Arkansas Oil Spill Health Complaints Emerge In Mayflower

auditor0007

Gold Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,566
2,265
255
Toledo, OH
Arkansas Oil Spill Health Complaints Emerge In Mayflower

Sherry Appleman awoke abruptly in the middle of the night less than 48 hours after a pipeline rupture last month sent thousands of barrels of heavy crude oil into the streets and swamps of Mayflower, Ark.

"I couldn't breathe. My throat and nose and eyes were burning really bad," recalled Appleman, who lives on Lake Conway, about a mile outside the 22-home evacuation zone -- but next to a slough now full of the thick, sticky diluted bitumen. "I could smell that horrible smell. I got really scared."

After nine days of headaches, stomachaches and a persistent sore throat, Appleman's sleep was disturbed again on Monday night by what she perceived as a "strange noise" coming from the lake. She spotted three guys in a boat equipped with a computer and large video screen netting several dead fish from the popular fishing spot. According to Appleman, the men ignored her questions and shined a spotlight on her as she tried to take pictures from the shore with her iPhone.

"I can't figure out half of the stuff that is going on," said Appleman. "They haven't given us any answers."

ExxonMobil, owner of the ruptured Pegasus pipeline, maintains that none of the leaked Wabasca heavy crude mined from Canada's tar sands region has migrated into Lake Conway. The company also said air quality has remained safe for residents outside the immediate cleanup areas.

Nevertheless, health concerns are increasing. The local elementary school sent home eight children last week after they became ill breathing the petrochemical fumes. John Gray, Mayflower School District superintendent, told The Huffington Post that while an oil odor was obvious inside and outside the school building that day, air monitoring showed chemical levels were safe.

Public health advocates said they believe this is just one of many mistakes made since the March 29 spill.




"A lot of the released chemicals -- benzene, hydrogen sulfide, toluene -- are still extremely toxic, especially to children, the elderly and pregnant women, at very low levels," said April Lane, chair of school health and safety with the Faulkner County Concerned Citizens Advisory Group.

Lane suggested that Mayflower residents may misinterpret air quality tests coming back from local agencies and industry with zeros, or with values that fall below what Exxon calls "necessary action levels," to mean that they are not in danger. The tests are not sensitive enough to detect levels of toxins that could cause harm, Lane noted. Further, such action levels are generally outdated and set for healthy workers, which means they may not take into account the greater effects a chemical can have on more vulnerable populations.

In order to better inform residents of the risks, Lane and her group are monitoring the air around Mayflower for a broader array of chemicals, and at levels in the parts per billion rather than the parts per million of current tests. They anticipate their independent results by late April.

"Claiming that the air is okay is simply inappropriate and unsafe," said Lane.

Government and industry air monitoring so far does show days with levels of toxic pollutants above occupational health benchmarks in Mayflower clean-up areas. Benzene reportedly averaged 0.6 parts per million in the air -- and reached as high as 2.2 parts per million at work areas on March 29, for example. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends workers wear special breathing equipment when they are likely to be exposed to benzene at levels exceeding 0.1 parts per million because "benzene can cause cancer."

Multiple witnesses told HuffPost they saw workers cleaning up oil without protective equipment, especially during the first days after the spill.

"These guys were walking around in this nasty stuff, with rakes and hoes, knocking down vegetation, and I didn't see anyone wearing a respirator," said Rocky Kistner of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Meanwhile, last Tuesday, the National Safety Council presented Exxon Mobil Corporation with the Green Cross for Safety medal for its leadership and "comprehensive commitment to safety excellence."

James Rutherford of the Calhoun County Health Department in Michigan recalled the same mistakes among clean-up crews in the aftermath of the Enbridge tar sands oil spill in Kalamazoo in 2010. He also said he foresees a familiar tragedy playing out from the oil stopped up in Mayflower wetlands, including the swale by the Applemans. "Those areas are the worst," he said. "That's where oil sits and not only vaporizes, but sinks."

"So not only are you going to have short-term health issues, but a year or two from now, there will also be long-term problems," said Rutherford. "That's what we're dealing with now in Kalamazoo -- almost three years out."

Arkansas Oil Spill Health Complaints Emerge In Mayflower

Problems with oil spills are not really problems unless they affect you personally, then they become tragedies. Again, that doesn't mean I am completely opposed to oil pipelines, but those who do support them need to realize they come with inherent problems that affect real people. There is good reason that many people do oppose more pipelines, and it's not because they are environmental wackos.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top