Atheists want multiple universes and extra-terrestrial civilizations to exist because they think it will hurt Christianity

Basically, I've already stated that only life begets life and we have the fine tuning facts.
The Miller-Urey experiment proved spontaneous evolution regarding amino acids in a relatively short time; the building blocks of life.

And, your opinion is merely special pleading. If God is alive, who or what begat Him?

Your answer shows you don't know about the building blocks of life. If you can get a simple cell from random amino acids which are found everywhere, then you will be world famous.
 
Basically, I've already stated that only life begets life and we have the fine tuning facts.
The Miller-Urey experiment proved spontaneous evolution regarding amino acids in a relatively short time; the building blocks of life.

And, your opinion is merely special pleading. If God is alive, who or what begat Him?

Your answer shows you don't know about the building blocks of life. If you can get a simple cell from random amino acids which are found everywhere, then you will be world famous.
How did they evolve in an experiment outside of natural nature?
 
Basically, I've already stated that only life begets life and we have the fine tuning facts.
The Miller-Urey experiment proved spontaneous evolution regarding amino acids in a relatively short time; the building blocks of life.

And, your opinion is merely special pleading. If God is alive, who or what begat Him?

Your answer shows you don't know about the building blocks of life. If you can get a simple cell from random amino acids which are found everywhere, then you will be world famous.
How did they evolve in an experiment outside of natural nature?

The answer to the building blocks of life are proteins. You've never heard of that in elementary health class? Proteins are made up of amino acids, but one can't just create proteins from amino acids outside the cell due to chirality. Thus, one needs to start with a living cell to produce more.

Outside of natural nature, one needs God to create living organisms first and God did that by creating adult living organisms. The only infant was Jesus.

The atheists claim the egg came first, but that is impossible, but the atheists keep believing in the fairy tale of evolution and think that is possible. Abiogenesis (spontaneous generation) is possible. Aliens are possible. Atheists and their scientists believe in fairy tales.

So, if you want to show God isn't necessary, then all one has to do is create a protein from amino acids.
 
Basically, I've already stated that only life begets life and we have the fine tuning facts.
The Miller-Urey experiment proved spontaneous evolution regarding amino acids in a relatively short time; the building blocks of life.

And, your opinion is merely special pleading. If God is alive, who or what begat Him?

Your answer shows you don't know about the building blocks of life. If you can get a simple cell from random amino acids which are found everywhere, then you will be world famous.
How did they evolve in an experiment outside of natural nature?

The answer to the building blocks of life are proteins. You've never heard of that in elementary health class? Proteins are made up of amino acids, but one can't just create proteins from amino acids outside the cell due to chirality. Thus, one needs to start with a living cell to produce more.

Outside of natural nature, one needs God to create living organisms first and God did that by creating adult living organisms. The only infant was Jesus.

The atheists claim the egg came first, but that is impossible, but the atheists keep believing in the fairy tale of evolution and think that is possible. Abiogenesis (spontaneous generation) is possible. Aliens are possible. Atheists and their scientists believe in fairy tales.

So, if you want to show God isn't necessary, then all one has to do is create a protein from amino acids.
What is outside of “natural nature”? Is there a supernatural nature?

People who define supernatural gods as the magical inventors of nature will overwhelmingly default to the gods of their familial / geographic location so we’re left to ask if a super consortium, a unionized collection of gods are therefore responsible for nature. That would tend to dismiss the very definition of nature or “natural” so we’re left to question the very definition of “natural”. One version of religioners; ID’iot creationers claim magical realms where persons are made from ribs, snakes converse and plants grow supernaturally, (without sunlight), magically appeared 6,000 years ago. ID’iot creationers claim the magic came first (the chicken or the egg thingy), but that version of supernaturalism and magic conflicts with other versions. Why is your version wrong when other versions are “more better”?
 
The answer to the building blocks of life are proteins. You've never heard of that in elementary health class? Proteins are made up of amino acids, but one can't just create proteins from amino acids outside the cell due to chirality. Thus, one needs to start with a living cell to produce more.
The point was about abiogenesis. Millions or billions of years of evolution does the rest.
 
