Ashkenazim and Germans

[rupol2000]

Why should Persians fight with their ancestors?

Parsis are not Aryans and do not come from Aryans

What a nonsense. Do you like to say Aryans existed? Where, when and how do you know this?

Everyone knows that except you, cretin

Because linguists made a hypothetic language which they called "Aryan" as far as I heard. Whatever. The theme "Aryans" is for me personally not interesting.

no, this is not a hypothetical language, ancient Greek, Celtic Latin, Mitannian and Vedic are its direct dialects, they are preserved in written sources and are well studied.

 

[zaangalewa]

In addition, the Germans had a matriarchy.

You believe every bullshit someone says about history, isn't it. Nowhere existed a matriarchy. But in the near of Paris exist graves of celtic "Queens".

They even went to battle, accompanied by women who stood behind, until recently they were on the queen's thrones, in England, Scandinavia and in Russia under the Holstein-Gottorp government. This was unthinkable for chivalry and was not in Austro-Hungary. By the way, this is another evidence of closeness with the Ashkenazim.

Women have in a bloody battle with swords and spears not any chance against bloodthirsty men. And your ideas about Germany and Austria are anyway only bullshit.

 

[rupol2000]

Persians

"Persia" is the name of the Achaemenid state. Before Cyrus the Great rebelled against the Median kings, this territory was subject to the Medes, and the Medes language was Avestan, which in ancient form is similar to the Vedic. Precisely the Medes were the Aryans. And the Parsis were most likely Semites. Their descendants Tats in the Caucasus are considered Jews. The Parsis themselves in Iran also refer to themselves as Semites.

 

[rupol2000]

You believe every bullshit someone says about history, isn't it. Nowhere existed a matriarchy. But in the near of Paris exist graves of celtic "Queens".

In old Europe and the Middle East, there was matriarchy, science has no doubts about it, and traces of it, such as matrilinealism and women in politics, have remained from it.

 

[rupol2000]

Women have in a bloody battle with swords and spears not any chance against bloodthirsty men. And your ideas about Germany and Austria are anyway only bullshit.

First, to have power does not mean to fight.
Secondly, judging by the clothes of the Prussian-English style, they did not look very much like warriors. Third, mass infantry does not need strong warrior

 

[rupol2000]

Northen-german style

Austro-hungarian style

 

[rupol2000]

But in the near of Paris exist graves of celtic "Queens".

After the Roman republic, the Celts no longer existed as a people with a separate culture, they were mixed and Rome was polyethnic.
Italics were a kind of Celts, in particular the Latins themselves, they had only Male leaders, and all Roman kings and patricians were men. The word patricians itself means fathers

 

[rupol2000]

Germanic priests wore women's clothing, therefore, the female appearance gave authority.

 

[rupol2000]

By the way, they made sacrifices in the peat bogs, they drowned there, including the captured knights. This may explain their archaeological finds of swords and armor: these were not their things.
This is indirectly confirmed by the fact that until about the 5-6th century, there was no iron or bronze at all in the Baltic cultures, they used the Neolithic tools and bones.
And this includes the localization of the Germanic tribes.

 

[rupol2000]

By the way, from this map you can see that the Goths are practically the same people as the Prussians.

 

[rupol2000]

with swords

So battles with swords are doubful there (see reasoning above). In Mauritius the Strategist also did not write about swords, and although he spoke of the "Slavs", according to the landscape, it was the Balto-Germans there.

"Each is armed with two small spears, some also have shields, strong but difficult to carry (from place to place). They also use wooden bows and small arrows, soaked in a poison special for arrows"

There is no direct evidence of the use of metal. Arrowheads could be bone, or there could be arrows without arrowheads.
In addition, these weapons could have been left there from the Old Scandinavians or Hungarians.

 

[rupol2000]

You are right that the northwest of Russia was under the rule of the Prussians, but as you can see, the Prussians are Goths, and it was they who created what was called the Roman Empire of the German nation, from the 12th to the 16th century the Gothic style spread there, and this is precisely the Prussian art.

 

[rupol2000]

The map is confirmed by the fact that one of the historical names of the region of modern Belarus is Gudia

 

[Quasar44]

Jews are not Germans

They have zero connection.

 

[zaangalewa]

By the way, they made sacrifices in the peat bogs, they drowned there, including the captured knights. This may explain their archaeological finds of swords and armor: these were not their things.
This is indirectly confirmed by the fact that until about the 5-6th century, there was no iron or bronze at all in the Baltic cultures, they used the Neolithic tools and bones.
And this includes the localization of the Germanic tribes.

In the time when the Frankonian empire had been founded from Chlodwig I the Langobards lived in the North of Italy where still today live people who speak German. And the Vandals lived in the North of Africa where from they came later back to Europe to found Andalusia (=the land of the vandals) in Spain - which had been on its own also founded from Germanics like France had been founded from Germanics and also England had been founded from Germanics.

 

[rupol2000]

In the time when the Frankonian empire had been founded from Chlodwig I the Langobards lived in the North of Italy where still today live people who speak German. And the Vandals lived in the North of Africa where from they came later back to Europe to found Andalusia (=the land of the vandals) in Spain - which had been on its own also founded from Germanics like France had been founded from Germanics and also England had been founded from Germanics.

Apparently they are true Finns-Veneti, not quite Germans, related to Illyrians, modern Balkans. But this is not relevant.

 

[rupol2000]

like France

France is Celtica

 

[zaangalewa]

France is Celtica

So what? Germanics founded France - that's why she is called and calls herselve "France".

 

[zaangalewa]

Apparently they are true Finns-Veneti, not quite Germans, related to Illyrians, modern Balkans. But this is not relevant.

I guess you are the only one who knows what Illyrians have to do with not existing "Balkans".

 

[rupol2000]

So what?

Germanics founded France

Captured. Celtica was the first country in which Gothic was found. The Celtic spirit has survived to this day in France. Divine Mylene Farmar hates the Gothic church and loves horses.