate LIE that proves that everything they say is a lie. When it isn't a lie it's still a lie because truth is often determined by context and the context of their lies is always a false narrative.

Harris/Bide and their deep state, MIC, and RINO collaborationists have extended the legal principal of 'falsus in uno falsus in omnibus to falsus in pluribus falsus in omnibus.' (Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus - Wikipedia )
They have lied about so many things so consistently that we just have to assume every word out of their mouths every dot on a printed page is a lie. And our ears are closed to the notion that it could be otherwise.
It's like the lie "the threat is not China, it's Russia," a lie on which Tim Cook and Jobs's the Atlantic owning widow have been trying to bet their fortunes. Once Biden becomes zombie President do you think the CCP is going to refrain from taking everything they want, Apple and Taiwan included. What are we going to do - risk nuclear war? A question you have to turn around on the Chinese and convince them there is a very very bright red white and blue line in the Ocean starting 6 miles off the Chinese coast-line.
They can bet their own fortunes, but we refuse to have them use ours in their efforts. They can't bet ours and that is what they are trying to do.
Consider this.
Why would *any* voter to pick the party of violent rapists, murderers, arsonists, rioters and looters over the GOP at a time when Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat prosecutors are aiding criminals instead of prosecuting them?
PMS/DSA Democrat Leftists want productive people harnessed to their communist schemes or dead. To the Dems, we are the kulaks that Stalin killed by the millions - wreckers and saboteurs and enemies of the state. Why would any productive person vote Democrat? It’s like voting yourself into the grave.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat Leftists are going for broke to eliminate Trump and the GOP... They have failed and they are well aware of their failure. They have only one option Left and are scared to use it...

WTF?

This is just a stupid sycophant rant....god damn 2 minutes wasted.

~~~~~~

What can you expect from the Jobs Black Widow after donating half a million to the Biden Campaign...

Here's How We Know The Atlantic's Hit Piece on Trump Is Pure Fiction

pjmedia.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Atlantic hit piece set up by Biden and Conor Lamb

Trump tells reporters the story is false “To think that I would make statements negative to our military and fallen heroes when nobody has done what I’ve done,” for the US …

www.citizenfreepress.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

The Atlantic Rolls out the Next Anti-Trump Hoax – DB DAILY UPDATE

Do you have anything besides the echo chamber that shows that the FOX confirmation of the "suckers" and "losers" to be false.

The Fox "confirmation" by Jennifer Griffin is nothing more that regurgitation of the Goldberg BS with additional claims that she has impeccable anonymous sources that say the sames thing that Goldberg's anonymous sources said.

John Bolton, no fan of Trump, has debunked their false claims.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

If they are asked independently and tell the same story......it has credibility.

Not necessarily at all.
Did you not read my comment that said multiple people agreeing on a lie doesn't make the lie true?
Are you familiar with the Russian hoax? How many people agreed to buy that bullshit?

Are you completely dishonest and pathetic?
Or just mostly?

A President who repeatedly lies does not have credibility

So Obama has no credibility. Finally something I agree with.

The question is did Donald Trump lie about The Atlantic published myth? The magazine dropped their
support for their own deceitful invention, so I would say no.

Of course you have more than a few screws loose, so you will continue to lie and make shit up
ad infinitum. Go fuck your lies.

 

[Obiwan]

Gee, look what I just found out about Goldberg (from HuffPo, no less)...

The Evolution of Jeff Goldberg: From Prison Guard in the West Bank to Lobby Poster Boy

I am not going to deconstruct a Goldberg column. His biography tells you everything you need to know about him. The sad thing is that he is only 45. Imagine how ethnocentric and terrified he will be at 60.

www.huffpost.com

Jeff Goldberg of the Atlantic is a little young for the “oy, the goyim are coming to kill us” disease. Marty Peretz didn’t contract the disease until his early 50’s, while Ed Koch and Alan Dershowitz didn’t become afflicted until fairly recently.
None of those guys would have dreamed of enlisting in the IDF in their early twenties. Koch was in the American army and came home to reform the Manhattan Democratic party. Peretz was anti-Vietnam war organizer at Brandeis and then Harvard. Dershowitz was hard at work becoming an expert on the US Constitution. In other words, they were fairly typical Jewish liberals who became reactionary and parochial as they aged. Like 99.9% of American Jews, they did not consider joining the Israeli army (Why? Because they are Americans? In fact, until the late 1960’s, joining a foreign army resulted in loss of US citizenship).
But Goldberg is another breed of cat. Not comfortable in this country, Goldberg emigrated from the United States to Israel in his early 20’s, and joined the Israeli army. There he served as a prison guard, inflicting punishment on, in Goldberg’s words, “so-called [Palestinian] administrative detainees. They had been put in jail without charge and without trial, by military order, for a six month term, renewable at the discretion of a military judge, who did what the Shabak [Shin Bet security service] told him to do.”