Basically, I've already stated that only life begets life and we have the fine tuning facts.
The Miller-Urey experiment proved spontaneous evolution regarding amino acids in a relatively short time; the building blocks of life.

And, your opinion is merely special pleading. If God is alive, who or what begat Him?

Your answer shows you don't know about the building blocks of life. If you can get a simple cell from random amino acids which are found everywhere, then you will be world famous.
How did they evolve in an experiment outside of natural nature?

The answer to the building blocks of life are proteins. You've never heard of that in elementary health class? Proteins are made up of amino acids, but one can't just create proteins from amino acids outside the cell due to chirality. Thus, one needs to start with a living cell to produce more.

Outside of natural nature, one needs God to create living organisms first and God did that by creating adult living organisms. The only infant was Jesus.

The atheists claim the egg came first, but that is impossible, but the atheists keep believing in the fairy tale of evolution and think that is possible. Abiogenesis (spontaneous generation) is possible. Aliens are possible. Atheists and their scientists believe in fairy tales.

So, if you want to show God isn't necessary, then all one has to do is create a protein from amino acids.
What is outside of “natural nature”? Is there a supernatural nature?

People who define supernatural gods as the magical inventors of nature will overwhelmingly default to the gods of their familial / geographic location so we’re left to ask if a super consortium, a unionized collection of gods are therefore responsible for nature. That would tend to dismiss the very definition of nature or “natural” so we’re left to question the very definition of “natural”. One version of religioners; ID’iot creationers claim magical realms where persons are made from ribs, snakes converse and plants grow supernaturally, (without sunlight), magically appeared 6,000 years ago. ID’iot creationers claim the magic came first (the chicken or the egg thingy), but that version of supernaturalism and magic conflicts with other versions. Why is your version wrong when other versions are “more better”?

Ask the other guy
 
The answer to the building blocks of life are proteins. You've never heard of that in elementary health class? Proteins are made up of amino acids, but one can't just create proteins from amino acids outside the cell due to chirality. Thus, one needs to start with a living cell to produce more.
The point was about abiogenesis. Millions or billions of years of evolution does the rest.

Abiogenesis is the same as spontaneous generation. A fairy tale by a modern name. The reality is no abiogenesis happens and no aliens.
 
The answer to the building blocks of life are proteins. You've never heard of that in elementary health class? Proteins are made up of amino acids, but one can't just create proteins from amino acids outside the cell due to chirality. Thus, one needs to start with a living cell to produce more.
The point was about abiogenesis. Millions or billions of years of evolution does the rest.

Abiogenesis is the same as spontaneous generation. A fairy tale by a modern name. The reality is no abiogenesis happens and no aliens.
The Miller-Urey experiment proved you wrong.
 
The answer to the building blocks of life are proteins. You've never heard of that in elementary health class? Proteins are made up of amino acids, but one can't just create proteins from amino acids outside the cell due to chirality. Thus, one needs to start with a living cell to produce more.
The point was about abiogenesis. Millions or billions of years of evolution does the rest.

Abiogenesis is the same as spontaneous generation. A fairy tale by a modern name. The reality is no abiogenesis happens and no aliens.
The Miller-Urey experiment proved you wrong.

You are brain dead. Urey-Miller failed. Do you know why?

No, see my first sentence.
 
The answer to the building blocks of life are proteins. You've never heard of that in elementary health class? Proteins are made up of amino acids, but one can't just create proteins from amino acids outside the cell due to chirality. Thus, one needs to start with a living cell to produce more.
The point was about abiogenesis. Millions or billions of years of evolution does the rest.

Abiogenesis is the same as spontaneous generation. A fairy tale by a modern name. The reality is no abiogenesis happens and no aliens.
The Miller-Urey experiment proved you wrong.

You are brain dead. Urey-Miller failed. Do you know why?

No, see my first sentence.
You are one of the Reasons we are stuck in Nexus Six with Zardoz and the incorrigibles.

And, no, the Miller-Urey did not fail; it achieved an objective of discovering a potential possibility frontier regarding abiogenesis.
 

Forum List

Back
Top