Unlike other right-wing defenders of the occupation, Jeff Goldberg didn’t just talk the talk. Goldberg walked the walk.
He enforced the occupation which he now defends in his writings.



And I thought the Democrats hated Israel and backed the Palestinians....

 

[j-mac]

What we know about Trumps views about the military

He prefers those who were not captured
Trump knows more than the Generals
He only respects Gold Star Families who are Christian
He thinks those who die for their country are suckers and losers
He says people do not want to look at cripples.

How can anyone who served our country support him?

Because litterally everything you just posted is a lie.

Well documented

All Trumps denials are lies

No, it’s a smear...The editor already said as much.

 

[rightwinger]

What we know about Trumps views about the military

He prefers those who were not captured
Trump knows more than the Generals
He only respects Gold Star Families who are Christian
He thinks those who die for their country are suckers and losers
He says people do not want to look at cripples.

How can anyone who served our country support him?

Because litterally everything you just posted is a lie.

Well documented

All Trumps denials are lies

No, it’s a smear...The editor already said as much.

No he didn’t.
He only said cancellation of the trip due to weather may be true

 

[rightwinger]

If they are asked independently and tell the same story......it has credibility.

Not necessarily at all.
Did you not read my comment that said multiple people agreeing on a lie doesn't make the lie true?
Are you familiar with the Russian hoax? How many people agreed to buy that bullshit?

Are you completely dishonest and pathetic?
Or just mostly?

A President who repeatedly lies does not have credibility

So Obama has no credibility. Finally something I agree with.

The question is did Donald Trump lie about The Atlantic published myth? The magazine dropped their
support for their own deceitful invention, so I would say no.

Of course you have more than a few screws loose, so you will continue to lie and make shit up
ad infinitum. Go fuck your lies.

The Atlantic hasn’t dropped their story.

 

[rightwinger]

The Military usually favors Republicans

Trumpâs popularity slips in latest Military Times poll â and more troops say theyâll vote for Biden

About half of troops surveyed for the poll said they have an unfavorable view of the commander in chief.

www.militarytimes.com

 

[Obiwan]

What we know about Trumps views about the military

He prefers those who were not captured
Trump knows more than the Generals
He only respects Gold Star Families who are Christian
He thinks those who die for their country are suckers and losers
He says people do not want to look at cripples.

How can anyone who served our country support him?

Because litterally everything you just posted is a lie.

Well documented

All Trumps denials are lies

No, it’s a smear...The editor already said as much.

No he didn’t.
He only said cancellation of the trip due to weather may be true

I have a question for you...

Read post #303...

Then reflect on the fact that the Democrats have spent YEARS telling us that Israel's occupation of the West Bank (and their confinement of Palestinians) are WAR CRIMES!!!

Would you care to explain why YOU (and the Democrats) are rushing to defend someone that your party believes is a WAR CRIMINAL???

 

[hadit]

A story based on anonymous sources is inherently unreliable and Atlantic's editors broke journalism rules of ethics to publish it.

Not if they verified the sources and found them credible.

Those who are aware of who said it and corroborated it are sticking by the story

So let's get them on the record and named so we can judge their credibility for ourselves.

OK
As long as Trump will testify on the record
Haven’t seen him do that yet

Completely unrelated. We have a story from anonymous sources that is countered by a named source on the record. I could just as easily demand that Biden be put on the stand to answer questions too. IOW, completely unrelated.

They weren't anonymous to the journalists.

They're still one step removed from the credibility of the named source who was willing to go public.

and be denigrated or fired.

EXACTLY. You've just identified why a named source is more credible than an anonymous source.

 

[rightwinger]

A story based on anonymous sources is inherently unreliable and Atlantic's editors broke journalism rules of ethics to publish it.

Not if they verified the sources and found them credible.

Those who are aware of who said it and corroborated it are sticking by the story

So let's get them on the record and named so we can judge their credibility for ourselves.

OK
As long as Trump will testify on the record
Haven’t seen him do that yet

Completely unrelated. We have a story from anonymous sources that is countered by a named source on the record. I could just as easily demand that Biden be put on the stand to answer questions too. IOW, completely unrelated.

They weren't anonymous to the journalists.

They're still one step removed from the credibility of the named source who was willing to go public.

and be denigrated or fired.

EXACTLY. You've just identified why a named source is more credible than an anonymous source.

Doesnt mean anonymous sources are not credible.

Deep Throat from Watergate was anonymous. His claims turned out to be true

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The Atlantic hasn’t dropped their story.

Did you read the thread OP? They already admitted their story can't be confirmed.
So how many Goldberg sources have stepped up to confirm the allegations?

 

[Cecilie1200]

The Atlantic hasn’t dropped their story.

Did you read the thread OP? They already admitted their story can't be confirmed.
So how many Goldberg sources have stepped up to confirm the allegations?

Let's face it. Leftists have always been really shaky on the concept of "evidence". They essentially believe that "proof" is defined as "My ability to scream that something is true over and over until people get disgusted and walk away from me."

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Doesnt mean anonymous sources are not credible.

Deep Throat from Watergate was anonymous. His claims turned out to be true

Steele says he used unverified information to support details about web company in dossier - CNN Politics

A newly released snippet of a deposition with the ex-British spy behind the Trump-Russia dossier describes some of the steps he took to verify information he collected for it in 2016, including pulling from a user-generated citizen journalism initiative by CNN, iReport, which no longer operates.

www.cnn.com

And how about the unverified sources of Christopher Steele and their information?

 

[rightwinger]

Doesnt mean anonymous sources are not credible.

Deep Throat from Watergate was anonymous. His claims turned out to be true

Steele says he used unverified information to support details about web company in dossier - CNN Politics

A newly released snippet of a deposition with the ex-British spy behind the Trump-Russia dossier describes some of the steps he took to verify information he collected for it in 2016, including pulling from a user-generated citizen journalism initiative by CNN, iReport, which no longer operates.

www.cnn.com

And how about the unverified sources of Christopher Steele and their information?

The OP is opinion

The Atlantic stands by its claim

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The OP is opinion

The Atlantic stands by its claim

So do the flat earth people and Bigfoot believers. Without verifiable proof to back up their claims
they are just throwing out sucker fodder for idiots like you.

 

[rightwinger]

The OP is opinion

The Atlantic stands by its claim

So do the flat earth people and Bigfoot believers. Without verifiable proof to back up their claims
they are just throwing out sucker fodder for idiots like you.

Looks like we will have to let the voters decide who they believe.......The Atlantic or Trump

 

[hadit]

A story based on anonymous sources is inherently unreliable and Atlantic's editors broke journalism rules of ethics to publish it.

Not if they verified the sources and found them credible.

Those who are aware of who said it and corroborated it are sticking by the story

So let's get them on the record and named so we can judge their credibility for ourselves.

OK
As long as Trump will testify on the record
Haven’t seen him do that yet

Completely unrelated. We have a story from anonymous sources that is countered by a named source on the record. I could just as easily demand that Biden be put on the stand to answer questions too. IOW, completely unrelated.

They weren't anonymous to the journalists.

They're still one step removed from the credibility of the named source who was willing to go public.

and be denigrated or fired.

EXACTLY. You've just identified why a named source is more credible than an anonymous source.

Doesnt mean anonymous sources are not credible.

Deep Throat from Watergate was anonymous. His claims turned out to be true

I didn't say that, did I? Hence, strawman argument. In this case, we have anonymous and named sources that disagree, and until further evidence emerges, logic and fairness dictate that we believe the named source, unless of course you're a partisan who would take the word of a howler monkey over that of a source who says something you don't like.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

How do the democrats plan to steal the election? One illegal ballot at a time?

 

[bripat9643]

A story based on anonymous sources is inherently unreliable and Atlantic's editors broke journalism rules of ethics to publish it.

Not if they verified the sources and found them credible.

Those who are aware of who said it and corroborated it are sticking by the story

So let's get them on the record and named so we can judge their credibility for ourselves.

OK
As long as Trump will testify on the record
Haven’t seen him do that yet

Completely unrelated. We have a story from anonymous sources that is countered by a named source on the record. I could just as easily demand that Biden be put on the stand to answer questions too. IOW, completely unrelated.

They weren't anonymous to the journalists.

They're still one step removed from the credibility of the named source who was willing to go public.

and be denigrated or fired.

EXACTLY. You've just identified why a named source is more credible than an anonymous source.

Doesnt mean anonymous sources are not credible.

Deep Throat from Watergate was anonymous. His claims turned out to be true

It pretty much does, dumbass.

 

[bripat9643]

Doesnt mean anonymous sources are not credible.

Deep Throat from Watergate was anonymous. His claims turned out to be true

Steele says he used unverified information to support details about web company in dossier - CNN Politics

A newly released snippet of a deposition with the ex-British spy behind the Trump-Russia dossier describes some of the steps he took to verify information he collected for it in 2016, including pulling from a user-generated citizen journalism initiative by CNN, iReport, which no longer operates.

www.cnn.com

And how about the unverified sources of Christopher Steele and their information?

The OP is opinion

The Atlantic stands by its claim

No it doesn't, dumbass.